![]() |
Originally Posted by TheManShow
(Post 18055091)
I hate to say it but some bicycle riders think they are above the rules and regulation of the City, County, or State where they ride. As judges in courts of law have said for years, ignorance of the law is not an excuse or defense.
|
Originally Posted by TheManShow
(Post 18055091)
I hate to say it but some bicycle riders think they are above the rules and regulation of the City, County, or State where they ride. As judges in courts of law have said for years, ignorance of the law is not an excuse or defense.
|
Originally Posted by RubeRad
(Post 18053576)
$25! That's basically free!
|
I live and commute in Chicago too, and am personally very happy that some cops are actually enforcing the law (though I'm sorry it did happen to you). Standard biker mentality here in the city is that traffic laws do not apply to them, which gives all bikers a bad name and make the streets more dangerous for everybody. I hope this becomes the norm, and they can put all that extra revenue into road improvements.
BTW, I feel the same way about traffic violations. I see at least one car breaking the law every day and can count on one hand the number of times I've seen someone pulled over in over 2 years. |
Originally Posted by no motor?
(Post 18053733)
That is surprising considering Chicago's use of red light cameras for revenue generating.
http://i.imgur.com/BoRVUHu.png |
^ Yea i was gonna say how much is the surcharge?
|
I wonder how much Emanuel paid for this?
|
How do they determine the actual fine? That is incredibly vague.
I once got a jaywalking ticket in L.A. The face value of the ticket was something like $35. The actual amount I had to pay was around $280. Totally ridiculous. |
fight it, it can't get any worse
|
Originally Posted by Phil_gretz
(Post 18054157)
My ticket for "failure to obey traffic signal" was for $120. Thanks, Sgt Nugent. I had been track standing and entered an intersection ~1.5 seconds ahead of the green. All cars were stopped and it was [nearly] my turn to go. Sgt Nugent would not entertain any discussion on the matter. I didn't have any ID, but willfully gave my full and complete information so that he could write the citation. My wife still complains about the unjustice of it all. I think that he had a choice whether to ticket. I respect that choice.
Originally Posted by bowermb
(Post 18057261)
BTW, I feel the same way about traffic violations. I see at least one car breaking the law every day and can count on one hand the number of times I've seen someone pulled over in over 2 years.
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
(Post 18065900)
fight it, it can't get any worse
|
Originally Posted by RubeRad
(Post 18053779)
I have noticed that BF has a big hole in the area of mountain biking. When I google for mtb-related stuff, I almost always find better coverage at mtbr than bf. Haven't taken the trouble to sign up for mtbr yet though. I guess someday when I finally do, my first post will look to them like yours looked to me!
And it should bring up predominantly BF stuff. |
Originally Posted by PatrickGSR94
(Post 18065942)
How does one fight an obvious RLJ to which he has already admitted to committing here in this thread? What would be the point of trying? To insult the judge's intelligence?
However, if the light is on a switch, and there is no reasonable way to reliably trigger the switch, and no cars sitting on the switch, then one might be able to fight the citation. Especially after ascertaining there is no cross traffic. Also, one could argue that T-intersections into bike lanes, or perhaps right turns into bike lanes operate independent of traffic flow. |
Originally Posted by CliffordK
(Post 18065990)
I have found that Judges don't really care what is right, wrong, or appropriate.
However, if the light is on a switch, and there is no reasonable way to reliably trigger the switch, and no cars sitting on the switch, then one might be able to fight the citation. Especially after ascertaining there is no cross traffic. Also, one could argue that T-intersections into bike lanes, or perhaps right turns into bike lanes operate independent of traffic flow. Just a quick bit of Google Maps trolling using the info in the OP. :) If he stopped and then did go with no traffic, or knew that the light would not change from detecting his bike, then yeah I suppose fighting it would be a possibility. Lots of time and hassle, though, plus more money probably if you lose. |
Illinois has a law applying to motocyclists and bicyclists allowing them to proceed on a red light after waiting for 120 seconds. Also, the law does not apply in the city of Chicago.
|
Originally Posted by PatrickGSR94
(Post 18065942)
Dang, I see a number of cars pulled over in my area every single week.
