Bike Lane Danger?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Back-of-beyond, Kootenays, BC
Posts: 741
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Exp ert Road and Specialized Stump Jumper FS Mountain; De Vinci Caribou touring, Intense Tracer T275c, Cramerotti, Specialized Allez, Condor
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 162 Post(s)
Liked 89 Times
in
53 Posts
Bike Lane Danger?
Interesting article on the inherent risk of bike lanes:
Lawrence Solomon: Rip out the bike lanes ? before more innocent people get hurt | Financial Post
Lawrence Solomon: Rip out the bike lanes ? before more innocent people get hurt | Financial Post
#3
Banned
This is idiotic. Just build bike lanes correctly and none of those "problems" are "problems."
#4
Senior Member
Bike lane fear from a paid AGW denier.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18319 Post(s)
Liked 4,487 Times
in
3,337 Posts
Keep in mind that inexperienced cyclists gain experience by being on the road. Keep their bikes parked in the garage, and they'll always be inexperienced cyclists.
Of all accident types, the "overtaking" accidents are the most likely to be fatal. So, if one looks only at total accidents, the seriousness of the overtake accidents will be under-represented. Of course, the true picture of accidents should look at fatal&serious plus minor (reportable?) accidents.
Another thing about the overtake accidents is that they become much worse at night (with poor lighting). Ride where the cars don't drive, and the invisible rider may survive with cars passing not seeing the person. Ride in the middle of where cars are driving, and the invisible rider at night becomes bug-splat on a bumper.
Here is a New York study in which only ONE fatality occurred inside a bicycle lane (out of 225 in the study), and only ten that were near a bicycle lane (including 3 that didn't include motor vehicles).
https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/download...fatalities.pdf
It is hard to argue the dangers of the bike lanes when < 1% of the fatalities occur in bike lanes, and < 5% occur near the bike lanes.
Of all accident types, the "overtaking" accidents are the most likely to be fatal. So, if one looks only at total accidents, the seriousness of the overtake accidents will be under-represented. Of course, the true picture of accidents should look at fatal&serious plus minor (reportable?) accidents.
Another thing about the overtake accidents is that they become much worse at night (with poor lighting). Ride where the cars don't drive, and the invisible rider may survive with cars passing not seeing the person. Ride in the middle of where cars are driving, and the invisible rider at night becomes bug-splat on a bumper.
Here is a New York study in which only ONE fatality occurred inside a bicycle lane (out of 225 in the study), and only ten that were near a bicycle lane (including 3 that didn't include motor vehicles).
https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/download...fatalities.pdf
It is hard to argue the dangers of the bike lanes when < 1% of the fatalities occur in bike lanes, and < 5% occur near the bike lanes.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 223
Bikes: Marinoni Piuma, Tricross Elite, Tricross Sport (*R.I.P), Mikado DeChamplain
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Solomon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Probe
"After its separation and incorporation, and led from then on by Lawrence Solomon, EPRF began to accept funding from the oil and gas industry, and, in 1983, began a campaign "to educate Canadians to the social, environmental and economic benefits of less regulation in the petroleum field.""
Less bike commuting means more cars which burns more oil. Profit!
This is sleazy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Probe
"After its separation and incorporation, and led from then on by Lawrence Solomon, EPRF began to accept funding from the oil and gas industry, and, in 1983, began a campaign "to educate Canadians to the social, environmental and economic benefits of less regulation in the petroleum field.""
Less bike commuting means more cars which burns more oil. Profit!
This is sleazy.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 223
Bikes: Marinoni Piuma, Tricross Elite, Tricross Sport (*R.I.P), Mikado DeChamplain
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Damn it, I used to order from Green Beanery (Toronto) , well forget that now. To think I funded an anti-bike organization...
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,787
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 522 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3228 Post(s)
Liked 3,853 Times
in
1,436 Posts
I do think there are in many situations better infrastructure choices than bike lanes, but I also think that bike lanes are much better than just throwing people into busy lanes that must be shared with cars and trucks. Bike lanes seem to work better in the suburbs than they do in the city. In the city more planning is required for proper bike lane deployment.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I almost clicked through just to see what argument could possibly be made against bike lanes, then I thought better of it. There are some cyclists here in the Portland area who are against bike lanes. They're usually the same people who are against helmets (not just against requiring helmets but actually against helmets). I find that I'm much happier if I don't try to engage their arguments.
I do think there are in many situations better infrastructure choices than bike lanes, but I also think that bike lanes are much better than just throwing people into busy lanes that must be shared with cars and trucks. Bike lanes seem to work better in the suburbs than they do in the city. In the city more planning is required for proper bike lane deployment.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,541
Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 978 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
395 Posts
I hate to say it, but I almost think it would be better (in this location) to remove the bollards and leave the painted lines, plow the lanes and (hopefully) have better enforcement.
Steve
EDIT: Sorry... I don't know why the images are rotated.
