![]() |
Originally Posted by kickstart
(Post 18136096)
Having both dyno and battery lights, yes, the cost of dyno lights is higher, but to me so is their relative value.
|
Originally Posted by CrankyOne
(Post 18136303)
Absolutely. We never have to think about lights or charging. Lights are always on our bikes and they'll always work. Well, so long as we do.
|
I've seen this argument before, and frankly, it doesn't seem to hold water.
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 18131288)
My road bikes get ridden mostly during mid-day but I've been known to go for long rides in the middle of the night. My mountain bikes get used a lot during the winter time for commuting. I can take any bike I like off the wall, put on the lights and batteries and go for a ride without worrying about lights either. I also don't have to worry about the hassle and expense of having 8 different dyno wheels and 8 different lights and the cost that would entail.
But why do you have to get a dyno system for every bike in the stable? That doesn't make sense. If you wanted to spend money on dyno lights (which you don't seem to), you could buy one system for one mountain bike to commute with in the winter. I have two commute bikes, a primary and a backup, which both have dyno lights. The other bike doesn't, and I have a couple of small lights I can slap on it for a limited night ride. If you decide to go for a night ride, you also have: I have 4 lights, probably 8 batteries (I may have a few more), 4 chargers and less than $200 invested in the whole kit and kaboodle. And my light system can be shared. My wife doesn't ride much at night...maybe once in the last 5 years...so spending the money for a generator system for her wouldn't be cost effective. However if she does what to do a night ride, which we did this summer, I would have to shell out the money for yet another generator system since her wheels aren't the same size as any bike I have. With a battery system, all I had to do was install a clamp for my battery lights and put the batteries on her bike. We were ready to go in 5 minutes. |
Originally Posted by kickstart
(Post 18136394)
Yeah, my wife bumped a tractor implement with her car and broke the headlight. After seeing how expensive a replacement would be, I suggested a rechargeable bicycle light, naming all their advantages.......I got the "look", and that was the end of that. :p
Bicycles usually don't. Lights are an add-on...and for good reason. I, personally, won't buy a bike with someone else's idea of a light system. I keep my bikes longer than most of my light systems because bicycle lighting is, and has been, in a state of flux. I'd hate to have a bike that would have been outfitted with the NiteHawk lights I had about 10 years ago. They were a first generation LED that were weak in the extreme. If they had been integrated into the bicycle, the bicycle would likely be useless now if I wanted better lighting.
Originally Posted by pdlamb
(Post 18137867)
I've seen this argument before, and frankly, it doesn't seem to hold water.
I'll admit that there is an advantage to generator systems. They are convenient and they do have better lights...now. But battery powered lights have their advantages as well. Personally, I feel that they have many more advantages than generator systems. They are more flexible, they are far cheaper for a similar light output. If the battery system is as expensive as a generator system, the light output is far greater. Battery lights...especially the cheap ones...are easier to upgrade as well. If you are paying $145 just for the head lamp, you aren't likely to get a new lamp every time the technology gets a higher output. But at $60 per headlamp like the old Magicshine (350 lumens), it's not that expensive to get the latest version which then cost $45 for a 600 lumen light. Thanks to the very cheap lights, jumping up to an 800 lumen light is only $40. I don't feel bad about ditching the old systems for that little money.
Originally Posted by pdlamb
(Post 18137867)
OK, so you've decided to buy and own 8 different bicycles if it would take 8 wheels and lights to equip your fleet. Your money, your choice. No argument here.
But why do you have to get a dyno system for every bike in the stable? That doesn't make sense. If you wanted to spend money on dyno lights (which you don't seem to), you could buy one system for one mountain bike to commute with in the winter. I have two commute bikes, a primary and a backup, which both have dyno lights. The other bike doesn't, and I have a couple of small lights I can slap on it for a limited night ride.
Originally Posted by pdlamb
(Post 18137867)
If you decide to go for a night ride, you also have:
So slap one of those lights and batteries on the bike of your choice and take off. If one of them is charged, of course. This does bring up the issue of charging. In a post above, you said that you ran batteries for 2 weeks and worried if it had enough charge to get you home. Why? I would never try to squeeze two weeks of riding out of a battery under any circumstances. I charge my batteries as soon as I get home. I have since the days of NiCd, NiMH and now with Li-ion batteries. Back in the days of NiCd, I would occasionally cycle my batteries to reduce the memory effect by using them in an RC truck...at least that's what I told my wife the truck was for;) But trying to squeeze the very last electron out of a battery is a recipe for being stuck in the dark.
Originally Posted by pdlamb
(Post 18137867)
I must have missed something. Will your current inventory of battery lights stop working if you get a different light? Why can't you put one of the other battery lights on your wife's bike? Is there some reason you have to throw out all the old lights, batteries, and chargers if you buy one dyno light?
