Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Commuting (https://www.bikeforums.net/commuting/)
-   -   Mountain bike to commuter (https://www.bikeforums.net/commuting/1027261-mountain-bike-commuter.html)

PaulRivers 08-31-15 11:56 AM


Originally Posted by Simoune (Post 18124085)
Thanks guys, not sure if ill switch to rigid bike fork since I can lock my suspension. I will definitely check out the advantages of fat vs narrow tires though. Anyone knows what are the minimum and maximum sizes of tires will fit on my rims?

I agree with your comment on the fork. I personally have not found rear suspension to eat energy (suspension that's under your legs) but front suspension hasn't been a problem for me. If you can lock the front fork, even better. If you got to the point of caring about that little loss, it's time to invest that money in a more road oriented bike instead, in my opinion. (700c wheels are also faster than 26" wheels, but require an entirely new bike.)

I don't know the min and max on your rim, but usually it's between 1.25" and 2.2". Like I said in an earlier post, I think 1.5" is ideal on a bike that came with 2" tires.
The difference between 1.25" and 1.5" in speed is very small, but the difference in comfort is rather large.
The different between 1.5" and 2.0" in speed is far larger, and the difference in comfort is rather small.
Also on loose stuff 2.0" has more of a tendency to slide around, 1.5" feels like it bites into the surface more and I feel more in control of the bike.

Obviously personal opinions differ, those are my thoughts. It's worthwhile to replace the tires with slicks, but once you get into replacing a fork your money would be better spent on going for a new more road oriented bike.

Medic Zero 08-31-15 04:09 PM


Originally Posted by Leebo (Post 18125316)
Dim to no lights? Good luck with that. Trying for a darwin award?

He's a troll.

SlowJoeCrow 08-31-15 04:23 PM

Mountain bike to commuter is a pretty solid conversion and the result is similar to a German city bike. My Kona Cinder Cone has a Salsa suspension corrected steel fork, Specialized Nimbus slicks a rack and fenders all nicely bolted on to the eyelets on the dropouts. The end result cost a bit to buy a fork and tires but worked out better than getting another bike of comparable quality.

Darth Lefty 08-31-15 04:31 PM

You replace-the-fork guys are killing me! This is an XT-level cross country racing bike with a Lefty Head Shok. It predates the time anyone wanted disks on a commuter, so I would not be surprised to learn it has no rack or fender eyes, and difficult if it did. Let it be what it is, and tell OP to get a hybrid!

Leisesturm 08-31-15 04:58 PM


Originally Posted by Medic Zero (Post 18126495)
He's a troll.

He is being sarcastic, you are the troll...

Leisesturm 08-31-15 05:18 PM


Originally Posted by Darth Lefty (Post 18126542)
You replace-the-fork guys are killing me! This is an XT-level cross country racing bike with a Lefty Head Shok. It predates the time anyone wanted disks on a commuter, so I would not be surprised to learn it has no rack or fender eyes, and difficult if it did. Let it be what it is, and tell OP to get a hybrid!

or tourer, or sport tourer, or CX machine or... gasp... a purposed commuter: LHT? Sirrus? 7.5FX? I'm feeling you with post #18 .

Siu Blue Wind 08-31-15 09:08 PM


Originally Posted by Medic Zero (Post 18126495)
He's a troll.


Originally Posted by Leisesturm (Post 18126588)
He is being sarcastic, you are the troll...

Please stop the name calling.

Simoune 09-01-15 07:48 PM

Probably cant sell that and find another bije thats affordable right now (15% taxes in quebec) so I will buy some wide slick tires and see how that feels for now.

Craptacular8 09-02-15 09:13 AM


Originally Posted by Medic Zero (Post 18124278)

I run my front tire at about 75 PSI and my rear at 90, and while it is true the fatter tires like Big Apples and Big Bens were a little more comfortable over the rough roads here, I don't think they were worth the penalty in handling and speed. Someone mentioned Continental Town & Country's, I used to like these when they were available in 1.75" and I think they were slightly different in compound and tread, but I don't think they're a good tire in larger sizes than that. The Big Ben is a much better ~2" tire. BTW, I was glad I went with the 2.15" size, the 2.35" wouldn't have fit under fenders at all.

