Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Superflash vs. Blackburn 2.0 (or others); Which makes more sense? Which is better?

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Superflash vs. Blackburn 2.0 (or others); Which makes more sense? Which is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-07, 03:11 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, Maine USA
Posts: 779

Bikes: Trek 850 Antelope

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Superflash vs. Blackburn 2.0 (or others); Which makes more sense? Which is better?

I'm looking for a really good, really bright rear safety light as a Chrismas gift to my aunt. Besides being a commuter cyclist, she has some long distance experience, too. When she asked for a rear blinkie or safety light to attach to the back of her bicycle, I wasn't sure which type suited her needs the best. Was she referring to one of the smaller, brighter lights like the PB Superflash? Was she asking for something larger and dorky like the Blackburn Mars 2.0, or something else? I do know that she doen't have a rack on the back, nor does she do her riding at night.

Which would you recommend? Which makes more sense? Please give me your feedback. There isn't much time left.

Thank You,

Powerhouse

Last edited by powerhouse; 11-29-07 at 07:55 PM.
powerhouse is offline  
Old 11-29-07, 03:15 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
I have both and the Superflash is the brighter of the two.
fender1 is offline  
Old 11-29-07, 03:30 PM
  #3  
DNPAIMFB
 
pinkrobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, AB
Posts: 4,655

Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Superflash FTW!
pinkrobe is offline  
Old 11-29-07, 03:40 PM
  #4  
Sensible shoes.
 
CastIron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Paul,MN
Posts: 8,798

Bikes: A few.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have several of both. Both are good lights. The Superflash is hands down the best. Want a test? Tape one of each to a road sign post at night at look at 'em from two blocks away.
__________________
Mike
Originally Posted by cedricbosch
It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
Originally Posted by cedricbosch
Why am I in your signature.
CastIron is offline  
Old 11-29-07, 03:41 PM
  #5  
Body By Nintendo
 
Psydotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Videogames ruined my life. Good thing i have 2 extra lives.
Posts: 3,187

Bikes: Giant TCR2, Giant TCX, IRO BFSSFG SE, Salsa Casseroll, IRO Rob Roy.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Do her a favor and buy her two superflashes.
__________________

Originally Posted by jsharr
A girl once asked me to give her twelve inches and make it hurt. I had to make love to her 3 times and then punch her in the nose.
Psydotek is offline  
Old 11-29-07, 06:04 PM
  #6  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
The Superflash is brighter to the rear, and the Mars (the 3.0's even better) is a good side-facing light with its amber LEDs.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 12:33 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The Mars 3.0 is a pain due to the tiny screws which need to be removed to change the batteries.

The SuperFlash is good.

The best I've used is the new Cateye TL-1100. It's a lot more visible than the SF, especially during low light times such as dawn and dusk. It takes AA batteries and doesn't need any tools to change them.

BTW, I own and have used all the light mentioned above.
Cyclist0383 is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 03:10 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 1,213

Bikes: 09 Specialized Tricross Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Is it just me or is the SF mount really weak? I just bought a SF tonight, mounted it to my seatstay and when I clicked the light body into the mount, I found it was held there really weakly.. like it could pop out of its mount if I hit a sharp bump or something. I'm returning the thing for this reason but I wanted to see what others have to say.
thirdin77 is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 07:24 AM
  #9  
crash survivor
 
tate65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 654

Bikes: C-dale rush, Mountain cycle fury, Monocog 29er, Haro hard tail VX, Scattante R330

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you want a big bright light here is what I use, only this one is a rechargeable version . Its 4"x6" and bright as heck. Mine last about 30 hours on flash but if it was rechargeable I wouldn't have to worry

https://www.ledsafetylights.com/safet...p?ProductID=41
tate65 is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 08:09 AM
  #10  
Trans-Urban Velocommando
 
ax0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lenexa, KS
Posts: 2,400

Bikes: 06 Trek 1200 - 98 DB Outlook - 99 DB Sorrento

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ride with people that use the superflash, and I have the Mars 3.0. It's definitely brighter than the Mars 2.0, and definitely not as bright as the superflash, however in its own right, it's pretty bright. As mentioned prior, the amber side-facing LEDs give it good side visibility as well. The brightness difference isn't enough to make me ditch the Mars for a Superflash. My next tail light will be something ridiculously bright, like the DiNotte 140R
ax0n is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 09:43 AM
  #11  
dabbler
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ziemas
The best I've used is the new Cateye TL-1100. It's a lot more visible than the SF, especially during low light times such as dawn and dusk. It takes AA batteries and doesn't need any tools to change them.
Interesting, that's what I have, and assumed with all the talk of the PB Superflash, that it must be superior and I should get one (though perhaps I should have both).

You say "new" - has it changed? I've had mine a couple of years (or perhaps it's not a TL-1100, just looks the same).

