Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Tire pressure in Nashbar 700x28C Tires?

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Tire pressure in Nashbar 700x28C Tires?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-18, 09:37 PM
  #1  
Very Slow Rider
Thread Starter
 
davei1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274

Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times in 101 Posts
Tire pressure in Nashbar 700x28C Tires?

Thought I would keep with the theme of ultra-controversial topics:

I just got my Nashbar tires in the mail - they're 700x28C (28x622).

What tire pressure should I be running?

Here are my vitals-

- I weight 173lbs and dropping
- My backpack (which I ALWAYS have) is 10-15 lbs (I need to carry my laptop with me and it's a boat anchor)
- Bike weighs 19lbs with my duck bill fender, lights, cyclocomputer and emergency kit, soaking wet
- I commute on paved roads and pathways, gravel encounters are rare

According to the Michelin table I found on the internet, I should be running max pressure which is 100 psi in these tires.

I have heard of people running lower pressure in the front because less weight is on the front.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
NashbarTire.jpg (828.7 KB, 175 views)
davei1980 is offline  
Old 02-03-18, 10:12 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Weight distribution on road bikes is 40-60 front/back, or 45-55 if you're more upright. Tire pressure can be set at the same percentages.

Even at 200-205 pounds I wouldn't run the 28's at 100 psi. 85-90 probably.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 02-04-18, 05:24 AM
  #3  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
+1, I'd be using 70/85psi at that weight.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 02-04-18, 08:33 AM
  #4  
Very Slow Rider
Thread Starter
 
davei1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274

Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times in 101 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
+1, I'd be using 70/85psi at that weight.
The sidewall says 80psi min.

You still maintain your position or would you up it to 80-85?
davei1980 is offline  
Old 02-04-18, 08:56 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by davei1980
The sidewall says 80psi min.

You still maintain your position or would you up it to 80-85?
I'd trust him over the sidewall. TBH, my 28's right now have about 60 front 70 back - time for an air-up. I have no issues at that pressure (weighing about 20 pounds less than you).

Generally you want just enough air to avoid pinch flats and feeling squirrely on fast corners, and not so low that the tire has more drag. There is a variable depending on how you ride - if you jump off curbs or hop over potholes for instance you'd probably want higher pressure. But lower gives us a better ride and less rolling resistance in some conditions, which is kind of the point of 28's. Even below the sidewall rating, for me, is no problem.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 02-04-18, 11:21 AM
  #6  
Very Slow Rider
Thread Starter
 
davei1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274

Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times in 101 Posts
Thanks guys!! I am anxious to learn more about the science surrounding the relationship between psi and rolling resistance!!
davei1980 is offline  
Old 02-04-18, 11:44 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
wsgts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 251

Bikes: 2018 Specialized AWOL, 2013 Surly Pacer, 2011 Raleigh One-Way, 1973 Raleigh Super Course, 2020 Surly Big Dummy

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 21 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
I'd trust him over the sidewall. TBH, my 28's right now have about 60 front 70 back - time for an air-up. I have no issues at that pressure (weighing about 20 pounds less than you).

Generally you want just enough air to avoid pinch flats and feeling squirrely on fast corners, and not so low that the tire has more drag. There is a variable depending on how you ride - if you jump off curbs or hop over potholes for instance you'd probably want higher pressure. But lower gives us a better ride and less rolling resistance in some conditions, which is kind of the point of 28's. Even below the sidewall rating, for me, is no problem.
I have 28s on my primary commuter and typically have 100 in the front and 130 in the rear. I am at 260, plus have a rivbike under seat bag (guess would be another 10 pounds for that). My sidewall says max pressure 100psi but have had no issues at 130 in the rear. At your weight, 100 psi would probably feel very hard over any bumps you may encounter. So +1 for not necessarily trusting sidewalls.

Most people simply put the max pressure in without any consideration to what they are doing or how much weight will be hauling. That what most bikes shops do in my area as well.
wsgts is offline  
Old 02-04-18, 12:56 PM
  #8  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by davei1980
The sidewall says 80psi min.

You still maintain your position or would you up it to 80-85?
I'm standing pat! None of my front wheels are over the "minimum pressure" recommendation, if given. All that they are is a customer satisfaction dodge -- they don't want people to come back and complain if they get pinch flats or sidewall damage from running the tires too low. But the amount of pressure to achieve 15% drop has never led to any issues for me.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 02-04-18, 09:53 PM
  #9  
Very Slow Rider
Thread Starter
 
davei1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274

Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times in 101 Posts
This discussion of weight and pressure makes me wonder- what is the max weight of a bike? I have a coworker who’s easily holding down 300, he’s young and active and I think I can get him to ride if I could convince him the bike will hold him.