I also think you have missed the point I've been trying to make about the flexibility of battery systems vs generator lights. I already have more than enough batteries and headlights for my bike and my wife's bike...we can't use my "normal" configuration of 2 lights on the bar and one on a helmet if we both go for a night ride but that's a minor issue. Why would I equip any of my bikes with a generator system at all? I'm already committed to battery lights and don't see any advantage to generator lights that is great enough for me to switch over. For me, it would be a major downspec to switch. I'd be limited to one light on one bike for the cost of 3 or 4 lights that I can use on any bike I like so that I'm not limited to one bike. I have 8 bikes because I like to ride different bikes for different reasons. |
Originally Posted by JanMM
(Post 18130342)
Getting bummed lately seeing Fall Variety Packs of beer in the grocery store and now you tell me Winter is just around the corner!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :eek:
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 18138048)
Wrong analogy. Motor vehicles come with lights and an electrical system to operate them, along with the extra power to generate the electricity without impacting the vehicle's power.
|
Originally Posted by kickstart
(Post 18138239)
The point is dyno lights are always there and always work without any additional effort or routine. Simple.
It doesn't offer any back up if something goes wrong nor does it offer any ability to use it if you have to fix something on the bike. And it is always there. I don't always need a light nor do I want nor need to carry around a light all the time. On the other hand, battery lights don't require a whole lot of additional effort. Certainly not as as you generator guys make it out to be. |
I don't need all my bikes to be equipped the same. The three bikes that I use the most are also the bikes I am most likely to need lights on, so they have dynamo lights. One of them has an annoying sidewall dynamo, so it's really just an emergency system. I have battery powered lights for the bikes I prefer to keep lightweight. I move the lights between those bikes as needed. This approach lets me balance performance (which I perceive to be superior with dynamo lighting) and cost.
|
Originally Posted by noglider
(Post 18138460)
I don't need all my bikes to be equipped the same. The three bikes that I use the most are also the bikes I am most likely to need lights on, so they have dynamo lights. One of them has an annoying sidewall dynamo, so it's really just an emergency system. I have battery powered lights for the bikes I prefer to keep lightweight. I move the lights between those bikes as needed. This approach lets me balance performance (which I perceive to be superior with dynamo lighting) and cost.
One of the real benefits of a dyno system is when I forgot to charge my light or phone, I can just plug them in to charge while riding. Its also preferabl to carrying chargers and/or extra batteries for long, or multiple days. |
I was set last year and still am for this coming darkness. Used the 750 lm for a ride finish last week.
|
Yes, lighting. I'm in the process of upgrading that right now. Still trying to find a good budget solution. My headlight is sufficient to see on my mostly well-lit commute, but I might need to upgrade it come winter. Right now, I'm trying to find 2 decent blinkies that take AAA / AA / 18650 to put on my panniers to use in addition to a steady rear light.
|
Originally Posted by tarwheel
(Post 18132485)
I use my lights year-round while commuting, in daylight as well as dark. However, I'm actually starting to see the beam on the pavement again when I set out in the mornings.
|
I have both dynamo lights and battery lights on my commuter. The dynamo provides "minimum legal lights" and the Magic Shine clone (MSC), with a defuser lens, provides enough light to see by.
Tuesday this was useful. I hadn't charged my MSC for about a week and it gave up on the way to work. I still had a minimum legal light, provided by the dynamo, so I wasn't too concerned. Sure, in comparison it was just a dim glow; but I am more concerned with a ticket for no lights. I also, generally, leave the dynamo light on, so it provides a bit of a daytime running light. Like I mentioned in other threads, the dynamo light takes a block or two to turn on; but that isn't a big deal. Even with dead batteries, the MSC will light for that long. It works for me; however, if I had to get ride of one of them (which I don't) The MSC is the one I would keep. |
Originally Posted by Robert C
(Post 18157103)
Like I mentioned in other threads, the dynamo light takes a block or two to turn on; but that isn't a big deal. Even with dead batteries, the MSC will light for that long. It works for me; however, if I had to get ride of one of them (which I don't) The MSC is the one I would keep.
|
I'm just getting back on the bike after 30+ years away. Had no idea where to begin so I bought a Blackburn 2'FER white/red flasher for the front handlebar. I already had a blinking red LED clipped to my hat. If I get a serious front light I'll move the 2'FER to the rear.
I like being able to choose my own rechargeable NiMH our Eneloops so that will factor into whatever I chose for a more serious front light. Used to put an ordinary bottle generator on the 1976 Motobecane Mirage for commutes, which were often at night, and took it off for long distance daylight rides (a couple of times a year). It felt a little sluggish, sure, but did the job. If I get serious about biking again I'll look for a utility/commute bike with built in generator for my next bike. |
Originally Posted by Robert C
(Post 18157103)
Like I mentioned in other threads, the dynamo light takes a block or two to turn on;
|
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
(Post 18157871)
my dynamo provided plenty of light to see by at walking speed just walking.
|
Originally Posted by kickstart
(Post 18158704)
You haven't got that fixed yet? That would drive me nuts.
