Why is it so hard to find commuting bikes with 26" wheels?
#52
Dave
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Homestead FL
Posts: 685
Bikes: Nashbar X-Cross 29r wheels front disc brake
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I chose to build my bike out of Nashbar's cyclocross frame and carbon fork. The carbon fork has disc brake tabs. I built this after wearing out a dept store mtb, or as I was wearing it out.
I decided to build it because I couldn't find everything I wanted in an out of the box bike.
Wheels are 29'r Sun Ringle Highriders. It's a mtb wheelset in 700c size. The brake is an Avid BB7 mechanical on front (roadbike version). Tires are Panaracer Pasela GT, kevlar belted and kevlar beads 700c x 32 with Mr. Tuffy tire liners.
Handlebars: Bar One Midge, a mild drop bar in mtb tube diameter Shimano barend shifters, Sora delrailleurs.
I wish now, I had done this sooner. The difference is amazing. Headwinds are not the devil they were on the mtb.
You could take a rigid mtb frame and build out a commuter with drop bars and road drive train.
My riding environment/road conditions are as bad as anyones. Broken glass and new potholes dictated my choice of wheels and tires. The wheel choice mandated a cyclocross frame. Disc brake on front narrowed choice of fork to the one sold by Nashbar. I am not afraid to take off road detours when necessary.
I built this after commuting every day for 18 months. I even put the cyclocross fork on the mtb for the last few months. It handled very well. It was the first part I bought. came up on sale one day.
I decided to build it because I couldn't find everything I wanted in an out of the box bike.
Wheels are 29'r Sun Ringle Highriders. It's a mtb wheelset in 700c size. The brake is an Avid BB7 mechanical on front (roadbike version). Tires are Panaracer Pasela GT, kevlar belted and kevlar beads 700c x 32 with Mr. Tuffy tire liners.
Handlebars: Bar One Midge, a mild drop bar in mtb tube diameter Shimano barend shifters, Sora delrailleurs.
I wish now, I had done this sooner. The difference is amazing. Headwinds are not the devil they were on the mtb.
You could take a rigid mtb frame and build out a commuter with drop bars and road drive train.
My riding environment/road conditions are as bad as anyones. Broken glass and new potholes dictated my choice of wheels and tires. The wheel choice mandated a cyclocross frame. Disc brake on front narrowed choice of fork to the one sold by Nashbar. I am not afraid to take off road detours when necessary.
I built this after commuting every day for 18 months. I even put the cyclocross fork on the mtb for the last few months. It handled very well. It was the first part I bought. came up on sale one day.
#53
Dances With Cars
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 10,527
Bikes: TBL Onyx Pro(ss converted), Pake SS (starting to look kinda pimped)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
^^^sounds like a nice build^^^
I think it's mostly a matter of gearing and tire width as to how one gets off the line. I run a MTB with 1 inch slicks pumped to 100psi and it rips on the street. I also run a SS with road (700s'). In the winter the MTB gets the big fatty knobbies and the speed dramatically decreases. As for comfort.. fit in relation to abilities/fitness/body type as well as just how sporty one wants to be positioned on the ride into work would be a determinative set of factors in deciding what to buy for commuting.
I think it's mostly a matter of gearing and tire width as to how one gets off the line. I run a MTB with 1 inch slicks pumped to 100psi and it rips on the street. I also run a SS with road (700s'). In the winter the MTB gets the big fatty knobbies and the speed dramatically decreases. As for comfort.. fit in relation to abilities/fitness/body type as well as just how sporty one wants to be positioned on the ride into work would be a determinative set of factors in deciding what to buy for commuting.
#54
Batüwü Griekgriek
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
26 inch wheel with a fairly common 2.125 is about the same circumference as a 700C X 25.
*shrugs* Same effective size if you ask me. I just get to soak up holes and can fearlessly smash into curbs with a 26 inch wheel. (I pay for that comfort in sidewall deflection when cornering and in weight, but hey I'm not RACING on my commute, so what difference does it really make?)
*shrugs* Same effective size if you ask me. I just get to soak up holes and can fearlessly smash into curbs with a 26 inch wheel. (I pay for that comfort in sidewall deflection when cornering and in weight, but hey I'm not RACING on my commute, so what difference does it really make?)
if you use small profile 1" tires on your 26" rims they are definitely smaller, with all that entails.
some people's commutes might be along highways or country roads (maybe yours is too - ?), in which case some - self included - would prefer 700s.
I realize commuting is not the TdF, but still nice to have the proper bike depending on the route.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 2,968
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
nope. good point
__________________
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 2,968
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
nope. good point... went from a mtn bike to a road bike.
