Superflash vs. Blackburn 2.0 (or others); Which makes more sense? Which is better?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, Maine USA
Posts: 779
Bikes: Trek 850 Antelope
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Superflash vs. Blackburn 2.0 (or others); Which makes more sense? Which is better?
I'm looking for a really good, really bright rear safety light as a Chrismas gift to my aunt. Besides being a commuter cyclist, she has some long distance experience, too. When she asked for a rear blinkie or safety light to attach to the back of her bicycle, I wasn't sure which type suited her needs the best. Was she referring to one of the smaller, brighter lights like the PB Superflash? Was she asking for something larger and dorky like the Blackburn Mars 2.0, or something else? I do know that she doen't have a rack on the back, nor does she do her riding at night.
Which would you recommend? Which makes more sense? Please give me your feedback. There isn't much time left.
Thank You,
Powerhouse
Which would you recommend? Which makes more sense? Please give me your feedback. There isn't much time left.
Thank You,
Powerhouse
Last edited by powerhouse; 11-29-07 at 07:55 PM.
#4
Sensible shoes.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Paul,MN
Posts: 8,798
Bikes: A few.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have several of both. Both are good lights. The Superflash is hands down the best. Want a test? Tape one of each to a road sign post at night at look at 'em from two blocks away.
#5
Body By Nintendo
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Videogames ruined my life. Good thing i have 2 extra lives.
Posts: 3,187
Bikes: Giant TCR2, Giant TCX, IRO BFSSFG SE, Salsa Casseroll, IRO Rob Roy.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#6
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
The Superflash is brighter to the rear, and the Mars (the 3.0's even better) is a good side-facing light with its amber LEDs.
#7
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The Mars 3.0 is a pain due to the tiny screws which need to be removed to change the batteries.
The SuperFlash is good.
The best I've used is the new Cateye TL-1100. It's a lot more visible than the SF, especially during low light times such as dawn and dusk. It takes AA batteries and doesn't need any tools to change them.
BTW, I own and have used all the light mentioned above.
The SuperFlash is good.
The best I've used is the new Cateye TL-1100. It's a lot more visible than the SF, especially during low light times such as dawn and dusk. It takes AA batteries and doesn't need any tools to change them.
BTW, I own and have used all the light mentioned above.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 1,213
Bikes: 09 Specialized Tricross Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Is it just me or is the SF mount really weak? I just bought a SF tonight, mounted it to my seatstay and when I clicked the light body into the mount, I found it was held there really weakly.. like it could pop out of its mount if I hit a sharp bump or something. I'm returning the thing for this reason but I wanted to see what others have to say.
#9
crash survivor
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 654
Bikes: C-dale rush, Mountain cycle fury, Monocog 29er, Haro hard tail VX, Scattante R330
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If you want a big bright light here is what I use, only this one is a rechargeable version . Its 4"x6" and bright as heck. Mine last about 30 hours on flash but if it was rechargeable I wouldn't have to worry
https://www.ledsafetylights.com/safet...p?ProductID=41
https://www.ledsafetylights.com/safet...p?ProductID=41
#10
Trans-Urban Velocommando
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lenexa, KS
Posts: 2,400
Bikes: 06 Trek 1200 - 98 DB Outlook - 99 DB Sorrento
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ride with people that use the superflash, and I have the Mars 3.0. It's definitely brighter than the Mars 2.0, and definitely not as bright as the superflash, however in its own right, it's pretty bright. As mentioned prior, the amber side-facing LEDs give it good side visibility as well. The brightness difference isn't enough to make me ditch the Mars for a Superflash. My next tail light will be something ridiculously bright, like the DiNotte 140R
#11
dabbler
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You say "new" - has it changed? I've had mine a couple of years (or perhaps it's not a TL-1100, just looks the same).
I have problems with battery connections though - I'm planning to stick some magnets on my batteries to force a tight connection.
#12
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Interesting, that's what I have, and assumed with all the talk of the PB Superflash, that it must be superior and I should get one (though perhaps I should have both).
You say "new" - has it changed? I've had mine a couple of years (or perhaps it's not a TL-1100, just looks the same).
I have problems with battery connections though - I'm planning to stick some magnets on my batteries to force a tight connection.
You say "new" - has it changed? I've had mine a couple of years (or perhaps it's not a TL-1100, just looks the same).
I have problems with battery connections though - I'm planning to stick some magnets on my batteries to force a tight connection.
#13
DancesWithSUVs
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Griffin Cycle Bethesda,MD
Posts: 6,983
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Is it just me or is the SF mount really weak? I just bought a SF tonight, mounted it to my seatstay and when I clicked the light body into the mount, I found it was held there really weakly.. like it could pop out of its mount if I hit a sharp bump or something. I'm returning the thing for this reason but I wanted to see what others have to say.
__________________
C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
#14
sniffin' glue
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,177
Bikes: Surly crosscheck ssfg, Custom vintage french racing bike, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The Mars 3.0 is a pain due to the tiny screws which need to be removed to change the batteries.
The SuperFlash is good.
The best I've used is the new Cateye TL-1100. It's a lot more visible than the SF, especially during low light times such as dawn and dusk. It takes AA batteries and doesn't need any tools to change them.
BTW, I own and have used all the light mentioned above.
The SuperFlash is good.
The best I've used is the new Cateye TL-1100. It's a lot more visible than the SF, especially during low light times such as dawn and dusk. It takes AA batteries and doesn't need any tools to change them.
BTW, I own and have used all the light mentioned above.
Imagine needing batteries while on a ride or commute and not having the tiny screwdriver needed to install the batteries. I had a mars 3.0, but someone stole it from my bike....maybe they did me a favor?
Now i am using the SF, and it is great.
That cateye is interesting, 10 LEDs! Never seen one except for in the packaging, but i imagine it is bright.
#15
Spinning @ 33 RPM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 747
Bikes: '89 Fuji Saratoga, '97 Schwinn Mesa SS, '07 Felt F1X, '10 Transition TransAM, '11 Soma Analog SS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I have a Mars 3.0 and have seen many people with the SF. The SF is a bit brighter from directly behind and the batteries are a bit easier to change. The Mars 3.0 however is bright from most angles and seems to be built a bit tougher IMHO. I have had it fall off my belt loop many times while going 20-30mph and it just slides down the road still flashing. It barely even gets scuffed.
#16
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
Really, the amber side lights are just about the only reason I still use it. I'm not aware of another blinky that has the same setup.
#17
crash survivor
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 654
Bikes: C-dale rush, Mountain cycle fury, Monocog 29er, Haro hard tail VX, Scattante R330
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Our local commuter group is meeting Dec 14th to do some vidoe testing of a bunch of different front and rear lights. I'll post thoes results when we get them.
#18
DNPAIMFB
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, AB
Posts: 4,655
Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is it just me or is the SF mount really weak? I just bought a SF tonight, mounted it to my seatstay and when I clicked the light body into the mount, I found it was held there really weakly.. like it could pop out of its mount if I hit a sharp bump or something. I'm returning the thing for this reason but I wanted to see what others have to say.
#20
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
#21
RacingBear