Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Brooks saddle bad choice for commuting?

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Brooks saddle bad choice for commuting?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-08, 10:50 AM
  #26  
Batüwü Griekgriek
Thread Starter
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911

Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I definitely like the feel of the brooks for the commute ride. Even rock hard i like it (I've got about 750 miles on there, mostly seated spinning and no signs of breaking in yet), except for when I hit a bump with no padded shorts.

I use the plastic bags and keep it out of the rain. I've hit it lightly maybe three times in as many years with proofhide (The saddle sat for about 18 months till my old Turbo wore out).

It's really the constant lifting I was worried about. I hate to think of it getting stolen, but better that than it sitting unused in the box.....If the lifting is really bad for it I'd rather stick it on another bike not used for commuting (course, then I'd have to buy a fourth bike!!!)
__________________
Originally Posted by jsharr
People whose sig line does not include a jsharr quote annoy me.
pgoat is offline  
Old 05-12-08, 02:02 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
mparker326's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,977

Bikes: Schwinn Paramount P15, Fisher Montare, Proteus, Rivendell Quickbeam

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by slvoid
Just out of curiosity, what would happen if I did the same thing to a brooks all leather saddle without caring for the leather?
I've seen a couple old B72's off of some old Raleighs' that looked much better than the bicycle did. B72's were the primary saddle on a lot of these old 3 speeds and most people back then didn't worry about protecting their saddle, they just got on the bike and rode. 30 years later, those abused saddles fetch ~$50 on ebay.
mparker326 is offline  
Old 05-12-08, 03:06 PM
  #28  
Batüwü Griekgriek
Thread Starter
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911

Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Indeed - i bought an older model Brooks off ebay for a display bike restoration project.....it's weathered looking but I bet i could hop on and ride it another 5 or 10 years with a little conditioner and TLC.....
__________________
Originally Posted by jsharr
People whose sig line does not include a jsharr quote annoy me.
pgoat is offline  
Old 05-12-08, 03:22 PM
  #29  
ews
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 170
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pgoat
(I've got about 750 miles on there, mostly seated spinning and no signs of breaking in yet)
Does it really take that long to break in? I'm considering a Brooks saddle but my commute is only 15 miles, so I'm riding, Monday-Friday, about 75 miles a week. Is it really gonna take more than 2.5 months of commuting to break in?
ews is offline  
Old 05-12-08, 03:37 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
CliftonGK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375

Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by ews
Does it really take that long to break in? I'm considering a Brooks saddle but my commute is only 15 miles, so I'm riding, Monday-Friday, about 75 miles a week. Is it really gonna take more than 2.5 months of commuting to break in?
There's two camps on this one:

1 - The saddle breaks-in over use

2 - Your butt breaks-in over time


I think it's a combo of the two. I found the B-17 to be comfortable right out of the box, but it did get even more comfy as I rode more. 750 miles without any break-in signs would be a very extreme case, IMO. Mine was starting to show crease marks (break-in) after only 50 miles.
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
CliftonGK1 is offline  
Old 05-12-08, 03:46 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
How does one measure the sitzbones? or... where can I find an assometer?
moore.sean is offline  
Old 05-12-08, 03:51 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 942
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pgoat
I use an old rigid mtb for my 6-mile commute on fairly rough city roads.

Last fall I sensed my 15 year old Selle Italia Turbo was going mushy (felt it squishing up into the soft tissues) so I threw a new Brooks Swift onto the bike.

I like the width of the Brooks (I have wide sit bones, about 130 to 140mm, depending which assometer you believe) and I actually use it on my racing and touring road bikes with padded bibs.

On the commuter, the stiffness is nice for climbing the 59th st. bridge and surging through an intersection when necessary, but it is rather too hard when riding over bumps and crevices in the road (I don't wear padded shorts when commuting).

I was going to go back to a new Turbo.....I was always worried about the Brooks getting rain soaked, stolen, or ruined by constantly grabbing it to maneuver a 30 pound loaded bike in and out of buildings on a daily basis.

Does anyone else have these concerns for a new Brooks, or do you beat 'em up on a utility bike?
I pull a trailer with 300 pounds on it and routinely use my brooks to pull it up over a curb. That is a lot of weight on the back of the saddle as I pull and pull on it....no problems there.

I also use a brooks champion flyer and that takes the bumps out.
gosmsgo is offline  
Old 05-13-08, 07:58 AM
  #33  
Batüwü Griekgriek
Thread Starter
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911

Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CliftonGK1
There's two camps on this one:

1 - The saddle breaks-in over use

2 - Your butt breaks-in over time


I think it's a combo of the two. I found the B-17 to be comfortable right out of the box, but it did get even more comfy as I rode more. 750 miles without any break-in signs would be a very extreme case, IMO. Mine was starting to show crease marks (break-in) after only 50 miles.
I think use is more like it....I average maybe 25 miles per week on it, maybe 26 wks per year. I am NOT of the soak it in oil mindset. A little conditioner to keep it water resistant and watch for drying out, but I believe in letting leather soften with natural use.

