Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

26" Big Apples - comfort, rolling resistance, fenders, etc., need help choosing

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

26" Big Apples - comfort, rolling resistance, fenders, etc., need help choosing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-16, 07:10 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 201
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
26" Big Apples - comfort, rolling resistance, fenders, etc., need help choosing

I'm looking for a set of Big Apple Raceguard tires as part of my vintage mountain bike / commuter bike project. I'm trying to decide between 50-559 and 55-559 Big Apple Raceguards. I think the 50mm tires weigh in around 675g or so, the 55mm tires a little more.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...A3HKWFZMD0QFVQ


My question is: which will have the best balance of comfort, rolling resistance, and speed? Also, does anyone have actual tire width measurements for a 20mm-ish rim? I plan to run fenders, likely the Velo Orange 60mm fenders, as they are the only ones I can find in aluminum and look traditional:

VO Smooth 60mm Fenders, 26"

Velo Orange states that they accomodate up to 50mm tires. I'm not sure if I could get away with 55mm tires or not.

Thoughts?
kalash74 is offline  
Old 08-04-16, 07:23 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,440
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times in 136 Posts
Don't know what 55mm converts to (I only speak English), but my Big Apples are 26" X 2.35" and I love the way they ride. Be sure whichever width you choose will fit your frame, as I had to settle for the Big Apples over the wider Maxxis Hookworms because of this.

Big Apples are great on comfort but suck on rolling resistance and speed. Or maybe I just suck at those things.

Can't imagine fitting a fender over the 2.35" width.
Papa Tom is offline  
Old 08-04-16, 07:27 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 201
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Papa Tom
Don't know what 55mm converts to (I only speak English), but my Big Apples are 26" X 2.35" and I love the way they ride. Be sure whichever width you choose will fit your frame, as I had to settle for the Big Apples over the wider Maxxis Hookworms because of this.

Big Apples are great on comfort but suck on rolling resistance and speed. Or maybe I just suck at those things.

Can't imagine fitting a fender over the 2.35" width.
50mm = 2"
55mm = 2.165"

I was asking whether people have measured actual widths of these (in mm) with calipers. I've heard they are under spec. I thought before about a pair of 2.35" Fat Franks but they are just too wide for me. I'm leaning towards 50mm but wondering if I should go 55mm. Trying to get a comfy ride but also cut down on rolling resistance.
kalash74 is offline  
Old 08-04-16, 09:09 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 684

Bikes: Jamis Coda Elite - custom 1x9 setup

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 222 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
i have no idea why anyone would want to go that wide with tires for a commuter
idiotekniQues is offline  
Old 08-04-16, 09:15 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 201
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by idiotekniQues
i have no idea why anyone would want to go that wide with tires for a commuter
Comfort and stability. Can't ride high pressure, narrow tires due to back pain. Now, does anyone have experience with the above tires that might aid me in a making a decision?
kalash74 is offline  
Old 08-04-16, 09:18 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,532

Bikes: Working on replacing my stolen Soma Buena Vista Mixte

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Liked 95 Times in 44 Posts
Since you have 60cm fenders, and generally you want 10-12mm of clearance for fenders, it seems like 50mm is more prudent. Since many people find 38mm and 42mm comfy, I can't imagine why you need another 5mm on an already wide tire.

**My bike shop friend loves these tires. 2in is huge.
jade408 is offline  
Old 08-04-16, 09:36 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
alan s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 6,977
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1496 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times in 128 Posts
I have 26 x 2.35 (60 mm) with 60 mm fenders. They fit fine and ride great.

alan s is offline  
Old 08-05-16, 11:11 AM
  #8  
Disco Infiltrator
 
Darth Lefty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,460

Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3130 Post(s)
Liked 2,111 Times in 1,374 Posts
Originally Posted by idiotekniQues
i have no idea why anyone would want to go that wide with tires for a commuter
Not everyone has the same commute.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Darth Lefty is offline  
Old 08-05-16, 11:27 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 201
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alan s
I have 26 x 2.35 (60 mm) with 60 mm fenders. They fit fine and ride great.

Nice pic! Out of curiosity, do your 60mm Big Apple's measure 60mm or somewhat less? Also, which fenders are you running?
kalash74 is offline  
Old 08-05-16, 11:34 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
alan s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 6,977
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1496 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times in 128 Posts
Originally Posted by kalash74
Nice pic! Out of curiosity, do your 60mm Big Apple's measure 60mm or somewhat less? Also, which fenders are you running?
I've never actually measured the tires, but probably 60mm since the fenders are 60mm, and the tires are about as wide. I think the rims are 19mm. The fenders are Planet Bike. Keep in mind that most spray off the tires comes from the middle of the tire, so while you don't get quite as good protection with the fenders and tires the same width, it's pretty close, and good enough for me.
alan s is offline  
Old 08-09-16, 10:30 AM
  #11  
Did I catch a niner?
 