What was "bad" about the larger size town and country? Just curious, I don't have a ton of experience with them, just have a few hundred miles of gravel riding on a set of 1.9" not sure what I'm missing...no flats, they've seemed to perform just fine for me, but perhaps I'm not particularly discerning.

AlTheKiller 09-02-15 12:30 PM


Originally Posted by Craptacular8 (Post 18131520)
What was "bad" about the larger size town and country? Just curious, I don't have a ton of experience with them, just have a few hundred miles of gravel riding on a set of 1.9" not sure what I'm missing...no flats, they've seemed to perform just fine for me, but perhaps I'm not particularly discerning.

probably just minute personal preference. You could find just as many people who think the 1.9" blows away the skinnier one.

And, yeesh, that tire pressure he mentioned is so damn high. he's only a couple PSI down from what pressure I ran my 700x25 tires at. My fast, 700x35 tires are usually set to 60f/65 rear, and dropped down in the 50psi range for mixed road riding. Anything even approaching MTB sizes doesn't even get close to 65PSI for me. I don't even know why you'd run tires that wide if you're just jacking up the pressure and taking away any of the benefit. Unless you're a really big guy running a heavy load.

my 26x2.1 tires get set to about 35/40, and then don't get topped off for weeks. Usually the ride quality improves a week or so later. my balloon tires got set to about 30.

edit: hmm, this actually seems to be a common occurrence. Nearly everyone I've heard who didn't think wider tires were any good, almost always ran them at about double the necessary pressure. The whole point of wider is you can run less and less pressure with no negatives. Bumping it up above a certain point only make the ride quality and handling turn to ****, with no speed gains.

Hypno Toad 09-02-15 12:57 PM


Originally Posted by Leisesturm (Post 18125137)
I find even .5 watt too much, unless its rainy out, so I let the batteries run down in my garage and use the light only after its really, really dim. Sometimes the light goes out completely half-way through my commute. Perfect. I may soon try just not using any lights at all at night.

What?!? You need a light that will stand out in traffic, cars run ~700 lumens on low-beam. If your're running .5 watt (~90 lumens) in that crowd, you might as well have nothing.

Bike lights serve two functions, to been seem by other traffic, and to light your path. Think about a light that fits both needs. If you live in the 'burbs with little street lights, you want 700 lumens for night riding. In the city, with lots of street lights, you can run with a lower, ~25 lumens.

If you are using a bright light, be thoughtful about the adjustment/angle, you don't want to point a bright light at driver's eye-level. I like to turn on the light in the garage and see that the beam of the light is roughly a car-length out in front of the bike.

To the OP question, I commuted (11 miles one-way) by MTB with front suspension for years. It was just fine. When I decided to commit to daily bike-commuting, I purchased a new bike with drop bars and narrow tires. It made the ride faster (& funner*). I kept the MTB for winter riding and some single-track riding.

* Yes, I said "funner" and funner is not a word. Deal with it!

Simoune 09-02-15 02:47 PM

Anyone knows if just buying a cheap fixed gear might do the job? They look nice and I feel like it would be more fun to ride on the cycling roads and for commuting.

PaulRivers 09-02-15 03:58 PM


Originally Posted by Simoune (Post 18132508)
Anyone knows if just buying a cheap fixed gear might do the job? They look nice and I feel like it would be more fun to ride on the cycling roads and for commuting.

As long as your current bike that you're talking about fits you, it would really be fine as long as you put nicer tires on it. What you're running into here is the usual antagonistic posturing which unfortunately often happens on the forum - it doesn't really mean a lot. It's like people arguing over whether the black, red, or silver paint job makes something a better car.

Satisfaction levels with fixed gear bikes vary a lot. Some people love them, some people absolutely hate them. Generally the more the roads are flat the more people like them.

nfmisso 09-03-15 10:43 PM


Originally Posted by Simoune (Post 18118189)
Thanks guys, any of you have suggestions for good tires?