The reality is that it adds nothing. I have to look down at it to even see if it is on (it is mounted above the fender). It is so dim that if there is much light out I have to put my hand in front of it and look at my palm to see if it is on. As I often describe it, it is a minimum legal light. Some time soon I will take pictures of the two lights on the road so you can see the difference. The trouble is that dynamo lights are hard to get good pictures of. |
Originally Posted by Robert C
(Post 18158725)
No, I haven't bothered. The reality is that when it is dark i turn on the regular light (the Magic Shine Clone). Once that light is on I cant even see the dynamo lights output.
The reality is that it adds nothing. I have to look down at it to even see if it is on (it is mounted above the fender). It is so dim that if there is much light out I have to put my hand in front of it and look at my palm to see if it is on. As I often describe it, it is a minimum legal light. Some time soon I will take pictures of the two lights on the road so you can see the difference. The trouble is that dynamo lights are hard to get good pictures of. Edit, The OE B&M light that came with my Gazelle was the same output as the light on your Gotham. They are indeed minimum output lights that won't compare to a MS clone in any way, but it should provide enough light to ride 10 - 15 mph in the dark. |
Originally Posted by Robert C
(Post 18158725)
No, I haven't bothered. The reality is that when it is dark i turn on the regular light (the Magic Shine Clone). Once that light is on I cant even see the dynamo lights output.
The reality is that it adds nothing. I have to look down at it to even see if it is on (it is mounted above the fender). It is so dim that if there is much light out I have to put my hand in front of it and look at my palm to see if it is on. As I often describe it, it is a minimum legal light. Some time soon I will take pictures of the two lights on the road so you can see the difference. The trouble is that dynamo lights are hard to get good pictures of. Taking a block to turn on sounds like it doesn't even meet any minimum legal specs, sounds like it's defective and not getting the power it usually would. Even for a cheap, minimum spec light. |
Originally Posted by Phil_gretz
(Post 18125978)
NiteRider Lumina series. One for the helmet, one for the handlebars. Rechargeable with micro-USB AC adapters.
There are many rear blinkies that are super. I use the Chinese knock-offs of the Planet Bike blinkie. They've held up for 4 years now. On my helmet, strapped the rear, is a Blackburn blinkie that has an intense pattern. What was your question? I haven't done much night commuting and am interested in a good setup... |
Yes, defective is my guess, too. It sounds like the light is powered by the capacitor rather than the input voltage. When I start my bike at low speed, the light flickers for reasons I hope are obvious and I don't have the energy to explain.
|
For those considering going the flashlight route. For the past few years I've been going with the TerraLux Lightstar 300. $29 at Amazon. This with a two fish lock block to mount it with. And some good rechargeable batteries. And you've got yourself a good inexpensive (under $75 with charger) light. Excellent commuting light. Handles any weather thrown its way. I change the batteries after the third day. I've had Fenix's that suddenly quit after a few months. Same with Romisen. I had a romisen for four years before I replaced it with another one that lasted me one month. Never again. I've had the Terralux for two years and have had no issues. I have another one as a spare in the house. Rugged and well built. Made in the USA too.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...SR160,160_.jpg |
Originally Posted by e0richt
(Post 18159086)
and could you point out where you bought them? if amazon, maybe an url pointing to them?
I haven't done much night commuting and am interested in a good setup... Sending you links won't help. You have to decide where you will mount, how you will recharge, and your budget. For me, the flashlight with rechargeable battery route doesn't sound attractive. I'd much prefer a Lumina 650 or 700 with the helmet mount, plus another one for the handlebar. Battery is internal, package is water tight already. Micro USB charger, available at work or at home, compatible with smart phone chargers I already have. All of that. The MagicShine triple head is really versatile, but it's not for everyone. I like it. You need to buy backup battery packs if you plan to ride more than a couple of hours at full power, though. So, there's a weight penalty. They velcro to the frame, so storing/carrying isn't a proble. Anyway, I'd recommend that you design your own lighting system to meet your own needs. There are no shortcuts to doing this right. |
|
Originally Posted by GovernorSilver
(Post 18126391)
Based on the two night rides I've down so far, I feel like I'm set - dyno hub powered head- and tail-lights to be seen, and USB-charged helmet mounted light for spotting road hazards like broken glass, squirrels, etc.
I just moved my flashing headlight to my helmet from my handlebar so it could be seen over parked cars. I felt like I was having cars pull out from driveways and side streets a lot more when the light was mounted on my handlebar. Now that it is up high, drivers see me a lot better. |
Originally Posted by ChicagoDan
(Post 18279191)
I do the opposite. I angle the dyno-powered light to see, since the optics are better in the lens than in my battery powered light.
There's one section of the Mt. Vernon Trail that gets dark as hell at night - really glad to have the two lights when I'm riding through it. |
The nights are getting shorter it won't be long
Won't be long til summer comes Now that the boys are here again |
Wow! There's a guy I hadn't heard of in a long time. Thanks for sharing!
|
It's about that time again.....
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:22 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.