![]() |
Originally Posted by jfowler85
(Post 17858858)
You're making my point for me. Were the rules followed? Nope. You are erroneously assuming that I take the opposite end of the argument being made, when in fact I mean to take the middle ground of neutrality.
I do agree that politeness ought not to be taken to the extreme of inconveniencing others and/or sowing confusion and thereby decreasing safety. Whatever vehicle I'm using, I always figure we're all trying to get somewhere as soon as we can, so let's work together to achieve that goal safely. |
Originally Posted by jfowler85
(Post 17858968)
You are assuming I feel that way, although I will grant you that it is an assumption easily made. My comments are in response to those in this thread who express discontent when someone does not let them through.
Let me boil it down for you, because you are having trouble going back through previous posts: it is dumb for you (hypothetical) to get pissed at someone else who doesn't extend you a courtesy when they are under no obligation to do so. .... I treat all my fellow road users as I might treat my aunt (my mother's hypothetical sister, who has a big mouth and enjoys showing up my mother -- "I can't believe how rudely YOUR son treated me....". As I said earlier, when situations like this occur, I'm more often driven by the question "why not?" So now that you made a point that you're a nice guy, and that you have no obligation to do so, maybe you'll answer the original question. What if someone at a light asked you to move over so he could slide by and make a legal right on red. The OP said he always refuses, what would you do? BTW- I might point out that this is the commuter thread, and commuting has unique aspects unlike most cycling. One of those is that we tend to share the road with the same people daily, same bus, police, UPS/Fedex drivers, and many of the same motorists on a regular basis. After 5 years riding the same routes at roughly the same times I know the cops, school crossing guards, and many of the regular drivers I see on my route. That's an important distinction because it mean I can ride surrounded by friends or enemies. If I stop to fix a flat, people will stop, ask if I'm OK and offer a lift. To show how well a bicycle commuter can be known in his area, when I'm walking, some drivers will slow and ask "where's the bike today?" or something to that effect and offer me a lift. |
Originally Posted by jimincalif
(Post 17858996)
So much anger. And using such terms conveniently depersonalizes the driver, who could be anybody and in a different setting might be your best friend...Peace, out.
|
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 17859159)
So now that you made a point that you're a nice guy, and that you have no obligation to do so, maybe you'll answer the original question. What if someone at a light asked you to move over so he could slide by and make a legal right on red. The OP said he always refuses, what would you do? When there is no right turn lane, I generally move way up to the front which tends to give enough room for those behind me to turn right. Occasionally, for varied reasons, I sit on the curb which blocks right-turners. Most commonly I am hitting the crosswalk button and a driver pulls up behind me. It's awkward to reposition within the intersection in this circumstance, so there I wait, and overall no gets pissed, although one of those blocked right-turners probably went home, complained to the wife/husband, then got on bf to complain about me being a dick. |
Originally Posted by ClarkinHawaii
(Post 17859001)
Trolling helps me pass time at work
|
Originally Posted by jfowler85
(Post 17860286)
;)
|
I make room if it's safe to do so.
|
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 17859159)
...BTW- I might point out that this is the commuter thread, and commuting has unique aspects unlike most cycling. One of those is that we tend to share the road with the same people daily, same bus, police, UPS/Fedex drivers, and many of the same motorists on a regular basis. After 5 years riding the same routes at roughly the same times I know the cops, school crossing guards, and many of the regular drivers I see on my route.
That's an important distinction because it mean I can ride surrounded by friends or enemies.... |
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
(Post 17861375)
I once read a piece of advice on a Forum, that the closer you get to work, the less likely you should cuss out motorists, since it might be a co-worker (or Boss :eek:).
|
Originally Posted by tjspiel
(Post 17855771)
Yes, if I see a car behind me with a turn signal on and I have room, I'll just move over. Have had people roll down their windows to thank me or just wave. It's a small thing but I feel good about doing it.
|
Originally Posted by metz1295
(Post 17862095)
This is my POV. I move will to the left and give them room to turn while still holding the lane for when I ride through the intersection. I've received many "Thanks" from drivers. I look at it strengthening the relationship between drivers and riders. Maybe next time that driver comes up on a bike they slow down a little more. If I don't give a little, maybe they squeeze out a rider if the lane is tight instead of waiting till more room is available.
If you make room, drivers learn the lesson "Cyclists (at least some of them) are considerate and do not just clog up 'my' roads". If you don't make room, drivers do not learn the lesson "Oh, I guess I should just wait", instead they learn the lesson "Cyclists are a$$holes that annoy me and slow everybody down". Next time they have to make a judgment call of whether to speed up to turn right in front of a cyclist (or whether their current speed is sufficient to turn right in front of a cyclist), vs slowing down to turn right behind... |
I used to be pretty hard nosed when it came to demanding my right to the lane, but I've noticed that good will toward drivers goes a long way, especially if you're on a route where you'll encounter the same drivers every day. If I see a car pull up behind me with its right turn signal on, I'll usually get off my bike, pick it up and move it the four or five feet to the left the car needs to turn. A grateful smile beats a menacing look any day as far as I'm concerned.
|
Just ignore the fact that it makes things easier for other people. Setting up on the left side of the right-most lane makes it easier and safer for you. You are out of the way of the jerk who is going to try to squeeze past to make a right no matter what, and it removes any ambiguity about whether you're going straight or right. So there, just do it for your own selfish reasons that also just happen to make things safer, more efficient, and spread a little goodwill.
|
Originally Posted by Ray Lovinggood
(Post 17856360)
There is no room to move to the right of the lane to allow a car to go around my left side then turn right in front of me.