__________________
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
#57
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,104
Bikes: Too many to count
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Are you sure about this? I've had a 700c x 28 once and I don't remember it even being marginally close in width to a MTB tire of about 2" wide, but maybe I'm wrong. I've never looked at them side by side.
#58
Batüwü Griekgriek
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#59
Dances With Cars
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 10,527
Bikes: TBL Onyx Pro(ss converted), Pake SS (starting to look kinda pimped)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
considering a 25 is a little bigger than a racing tire, and the MTB is sporting two + inches of rubber, night and day difference in rolling resistance
#60
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,104
Bikes: Too many to count
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. From your experience,
so making these equal, a MTB slick compared to w road slick... a skinnier road tire is both faster and more comfortable than a fatter, and equally smooth, MTB 26" tire. Is this because overall, larger diameter tires are both faster and more comfortable than a smaller diameter tire?
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,242
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I enjoy my 26" commuter wheels on my Breezer.
Love the wider tires than those on my 700 mm hybrid. More importantly, the bike handles better. It's quicker and more responsive than the hybrid, even though the hybrid is a faster bike.
I have to take it up and down stairs daily and I appreciate that it isn't so tall.
I also have a folder with 20" wheels. In my opinion, wheel size doesn't make a lick of difference in speed as my folder is just as fast as my hybrid. Both are a hair faster than my IGH Breezer.
Irregardless, I prefer to ride my Breezer.
Love the wider tires than those on my 700 mm hybrid. More importantly, the bike handles better. It's quicker and more responsive than the hybrid, even though the hybrid is a faster bike.
I have to take it up and down stairs daily and I appreciate that it isn't so tall.
I also have a folder with 20" wheels. In my opinion, wheel size doesn't make a lick of difference in speed as my folder is just as fast as my hybrid. Both are a hair faster than my IGH Breezer.
Irregardless, I prefer to ride my Breezer.
#62
kipuka explorer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hilo Town, East Hawai'i
Posts: 3,297
Bikes: 1994 Trek 820, 2004 Fuji Absolute, 2005 Jamis Nova, 1977 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thread summary for cyclists in a hurry: This is a non-issue for commuting purposes.
__________________
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.
#63
VOTE FOR KEN WIND
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 984
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There are so many factors that go into speed. If you are using slicks, I don't think the tire width, circumference, or volume (within reason) will affect speed as much as aerodynamics will.
#64
kipuka explorer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hilo Town, East Hawai'i
Posts: 3,297
Bikes: 1994 Trek 820, 2004 Fuji Absolute, 2005 Jamis Nova, 1977 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
On any decent bike, on flat ground and a non-windy day, proper bike fit is the #1 factor in the speed vs. effort equation, IMO.
__________________
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.
Last edited by bkrownd; 05-15-08 at 04:30 PM.
#65
not a role model
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I guess I agree. At the same time, I automatically assume (for these types of discussions) that people are already riding bikes that fit them. Seems along the lines of saying, having air in your tires is the #1 factor in speed.
#66
kipuka explorer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hilo Town, East Hawai'i
Posts: 3,297
Bikes: 1994 Trek 820, 2004 Fuji Absolute, 2005 Jamis Nova, 1977 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, for instance my mountain bike is an undersized frame, which works well for curb-hopping and off-roading where I'm mostly standing on the pedals. I commuted on it happily for a decade before I ever sat on a bike that actually "fits" me in the way that a "road" bike is supposed to.
__________________
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.
#67
Pedaling fool
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 767
Bikes: 07 Schwinn Voyageur GSD, Next Avalon, 2007 Dahon Yeah
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
My Diamondback Transporter has 26" wheels. I swapped out the WTB terrainasorus tires for street slicks, though. It comes stock with fenders so I'm sure D'back had the commuters in mind.
https://utilitycyclist.blogspot.com/2...er-review.html
https://utilitycyclist.blogspot.com/2...er-review.html
#68
Batüwü Griekgriek
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. From your experience,
so making these equal, a MTB slick compared to w road slick... a skinnier road tire is both faster and more comfortable than a fatter, and equally smooth, MTB 26" tire. Is this because overall, larger diameter tires are both faster and more comfortable than a smaller diameter tire?
in my experience, yes...ymmv, of course.
but I agree - these are negligible differences. You'd really feel it on a bmx with 20" wheels or maybe a folding bike? But yes, proper fit (including frame geometry) and gearing is more important. The thigs we tend to obsess about (components, frame materials, etc.) matter, but probably to a much lesser degree.
so making these equal, a MTB slick compared to w road slick... a skinnier road tire is both faster and more comfortable than a fatter, and equally smooth, MTB 26" tire. Is this because overall, larger diameter tires are both faster and more comfortable than a smaller diameter tire?
in my experience, yes...ymmv, of course.
but I agree - these are negligible differences. You'd really feel it on a bmx with 20" wheels or maybe a folding bike? But yes, proper fit (including frame geometry) and gearing is more important. The thigs we tend to obsess about (components, frame materials, etc.) matter, but probably to a much lesser degree.