#12
Banned
#13
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,424
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times
in
127 Posts
My city (Novi Sad, Serbia, Former-Yugoslavia, Europe, 3rd rock from the Sun... ) has lots of separate bicycle roads. It is a great thing for begginner cyclists. However, intersections of those lanes over roads is a very dangerous place. Most were well designed, but in the last few decades, it has all gone to hell - no planning. So now we have newspaper stands with windows opening over a bicycle road. Caffee "gardens" taking 90% of the sidewalk, so pedestrians use the bike-road for walking. Large boards with advertisments just before an intersection of bicycle road and the car roads - so the view is blocked both ways. I prefer using the road (even though the law says to use bike lane/road whenever it is available).
Still, for begginner cyclists, it's a good place.
Bike lane on a car-road? We have a few, with car parking next to the lane often. Guess it's still safer for inexperienced cyclists than just riding on the road though.
Here's what a good design with a bad implementation (law enforcement and planning) looks like (not my video):
Volume 2
I had read some studies that conclude that more bike lanes/paths usually result in more people riding bicycles - which results in motorists being more used to bikes, resulting in cyclists being a bit safer.
Still, for begginner cyclists, it's a good place.
Bike lane on a car-road? We have a few, with car parking next to the lane often. Guess it's still safer for inexperienced cyclists than just riding on the road though.
Here's what a good design with a bad implementation (law enforcement and planning) looks like (not my video):
Volume 2
I had read some studies that conclude that more bike lanes/paths usually result in more people riding bicycles - which results in motorists being more used to bikes, resulting in cyclists being a bit safer.
Last edited by Bike Gremlin; 01-03-18 at 05:46 AM.
#14
Banned
My city (Novi Sad, Serbia, Former-Yugoslavia, Europe, 3rd rock from the Sun... ) has lots of separate bicycle roads. It is a great thing for begginner cyclists. However, intersections of those lanes over roads is a very dangerous place. Most were well designed, but in the last few decades, it has all gone to hell - no planning. So now we have newspaper stands with windows opening over a bicycle road. Caffee "gardens" taking 90% of the sidewalk, so pedestrians use the bike-road for walking. Large boards with advertisments just before an intersection of bicycle road and the car roads - so the view is blocked both ways. I prefer using the road (even though the law says to use bike lane/road whenever it is available).
Still, for begginner cyclists, it's a good place.
Bike lane on a car-road? We have a few, with car parking next to the lane often. Guess it's still safer for inexperienced cyclists than just riding on the road though.
Here's what a good design with a bad implementation (law enforcement and planning) looks like (not my video):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kumLyiWkIoE
Volume 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBKLy7NVokE
I had read some studies that conclude that more bike lanes/paths usually result in more people riding bicycles - which results in motorists being more used to bikes, resulting in cyclists being a bit safer.
Still, for begginner cyclists, it's a good place.
Bike lane on a car-road? We have a few, with car parking next to the lane often. Guess it's still safer for inexperienced cyclists than just riding on the road though.
Here's what a good design with a bad implementation (law enforcement and planning) looks like (not my video):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kumLyiWkIoE
Volume 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBKLy7NVokE
I had read some studies that conclude that more bike lanes/paths usually result in more people riding bicycles - which results in motorists being more used to bikes, resulting in cyclists being a bit safer.
CPH:
Deutschland
#15
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,424
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times
in
127 Posts
It's not gotten any better, in spite a growing number of cyclists.
Some cities in my country (northern ones) have separate bike-lane traffic lights as well. There's also one such light in my city. It boils down to the green light (safe to start crossing) stays on longer for bicycles than it does for pedestrians.
What's the law in Germany - is using bike lanes/roads obligatory wherever they are present, or can you still choose to ride on the road?
What's the law in Germany - is using bike lanes/roads obligatory wherever they are present, or can you still choose to ride on the road?
#16
Banned
It's not gotten any better, in spite a growing number of cyclists.
Some cities in my country (northern ones) have separate bike-lane traffic lights as well. There's also one such light in my city. It boils down to the green light (safe to start crossing) stays on longer for bicycles than it does for pedestrians.
What's the law in Germany - is using bike lanes/roads obligatory wherever they are present, or can you still choose to ride on the road?
Some cities in my country (northern ones) have separate bike-lane traffic lights as well. There's also one such light in my city. It boils down to the green light (safe to start crossing) stays on longer for bicycles than it does for pedestrians.
What's the law in Germany - is using bike lanes/roads obligatory wherever they are present, or can you still choose to ride on the road?
Most of the time the infrastructure is clean and maintained.
There are a lot of split cycle/ped paths, however peds are extremely good about not being in the bike portion as they'll be responsible for any collision (damage to bike / injury issues). Same with the autos actually, in general it's quite collegial.
The further east one goes across the continent until the Urals, the nicer the people are but resources (time, space, infrastructure) are more scarce, which seems to cause issues (parking, petty theft, etc...)