I have problems with battery connections though - I'm planning to stick some magnets on my batteries to force a tight connection.
sping is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 10:08 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by sping
Interesting, that's what I have, and assumed with all the talk of the PB Superflash, that it must be superior and I should get one (though perhaps I should have both).

You say "new" - has it changed? I've had mine a couple of years (or perhaps it's not a TL-1100, just looks the same).

I have problems with battery connections though - I'm planning to stick some magnets on my batteries to force a tight connection.
The TL-1100 is a newer and much brighter version of the TL-1000, which is what you have. They look almost identical.
Cyclist0383 is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 11:32 AM
  #13  
DancesWithSUVs
 
dynaryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Griffin Cycle Bethesda,MD
Posts: 6,983
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by thirdin77
Is it just me or is the SF mount really weak? I just bought a SF tonight, mounted it to my seatstay and when I clicked the light body into the mount, I found it was held there really weakly.. like it could pop out of its mount if I hit a sharp bump or something. I'm returning the thing for this reason but I wanted to see what others have to say.
Have been using the seatpost mount for over a year on my daily commuter,as well as a couple other bikes. No probs. I have seen 2 or 3 Blackburn mounts break,however.
__________________

C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
dynaryder is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 11:52 AM
  #14  
sniffin' glue
 
zoltani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,177

Bikes: Surly crosscheck ssfg, Custom vintage french racing bike, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ziemas
The Mars 3.0 is a pain due to the tiny screws which need to be removed to change the batteries.

The SuperFlash is good.

The best I've used is the new Cateye TL-1100. It's a lot more visible than the SF, especially during low light times such as dawn and dusk. It takes AA batteries and doesn't need any tools to change them.

BTW, I own and have used all the light mentioned above.
+1
Imagine needing batteries while on a ride or commute and not having the tiny screwdriver needed to install the batteries. I had a mars 3.0, but someone stole it from my bike....maybe they did me a favor?
Now i am using the SF, and it is great.
That cateye is interesting, 10 LEDs! Never seen one except for in the packaging, but i imagine it is bright.
zoltani is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 11:57 AM
  #15  
Spinning @ 33 RPM
 
Glynis27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 747

Bikes: '89 Fuji Saratoga, '97 Schwinn Mesa SS, '07 Felt F1X, '10 Transition TransAM, '11 Soma Analog SS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I have a Mars 3.0 and have seen many people with the SF. The SF is a bit brighter from directly behind and the batteries are a bit easier to change. The Mars 3.0 however is bright from most angles and seems to be built a bit tougher IMHO. I have had it fall off my belt loop many times while going 20-30mph and it just slides down the road still flashing. It barely even gets scuffed.
Glynis27 is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 01:21 PM
  #16  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by zoltani
+1
Imagine needing batteries while on a ride or commute and not having the tiny screwdriver needed to install the batteries.
Yeah, that's true. It stays together better than a snap-together light, but it's correspondingly more difficult to open up once the time comes.

Really, the amber side lights are just about the only reason I still use it. I'm not aware of another blinky that has the same setup.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 02:59 PM
  #17  
crash survivor
 
tate65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 654

Bikes: C-dale rush, Mountain cycle fury, Monocog 29er, Haro hard tail VX, Scattante R330

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Our local commuter group is meeting Dec 14th to do some vidoe testing of a bunch of different front and rear lights. I'll post thoes results when we get them.
tate65 is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 04:29 PM
  #18  
DNPAIMFB
 
pinkrobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, AB
Posts: 4,655

Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thirdin77
Is it just me or is the SF mount really weak? I just bought a SF tonight, mounted it to my seatstay and when I clicked the light body into the mount, I found it was held there really weakly.. like it could pop out of its mount if I hit a sharp bump or something. I'm returning the thing for this reason but I wanted to see what others have to say.
I think it might just be you. I've used the SF and its predecessors for 4 [5? 6?] years, and have yet had one eject from the bracket. Winter, summer, on road or dirt - no problems.
pinkrobe is offline  
Old 11-30-07, 04:42 PM
  #19  
RacingBear
 
UmneyDurak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,053
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 280 Post(s)
Liked 68 Times in 36 Posts
Is Cateye TL-1100 available in the states? I tried to google for it and all the sites are in UK.
UmneyDurak is offline  
Old 12-01-07, 05:43 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by UmneyDurak
Is Cateye TL-1100 available in the states? I tried to google for it and all the sites are in UK.
Yes.

https://aebike.com/page.cfm?PageID=30...ils&sku=LT4070
Cyclist0383 is offline  
Old 12-01-07, 04:20 PM
  #21  
RacingBear
 
UmneyDurak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,053
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 280 Post(s)
Liked 68 Times in 36 Posts
Thanks!
UmneyDurak is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.