Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Commuting (https://www.bikeforums.net/commuting/)
-   -   Riding the WRONG WAY on a one way street (https://www.bikeforums.net/commuting/542769-riding-wrong-way-one-way-street.html)

Metricoclock 05-18-09 05:16 PM

the lesson is don't be a 'Bike Salmon'

Jonahhobbes 05-18-09 05:27 PM


Originally Posted by mds0725 (Post 8940759)
What is is you really want, OP? My guess is you don't want any help looking for an alternate route. You suggest in your first post that the other possible route you would ride isn't acceptible because it has both a dangerous intersection and a hill. Presumably this other route is the one where you would go left on CP and right on 126. Then you say that the alternative that was suggested to you by CliftonGK1 isn't good because it "would take as long as left on Connecticut Path and then a right on 126." But doesn't this alternative at least eliminate the dangerous intersection? Like I said, I don't know what you really want but my guess is you're hoping someone will validate your belief that it's okay to do what you're doing because of the time you're supposedly saving and because you get to avoid a dangerous intersection. (By the way, when you ride the wrong way on a one-way street, every intersection is a dangerous intersection.) Or maybe you just want others to tell you what you already know -- that your shortcut is stupid and dangerous -- without having any intention of doing anything differently?

Trying to figure out what you wanted to accomplish by posting this thread (and the map of your route) reminded me of that joke where a hunter keeps going into the woods, shooting at a bear and missing, getting the crap beat out of him by the bear and having the bear warn him that if he ever comes back and tries that again he'll get beat up even worse. After the third time, the bear finally says to the hunter, "You really don't come here to shoot at bear, do you?"

Good bear story :)

rumrunn6 05-18-09 05:51 PM

I guess I was sharing my experience so that others would not do as I do. Today I made sure to stay on the left side, away from the incoming side streets.

it's gonna be hard to let go of this road

lil brown bat 05-18-09 07:53 PM


Originally Posted by Jonahhobbes (Post 8941478)
Good bear story :)

Yes, except in the version I heard, the bear wasn't beating the hunter up...which makes the punch line make a lot more sense.

mikeybikes 05-18-09 08:13 PM

IMO...

We spend all this time complaining that drivers don't treat us nicely. Wishing our cities would give us a better infrastructure. Yet, we can't even follow the rules of the road ourselves.

How can you expect drivers and the cities to treat us with respect when we can't respect the rules of the road...

Go the with traffic and not against.

lil brown bat 05-18-09 08:25 PM

Some "rules of the road" can stand to be bent, and at times even need to be bent, because they're designed with auto-only traffic in mind -- sometimes, to be safe on a bike, you need to bend rules that are designed to accommodate cars. Riding with traffic is not one of those rules, however.

apricissimus 05-18-09 09:01 PM

Like most seemingly questionable behavior (like sidewalk riding, red light running), going contraflow can be done safely IF you know what to look out for. Of course, always yield the ROW, and be aware that others might not see you. Ride accordingly. Don't do it if there are too many hazards on that particular road, etc.

Since taking all these extra precautions is far more annoying than riding with the flow of traffic, it only makes sense for very short distances. And it's easier on some roads than others. But in certain situations it can be useful.

apricissimus 05-18-09 09:03 PM


Originally Posted by mikeshoup (Post 8942571)
IMO...

We spend all this time complaining that drivers don't treat us nicely. Wishing our cities would give us a better infrastructure. Yet, we can't even follow the rules of the road ourselves.

How can you expect drivers and the cities to treat us with respect when we can't respect the rules of the road...

Which rules are those? The ones designed with automobiles in mind?

mds0725 05-19-09 12:15 AM


Originally Posted by rumrunn6 (Post 8941620)
I guess I was sharing my experience so that others would not do as I do. Today I made sure to stay on the left side, away from the incoming side streets.

it's gonna be hard to let go of this road

How could you possibly hope that others might learn from your experience when even *you* don't seem to want to learn from your experience? What am I missing here?

mds0725 05-19-09 12:24 AM


Originally Posted by lil brown bat (Post 8942427)
Yes, except in the version I heard, the bear wasn't beating the hunter up...which makes the punch line make a lot more sense.

Only if you think there's really much difference between having sex with a bear and being beaten up by one. I've heard the other version as well, told by Penn Gillette on the radio. He cleaned it up as little as he thought necessary to get away with telling it on the radio, and he kept apologizing for having to keep it relatively clean, but he definitely conveyed the gist of it. In any case, the point of the punchline in either version is that what the hunter actually wants is a lot different than what he acts as if he wants.

rumrunn6 05-19-09 03:12 AM

Sounds like a perverse version of Henry David Thoreau's: "Many men will spend their lives fishing, not knowing it isn't fish they are after"

bugly64 05-19-09 04:51 AM

This called bike salmoning according to Bike Snob NYC.

Fremdchen 05-19-09 05:50 AM

Why don't you go over to Foster Dr. or Cherry St instead?

Torrilin 05-19-09 06:26 AM


Originally Posted by rumrunn6 (Post 8938822)
OK, I learned a new reason not to ride the wrong way on a one way street. The cagers entering from sides street are only looking in one direction for traffic. I almost got killed the other day because I kept expecting the cager to stop their car at the intersection (crazy what was I thinking) and look my way but they didn't until they decided the coast was clear. If they had gunned it, I would have been a gonner. Good thing I wasn't a stroller!