Nashbar City Slick - fast, light, long lasting.

Dilberto 09-03-15 11:07 PM

2002 Cannondale F1000SL CAAD5 "Full Wood" easily converts to a blazing-fast, 700c commuter. The rear allows huge tire clearance, up to 35c slicks. The front is nearly unlimited, with a Lefty. I have the Volvo Team race version of your bike....fully converted to a flatbar, 700c Urban/Cyclocross machine:

http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/k...psiyscxmhs.jpg

AlTheKiller 09-04-15 12:19 AM


Originally Posted by Simoune (Post 18132508)
Anyone knows if just buying a cheap fixed gear might do the job? They look nice and I feel like it would be more fun to ride on the cycling roads and for commuting.

It depends on what you mean by cheap fixed gear. Stay away from the "fashion brand" types that market super sweet fixie colors, bro!! Purefix is a great example. Horrible frames and components.

I got back into cycling on a cheap Bikesdirect fixed gear. I think it was $250 at the time, but this was also right as fixed gear bikes were really turning into a marketable niche, prices have probably gone up since. The frame and components were still entry level-ish (tires and saddle being complete rubbish), but a nice step up from the trash on the market nowadays, which can be hard to avoid.

ciderguy 09-04-15 05:17 AM

Change the tires. Buy fenders. Get a saddle bag for a patch kit, pump, and spare tube. Have fun!

Simoune 09-04-15 08:27 PM

Welp then, guess ill go the most simple way and buy some slick fatties for now and see how that feels on my setup.

Artkansas 09-04-15 08:57 PM


Originally Posted by Simoune (Post 18118046)
Anyways, I was looking for a fixed gear to go around town and for commuting, but realised I could not do alot with it (cant climb sidewalks or those kind of things) so I thought I might switch some things on my mtb to make it more road friendly. I want to be able to bike comfortably and go moderately fast on the cycling roads and all that stuff.

What kind of terrain is your town? I live in a hilly area, so with my Hard Rock, I left the gears alone. I need them all. I put on street slicks, fenders, a rack and shopping panniers. Reflectors and lights, toe clips, a kickstand, a trailer hitch, and another water bottle. And a lock. The only area where the bike suffers is that downhill, I run out of gears and must coast above 30mph. Small loss.

http://www.pointhappy.com/gcf/Hard%2...rd%20rocks.png

kickstart 09-04-15 11:10 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I put Kojak 2.0 slicks on my Ross and they were great for the summer and in town, but offered inadequate traction in the perpetual wet of the PNW on rural roads and MUTs.
Vittoria randonneur cross in 1.75 solved the issues with slick conditions, with little change in speed or comfort, and seem to be less susceptible to cuts.

http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=475362

Medic Zero 09-05-15 01:51 AM


Originally Posted by Craptacular8 (Post 18131520)
What was "bad" about the larger size town and country? Just curious, I don't have a ton of experience with them, just have a few hundred miles of gravel riding on a set of 1.9" not sure what I'm missing...no flats, they've seemed to perform just fine for me, but perhaps I'm not particularly discerning.

It's hard to articulate what the differences were now, I do know that I didn't feel as comfortable getting as far over in turns with them, and that they generally just didn't feel as stable as they're slightly smaller version. IIRC, their flat protection wasn't the greatest either.

wolfchild 09-05-15 07:33 AM


Originally Posted by Simoune (Post 18118046)

Anyways, I was looking for a fixed gear to go around town and for commuting, but realised I could not do alot with it (cant climb sidewalks or those kind of things)

Yes it's possible to climb sidewalks and ride up and down the curbs with a fixed gear, you just need to be careful how you approach the curb and make sure that your pedal doesn't hit the curb. I do it all the time.

Paramount1973 09-10-15 11:04 AM

I recommend Panaracer Tservs in 1.75 (42mm). They are light, have good flat protection, and roll well.

azgreg 09-15-15 02:00 PM

I've used the Nashbar Streetwise, Geax Street Runner, and the Panaracer Pasela. I like them all.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 PM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.