Still, at 220 pounds, I woulda thought my sit bones woulda made some dentage by now!!
__________________
Originally Posted by jsharr
People whose sig line does not include a jsharr quote annoy me.
pgoat is offline  
Old 05-13-08, 08:00 AM
  #34  
Batüwü Griekgriek
Thread Starter
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911

Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gosmsgo
I pull a trailer with 300 pounds on it and routinely use my brooks to pull it up over a curb. That is a lot of weight on the back of the saddle as I pull and pull on it....no problems there.

I also use a brooks champion flyer and that takes the bumps out.
wow! Maybe I was worrying over nothing.

I rode in with the Turbo special this AM.....weird feeling after riding a wide rock hard Brooks for the last two years.....I used to think of the Special as a firm racing saddle - it feels like a cushy gel seat for Freds now....
__________________
Originally Posted by jsharr
People whose sig line does not include a jsharr quote annoy me.
pgoat is offline  
Old 05-13-08, 08:13 AM
  #35  
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
'nother Brooks/leather saddle fan here. I run them on most if not all of my bikes. Proofide the crap out of the undersides a couple of times a year. Ride with fenders, and use the free shower caps from the motels as saddle covers if the bike is parked outside. As far as damaging the saddle by grabbing the back of it...as long as you have your hand on a piece of the saddle framework I don't see a problem, grabbing just the leather...maybe.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Old 05-13-08, 10:07 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Caspar_s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 530

Bikes: Giant Tcx1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The rail at the back is so close to the edge, just put your fingers in that and lift. I use that all the time. I wouldn't grab it by the side of the saddle and lift (the wings so to speak) because there is no support there, and it might be more likely to pull from the rivets.

My seat has been more wet from sweat on a summers ride than in a downpour with no problems (I think I proofhided once when I got it...) but I don't leave it out all day in the rain.... makes the chain rust :-)
Caspar_s is offline  
Old 05-13-08, 10:27 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
ottawa_adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 448

Bikes: kona dew hybrid, MEC shadowlands

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
For breaking in the saddle, my butt was only sore for about 1-2 weeks max. Of course, it was already sore from my former "ergonomic" saddle, so it just got better from there. After the first couple weeks, it fit like a butt-glove
ottawa_adam is offline  
Old 05-13-08, 06:24 PM
  #38  
Batüwü Griekgriek
Thread Starter
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911

Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I should mention even tho I haven't noticed any softening of my brooks, I was able to ride them from day one with no issues. They are indeed rock hard when new, but I prefer a firm mattress generally speaking.....


I tried a commute on my old Turbo Speical saddle today....weird.......it definitely soaked up the nasty bumps and ruts better (They are doing lotsa work right now around 34th street - ouch) and The Turbo's longer length and orientation of the rails allow you to scoot your butt a bit further back, which really helped on climbing......but yeah, I missed my Brooks!!
__________________
Originally Posted by jsharr
People whose sig line does not include a jsharr quote annoy me.
pgoat is offline  
Old 05-13-08, 06:39 PM
  #39  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
1. Your Brooks will NEVER soften ... unless something has gone terribly wrong. Your Brooks will always be a hard saddle ... that's how it is supposed to be.

2. When your Brooks is broken in, it will develop divots for your sitbones, making it a custom saddle, and will perhaps, have a little more give.

3. Brooks saddles can take some time to break in. Some people can hop on them and ride ... mine took 800 kms (3 weeks) to break in.

4. Brooks saddles can withstand a lot more water than people give them credit for.




I am a randonneur, cycletourist, commuter, recreational rider, etc. etc. etc.. I've logged about 40,000 kms on my Brooks saddle, and have ridden it in all sorts of weather ... heat, sun, drizzles, torrential downpours, snow, slush, sleet ... you name it. And my Brooks is still the most comfortable saddle I have ever owned. I'm planning to order another this summer.
Machka is offline  
Old 05-13-08, 09:07 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Newfield, NY
Posts: 140
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have Brooks saddles on all 3 of my road bikes. Ditto on the proofide and a plastic bag when it's raining hard. Brooks saddles are pretty tough. We don't worry too much about our saddles getting stolen in upstate NY

Scott
sesmith is offline  
Old 05-13-08, 10:01 PM
  #41  
kipuka explorer
 
bkrownd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hilo Town, East Hawai'i
Posts: 3,297

Bikes: 1994 Trek 820, 2004 Fuji Absolute, 2005 Jamis Nova, 1977 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Any problems with mold and mildew on them? I occasionally have problems with leather shoes here.

What fraction of these are used without 'bike shorts', vs. those that used with padded 'bike shorts'? Do they have different designs for use with/without "cycle diapers"?

BTW, though my name is Brooks (Which actually makes it fairly disorienting to see a page full of the name 'Brooks'...) I don't work for or hold stock in the company.
__________________
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.

Last edited by bkrownd; 05-13-08 at 10:11 PM.
bkrownd is offline  
Old 05-13-08, 10:05 PM
  #42  
Hired geek
 
surfimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 197
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pgoat
On the commuter, the stiffness is nice for climbing the 59th st. bridge and surging through an intersection when necessary, but it is rather too hard when riding over bumps and crevices in the road (I don't wear padded shorts when commuting).
Sounds like you need to give yours a little more time to break in, and/or Proofhide it (some more) ?

