![]() |
Maybe, "Just stay off your cell phone while you drive and I'll be fine."
|
If it's a stranger, I would ask them something like "what kind of exercise do you do?" If they don't exercise, I say "If you have a family that needs you, don't you need to exercise instead of sitting most of the time".
If they think that's a stupid question, I respond with " I'm just responding to a stupid comment.". |
Originally Posted by Daniel4
(Post 20895593)
I would say a cyclist has 1/5the risk of fatality from those crazy drivers than another driver has.
|
Once in a while I hear similar concerns to the OP, and I'm happy to talk about the width of the bike lanes and zebra striping on my route, and how I'm riding the same roads at pretty much the same time every day with the same car-commuters, so they are used to seeing me, and how the real danger points are when bike lanes jump from the curb to the inside of right-turn lanes, but how I watch cars in my helmet mirror and very rarely see cars that race ahead of me to beat me into the right-turn lane, but almost always hang back and let me through, and, and, and
and they usually get tired before I do. |
I just say "It's not as dangerous as it looks from the outside".
|
Originally Posted by RubeRad
(Post 20897578)
?? How do you figure that?
|
Studies show that 73.4% of all statistics are made up on the spot
|
Originally Posted by wphamilton
(Post 20895370)
"I'm worried about you out there on a bike with all those crazy drivers and drunks?"
|
How do you respond to people who tell you, "I'm worried about you out there on a bike with all those crazy drivers and drunks?" |
I just explain that my #1 priority every day is to make it home alive and all my riding decisions are based on that. If they want more I might go in to detail about my route and explain how I keep safe in the parts that involve automobile traffic.
|
Originally Posted by RubeRad
(Post 20897578)
?? How do you figure that?
Here's one I just found: https://www.consumerreports.org/tran...ay-fatalities/ 37,000 total for 2017 6000 pedestrians 840 bicycles And various reports from Copenhagen and Toronto show similar ratios. |
Originally Posted by Daniel4
(Post 20898151)
Various reports and links have been posted in BF in past years all indicating the annual road fatalities in the US are about 36,000. And that includes about 8000 for pedestrians and bicyclists combined.
Here's one I just found: https://www.consumerreports.org/tran...ay-fatalities/ 37,000 total for 2017 6000 pedestrians 840 bicycles And various reports from Copenhagen and Toronto show similar ratios. Also, there's no way that CPH has similar numbers, so post your source. edit: this is what you should've posted CORRECTION: This version has been updated to clarify that the U.S. highway fatality rate reported by NHTSA for 2016 was 1.18 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled. |
Originally Posted by Daniel4
(Post 20898151)
Various reports and links have been posted in BF in past years all indicating the annual road fatalities in the US are about 36,000. And that includes about 8000 for pedestrians and bicyclists combined.
Here's one I just found: https://www.consumerreports.org/tran...ay-fatalities/ 37,000 total for 2017 6000 pedestrians 840 bicycles And various reports from Copenhagen and Toronto show similar ratios. |
Originally Posted by gregf83
(Post 20898347)
There are less than 100 deaths per year worldwide in free-climbing. Does that mean it’s safer than cycling?
|
I've now got the perfect comeback -- although I don't recommend anyone else "qualify." According to my cardiologist, I'd be dead by now if it weren't for all the cycling (including commuting) I did over the previous 19 years. If a drunk kills me on my home today, I'll have lived two years and a bit longer after my heart attack than if I never got back on a bicycle.
Plus, I enjoyed my commute in today. Did you?
Originally Posted by CliffordK
(Post 20897728)
Please send me a text before you get in your car!
|
Originally Posted by acidfast7
(Post 20898226)
These ratios are meaningless unless they are adjusted for distance travelled, like an reputable analysis would perform.
There was an interesting thread a while back discussing the most meaningful way to statistically compare car and bike safety -- by distance or by time is I think the biggest question. Different metrics answer different questions. |
Originally Posted by pdlamb
(Post 20898637)
I enjoyed my commute in today. Did you?
|
Originally Posted by pdlamb
(Post 20898637)
I've now got the perfect comeback -- although I don't recommend anyone else "qualify." According to my cardiologist, I'd be dead by now if it weren't for all the cycling (including commuting) I did over the previous 19 years. If a drunk kills me on my home today, I'll have lived two years and a bit longer after my heart attack than if I never got back on a bicycle.
Plus, I enjoyed my commute in today. Did you? Another good response! |
Stay Off My Sidewalk & I'm good ..
|
Flying in space is the safest form of travel based on the number of deaths per mile. How does adding distance help? The Space Shuttle had a rate of 1 death in 38.7 million miles, but it is not considered particularly safe.
|
"so far, so good"
|
Originally Posted by acidfast7
(Post 20898352)
Depends on the distance travelled. It could be safer, in actuality.
|
Originally Posted by RubeRad
(Post 20897580)
Once in a while I hear similar concerns to the OP, and I'm happy to talk about the width of the bike lanes and zebra striping on my route, and how I'm riding the same roads at pretty much the same time every day with the same car-commuters, so they are used to seeing me, and how the real danger points are when bike lanes jump from the curb to the inside of right-turn lanes, but how I watch cars in my helmet mirror and very rarely see cars that race ahead of me to beat me into the right-turn lane, but almost always hang back and let me through, and, and, and
and they usually get tired before I do. Dat fookin geezer on da yello pushbike. |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 20898859)
Flying in space is the safest form of travel based on the number of deaths per mile. How does adding distance help? The Space Shuttle had a rate of 1 death in 38.7 million miles, but it is not considered particularly safe.
|
Originally Posted by Skipjacks
(Post 20899023)
Good enough for me! I'll take a space shuttle ride...or a soyez ride....whatever. I'm not picky. I just wanna go on a spaceship.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:10 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.