#17
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,424
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times
in
127 Posts
In my country it's usually the driver's responsibility, no matter what happens. For a cyclist/pedestrian collision - the cyclist gets it. I had a situation:
Riding slowly on a separate bicycle lane. An elderly pedestrian runs for a bus, across the lane, jumping between a tree line, hitting me sideways (my upper body took most of the hit). He fell, and started shouting, crying. I had called an ambulance, they picked him to the hospital. Then came the police and took my data. Another cyclst, that was riding behind me, stopped to give his report to the police, of how it all happened. There was no way for me to see, or avoid the pedestrian.
I was then taken to the hospital along with the bike Blood was taken, to test for alcohol. The final verdict was: if the pedestrian has any bones broken, the public prossecutor would press criminal charges against me, for causing "grevious bodily harm" - and I'd have to pay some good lawyers and forensics to avoid a severe fine. If there's no bones broken, then it's settled, no charges ?!?!?! From then on, I like bike lanes even less.
#18
Banned
In my country it's usually the driver's responsibility, no matter what happens. For a cyclist/pedestrian collision - the cyclist gets it. I had a situation:
Riding slowly on a separate bicycle lane. An elderly pedestrian runs for a bus, across the lane, jumping between a tree line, hitting me sideways (my upper body took most of the hit). He fell, and started shouting, crying. I had called an ambulance, they picked him to the hospital. Then came the police and took my data. Another cyclst, that was riding behind me, stopped to give his report to the police, of how it all happened. There was no way for me to see, or avoid the pedestrian.
I was then taken to the hospital along with the bike Blood was taken, to test for alcohol. The final verdict was: if the pedestrian has any bones broken, the public prossecutor would press criminal charges against me, for causing "grevious bodily harm" - and I'd have to pay some good lawyers and forensics to avoid a severe fine. If there's no bones broken, then it's settled, no charges ?!?!?! From then on, I like bike lanes even less.
Having said that, there's no medical bills to pay (everyone is fully insured unless they make over a certain amount €70k/year and opt out). Also, everyone has liability (Haftpflichtversicherung) so that would cover the cost of the bicycle part from the pedestrian, but their insurance would increase.
#19
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
We don't have any bike lanes around my area to like or dislike. Ride/share the road. I imagine plenty of areas are like this.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Keep in mind that inexperienced cyclists gain experience by being on the road. Keep their bikes parked in the garage, and they'll always be inexperienced cyclists.
Of all accident types, the "overtaking" accidents are the most likely to be fatal. So, if one looks only at total accidents, the seriousness of the overtake accidents will be under-represented. Of course, the true picture of accidents should look at fatal&serious plus minor (reportable?) accidents.
Another thing about the overtake accidents is that they become much worse at night (with poor lighting). Ride where the cars don't drive, and the invisible rider may survive with cars passing not seeing the person. Ride in the middle of where cars are driving, and the invisible rider at night becomes bug-splat on a bumper.
Here is a New York study in which only ONE fatality occurred inside a bicycle lane (out of 225 in the study), and only ten that were near a bicycle lane (including 3 that didn't include motor vehicles).
https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/download...fatalities.pdf
It is hard to argue the dangers of the bike lanes when < 1% of the fatalities occur in bike lanes, and < 5% occur near the bike lanes.
Of all accident types, the "overtaking" accidents are the most likely to be fatal. So, if one looks only at total accidents, the seriousness of the overtake accidents will be under-represented. Of course, the true picture of accidents should look at fatal&serious plus minor (reportable?) accidents.
Another thing about the overtake accidents is that they become much worse at night (with poor lighting). Ride where the cars don't drive, and the invisible rider may survive with cars passing not seeing the person. Ride in the middle of where cars are driving, and the invisible rider at night becomes bug-splat on a bumper.
Here is a New York study in which only ONE fatality occurred inside a bicycle lane (out of 225 in the study), and only ten that were near a bicycle lane (including 3 that didn't include motor vehicles).
https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/download...fatalities.pdf
It is hard to argue the dangers of the bike lanes when < 1% of the fatalities occur in bike lanes, and < 5% occur near the bike lanes.
#21
Banned
Interesting findings. Note the huge proportion of crashes that happen at intersections vs. mid-block. I'd be willing to bet that most of those were cyclists filtering traffic and trying to blow through a red light, or coming up along the right side of turning cars, or salmoning where a motorist is turning out and not looking towards their right.
#22
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times
in
1,574 Posts
Interesting article on the inherent risk of bike lanes:
Lawrence Solomon: Rip out the bike lanes ? before more innocent people get hurt | Financial Post
Lawrence Solomon: Rip out the bike lanes ? before more innocent people get hurt | Financial Post
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
or, you know, don't pass stopped traffic only to make them have to pass you again. That's a d*ck move.
#24
Banned
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
which is why I hate bike boxes. Forcing motorists to negotiate passing the same cyclists again and again and again is really dumb. Oh there's a cycle lane you say? Well all those people in that bike box will NOT move immediately into the cycle lane, nor would they all fit. I know what London cycle lanes and bike boxes look like. And they're ridiculous.