![]() |
Originally Posted by 350htrr
(Post 19407457)
You just got's to ignore it... alan s & others of his ilk did the same thing to a thread I started in the touring forum... E-Bike touring is not bicycle touring, get a motorbike, you cheated, Your E-Bike tour belongs in the E-Bike forum :rolleyes:
Do not feed trolls. |
Are we talking e-bikes or e-assist bikes? They are two different animals with different laws. I'm not sure, but it looks like in Minnesota if it is not an e-assist it is considered a motorized bicycle and you're supposed to have a license. But an e-assist is considered a bicycle.
|
Originally Posted by steve0257
(Post 19407737)
Are we talking e-bikes or e-assist bikes? They are two different animals with different laws. I'm not sure, but it looks like in Minnesota if it is not an e-assist it is considered a motorized bicycle and you're supposed to have a license. But an e-assist is considered a bicycle.
BOTH types "are" assisting you to get up that hill... It's the way things work. ;) and OK, technically, mechanical assistance IS different than motor assistance, but they both have the same "effect" they get you up the hill easier, than without... :innocent: |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19407158)
Did I write that somewhere? BTW, you don't need to add your name after your question.
Still one of my favorite bikes in all the forums: http://www.bikeforums.net/commuting/...ter-build.html |
Originally Posted by steve0257
(Post 19407737)
Are we talking e-bikes or e-assist bikes? They are two different animals with different laws. I'm not sure, but it looks like in Minnesota if it is not an e-assist it is considered a motorized bicycle and you're supposed to have a license. But an e-assist is considered a bicycle.
Unfortunately some feel compelled to punish safe, respectful, legal e-cyclists for the misdeeds of a few to protect their delicate sensibilities. |
You would think more people would be accepting of e-assist bikes. I mean, they are even (allegedly) being used in the pro peloton! If the pros are doing it, it's good for all of us, right?
Anyway, I don't see how your commute in Washington State hurts others commutes a continent away. People should just do their thing and not worry about what other people are doing |
A guy on an e-bike has been passing me safely for years on the biggest hill of my commute without the slightest hint of an issue as the speed differential is about 4 mph. The bike lanes, MUT, and sidewalk I use on my commute get me through areas where riding on the road isn't wise for any type of bike.
Would it really make you happy to force safe, respectful, legal cyclists like myself to ride in dangerous conditions, in pain, or give up bike commuting entirely? |
Originally Posted by kickstart
(Post 19406110)
I can't say e-bikes "appeal" to me either, my passion is still for regular bikes, its simply a practical answer to my particular everyday transportation needs. My commute is 16 miles RT with a 1200' gain in elevation. I've wanted a long tail cargo bike for a long time, but knew it simply wouldn't work for me without the assist.
Originally Posted by Leebo
(Post 19407019)
Are ebikes allowed on the DC mups? Or don't like being passed? My ego is not that fragile. The few that I see on the Boston mups are not going that much faster, if at all, than everybody else. My am stretch out of Arlington sees lots of kids, bikes, peds and dog walkers. Lots of traffic, every one seems to stay right and get along fine. Ya know, share and care :)
|
Originally Posted by autonomy
(Post 19408625)
How heavy is that, with the battery and all? Unless you roll it into your garage, seems like it would be too heavy to carry
|
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19408351)
Appreciate the shout out on the Lynskey. Reminds me to update that thread with some recent changes.
I agree there are lots of issues, not just with cyclists, but all MUP users, that could be addressed. The extreme outliers should be aware they are making the situation more dangerous and unpleasant for all. I put e-bikes in that extreme, particularly on uphills, where let's say, the average cyclist is riding at 12 mph, and the e-bike is passing everyone at 20 mph. Using the MUPs to get around traffic and cheat the system is really unfair to those using the MUPs as intended. |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19409164)
So I guess you wouldn't have a problem with self-driving e-cars on the MUPs? Question is, where do you draw the line? I draw it at self-propelled vehicles or on foot. As soon as you start accepting motor bikes, it won't be long before there's a push to turn MUPs into another traffic-jammed route. If you want to solve the world's transportation problems, do so at someone else's expense. Take away a lane on the road or expand the roads. It's already happening, so get used to it.
|
Feed the troll and the troll gathers energy. :)
|
Very interesting report! I'd like to add an e-assist cargo bike at some point myself. I don't need one for commuting, but with a capable enough bike I could dramatically reduce the need to use a car for some things and that's a big enough win in my books.
