![]() |
Originally Posted by kickstart
(Post 19406873)
Yes, old news.
In much of Europe e-bikes capable of 28+ mph are now classed as pedelecs, and subject to their own unique regulations separate from standard e-bikes. FYI, they are all pedalecs (in that region) but generally 20-28mph is a speed pedalec and has specific license requirements and usability restrictions. Above that it is basically a moped. |
Alan sure has you guys riled up. His arguments can be used for one guy doing 20mph on a trail, or a pack of a dozen lycra racers doing 30mph on a MUP (been there, done that, don't ride with that type of group more than once). I've ridden with the 25-30mph paceline crowd, and I've never seen or heard an e-bike doing things as stupid some of them do.
People hate road bikers who do stupid things in traffic People hate mountain bikers who do stupid things on/off trails People hate e-bikers, cause its something new to hate... ;-) It is all a matter of respect. |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19406913)
I did read it. Did you?
"News reports have indicated that the authorities have not yet determined whether the new bikes will be permitted on bicycle paths; discussions are still being conducted with the Minister of Infrastructure and the Environment (which covers transportation) to finalize the new rules for the bikes." |
Originally Posted by chas58
(Post 19406966)
I think you mean SPEED pedalecs.
FYI, they are all pedalecs (in that region) but generally 20-28mph is a speed pedalec and has specific license requirements and usability restrictions. Above that it is basically a moped. |
Originally Posted by chas58
(Post 19406983)
Alan sure has you guys riled up. His arguments can be used for one guy doing 20mph on a trail, or a pack of a dozen lycra racers doing 30mph on a MUP (been there, done that, don't ride with that type of group more than once). I've ridden with the 25-30mph paceline crowd, and I've never seen or heard an e-bike doing things as stupid some of them do.
People hate road bikers who do stupid things in traffic People hate mountain bikers who do stupid things on/off trails People hate e-bikers, cause its something new to hate... ;-) It is all a matter of respect. |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19406954)
I ride on MUPs to get away from motorized traffic. So "the more the merrier" is the opposite of getting it. The more the merrier on the streets, sure thing. Whatever.
|
I'm not sure why people are upset with a bike that has a motor? While on my ebike I've been passed by bikes without a motor, it doesn't bother me. I am actually capable of going faster on my road bike than my ebike (motor cut off at 20 mph.) I don't see a motor as being any more of an "advantage" than gears are over a single speed.
|
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19407119)
adding high speed e-bikes is rather alarming and disturbing. To me, the MUPs are a refuge from motorized vehicles, and I hope they stay that way.
If they are banned, fine... people should not use the MUP with an ebike. However, if they are allowed they should be treated like any other bicycle that has been modified beyond a single speed to allow the rider to go faster with more efficiency. |
Originally Posted by InTheRain
(Post 19407145)
I'm not sure why people are upset with a bike that has a motor? While on my ebike I've been passed by bikes without a motor, it doesn't bother me. I am actually capable of going faster on my road bike than my ebike (motor cut off at 20 mph.) I don't see a motor as being any more of an "advantage" than gears are over a single speed.
|
Originally Posted by kickstart
(Post 19407015)
Yeah, it's the same tiresome intolerance we've been subject to from motorists for years, except now its being pedaled by few cyclists.
|
Originally Posted by 350htrr
(Post 19407457)
You just got's to ignore it... alan s & others of his ilk did the same thing to a thread I started in the touring forum... E-Bike touring is not bicycle touring, get a motorbike, you cheated, Your E-Bike tour belongs in the E-Bike forum :rolleyes:
Do not feed trolls. |
Are we talking e-bikes or e-assist bikes? They are two different animals with different laws. I'm not sure, but it looks like in Minnesota if it is not an e-assist it is considered a motorized bicycle and you're supposed to have a license. But an e-assist is considered a bicycle.
|
Originally Posted by steve0257
(Post 19407737)
Are we talking e-bikes or e-assist bikes? They are two different animals with different laws. I'm not sure, but it looks like in Minnesota if it is not an e-assist it is considered a motorized bicycle and you're supposed to have a license. But an e-assist is considered a bicycle.
BOTH types "are" assisting you to get up that hill... It's the way things work. ;) and OK, technically, mechanical assistance IS different than motor assistance, but they both have the same "effect" they get you up the hill easier, than without... :innocent: |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19407158)
Did I write that somewhere? BTW, you don't need to add your name after your question.