Is this possible? What does it take-
Smaller wheels? Greater spoke count?
davei1980 is offline  
Old 02-05-18, 07:13 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Stormsedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 678

Bikes: 2017 Trek Domane SL6 Disc, 1990 Schwinn Crosscut Frankenroadbike, 2015 KHS Team 29 FS, 2000 Gary Fisher Tassajara--gone but not forgotten

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 155 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times in 30 Posts
I run my 28s at 80-90...no issues. My weight about the same as yours given your backpack and gear.
Stormsedge is offline  
Old 02-05-18, 08:11 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times in 2,342 Posts
fwiw, went out on my road bike which has 25mm tires this weekend. pumped 90 up front & let the pump burp so it had less. the rear got 100 w a little less after removing the chuck. seemed good for me w me, gear & bike weighing approx 250lbs. I've ridden w the tires harder, but the roads right now are cr*p
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 02-05-18, 01:13 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by davei1980
Thanks guys!! I am anxious to learn more about the science surrounding the relationship between psi and rolling resistance!!
I run my 28's at 70 front 90 rear
or on gravel (or tubeless) 50 front 65 rear.

Good topic for studying up on!

Google: bicycle quarterly tire pressure
and maybe read some of the tests here: https://www.bicyclerollingresistance...d-bike-reviews

What is interesting is that wider tires have less resistance (all other things being equal). That is balanced a bit by the fact they have extra weight. I was shocked to purchase some 60mm tires that have less rolling resistance than my 23/25mm race tires. Its kinda cool!

Cross racers run a course dropping pressure, until they hit the rim, and then put a little PSI back in.

If I do that with inner tubes, I get pinch flats. But I'll do that running tubeless.
chas58 is offline  
Old 02-05-18, 01:19 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by davei1980
This discussion of weight and pressure makes me wonder- what is the max weight of a bike? I have a coworker who’s easily holding down 300, he’s young and active and I think I can get him to ride if I could convince him the bike will hold him.

Is this possible? What does it take-
Smaller wheels? Greater spoke count?
More tire pressure?

I have a bike that has a 120kg (264lb) weight limit. But that is a light racing bike. Get a good solid steel frame bike and you can probably do anything. I do have a tandem that is a bit over built (compared to a single). It has a beefy fork and 36spoke wheels. It depends of course a bit on how you are riding it. Bigger tires (well, more than 25mm) are going to help as there is less of a chance of bottoming out and pinch flatting. That tire pressure chart I mentioned above goes up to 154lbs per wheel (covering your friend's needs).

If my brother and myself can ride a fully loaded tandem, I wouldn't worry too much if you have a decent bike in good shape.
chas58 is offline  
Old 02-05-18, 03:02 PM
  #14  
Very Slow Rider
Thread Starter
 
davei1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274

Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times in 101 Posts
Originally Posted by chas58
More tire pressure?

I have a bike that has a 120kg (264lb) weight limit. But that is a light racing bike. Get a good solid steel frame bike and you can probably do anything. I do have a tandem that is a bit over built (compared to a single). It has a beefy fork and 36spoke wheels. It depends of course a bit on how you are riding it. Bigger tires (well, more than 25mm) are going to help as there is less of a chance of bottoming out and pinch flatting. That tire pressure chart I mentioned above goes up to 154lbs per wheel (covering your friend's needs).

If my brother and myself can ride a fully loaded tandem, I wouldn't worry too much if you have a decent bike in good shape.
Nashbar has great deals sometimes on steel frames set up for 26" wheels - sounds like my next build! now I just have to convince him to ride to work with me!
davei1980 is offline  
Old 02-05-18, 03:56 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 60
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I've actually never even considered running anything less than max pressure on theory that "more is better" (at reducing rolling resistance), so this is very interesting! Do you run lower pressure primarily for ride comfort?
mc510 is offline  
Old 02-05-18, 04:25 PM
  #16  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by mc510
I've actually never even considered running anything less than max pressure on theory that "more is better" (at reducing rolling resistance), so this is very interesting! Do you run lower pressure primarily for ride comfort?
It turns out that the steel drum tests done in the 1980s that led to the "more pressure = less rolling resistance" mantra ignored a big source of energy loss -- vibrations in the rider's body. Quite a few watts can be lost by jiggling around on hard overinflated tires, so letting a little air out is not only more comfortable, but can get you to your destination feeling less spent.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 02-05-18, 04:57 PM
  #17  
Very Slow Rider
Thread Starter
 
davei1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274

Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times in 101 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
It turns out that the steel drum tests done in the 1980s that led to the "more pressure = less rolling resistance" mantra ignored a big source of energy loss -- vibrations in the rider's body. Quite a few watts can be lost by jiggling around on hard overinflated tires, so letting a little air out is not only more comfortable, but can get you to your destination feeling less spent.
A MAZ ING


Go easy on the 1980s- remember - this is the same decade that taught us to eat lo-fat. Nevermind the fact that the sugars used to replace fats in foods turns to fat the instant it's processed by your liver......
davei1980 is offline  
Old 02-05-18, 05:06 PM
  #18  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by davei1980
A MAZ ING