My big problem at present is storage. I really don't have anywhere practical to keep a large, heavy bike. |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19409312)
Well, I'm sure we can find a way to add some pedals to a self-driving e-car to satisfy your concerns. The car won't move unless you are turning some pedals to generate one watt. You can sit there and text and watch youtube while getting a slight workout. Think how green that is, and eco-friendly, and how the planet will benefit. One less car on the road and all. Everything you are advocating can be accomplished without turning our precious MUPs into an e-bike thruway. It's sad that someone who bikes, apparently on MUPs also, is so eager to throw away a valuable sanctuary.
|
Originally Posted by winston63
(Post 19409351)
Very interesting report! I'd like to add an e-assist cargo bike at some point myself. I don't need one for commuting, but with a capable enough bike I could dramatically reduce the need to use a car for some things and that's a big enough win in my books.
My big problem at present is storage. I really don't have anywhere practical to keep a large, heavy bike. |
Originally Posted by winston63
(Post 19409351)
Very interesting report! I'd like to add an e-assist cargo bike at some point myself. I don't need one for commuting, but with a capable enough bike I could dramatically reduce the need to use a car for some things and that's a big enough win in my books.
My big problem at present is storage. I really don't have anywhere practical to keep a large, heavy bike. |
Originally Posted by Leebo
(Post 19409390)
I never thought of a public domain MUP as a sanctuary. Interesting. Precious 8-10' wide pavement? Hmmmm. I commuted about 2,100 bike miles this last year. More on day trips, mt biking and touring. Sad? Folks who are so narrow minded about the bright future of transportation. That doesn't involve a gas engine. Wait till the regen able motors for bikes get here, just pedaling will charge them up. Whooot. I guess you never pedal on the road? The Fred reference was to Fred Flintstone. Ya know, a pedal car. Use any dyno hubs on your tours? Same thing, no? I don't text and drive or text and pedal, only air guitar. Van Halen, really loud singing off key, every one gets outta my way. Really.
|
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19408351)
Appreciate the shout out on the Lynskey. Reminds me to update that thread with some recent changes.
I agree there are lots of issues, not just with cyclists, but all MUP users, that could be addressed. The extreme outliers should be aware they are making the situation more dangerous and unpleasant for all. I put e-bikes in that extreme, particularly on uphills, where let's say, the average cyclist is riding at 12 mph, and the e-bike is passing everyone at 20 mph. Using the MUPs to get around traffic and cheat the system is really unfair to those using the MUPs as intended. I've never considered that you could "cheat" at commuting (didn't realize I was in a competition.) Per the laws in my State and community, riding an ebike on the MUP is within the intent. An ebike such as mine is classified as a bicycle, not a motor vehicle per State law. |
The basic problem is speed differential. It doesn’t matter whether the faster MUP traveler is running or riding a bike; if the speed difference it too great (whatever that might mean) --- there will be conflict.
When I ride on a MUP, I consider everyone I approach from behind to be completely unaware of me and act accordingly (i.e. I go slow and announce my presence). I also act as though some of them are self-involved folks who are at least one standard deviation down on the IQ scale. ;o) Joe |
Originally Posted by Leebo
(Post 19409399)
I think the e cargo bikes are great for the shopping, groceries and bulk kind of stuff, kids as well. So no garage? Storage shed? Rent one when needed? Do a bike share with a small group of friends? All kinds of solutions these days.
|
Originally Posted by InTheRain
(Post 19409475)
Per the laws in my State and community, riding an ebike on the MUP is within the intent. An ebike such as mine is classified as a bicycle, not a motor vehicle per State law.