Still one of my favorite bikes in all the forums: http://www.bikeforums.net/commuting/...ter-build.html |
Originally Posted by steve0257
(Post 19407737)
Are we talking e-bikes or e-assist bikes? They are two different animals with different laws. I'm not sure, but it looks like in Minnesota if it is not an e-assist it is considered a motorized bicycle and you're supposed to have a license. But an e-assist is considered a bicycle.
Unfortunately some feel compelled to punish safe, respectful, legal e-cyclists for the misdeeds of a few to protect their delicate sensibilities. |
You would think more people would be accepting of e-assist bikes. I mean, they are even (allegedly) being used in the pro peloton! If the pros are doing it, it's good for all of us, right?
Anyway, I don't see how your commute in Washington State hurts others commutes a continent away. People should just do their thing and not worry about what other people are doing |
A guy on an e-bike has been passing me safely for years on the biggest hill of my commute without the slightest hint of an issue as the speed differential is about 4 mph. The bike lanes, MUT, and sidewalk I use on my commute get me through areas where riding on the road isn't wise for any type of bike.
Would it really make you happy to force safe, respectful, legal cyclists like myself to ride in dangerous conditions, in pain, or give up bike commuting entirely? |
Originally Posted by kickstart
(Post 19406110)
I can't say e-bikes "appeal" to me either, my passion is still for regular bikes, its simply a practical answer to my particular everyday transportation needs. My commute is 16 miles RT with a 1200' gain in elevation. I've wanted a long tail cargo bike for a long time, but knew it simply wouldn't work for me without the assist.
Originally Posted by Leebo
(Post 19407019)
Are ebikes allowed on the DC mups? Or don't like being passed? My ego is not that fragile. The few that I see on the Boston mups are not going that much faster, if at all, than everybody else. My am stretch out of Arlington sees lots of kids, bikes, peds and dog walkers. Lots of traffic, every one seems to stay right and get along fine. Ya know, share and care :)
|
Originally Posted by autonomy
(Post 19408625)
How heavy is that, with the battery and all? Unless you roll it into your garage, seems like it would be too heavy to carry
|
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19408351)
Appreciate the shout out on the Lynskey. Reminds me to update that thread with some recent changes.
I agree there are lots of issues, not just with cyclists, but all MUP users, that could be addressed. The extreme outliers should be aware they are making the situation more dangerous and unpleasant for all. I put e-bikes in that extreme, particularly on uphills, where let's say, the average cyclist is riding at 12 mph, and the e-bike is passing everyone at 20 mph. Using the MUPs to get around traffic and cheat the system is really unfair to those using the MUPs as intended. |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19409164)
So I guess you wouldn't have a problem with self-driving e-cars on the MUPs? Question is, where do you draw the line? I draw it at self-propelled vehicles or on foot. As soon as you start accepting motor bikes, it won't be long before there's a push to turn MUPs into another traffic-jammed route. If you want to solve the world's transportation problems, do so at someone else's expense. Take away a lane on the road or expand the roads. It's already happening, so get used to it.
|
Feed the troll and the troll gathers energy. :)
|
Very interesting report! I'd like to add an e-assist cargo bike at some point myself. I don't need one for commuting, but with a capable enough bike I could dramatically reduce the need to use a car for some things and that's a big enough win in my books.
My big problem at present is storage. I really don't have anywhere practical to keep a large, heavy bike. |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19409312)
Well, I'm sure we can find a way to add some pedals to a self-driving e-car to satisfy your concerns. The car won't move unless you are turning some pedals to generate one watt. You can sit there and text and watch youtube while getting a slight workout. Think how green that is, and eco-friendly, and how the planet will benefit. One less car on the road and all. Everything you are advocating can be accomplished without turning our precious MUPs into an e-bike thruway. It's sad that someone who bikes, apparently on MUPs also, is so eager to throw away a valuable sanctuary.
|
Originally Posted by winston63
(Post 19409351)
Very interesting report! I'd like to add an e-assist cargo bike at some point myself. I don't need one for commuting, but with a capable enough bike I could dramatically reduce the need to use a car for some things and that's a big enough win in my books.
My big problem at present is storage. I really don't have anywhere practical to keep a large, heavy bike. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:36 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.