![]() |
Originally Posted by RubeRad
(Post 20973117)
lol the commuter's longstanding claim that wider/softer is better is finally the latest fad of the weight weenies
|
Originally Posted by acidfast7
(Post 20973124)
The original marathon is pretty much impossible to get in 23-622 any longer :/
|
Originally Posted by RubeRad
(Post 20973165)
With a tire that narrow, and a sidewall that thick, you might as well just go solid
Incidentally, I ordered the Marathon (not supremes) HS420's last night. They should be here next week |
So update...
I got the Marathon HS420's in 37-622 and they measure exactly 37mm when inflated Though I think I immediately regretted this when I put them on the bike. They look too thin, and ended up being thinner than the 37's I had on there. With the cheap suspension fork they look comically narrow. I'm wondering if I should have gone with the 40mm tires, now that we've removed fenders from the equation. They are slightly heavier, but would they ride better? Be slower? Would I even notice? I am overthinking this? |
Originally Posted by skipjacks
(Post 20987512)
so update...
I got the marathon hs420's in 37-622 and they measure exactly 37mm when inflated though i think i immediately regretted this when i put them on the bike. They look too thin, and ended up being thinner than the 37's i had on there. With the cheap suspension fork they look comically narrow. I'm wondering if i should have gone with the 40mm tires, now that we've removed fenders from the equation. They are slightly heavier, but would they ride better? Be slower? Would i even notice? I am overthinking this? |
Originally Posted by RidingMatthew
(Post 20987568)
yes:thumb:
|
[MENTION=468175]Skipjacks[/MENTION] you are over thinking it. you already have tires use them up and then get another pair later or get the tires and see which you like better.
|
I have been known to get into my own head at times.
|
Originally Posted by Skipjacks
(Post 20987512)
Though I think I immediately regretted this when I put them on the bike.
They look too thin, and ended up being thinner than the 37's I had on there. With the cheap suspension fork they look comically narrow. I've used 26x1.5" (32mm) treadless Nashbar Slick City tires to roadify a couple mountain bikes, and 'comically narrow' sounds about right. I have described it before as 'like a porn star -- shockingly bald down below' |
Originally Posted by RubeRad
(Post 20987938)
I forget, did you ever say what the bike is?
I've used 26x1.5" (32mm) treadless Nashbar Slick City tires to roadify a couple mountain bikes, and 'comically narrow' sounds about right. I have described it before as 'like a porn star -- shockingly bald down below' It came with 38-622's that are closer to 42mm I've had Michelin Proteks on it for about 2 years that are 37-622's but measure to 39mm, but are more rounded than the Marathons. The Marathons are more pointy across the tread, like the top curve of an egg vs the bottom curve of a egg if that makes any sense. So even though they are only 2mm thinner than the Michelin's they look tinier. I assume the pointer profile means the slick center on the tread will be the highest pressure spot on the ground, which is a good thing. It's probably part of the overall design to give the tire better rolling resistance. It just looked weird on the bike, especially in the suspension fork with arms as wide as the tire and lots of clearance space. hahaha (And I've been thinking about swapping out the suspension fork with a rigid fork anyway since I only use this bike as a commuter now) Whatever...they will probably expand out a little bit once I ride them. I didn't get a chance to test ride them today because I couldn't get the kids through breakfast in time to get out the door soon enough. So now I'm sitting here with fresh tires I haven't ridden on overthinking everything. |
Originally Posted by RubeRad
(Post 20987938)
I forget, did you ever say what the bike is?
I've used 26x1.5" (32mm) treadless Nashbar Slick City tires to roadify a couple mountain bikes, and 'comically narrow' sounds about right. I have described it before as 'like a porn star -- shockingly bald down below' |
Originally Posted by Skipjacks
(Post 20987512)
So update...
I'm wondering if I should have gone with the 40mm tires, now that we've removed fenders from the equation. They are slightly heavier, but would they ride better? Be slower? Would I even notice? I am overthinking this? |
42-->39-->37, I think you'll get used to it.
|
Originally Posted by RubeRad
(Post 20988427)
42-->39-->37, I think you'll get used to it.
Hate them. They sound like a hurricane and have the rolling resistance of dragging a cinder block behind me. (Pretty decent on hard pack gravel and crushed limestone and stuff like that though) They are a comfortable ride though, absorbing any bumps in the road nicely. Just slowly. The 39mm Michelin Protek were a great speedy ride. But I wore those down to the liner pretty quick. Like a few hundred miles quick. Nice ride but that wear was ridiculous. |
Apparently, the Marathon Plus is not a match for crappy UT roads. 3rd commute into work and I get a flat.
To be fair, I'm dodging debris all the way to work, every day. The next city over (Layton) does a pretty good job keeping their roads clean, but I bike through Clearfield and Syracuse, and it looks like a frat party just let out pretty much the entire way with broken bottles, and (probably the worse culprit) shreds of random car tires. Nice thing about a velomobile is that I don't actually have to remove the wheel to change the tire/tube. :) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.