Oh, so you're the idiot who almost ran me over last summer?

(hint: traffic laws apply to bikes. the chick on a bike, riding with traffic and crossing a one way street is not going to be looking for two way bike traffic. Nor will the car drivers on the same cross street. NOR WILL THE DRIVERS ON THE ONE WAY STREET. Fun times ensue when you're in the process of a collision and there's 3 cars bearing down at 40 mph.)

Yan 05-19-09 06:17 PM


Originally Posted by rumrunn6 (Post 8938895)
I do it because I save so many miles. The short cut is only 2/10 miles long; the alternate route involves an additional 3/4 mile.

Does not compute.

noteon 05-19-09 06:40 PM


Originally Posted by mikeshoup (Post 8942571)
How can you expect drivers and the cities to treat us with respect

I have no expectation of that.

At any moment, you'll find me where I think I'm safest. I have slightly different criteria for success than a city government's acceptable cyclist mortality rate.

lil brown bat 05-19-09 07:37 PM


Originally Posted by noteon (Post 8948692)
I have no expectation of that.

At any moment, you'll find me where I think I'm safest. I have slightly different criteria for success than a city government's acceptable cyclist mortality rate.

Errr, yeah, but that's kind of beyond the realm of the current discussion, which is whether it's prudent (never mind lawful) to ride against traffic. What are your thoughts on that?

noteon 05-19-09 07:48 PM


Originally Posted by lil brown bat (Post 8949074)
Errr, yeah, but that's kind of beyond the realm of the current discussion, which is whether it's prudent (never mind lawful) to ride against traffic. What are your thoughts on that?

Errr, yeah, pretty sure I just answered that. When it's safe, I'll do it. When it's not, I won't.

I realize that "sometimes" isn't black-and-white enough to get a really good righteous brawl going, but when the question is this vague, it's the only reasonable answer. Sometimes it's safe, sometimes it's not. If you can't tell the difference, don't do it.

lil brown bat 05-20-09 09:01 AM


Originally Posted by noteon (Post 8949156)
Errr, yeah, pretty sure I just answered that. When it's safe, I'll do it. When it's not, I won't.

I realize that "sometimes" isn't black-and-white enough to get a really good righteous brawl going, but when the question is this vague, it's the only reasonable answer. Sometimes it's safe, sometimes it's not. If you can't tell the difference, don't do it.

Glad to see your shoulder is still in great shape, noteon. So how can you enter a one-way street the wrong way and know that it's safe?

fredgarvin7 05-20-09 09:21 AM

"Which rules are those? The ones designed with automobiles in mind?"

I think the poster was actually refering to roads which were designed only for cars and no thought at all given to bikes or walkers. I very occasionally ride on the wrong side of the road. For example, when I visit mt local Aldi store, which sits on a divided 4 lane highway, I can go right, which takes me out of my way 1/4 mile and forces me to make a left from a jughandle where cagers often honk at and curse me,OR I can make a left, riding on the wrong shoulder for about 50 yards and then using the various strip mall parking lots to arrive at a different jughandle where I go straight and no one wants to maim or kill me. To me it's shorter And SAFER than fighting some maniac for my right to make a left when I may slow him down for 5 seconds and cause him to flip out.

noteon 05-20-09 09:24 AM


Originally Posted by lil brown bat (Post 8951687)
Glad to see your shoulder is still in great shape, noteon. So how can you enter a one-way street the wrong way and know that it's safe?

And I'm glad to see you still aren't able to post disagreement without disdain, or conceive anything larger than a single bullet item at a time--a shortcoming you defend by trying to get other people to reduce complex issues to single bullet items so you can argue with them.

Entering a one-way street the wrong way and knowing it's safe is just like entering a two-way street and knowing it's safe. There's this thing now called looking.

If you can't function without an unvarying rule, and are deficient at reading larger pictures, you should probably just follow other people's rules. It's not as safe as being able to judge each situation on its own merits, but the 80/20 rule is better than none.

rumrunn6 05-20-09 12:07 PM

re: "So how can you enter a one-way street the wrong way and know that it's safe?"

With hind-sight of course.

apricissimus 05-20-09 12:11 PM


Originally Posted by noteon (Post 8951835)
Entering a one-way street the wrong way and knowing it's safe is just like entering a two-way street and knowing it's safe. There's this thing now called looking.

Being very familiar with the street in question helps too. That's usually a precondition for me for riding the wrong way (and I'll only do it very short distances, like a block or less).

JeffS 05-20-09 12:12 PM


Originally Posted by rumrunn6 (Post 8938947)
BTW: I use the sidewalk to enter the road.

Why am I not surprised.

apricissimus 05-20-09 12:13 PM


Originally Posted by Torrilin (Post 8944224)
Oh, so you're the idiot who almost ran me over last summer?

(hint: traffic laws apply to bikes. the chick on a bike, riding with traffic and crossing a one way street is not going to be looking for two way bike traffic. Nor will the car drivers on the same cross street. NOR WILL THE DRIVERS ON THE ONE WAY STREET. Fun times ensue when you're in the process of a collision and there's 3 cars bearing down at 40 mph.)

Use noteon's method of looking to avoid those vehicles that have the right of way, and who might not be looking out for you.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.