I have a Brooks on my Surly Cross Check fixed gear and I love it. Was very firm at first, but I put Proofhide on a few times (maybe 3-4) and then just rode it a lot. I don't have a lot of miles on it yet, but it's now very comfortable and I don't notice it at all. Did a 17 mile ride on it this past Sunday and didn't have any soreness at all.

Steve
surfimp is offline  
Old 05-13-08, 10:58 PM
  #43  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by bkrownd
Any problems with mold and mildew on them? I occasionally have problems with leather shoes here.
Nope!

Originally Posted by bkrownd
What fraction of these are used without 'bike shorts', vs. those that used with padded 'bike shorts'? Do they have different designs for use with/without "cycle diapers"?
I ride my B-17 either way ... I prefer riding long distances with padded shorts, but I'll ride shorter distances (under 100 kms) with regular shorts.
Machka is offline  
Old 05-13-08, 11:08 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by bkrownd
Any problems with mold and mildew on them? I occasionally have problems with leather shoes here.
Yes, but that is because I left a bike in a flooded basement. Wiping the saddle down was enough to fix the issue.

Originally Posted by bkrownd
What fraction of these are used without 'bike shorts', vs. those that used with padded 'bike shorts'? Do they have different designs for use with/without "cycle diapers"?
Umm--I ride a B17 without cycling tights, and all of my upright Brooks without "diapers".
It really depends on how you have your bike set up, and less about the saddle. More upright, less lycra. More aggressive, more super hero gear.

Brooks has a whole range of saddles from racing saddles to heavily sprung tractor seats. The B17 is about the middle of the range.
Allen is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 07:37 AM
  #45  
Batüwü Griekgriek
Thread Starter
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911

Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ugh - day two on the Turbo Special and my soft tissues are hurting (started last night after the ride home).

Not the usual "I just changed saddles and my body is adjusting" pain, either. This is more - "please give me my Brooks back"

I guess I'll have to live with the security chain and plastic bags....sigh.

On the positive side, I have about a dozen NOS padded saddles I'm gonna sell to raise funds for a backup Brooks, just in case the commuter bites the bullet or 'walks away' (did I mention I already have a new Swallow waiting for my next new road bike?)
__________________
Originally Posted by jsharr
People whose sig line does not include a jsharr quote annoy me.
pgoat is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 07:38 AM
  #46  
Batüwü Griekgriek
Thread Starter
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911

Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Machka
1. Your Brooks will NEVER soften ... unless something has gone terribly wrong. Your Brooks will always be a hard saddle ... that's how it is supposed to be.

2. When your Brooks is broken in, it will develop divots for your sitbones, making it a custom saddle, and will perhaps, have a little more give.

3. Brooks saddles can take some time to break in. Some people can hop on them and ride ... mine took 800 kms (3 weeks) to break in.

4. Brooks saddles can withstand a lot more water than people give them credit for.




I am a randonneur, cycletourist, commuter, recreational rider, etc. etc. etc.. I've logged about 40,000 kms on my Brooks saddle, and have ridden it in all sorts of weather ... heat, sun, drizzles, torrential downpours, snow, slush, sleet ... you name it. And my Brooks is still the most comfortable saddle I have ever owned. I'm planning to order another this summer.
You've sold me Machka.

That's good to know about the break-in...to my knowledge there were two types of brooks - the brand new cast iron types I own, and the ones that are all patina floppy you see on old three-speeds.....I'll keep riding mine patiently.
__________________
Originally Posted by jsharr
People whose sig line does not include a jsharr quote annoy me.
pgoat is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 07:39 AM
  #47  
Batüwü Griekgriek
Thread Starter
 
pgoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911

Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sesmith
We don't worry too much about our saddles getting stolen in upstate NY

Scott
consider yourself envied!
__________________
Originally Posted by jsharr
People whose sig line does not include a jsharr quote annoy me.
pgoat is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 02:21 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
m00n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I tried two other saddles when I started commuting last year. Finally went with a Brooks. I keep my bike inside at work/home so I have no issues there.
m00n is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 06:33 PM
  #49  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by pgoat
You've sold me Machka.

That's good to know about the break-in...to my knowledge there were two types of brooks - the brand new cast iron types I own, and the ones that are all patina floppy you see on old three-speeds.....I'll keep riding mine patiently.
Here's mine ... and those were taken at least 18 months ago.

.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Brooks1.JPG (85.2 KB, 65 views)
File Type: jpg
Brooks2.jpg (9.1 KB, 56 views)
File Type: jpg
Brooks3.jpg (4.9 KB, 59 views)
Machka is offline  
Old 05-14-08, 09:48 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I did not achieve butt nirvana on my commuter until I combined bike shorts with my B17. The B17 has about 3000 miles so I think it is about as broken in as it will get. Without bike shorts I get seams and bunched up underwear pressing into my tender spots.
JPMacG is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.