Go easy on the 1980s- remember - this is the same decade that taught us to eat lo-fat. Nevermind the fact that the sugars used to replace fats in foods turns to fat the instant it's processed by your liver......
To quote our President at the time, "mistakes were made."
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 02-05-18, 05:41 PM
  #19  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,461 Times in 1,433 Posts
There is a LOT of leeway with those sidewall pressure ratings. In fact, I don't even bother with them. I bet you could run 60 psi in the rear. See the chart here. Note that the weights are per wheel, not per bike.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 02-05-18, 06:24 PM
  #20  
Very Slow Rider
Thread Starter
 
davei1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274

Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times in 101 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
To quote our President at the time, "mistakes were made."
Exactly! The same decade which elected Reagan twice and Bush once!!! Unleashed a war on workers which we still haven’t recovered from
davei1980 is offline  
Old 02-05-18, 09:47 PM
  #21  
ambulatory senior
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times in 1,679 Posts
being a real stickler for tire pressure i generally inflate all of them to 100 psi and then forget for a month before i re-inflate.

works for me.
52telecaster is offline  
Old 02-06-18, 09:39 AM
  #22  
Very Slow Rider
Thread Starter
 
davei1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274

Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times in 101 Posts
Originally Posted by 52telecaster
being a real stickler for tire pressure i generally inflate all of them to 100 psi and then forget for a month before i re-inflate.

works for me.
I like it! It's like these debates over ideal tire/wheel sizes: they're all round, they all spin around a hub.....
davei1980 is offline  
Old 02-06-18, 11:55 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Abe_Froman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,524

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9347 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 51 Posts
I'm 190 and run 85 in the back, 75 front. I could probably drop it some, though streets aren't the best here and I do occasionally space out and go right into a pothole.

Don't worry about pressures listed on the sidewall, for all intents and purposes...they mean nothing.

Rolling resistance really is sort of a fascinating topic when you really dig into it. There are all sorts of variables involved, probably the most important of which is the specific tire you use, but generally, the gist of current research is saying that you really do not pay much of a penalty when using larger tires sizes.

This is especially important in the context of your 300lb friend. Get him bigger tires. Riding at 130psi to keep from getting pinch flats on skinny tires is no fun, especially if you've got 300 lbs jiggling around over every imperfection in the road. Some nice, flexible 40mm tires at 50psi will feel great, and be just as fast as your 28s, unless you guys are in the tour de france.
Abe_Froman is offline  
Old 02-06-18, 12:39 PM
  #24  
Very Slow Rider
Thread Starter
 
davei1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274

Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times in 101 Posts
Originally Posted by Abe_Froman
I'm 190 and run 85 in the back, 75 front. I could probably drop it some, though streets aren't the best here and I do occasionally space out and go right into a pothole.

Don't worry about pressures listed on the sidewall, for all intents and purposes...they mean nothing.

Rolling resistance really is sort of a fascinating topic when you really dig into it. There are all sorts of variables involved, probably the most important of which is the specific tire you use, but generally, the gist of current research is saying that you really do not pay much of a penalty when using larger tires sizes.

This is especially important in the context of your 300lb friend. Get him bigger tires. Riding at 130psi to keep from getting pinch flats on skinny tires is no fun, especially if you've got 300 lbs jiggling around over every imperfection in the road. Some nice, flexible 40mm tires at 50psi will feel great, and be just as fast as your 28s, unless you guys are in the tour de france.
Thanks! I am thinking a high quality, steel MTB frame set up for 26ers would be perfect - he can run wide tires/36h rims PLUS the standover is not high (kicking the leg over may be tough until he loses weight) and the riding position is upright (he carries all his weight in the front, leaving little pedaling room for his legs with his belly)


I am happy to build him a bike because he is still so young and active there's no reason for him to be unhealthy
davei1980 is offline  
Old 02-06-18, 12:48 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Abe_Froman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,524

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9347 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by davei1980
Thanks! I am thinking a high quality, steel MTB frame set up for 26ers would be perfect - he can run wide tires/36h rims PLUS the standover is not high (kicking the leg over may be tough until he loses weight) and the riding position is upright (he carries all his weight in the front, leaving little pedaling room for his legs with his belly)


I am happy to build him a bike because he is still so young and active there's no reason for him to be unhealthy
A MTB might even be a bit to aggressive. A hybrid would probably be great, cheap, and comfy riding position.

Just make sure you don't use old cheap/knobby MTB tires. Especially with a big heavy load...those things will be SLOWWWWW on pavement. Nice, fat, slick, fast tires IMO. I used voyager hypers, but those are 700c only I believe. Compass is great from what I hear, but very expensive; probably not a great invenstment for someone that might not stick with it. Panaracer paselas get great reviews, are cheap(ish), and come in fairly wide 26" sizes.
Abe_Froman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.