![]() |
Absolutely YES, you should press charges. Your community needs you to do it and the bicycling community needs you to do it. Press charges AND if you want to be a real hero of the community, go to court to be a witness.
|
press charges if you are not intimidating enough to get your **** nicked just like that.
|
Is it up to you to charge the store? If so absolutely. Pawn shops know most of their stuff is stolen. They need to be hammered every time they sell or accept stolen goods.
|
Originally Posted by O-Town
(Post 6679879)
I must be a bit paranoid but...
If the guy gets off the charge will he come back to steal more stuff from me? That is the unknown I wanted some input from. If I could only get my hands on the punks who stole my brand new Giant back in 1988, or my car stereo and OUT OF PRINT CD's worth a bundle, they would have to restrain me. There is nothing like the feeling of someone taking your stuff :mad: |
Originally Posted by O-Town
(Post 6679879)
If the guy gets off the charge will he come back to steal more stuff from me? That is the unknown I wanted some input from.
|
>I must be a bit paranoid but...
More like illogical. People steal stuff because they need the money badly. Not because they have some personal beef with the world. Pressing charges is likely to lead to some local druggie spending some time in jail or something. Up to you. Steve |
I wish I could have pressed charges when my bike got stolen last year. Whoever said that you might be helping the next person this thief might steal from is absolutely right.
Definitely keep us posted please! :) |
death penalty
|
Originally Posted by bsyptak
(Post 6687801)
death penalty
|
i'd say no to charges, keep the (c)law out of it.
it cost us (the taxpayers) lots of dough to process, convict, and house felons - let's save it for the real bad ones, the killers, etc. |
thread got me thinking... do any of you guys use the National Bike Registry? Is it worth paying the $$, that is, if stolen is there a higher recovery rate if registered?
|
Glad you are pressing charges. You are doing the community a favor and you may even be doing the thief a favor. He might think twice about setting foot on someone's property where he could be shot or beat up, or as said it may be a wake up call to him to stop this behavior and clean his life up. I have to say you sound intimidated, maybe you are just a real nice guy. Don't lose one iota of sleep over this, this might be the moment that makes him think twice later on about getting into selling crystal meth or going down some other dead end road.
|
Originally Posted by mattm
(Post 6688822)
i'd say no to charges, keep the (c)law out of it.
it cost us (the taxpayers) lots of dough to process, convict, and house felons - let's save it for the real bad ones, the killers, etc. |
I had a similar situation, maybe. My place was broken into and a bunch of stuff was stolen. The nearby pawn shop got my DVD player, and the pawn shop reported the serial number (which they're required to do), and it came up as stolen. I got it back, and the detective told me that I could press charges, but she also told me that she felt fairly confident that the guy who sold it to pawn shop did not know that it was stolen, that he got from someone else, probably the thief, but that convicting the guy who sold my DVD player would not help punish the guy who actually stole it. They did get the name of the guy who they believe did steal it. I asked what they do about him. They said his name goes on a list of suspicious people, or some such nonsense. I asked what happens if he commits another crime and was told, "His name goes on the list again." "And if his name shows up on the list a bunch of time?" I ask. "Well, it doesn't look good."
So that's it. "It doesn't look good." Not very satisfying. But I didn't press charges. I'm not sure I did the right thing, but I didn't want to punish that guy just to punish someone. I wanted to punish the guy who had broken in, but I guess that wasn't an option. Incidentally, a few months later I was broken into again. This time nothing was recovered. So not pressing charges is certainly no guarantee that you'll be safe from future break ins. If you think your situation is analogous to mine, that the seller might not have known that he had stolen merchandise, then it's a judgment call. I'm not sure I made the right call. But if you suspect that the guy who sold your stuff was the thief, then I see no reason not to go after him. Not going after him is no guarantee that he won't come back, and if he's not the original thief, then the odds that he's going to rob you in retribution seem slim. |
Originally Posted by bsyptak
(Post 6687801)
death penalty
Just like they used to hang horse thieves. I've herd that the death penalty is the only option that guarantees zero repeat offenders, is that true? ;) |
Originally Posted by mattm
(Post 6688822)
i'd say no to charges, keep the (c)law out of it.
it cost us (the taxpayers) lots of dough to process, convict, and house felons - let's save it for the real bad ones, the killers, etc. However, I do prefer the middle east and other asian nation methods. Cheap, swift and awfully effective. Even if it doesn't prevent (neither do our methods), at least it solves the problem of the individual at hand. No need for this trash to breathe my air. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:12 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.