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
(Post 17858668)
That would be stupid anyway.
There are only two kinds of right lane at an intersection: a right turn only lane, and a regular right lane for either straight through or right turn. If it is a right turn only lane and you as cyclist do not intend to turn right, you have no business in that lane, so we don't need to discuss that situation any further. In even liberal cycle friendly cities like Portland, the rule is that cyclists stay to the right of other traffic. When you are at the corner waiting to go straight through you will be at the right side of the lane. If you wave a car by to turn right he will pass by on your left and turn across you while the light is still red. He cannot right hook you unless you are actually forward of the intersection and in the path of crossing traffic. Why would you be there? If he is pulling a long trailer that narrows the distance as he turns you should have noticed that! I (and others) have also learned to stop a couple of car lengths short of the corner which sends a clear message to traffic in the right lane that you do not intend to turn right and so they should pass you on your left and do what they have to do. It's simple, and works well. Anything else is non-standard and causes confusion. Some cyclists revel in all the confusion, contention and cussedness that they can cause. |
Originally Posted by Leisesturm
(Post 17862480)
Moving to the left side of a lane so cars can pass on your right confuses them, annoys them, angers them. In the best case they simply won't do it. They will simply sit and stare. If that's what you want, fine, but don't think you are helping anyone out when you go against convention.
|
Originally Posted by Leisesturm
(Post 17862480)
Moving to the left side of a lane so cars can pass on your right confuses them, annoys them, angers them. In the best case they simply won't do it. They will simply sit and stare. If that's what you want, fine, but don't think you are helping anyone out when you go against convention.
My experience (and many others around here) is that cars will often right-turn behind you if you position yourself to give them room. Sometimes I see tenative would-be-right-turners in my mirror, I reach back and give them a wave-through and if they go I try to send them a smile&wave or thumbs-up to communicate "Thanks for being aware of me and being concerned for my safety!" Once in a while somebody won't go through. I'll wave them through twice, then it's on them if they want to wait. |
Originally Posted by Leisesturm
(Post 17862480)
Why is that so stupid? You, the o.p. and others in this thread way overestimate the likelihood of a right hook collision in this type of scenario. There is such a thing as convention, and whether you all want to admit it or not, the convention that prevails in most cities is that cars pass cyclists on their left! Moving to the left side of a lane so cars can pass on your right confuses them, annoys them, angers them. In the best case they simply won't do it. They will simply sit and stare. If that's what you want, fine, but don't think you are helping anyone out when you go against convention.
At stop lights, if I can get the driver's attention and wave them forward, they will move up and make their right turn and give me a friendly wave. They otherwise seem content to wait. Maybe I'm clearer at doing it than others. There are only two kinds of right lane at an intersection: a right turn only lane, and a regular right lane for either straight through or right turn. If it is a right turn only lane and you as cyclist do not intend to turn right, you have no business in that lane, so we don't need to discuss that situation any further. In even liberal cycle friendly cities like Portland, the rule is that cyclists stay to the right of other traffic. When you are at the corner waiting to go straight through you will be at the right side of the lane. If you wave a car by to turn right he will pass by on your left and turn across you while the light is still red. He cannot right hook you unless you are actually forward of the intersection and in the path of crossing traffic. Why would you be there? If he is pulling a long trailer that narrows the distance as he turns you should have noticed that! I (and others) have also learned to stop a couple of car lengths short of the corner which sends a clear message to traffic in the right lane that you do not intend to turn right and so they should pass you on your left and do what they have to do. It's simple, and works well. Anything else is non-standard and causes confusion. Some cyclists revel in all the confusion, contention and cussedness that they can cause. |
Originally Posted by gpburdell
(Post 17858740)
... and that attitude right there is part of the problems on today's roads. The fireworks ensue when someone like this gets tangled up with someone else's "F-U, I'll do what I want" attitude. Sometimes leading to tragic results such as Woman Accused of Running Down Navy Chief Petty Officer in Road Rage Killing: CHP | NBC 7 San Diego
|
Originally Posted by unterhausen
(Post 17862741)
this is the kind of straw man argument that makes us want to hide A&S where the uninitiated can't see it. I don't know how any reasonable person can respond to that sort of accusation after simply having said that a road user's only obligation is to follow the rules. I think there is room for reasonable people to have an opinion on both sides of this argument, and I simply can't believe it's getting this heated.
|
Originally Posted by Ray Lovinggood
(Post 17855115)
Would they ever ask a driver of the car in front to move over? What about a motorcyclist?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:17 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.