Looking for advice to narrow two commuter bike choices. Please help.
#1
Out
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lalaland
Posts: 473
Bikes: two-wheelers
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Looking for advice to narrow two commuter bike choices. Please help.
Well, I just sold my bike tonight (low-end Trek), and am stepping it up a bit. I don't have a huge budget, but this is the next step for me (budget $700).
I've narrowed it down to two choices, the Trek Fitness (FX) 7.3 for $550 bucks, and the Trek Soho 1.0 for $650.
First, let me explain my ride: I have an eight-mile commute, round trip. The way there is uphill most of the way, and the way back is downhill most of the way. On the way back, before hitting the last hill, I like to stop at this little rest spot made by the local jogging club. I'm going to build a bench there in memory of my mother. Great spot.
Anyway, I ride on paved bike paths all the way there, only crossing residential roads occasionally (no state or federal highways). Very safe. Only golf carts are a threat, and they aren't any faster than a bike in most situations. The paths are smooth about 80% of the way, and a little bumpy from tree roots underneath the pavement in some spots. It's a nice ride that takes me about 20-25 minutes (depending on if my momentum is broken by golfcart traffic, the occasional car on a crossing street, etc.
The bikes:
The Trek 7.3 fitness bike is light (compared to my previous bike, a Trek 7100), is faster than my previous bike, and has pretty good components. It's an upper-level bike for average Joes, a mid-bike for newbies into biking, and a lower end for those guys who are roadies and really know their rides. The 7.3 is designed mostly for the road and is made light for guys who want to get out and get fit or commute short distances. Like I said, I'm only going four miles each way, with three relatively steep hills along the way there, and two on the way back.
The other bike, a Trek Soho 1.0 has the same components as the 7.3, but better rims and tires, and has disc brakes and handlebars more conduscive to accessories. The bike also has the internal cable system and sealed hubs, etc. so that you can cut through a puddle or two and not worry as much. It's designed more for commuting, accessories, and it built a lot more rugged.
Again, the 7.3 is $550 bucks at the LBS and the Soho 1.0 is a hundred bucks more. Both fit my budget.
So, what do you think? I suppose, since I can top out at 700 bucks, that with the 7.3 I can add a few accessories (I already have a good helmet) with the extra money, and the Soho will top out at 700 with tax.
I have to say (from my point of view) that I love the idea of light and quick (7.3), but the ruggedness and looks of the Soho are very appealing to me as well.
Thanks for those who give consideration and advice.
I've narrowed it down to two choices, the Trek Fitness (FX) 7.3 for $550 bucks, and the Trek Soho 1.0 for $650.
First, let me explain my ride: I have an eight-mile commute, round trip. The way there is uphill most of the way, and the way back is downhill most of the way. On the way back, before hitting the last hill, I like to stop at this little rest spot made by the local jogging club. I'm going to build a bench there in memory of my mother. Great spot.
Anyway, I ride on paved bike paths all the way there, only crossing residential roads occasionally (no state or federal highways). Very safe. Only golf carts are a threat, and they aren't any faster than a bike in most situations. The paths are smooth about 80% of the way, and a little bumpy from tree roots underneath the pavement in some spots. It's a nice ride that takes me about 20-25 minutes (depending on if my momentum is broken by golfcart traffic, the occasional car on a crossing street, etc.
The bikes:
The Trek 7.3 fitness bike is light (compared to my previous bike, a Trek 7100), is faster than my previous bike, and has pretty good components. It's an upper-level bike for average Joes, a mid-bike for newbies into biking, and a lower end for those guys who are roadies and really know their rides. The 7.3 is designed mostly for the road and is made light for guys who want to get out and get fit or commute short distances. Like I said, I'm only going four miles each way, with three relatively steep hills along the way there, and two on the way back.