Mr Pink57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: a van down by the river
Posts: 542

Bikes: Vassago Fisticuff/Surly Ogre/Surly Pugsley/Surly Pugsley 29+

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Depends on the shape of the fender.

The Planet Bike Cascadias seem to do the best job.

I have the 29x2.35 Big Apples on my Ogre with Planet Bike ALX Cascadia fenders. Prior to that I had a new set of Blackburn 65mm renders but they cut in pretty hard so they did not cover the entire tire. But the PB ALX (aluminum) fit great. Keep in mind I am on wide rims (rear: Salsa Gordo, front: Stans Flow).

The BG 29er is pretty accurate in width.
Mr Pink57 is offline  
Old 08-09-16, 12:53 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Sci-Fi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,329
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Imho, while you can mount wide tires on your rims, it might be on the hard side to get the tires on. Might/will feel more tire movement, esp if the bike is loaded, when cornering. Would recommend wider rims, like Alex DM24 or Sun Rhyno Lite. Saying this because of my experience when I replaced a worn rim with a Sun CR18 (18mm wide) and using Fat Franks. Can check various sites for recommended rim width to tire size combos. 2"+ wide tires do offer a more comfortable although heavier.
Sci-Fi is offline  
Old 08-09-16, 01:04 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
corwin1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,411
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times in 18 Posts
I have 55mm Big Apples on 25mm rims and they actually measure 54mm with a digital caliper. I've read many times that the 50's actually measure in the 45'ish mm range but I have no direct experience. My 50mm Schwalbe Marathon Supremes measured out at 45mm but that's not a balloon tire so it might not be comparable. I haven't measured my 60mm BA's but they look like a freaking motorcycle tire on my bike.

I love the Big Apples for utility and recreational riding. I wouldn't recommend them if you plan to ride long distances or with a group but for just getting on your bike and riding for fun, BA's are hard to beat.

Last edited by corwin1968; 08-09-16 at 01:08 PM.
corwin1968 is offline  
Old 08-10-16, 08:14 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
I think part of the problem is that people think they need to over inflate their tires.

I run the minimum recommended pressure up front, and a few pounds more in the back. With 26” tires, there isn’t much reason to put more than 30psi in the front, 40 in the back.

Do a search on bicycle quarterly tire pressure if you want more. Big tires are heavy (slow from a stop, slow up hill), but if you don’t ride much more than 10-12mph, size and weight are not going to be that big of a difference.

(I did purchase a tire similar to a big apple. But, boy was it slow and heavy. And, if you are not going to get some extra wide rims to match a 60mm tire, you are doing more harm than good. Food for though).
chas58 is offline  
Old 08-10-16, 10:48 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
alan s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 6,977
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1496 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times in 128 Posts
Originally Posted by chas58
I think part of the problem is that people think they need to over inflate their tires.

I run the minimum recommended pressure up front, and a few pounds more in the back. With 26” tires, there isn’t much reason to put more than 30psi in the front, 40 in the back.

Do a search on bicycle quarterly tire pressure if you want more. Big tires are heavy (slow from a stop, slow up hill), but if you don’t ride much more than 10-12mph, size and weight are not going to be that big of a difference.

(I did purchase a tire similar to a big apple. But, boy was it slow and heavy. And, if you are not going to get some extra wide rims to match a 60mm tire, you are doing more harm than good. Food for though).
Yeah, the BAs "float like a Cadillac" at around 40 psi. Love them, even cruising at 17-18 mph. Once they are up to speed, they just roll over everything.
alan s is offline  
Old 08-10-16, 05:56 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
AusTexMurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: South Austin, Texas
Posts: 919

Bikes: 2010 Origin8 CX700, 2003 Cannondale Backroads Cross Country, 1997 Trek mtn steel frame converted commuter/tourer, 1983 Univega Sportour, 2010 Surly LHT, Others...

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Ran a set of 26X2.15 Big Apples for 8,500 miles on my main commuter.
Race Guard level, like the OP mentions, are lighter and more supple.
One of my favorite tire sets to roll on that bike.
Smooth and fast over everything when up to speed.
Also need to get used to the feeling of balloon tires. Feel slower at first when getting accustomed to them.
Ran my front at 36-40 psi and the rear 40-45 tops depending on load.
Don't over inflate !
AusTexMurf is offline  
Old 08-11-16, 04:49 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,440
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times in 136 Posts
Originally Posted by AusTexMurf
Ran my front at 36-40 psi and the rear 40-45 tops depending on load.
Don't over inflate !
Try running them closer to 30psi. That's the sweet spot for my BA 26" X 2.35."
Papa Tom is offline  
Old 08-11-16, 08:08 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
AusTexMurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: South Austin, Texas
Posts: 919

Bikes: 2010 Origin8 CX700, 2003 Cannondale Backroads Cross Country, 1997 Trek mtn steel frame converted commuter/tourer, 1983 Univega Sportour, 2010 Surly LHT, Others...