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
https://www.specialized.com/bc/SBCBkM...08GlobeCentrum
Nice looking frame. 26-inch tires.
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 475
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The pertinent point in that post being 'slicks'. Fitting slicks to replace the mtb tires will take you more than half way to having a commuter with 26" wheels. Slicks will also take more air pressure.
#71
Mirror slap survivor
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 1,297
Bikes: Gunnar Sport, Surly Pacer, Access MTB, Ibex Corrida, one day a Simple City
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like how Surly does it with the Long Haul Trucker. 26" wheels on the smaller frame sizes and 700c wheels on the larger frame sizes. Makes sense to me.
Some of the boutique brands have 650B wheeled commuter style bikes. Those wheels are similar to 26 inch MTB wheels (with street tires). I'm not a 650B fan, but they do address the OP's issue.
Some of the boutique brands have 650B wheeled commuter style bikes. Those wheels are similar to 26 inch MTB wheels (with street tires). I'm not a 650B fan, but they do address the OP's issue.
#72
I love MMA
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 40
Bikes: Specialized Globe Centrum Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's weird. I haven't seen hardly any 26" wheel commuters in the bike shops. Most of the bike shops have 700c commuters. What brands have a 26" wheel purpose-built commuter?
Trek has 700c commuters
Specialized 700c commuters.
Swobo 700c commuters
Electra 700c commuters
where are the 26" commuters?
Oh and really wide 26" tires are good. I tried some Schwalbe fat apples in a 26x2.3" and they are sooooo comfy. Floating over any rough pavement is a breeze.
Trek has 700c commuters
Specialized 700c commuters.
Swobo 700c commuters
Electra 700c commuters
where are the 26" commuters?
Oh and really wide 26" tires are good. I tried some Schwalbe fat apples in a 26x2.3" and they are sooooo comfy. Floating over any rough pavement is a breeze.
https://www.specialized.com/bc/SBCBkModel.jsp?spid=34073
It has 26" x 1.5" tires.
#74
Trans-Urban Velocommando
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lenexa, KS
Posts: 2,400
Bikes: 06 Trek 1200 - 98 DB Outlook - 99 DB Sorrento
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think the problem is that companies are trying to make "niche" commuter bikes, when a lot of bikes make great commuters when commuting wasn't their intended purpose. Find a 26" bike that's comfortable to you, with eyelets for racks and/or fenders. They're everywhere. In fact, all four of the bikes my wife and I have (3 of which are 26") have these eyelets and with the exception of my 700c road bike, I wasn't looking for the eyelets.
So quit looking for bikes that have a cardboard circle in the wheel or a hanging tag from the handlebar that proclaims it as a "Commuting" bike. Just look at 26" bikes and you'll find your answer. Sure, you might need to replace knobby tires with higher-pressure "city" tires. Big deal.
My current backup commuter is a steel rigid-frame Diamondback from the 90s, outfitted with Forte Slick City ST tires, clipless pedals and smaller cogs on the rear wheel (less climbing ability, more speed). I think bike included I've spent $150 on it.
So quit looking for bikes that have a cardboard circle in the wheel or a hanging tag from the handlebar that proclaims it as a "Commuting" bike. Just look at 26" bikes and you'll find your answer. Sure, you might need to replace knobby tires with higher-pressure "city" tires. Big deal.
My current backup commuter is a steel rigid-frame Diamondback from the 90s, outfitted with Forte Slick City ST tires, clipless pedals and smaller cogs on the rear wheel (less climbing ability, more speed). I think bike included I've spent $150 on it.

#75
Pedaled too far.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Posts: 12,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
My thoughts exactly. 
An early '90s Specialized Hard Rock, slicks, rack, fenders and lights! And now it has a trailer hitch for my Bikes to Work trailer. What a workhorse.
Part of the problem might also be that bike companies may be targeting road riders as the ones to become commuters. Riders making this switch will naturally be looking at it from a roadie perspective.

An early '90s Specialized Hard Rock, slicks, rack, fenders and lights! And now it has a trailer hitch for my Bikes to Work trailer. What a workhorse.
Part of the problem might also be that bike companies may be targeting road riders as the ones to become commuters. Riders making this switch will naturally be looking at it from a roadie perspective.
__________________
"He who serves all, best serves himself" Jack London
Last edited by Artkansas; 05-17-08 at 12:25 PM.