No question that the e-bikes tend to go much faster than I'm capable of, but then again a large number of roadies go faster than me as well. |
Originally Posted by kickstart
(Post 19409449)
My Radwagon is rather compact for a cargo bike, it's only 4 inches longer than my classic Dutch bike, and 7 inches longer than my trekking bike. It's an excellent replacement for a car, I only drive my wife's car maybe a dozen times a year, and it will probably be able to eliminate any need to drive it. I've also noticed that motorists seem to be more accommodating when I'm riding it , but I hesitate to speculate why.
|
Originally Posted by InTheRain
(Post 19409475)
Per the laws in my State and community, riding an ebike on the MUP is within the intent. An ebike such as mine is classified as a bicycle, not a motor vehicle per State law.
MUPs in my area are operated by the parks district and the vehicle code doesn't apply. But e-bikes are prohibited by the park rules. |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19408351)
Appreciate the shout out on the Lynskey. Reminds me to update that thread with some recent changes.
I agree there are lots of issues, not just with cyclists, but all MUP users, that could be addressed. The extreme outliers should be aware they are making the situation more dangerous and unpleasant for all. I put e-bikes in that extreme, particularly on uphills, where let's say, the average cyclist is riding at 12 mph, and the e-bike is passing everyone at 20 mph. Using the MUPs to get around traffic and cheat the system is really unfair to those using the MUPs as intended. |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19409342)
I think a troll is someone who posts nonsense just to get a rise out of someone. Like you are doing right now.
A troll is someone who goes into a thread and picks an argument with each and every person who does not agree with their point of view, and just works continuously to create havic in the thread. A troll is someone who goes into a thread and continues to post comments that are not related to the OP. You have done both of these, over and over. I was attempting to get folks to stop feeding you, but I too have fallen into the trap of feeding the troll. I doubt that you will provide a serious answer to my comment. However, if you look at your behavior in this thread, you fit the definition of a troll. Your dislike of ebikes could be your own thread, but instead you are doing everything you can to damage someone else's thread, and have not made a single meaningful comment related to the OP. |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19409837)
This is a forum, the last time I checked. People have different points of view. If you go back and read the original post, especially the last part, you may need to rethink your position. Ask yourself, aside from trolling, what was your contribution? Shouting down someone who disagrees with you is the lowest form of debate. Name calling is the 2nd lowest.
|
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 19409837)
This is a forum, the last time I checked. People have different points of view. If you go back and read the original post, especially the last part, you may need to rethink your position. Ask yourself, aside from trolling, what was your contribution? Shouting down someone who disagrees with you is the lowest form of debate. Name calling is the 2nd lowest.
|
Originally Posted by kickstart
(Post 19409960)
I started this thread to highlight a benefit of commuting on an E-bike, NOT TO DEBATE WHERE THEY MAY BE ALLOWED. You're being a self centered, disrespectful troll, If you can't show some common courtesy by staying on topic, start your own thread.
|
This thread is about the unexpected benefits of commuting by e-bike. It is not an appropriate thread to debate the use of bikes on MUPs. If you would like to debate that, start your own thread.
alan s, please leave this thread. |
Originally Posted by Kindaslow
(Post 19410024)
Like you, I have been totally a surprised by the good workout, and needed to do this to save my knees. A friend who raced MTBs on the world circuit level was loaned an emtb, he was surprised by the workout and how fun it is I got to ride that bike, and agreed with him. Being able to use 4 levels of assist make it possible and practical.
The decision the get an e-bike was difficult for me. Besides being a major purchase for our budget, I was really concerned I would still be getting less exercise than I need, but I really didn't want to give up bike commuting completely so I took the leap. It was a real revelation that not only was that concern unfounded, it was 180 degrees off. Getting an e-bike has been one of the best transportation choices I have ever made, and feel a little bit foolish that I let misinformation and peer pressure put it off so long. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:07 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.