Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

What's faster & Why? Road Bike or MB w/Slicks?

Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

What's faster & Why? Road Bike or MB w/Slicks?

Old 12-18-08, 10:29 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
What's faster & Why? Road Bike or MB w/Slicks?

My best time commuting 17 miles to work was on my MB with slicks. I was surprised it took longer on a new hybrid with 700c wheels. I thought the bigger diameter wheels would make me faster. So then I tried an old road bike thinking the drop bars and geometry would send more power to the wheels and shorten my ride even more. However, I have yet to beat my best time on that MB! AGH! What is going on?
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 10:31 AM
  #2  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,272

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 128 Times in 95 Posts
A properly fitted road bike should be faster than an mtb with slicks... it's that whole lighter, more aero, taller gears thing.

Mind you, I used to run slicks on my mtb and could make some pretty excellent times... I had re-geared it to help with that.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 10:37 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 4,571

Bikes: 2009 Fuji Roubaix RC; 2011 Fuji Cross 2.0; '92 Diamond Back Ascent EX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 12 Posts
What was your NORMAL time on your MTB? We all have days when the stars align, the lights are all green, we have a constant tail wind and it seems our cranking is effortless. Times set on those days are the stuff of legend and should be chersihed, not compared to normal riding. As noted above, a road bike should be faster on average (I know it is for me).
CACycling is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 10:38 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
CliftonGK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375

Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
The one you pedal harder is the faster bike.
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
CliftonGK1 is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 10:47 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
My normal time on the MB? Hmm ... my best time was 50 minutes. I think maybe my normal time was 55 minutes - always under an hour. The hybrid and road bike were always OVER an hour. I was really hoping to cut my time to 45 minutes. Is that a crazy goal? to cut 10 minutes over 17 miles?
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 10:51 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Berea, Kentucky
Posts: 478

Bikes: 1990 Specialized Hard Rock

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A road bike should be faster than a mtb with slicks. Although it depends on many factors, I would say that maybe your gearing is making the hybrid seem slower...
metalchef87 is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 10:54 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
Yeah, don't know what's up with that hybrid. Might be the tires & geometry but it is NOT fast. I think I'll save it for vacationing with the kids.
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 10:57 AM
  #8  
not a role model
 
JeffS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver
A properly fitted road bike should be faster than an mtb with slicks... it's that whole lighter, more aero, taller gears thing.

Mind you, I used to run slicks on my mtb and could make some pretty excellent times... I had re-geared it to help with that.

1) You're not necessarily any more aero on a road bike (especially if you're riding the hoods)
2) taller gears are rarely the limitation of the typical rider. So you don't max out your speed going down a hill... you rest and have more power for the climb up the other side.

My MTB position was very similar to my position IN THE DROPS on my road bike and my speed was very close - especially on a commute. Wider tires actually speed up the commute since I could ride over instead of around obstacles.

Assuming position can be whatever you want it to be on either bike, the only advantage I'll give the road bike is weight... and in certain situations gearing.
JeffS is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 11:01 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
The road bike is an old '70s era Schwinn with steel wheels. The MB is much newer but also an old beater. But I believe it's wheels are aluminum. I should compare their weights. I guess the best way to do that is stand on a scale while holding the bike? Then subtract my body weight?
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 11:04 AM
  #10  
GATC
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: south Puget Sound
Posts: 8,728
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times in 27 Posts
A pro-racer is faster. A mtn bike w/ slicks vs a roadbike from the same commuter, not such a great difference relative to traffic, lights, etc...
HardyWeinberg is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 11:09 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
adaminlc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 328

Bikes: 2007 Surly Cross Check, 199? Novara Alpine

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Something else to consider is that you are accustomed to the mtb and not the hybrid. Over time your results might change.
adaminlc is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 11:10 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
badger1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 5,088
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1563 Post(s)
Liked 1,151 Times in 587 Posts
This question seems to come up over 'n over; over 'n over I'm surprised that people are surprised that, for commuting purposes, slicked mtbs are nearly as fast/as fast/faster for a specific rider on a specific route under specific conditions than 700c road bikes or hybrids. There's just too many variables to say, as many do with great certainty, that a roadbike is 'faster' than a slicked (I would say 'roadified') mtb.