(Are you in Chicago? See your tag says Memphis...my commute details may be irrelevant) |
I lived in a small town. Part of my regular commute was a 4way stop at an intersection. On my way out, the road to the right is one way coming out, so there's no left to right cross traffic in that approach. Sight lines are immense, hundreds of feet in all directions, so I usually slowed for the intersection, but rarely stopped, and in some cases, just blew through it at speed.
One of the times I totally blew the stop, there was a car parked in a lot to the right, just before the intersection. As I go by, I have time to think, "Wait, was that a..." and then I'm through the intersection. So blatant. Cop honked his horn to let me know he'd seen me, I acknowledged with a wave. No chase, no ticket. If I'd got one, I would have accepted it gracefully and paid the "I'm an idiot" tax... |
Originally Posted by bowermb
(Post 18066083)
Really? My commute is from River North, through Old Town and Lincoln Park.
(Are you in Chicago? See your tag says Memphis...my commute details may be irrelevant) |
Originally Posted by lostarchitect
(Post 18065877)
How do they determine the actual fine? That is incredibly vague.
I once got a jaywalking ticket in L.A. The face value of the ticket was something like $35. The actual amount I had to pay was around $280. Totally ridiculous.
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
(Post 18065900)
fight it, it can't get any worse
|
the purpose to fighting a ticket is to win. he learned his lesson.
I fight all my tickets. haven't lost a case in 20 years. the last one took 14 months but it was dismissed pay your tickets and rack up the points if you want to but you don't have to. again, you have nothing to lose. |
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
(Post 18066211)
I fight all my tickets. haven't lost a case in 20 years. the last one took 14 months but it was dismissed
I once had a coworker asking around about a good speed detector after getting like ticket number 3. I said, "Give me $200 and I'll tell you how to never get a speeding ticket again." |
The punchline is "don't speed", right?
|
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
(Post 18066211)
the purpose to fighting a ticket is to win. he learned his lesson.
I fight all my tickets. haven't lost a case in 20 years. the last one took 14 months but it was dismissed pay your tickets and rack up the points if you want to but you don't have to. again, you have nothing to lose. It took me a decade to get a dozen citations dismissed.
Originally Posted by mgw4jc
(Post 18066260)
Impressive. But isn't it easier to not get tickets in the first place?
But, there are cases of blatant police harassment where one has no choice but to fight the citations in court. |
I got a 490$ ticket for going around the interesection and waving at a cop, stupid cops in california.
|
Originally Posted by PatrickGSR94
(Post 18065942)
Trackstanding start, you can make it at least halfway through an intersection in 1.5 seconds. And if the light is still red that's going to look like a pretty blatant RLJ.
Dang, I see a number of cars pulled over in my area every single week. How does one fight an obvious RLJ to which he has already admitted to committing here in this thread? What would be the point of trying? To insult the judge's intelligence? Lastly you can take it to court and hope the police officer doesn't show up, and they often don't because it's not worth their time. If they don't, you're off the hook. You used to be able to plea "Guilty with explanation" and maybe the judge would cut you some slack. Don't know if you can do that anymore. Chicago is probably completely different. From the county's perspective (or whatever the jurisdiction is), it's pretty expensive to spend a court's time on a $200 ticket and I think ultimately that's why fighting them often results in favor of the person who got the ticket. I'm glad that people have recourse to fight tickets that they shouldn't have gotten or when the fine is out of line with the offense and puts undo burden on someone with less income, but I do get a little angry when people take up the court's time (and our tax money) to fight a ticket they deserved and can easily pay. |
Originally Posted by mgw4jc
(Post 18066260)
Impressive. But isn't it easier to not get tickets in the first place?
I once had a coworker asking around about a good speed detector after getting like ticket number 3. I said, "Give me $200 and I'll tell you how to never get a speeding ticket again." I came around a bend the same speed as everyone else including a cement mixer but because I was in the left lane I got nailed. the NY cop also saw the Red Sox stickers and my kids and he was the most polite a-hole I ever met and said TWICE that driving in the STATE OF NEW YORK was a privilege. there would be no leniency regardless of my polite nature and explanation and apology. so anyway I tried fighting it by hiring a NY traffic attorney and eventually got it dismissed. I don't even know why! |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.