The other bike, a Trek Soho 1.0 has the same components as the 7.3, but better rims and tires, and has disc brakes and handlebars more conduscive to accessories. The bike also has the internal cable system and sealed hubs, etc. so that you can cut through a puddle or two and not worry as much. It's designed more for commuting, accessories, and it built a lot more rugged.
Again, the 7.3 is $550 bucks at the LBS and the Soho 1.0 is a hundred bucks more. Both fit my budget.
So, what do you think? I suppose, since I can top out at 700 bucks, that with the 7.3 I can add a few accessories (I already have a good helmet) with the extra money, and the Soho will top out at 700 with tax.
I have to say (from my point of view) that I love the idea of light and quick (7.3), but the ruggedness and looks of the Soho are very appealing to me as well.
Thanks for those who give consideration and advice.
#2
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Fairmont, I am looking at a similar situation; I am considering the Trek 7.6fx vs. the Soho 4.0. I go back and forth between the disc brakes and internal gears, vs the lighter weight of the fx. One of the biggest problems I am facing is that few of the LBS carry/ have in stock either bike. I have been told to wait till September when the new model year roles around for the 7.6fx, but the soho series is hard to find. Will love to hear what the more experienced riders recommend...
#3
Out
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lalaland
Posts: 473
Bikes: two-wheelers
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I thought the Soho 4.0 is a single speed like the Soho S.
The FX you're looking at is also high-geared. Not much for climbing. You must live and commute in a flat area.
I'm looking forward to crusing downtown Atlanta when I get my bike (Monday).
I have to go THREE DAYS without riding (because I don't have a bike....sold it tonight), and the bike shop won't have it ready until Monday. But that's okay.
Actually, if I go with the 7.3 I can have it tomorrow. But with guest in town all weekend anyway, there's no point. I have to entertain and be a good brother-in-law.
Monday.
Gives me all weekend to decide. I am leaning toward the SOHO.
The FX you're looking at is also high-geared. Not much for climbing. You must live and commute in a flat area.
I'm looking forward to crusing downtown Atlanta when I get my bike (Monday).
I have to go THREE DAYS without riding (because I don't have a bike....sold it tonight), and the bike shop won't have it ready until Monday. But that's okay.
Actually, if I go with the 7.3 I can have it tomorrow. But with guest in town all weekend anyway, there's no point. I have to entertain and be a good brother-in-law.
Monday.
Gives me all weekend to decide. I am leaning toward the SOHO.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,522
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I went with a durable, internally geared and chainguarded bike. I'm also in WI, so snow and ice are a real issue for my bike. And since my bike is my main way of getting around, it was *well* worth spending the money to have a low maintenance bike. The Soho 4 is a bit like my bike in terms of durability... the 1.0 is not. Exposed drivetrains do *not* like snow.
In Atlanta, I'm not sure I'd see it as such a big deal to have the extra durability. Biggest thing I'd look at is fit. Then I'd want fenders, lights and maybe a rack.
In Atlanta, I'm not sure I'd see it as such a big deal to have the extra durability. Biggest thing I'd look at is fit. Then I'd want fenders, lights and maybe a rack.
#5
Out
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lalaland
Posts: 473
Bikes: two-wheelers
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'll get a light setup, but probably not fenders. I'll ride in separate clothing from my work clothes.
We get some rain, but no snow.
We get some rain, but no snow.
#6
Out
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lalaland
Posts: 473
Bikes: two-wheelers
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Decision is final!
I bought the Trek Soho 1.0 today. Done.
I won't get it until Monday, however, because I'm really busy all weekend (out of town) and the Trek dealer has to adjust it a bit.
But, come Monday, I get my new bike!!!
Altogether I will have gone four days without riding
But that's okay. I'm getting a new bike.
I won't get it until Monday, however, because I'm really busy all weekend (out of town) and the Trek dealer has to adjust it a bit.
But, come Monday, I get my new bike!!!
Altogether I will have gone four days without riding
But that's okay. I'm getting a new bike.