We're not talking about riding long distances under 'open' conditions here, possibly in a group. Under those conditions, yes -- a roadbike will travel further/faster for a given rider output; that is primarily down to the more aerodynamic riding position, which comes into play at higher sustained speeds. Except at (near) road racing speeds, where the factor is wheel aerodynamics (i.e. narrow), it has nothing to do with wheel diameter, except insofar as that affects effective gearing.

So, to the OP: doesn't surprise me at all that you found a 700c hybrid 'slower'; the hybrid could very well have a more upright (less aerodynamic) riding position than your mtb; and its wheel/tire combination could very well be heavier, and have higher rolling resistance, than your mtb wheelset. Of course, you might also simply have been feeling better on the day of your personal best, which just goes to show once again 'it's not about the bike'
badger1 is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 11:17 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Jtgyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Richardson TX
Posts: 1,308
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Tire pressure may be a factor too.
The slicks on MY MTB are 26 X1.25 and 100psi as compared to my hybrid's 700 X 35 tires rated at 60psi.
__________________
Hey, I'm just this GUY...you know?
>>>Team Critical Mess<<< (You mean it's not SUPPOSE to hurt?)

My nice new Nashbar Touring Build AKA "The Flying Avocadooooooooo!"
1998(?) Trek 700 Multitrack
1995 Trek 1220 AKA "Jimi"
Older Non-suspension Specialized Hardrock
Jtgyk is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 11:19 AM
  #14  
hello
 
roadfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 18,684
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 191 Post(s)
Liked 109 Times in 48 Posts
Perhaps you're less aero on the hybrid.
roadfix is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 12:20 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
tjspiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
The road bike is an old '70s era Schwinn with steel wheels. The MB is much newer but also an old beater. But I believe it's wheels are aluminum. I should compare their weights. I guess the best way to do that is stand on a scale while holding the bike? Then subtract my body weight?
Old Schwinns can be real tanks. Weight on the wheels makes more difference than probably anyplace else on the bike. You most likely have got 1.25" tires on there which may not be much narrower than the tires on your MTB. The steel wheels definitely hurt you.

Even in terms of geometry the Schwinn may offer no advantage. I'm suspecting this bike is more recreationally oriented than performance oriented given the steel wheels.

You also have to consider the relative condition of the bikes and the quality of the components. If the Schwinn has low end hubs that haven't seen new grease in 30 years, it's going to be that much harder to get it up to speed and keep it there.

Yes, the Schwinn has larger diameter wheels but that doesn't necessarily make the bike faster. High end Triathlon bikes often have smaller wheels than typical road bikes.

FWIW, I have a decent but not high end road bike from 80's and a slightly better quality MTB from the 90's. The road bike was intended to be a low end competition bike so it has an aggressive geometry.
I get to work on that bike in 25 to 30 minutes vs. 30 to 40 minutes on the MTB. The MTB time suffers worse when there's a headwind. Thirty minutes is a REALLY good time for me on the MTB while I can get home on the old road bike under 30 minutes pretty consistently.

I have a newer road bike now and that is a couple minutes faster than the old one.
tjspiel is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 12:51 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
Thanks everyone for this discussion. My goal of course is to go fast, take less time, not work as hard, and never get passed. :-)

Can't wait 'till spring so I can get the MB back on the rode for a testy test. Also, I may not have to buy a new old bike. Darn, I was getting better at shopping. Maybe I'll just shop for new wheels for the old Schwinn - but would still like better hardware. What's the oldest (least expensive) road bike I can look for that would have modern shifters built into the hand brakes on the drops?
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 01:40 PM
  #17  
Light Makes Right
 
GV27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Green Mountain, Colorado
Posts: 1,520

Bikes: Gianni Motta Criterium, Dean Hardtail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JeffS
1) You're not necessarily any more aero on a road bike (especially if you're riding the hoods)
2) taller gears are rarely the limitation of the typical rider. So you don't max out your speed going down a hill... you rest and have more power for the climb up the other side.

My MTB position was very similar to my position IN THE DROPS on my road bike and my speed was very close - especially on a commute. Wider tires actually speed up the commute since I could ride over instead of around obstacles.

Assuming position can be whatever you want it to be on either bike, the only advantage I'll give the road bike is weight... and in certain situations gearing.
+1 to all that.

