![]() |
Ultimate Commuter Jacket
|
This sort of thing has been covered before.
The problem with this notion is that many of us wear backpacks and messenger bags, thereby negating the effectiveness of the brake lighting on the back. The turn signal lighting on the arms is a good idea but it still looks to be not bright enough. This is mostly a limitation of current lighting and power technologies so it's good that people are continuing to design this sort of thing, but it's not there yet. Ideal would be a left glove with bright red lights on the palm and amber lights on the back which light up based on data from an accelerometer that knows whether you're signaling a stop, left or right turn. I don't think the capacity exists yet to make something small enough and bright enough that people would actually buy and then use such a device. |
Originally Posted by vaticdart
(Post 6497961)
This sort of thing has been covered before.
The problem with this notion is that many of us wear backpacks and messenger bags, thereby negating the effectiveness of the brake lighting on the back. As for the brightness of the lights on the jacket, I don't see why they couldn't be plenty bright enough. The lights could be just as bright as pretty much any other cycling tail lights, no? |
"Hand" signals are so rare today to the public wouldn't know them
when the see them. I thinks most would think you're waving at them.:eek::eek: |
Originally Posted by Tightwad
(Post 6502048)
"Hand" signals are so rare today to the public wouldn't know them
when the see them. I thinks most would think you're waving at them.:eek::eek: |
a right turn signal (left hand up) is definitely read as 'left hook me'
|
There is no freaking way I'd want green lights on my back even if I am accelerating.
Al |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.