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Papa Tom
Try running them closer to 30psi. That's the sweet spot for my BA 26" X 2.35."
My BA's are off the bike and paper thin with about 8,500 miles on them. Started getting frequent flats which had never been an issue with the tires.
I had the smaller 2.15's. Bit less volume.
And I was running them on a bike with front and rear racks, oftentimes fairly heavily loaded.
Pulled 2 different Trail-A-Bikes with kids and 3 different trailers with this setup.
I tended to air them up or down some depending on the load, particularly the rear.
Found the sweet spot for me between 36-42 psi. Pressure too high, ride quality diminished, bouncy.
AusTexMurf is offline  
Old 08-11-16, 08:19 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 5,721

Bikes: Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 854 Post(s)
Liked 111 Times in 66 Posts
Originally Posted by idiotekniQues
i have no idea why anyone would want to go that wide with tires for a commuter
Not all commutes are equal. Some involve 8 miles of dirt out of 20. A 29er with fat slicks is a great urban assault vehicle that can handle everything except mud. YRMV. I love showing up on group rides with keen sandals, a rack and bag, plus lights and fenders. 2 wheels with pedals, all good.
Leebo is offline  
Old 08-11-16, 12:05 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by alan s
Yeah, the BAs "float like a Cadillac" at around 40 psi. Love them, even cruising at 17-18 mph. Once they are up to speed, they just roll over everything.
Yeah, 5" tires are even better! At about 7psi are fairly fast and just roll over everything - feels like a tank tracks.

But, anything over 2" really needs some wide wheels. Otherwise, you are going to have problems running lower (or higher) pressures.

From Schwalbe (rim width is the inner width):
chas58 is offline  
Old 08-11-16, 02:24 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,440
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times in 136 Posts
Originally Posted by AusTexMurf
My BA's are off the bike and paper thin with about 8,500 miles on them. Started getting frequent flats which had never been an issue with the tires.
Yes, I too am finding that they wear fast.
Papa Tom is offline  
Old 08-13-16, 08:57 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Abbotsford BC
Posts: 205

Bikes: Some old CL beater

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
I've really enjoyed the ride of my 60x559 BAs. They measure a whopping 63 MM wide and almost 27" tall on a 30mm inside width rim. Use a 60mm Planet Bike fender because that's what I have on hand. Works OK.

I'm now running Rat Trap Pass tires from Compass Cycles. They are noticeably lighter and do roll faster but not that much faster. I kind of miss the Big Apples. Maybe it's just that first impression I had with the BAs after a set of Armadillos.
XXLHardrock is offline  
Old 08-14-16, 04:22 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by kalash74
My question is: which will have the best balance of comfort, rolling resistance, and speed? Also, does anyone have actual tire width measurements for a 20mm-ish rim? I plan to run fenders, likely the Velo Orange 60mm fenders, as they are the only ones I can find in aluminum and look traditional:

VO Smooth 60mm Fenders, 26"

Velo Orange states that they accomodate up to 50mm tires. I'm not sure if I could get away with 55mm tires or not.

Thoughts?
If you want comfort, rolling resistance, and speed, the best tire for all of those is the schwalbe marathon supreme 2" (50mm).
PaulRivers is offline  
Old 08-18-16, 03:46 PM
  #24  
GATC
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: south Puget Sound
Posts: 8,728
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times in 27 Posts
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
If you want comfort, rolling resistance, and speed, the best tire for all of those is the schwalbe marathon supreme 2" (50mm).
I prefer my 50 or 65mm BAs to marathon supremes above 32mm. I have only tried supremes in 700c though. The pudgy/fat ones seemed to want higher pressure than BAs let me get away with. But I have only used 26" BAs.

I like the supremes at 28 or 32.
HardyWeinberg is offline  
Old 09-18-16, 04:34 PM
  #25  
royal dutch of dukes
 
bikiola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: brooklyn, nyc
Posts: 400
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 66 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alan s
I've never actually measured the tires, but probably 60mm since the fenders are 60mm, and the tires are about as wide. I think the rims are 19mm. The fenders are Planet Bike. Keep in mind that most spray off the tires comes from the middle of the tire, so while you don't get quite as good protection with the fenders and tires the same width, it's pretty close, and good enough for me.
Resurrecting an older thread, what is the actual model of PB fenders? Their website stupidly doesn't list fender widths (only tire widths that the fender can accomodate). I run 26 x 2.35 on my troll, so it looks like we have a VERY similar setup. I had SKS P65 but they looked almost too fat and seemed cartoonish...
bikiola is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.