Weight is a grossly overestimated factor. 1) People make a big deal out of a pound or two on the bike while it's inconsequential in the total weight of the bike plus rider. 2) It's on the bike and rolling down the road - it's not like you're riding around holding that pound out in front of you nor are you lifting it vertically. You can push a lot more groceries around effortlessly in a cart than you can lift over your head at one go. 3) Weight slows down acceleration and climbing accentuates it, but once up to speed extra weight helps maintain that speed and helps overcome aero drag going downhill. It's a non-factor on a commute for the most part. A time-trial up l'Alpe d'Huez? Sure. "Jumping" to catch the wheel of a breaking-away rider? Sure. Your flat or rolling ride to work? Nope.
GV27 is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 01:43 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3355 Post(s)
Liked 5,431 Times in 2,810 Posts
If you hang around BF long enough, you will learn that whichever bike costs more, will always be the faster one.
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 01:46 PM
  #19  
Barbieri Telefonico
 
huhenio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 3,522

Bikes: Crappy but operational secondhand Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Fill your tires with helium and pedal faster
__________________
Giving Haircuts Over The Phone
huhenio is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 01:51 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
Well, I wouldn't call 17 miles of up & down grades a flat or rolling ride to work. It's more of a "cross-country" marathon, albeit relatively short. But you make good points about "weight" & another rider made an interpreting point about wheel diameter - (bigger isn't necessarily faster).
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 01:52 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 2,369

Bikes: 2003 Giant OCR2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GV27
+1 to all that.

Weight is a grossly overestimated factor. 1) People make a big deal out of a pound or two on the bike while it's inconsequential in the total weight of the bike plus rider. 2) It's on the bike and rolling down the road - it's not like you're riding around holding that pound out in front of you nor are you lifting it vertically. You can push a lot more groceries around effortlessly in a cart than you can lift over your head at one go. 3) Weight slows down acceleration and climbing accentuates it, but once up to speed extra weight helps maintain that speed and helps overcome aero drag going downhill. It's a non-factor on a commute for the most part. A time-trial up l'Alpe d'Huez? Sure. "Jumping" to catch the wheel of a breaking-away rider? Sure. Your flat or rolling ride to work? Nope.
At the same tire air pressure, my ancient steel hybrid (which weighs probably 10 lbs more than my road bike, easily) costs me about 3 mph or so when cruising, and about 4 on hills. I guess it's up to the individual as to whether that's significant enough to care about.
Mr. Underbridge is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 01:54 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
3 or 4 mph matter ...? Hell yeah! Especially if the commute takes about an hour! Who can do math? If a 17 mile ride takes 50 minutes on one bike, and another bike is 4 mph slower, how long would the trip take on bike #2?

Oh and while you're at it ... How much faster would the average speed have to be to make the trip in 45 minutes?
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 02:02 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
SSSTANG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Back in Middle Georgia
Posts: 116
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
When I started commuting to work I was riding my Giant MTB with knobbies 12.1 miles in 40:09 minutes. At the time I was just riding for the hell of it but as time went by I wanted to go faster. I put 1.70 slicks on it and wrecked (broken nose) on the way home on the first day. The wreck was caused from going so much faster when I entered this one tight turn that I had been through many times before. With the slicks my best time was 34:12. In a quest to go even faster I bought a road bike and my best time so far is 31:03.

I have decided to start riding the MTB more often when I do get to ride again to see if my time will improve. I have been out-of-commission for two weeks so far due to rotator cuff surgery.
SSSTANG is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 02:03 PM
  #24  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
Thanks everyone for this discussion. My goal of course is to go fast, take less time, not work as hard, and never get passed. :-)

Can't wait 'till spring so I can get the MB back on the rode for a testy test. Also, I may not have to buy a new old bike. Darn, I was getting better at shopping. Maybe I'll just shop for new wheels for the old Schwinn - but would still like better hardware. What's the oldest (least expensive) road bike I can look for that would have modern shifters built into the hand brakes on the drops?
The other issue you may be facing is with the narrower racing tires you are having to dodge crap in the street, where as with the MTB and slicks you may be focusing more on traffic and simply pushing harder.

While I like drop bars, I find MTB straight bars work better for commuting when I want to maintain a heads up view of traffic.
genec is offline  
Old 12-18-08, 02:06 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
SSSTANG - Great info! See - those slicks make a big difference don't they? But your rode bike was faster - where mine was not. You probably got a good one.
rumrunn6 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.