Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

Longer seatpost stronger than a shorter one for and Uber Clyde?

Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Longer seatpost stronger than a shorter one for and Uber Clyde?

Old 08-13-12, 06:54 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 74

Bikes: 2008 Kona Smoke 2-9, 2014 Novara Randonee, 2009 Kona Smoke

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Longer seatpost stronger than a shorter one for and Uber Clyde?

I've read all the stickies out there, Thomson is the best seatpost. I've read alloy seatpost are good too. This may sounds silly, but is the length of the seatpost also make a big factor in the strength of the seatpost? In other words, is a longer seatpost stronger than a shorter seatpost?
reno327 is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 07:20 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NZ
Posts: 3,841

Bikes: More than 1, but, less than S-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
A shorter seat tube can provide a smaller frame triangle and less bottom bracket flex. But, at the expense of a longer seatpost, which, other things being equal, will be more flexible than a shorter equivilent, place more stress on the frame and subsequently be slightly weaker than a shorter seatpost. As long as you have more than the "minimum" amount of post insertion, most don't get too concerned about it. The longer post, with it's increase in flex can also provide a slightly more comfortable ride.

If you were enquiring with regard to using a longer or shorter post within the same sized frame, yes, slightly more insertion may be stronger. It depends upon how close you are to the minimum insertion point with the shorter post and how much excess the longer post would provide.
__________________
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
bigfred is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 07:23 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NZ
Posts: 3,841

Bikes: More than 1, but, less than S-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
With regard to Thomson posts. They are popular not only because they seem to provide a high degree of strength at a reasonable weight and cost, but, also because they offer a broad rail clamp, both top and bottom that helps support the rails of clyde's saddles and help limit rail bending. There are other posts that offer a similiarly wide clamping surface, they just haven't gained the wide spread support that Thomsons have.
__________________
Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.
bigfred is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 07:28 PM
  #4  
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Keep in mind that if you use a sloping top tube frame, be sure the seatpost is long enough to penetrate the frame to proper depth.

If you use a short seatpost (to save weight or add strength) make sure you get it long enough to meet required depth I don't recall off hand but it may be 2 inches below top tube. If not, you can damage the frame itself as the seatpost will act as a fulcrum causing damage to the seat tupe collar area.
Mr. Beanz is offline  
Old 08-13-12, 10:35 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 74

Bikes: 2008 Kona Smoke 2-9, 2014 Novara Randonee, 2009 Kona Smoke

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Such as which other seatposts, please share.
reno327 is offline  
Old 08-14-12, 09:41 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
maidenfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 570
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by bigfred
With regard to Thomson posts. They are popular not only because they seem to provide a high degree of strength at a reasonable weight and cost, but, also because they offer a broad rail clamp, both top and bottom that helps support the rails of clyde's saddles and help limit rail bending. There are other posts that offer a similiarly wide clamping surface, they just haven't gained the wide spread support that Thomsons have.
I've switched to Thomsons on all of my bikes simply because they've "nailed it" with regards to making seat adjustments easy and measurable.
maidenfan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hondo Gravel
Fatbikes
0
02-01-18 11:20 PM
Campoli
Classic & Vintage
17
03-27-15 05:31 AM
evilcryalotmore
Bicycle Mechanics
16
02-13-12 07:07 PM
Leukybear
Bicycle Mechanics
9
04-24-11 12:56 PM
Airburst
Bicycle Mechanics
13
12-28-10 08:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.