![]() |
Got wood for a new commuter?
http://www.renovobikes.com/
Laminated bamboo. Not buying, but they sure look nice! http://www.renovobikes.com/storage/t...=1238595459075 http://www.renovobikes.com/storage/t...=1238385280649 |
Very interesting. A bit too expensive for me to blow on a(nother) toy right now...
|
Wow!
|
I won't buy a bicycle frame from anyone that tries to convince me that carbon fiber has a longer fatigue life than steel.
The fatigue life of wood rivals carbon and is substantially longer than aluminum or steel. The Renovo is an heirloom quality frame. |
Ok then, that makes buying a frame easier...
"I won't buy a bicycle frame from anyone that tries to convince me that carbon fiber has a longer fatigue life than steel."
According to: Deda: "Carbon lasts longer than metal." Kestrel: "carbon composites are not subject to fatigue failures as metals are" Columbus: "A fiber composite material has higher fatigue life, tensile strength and stiffness than metals" Reynolds: "Our fatigue testing would indicate that well built composite forks are far superior to metal forks, with cycle counts running hundreds of thousands of cycles rather than tens of thousands". Easton: "The good news is the fatigue life of carnon fiber is immensely more than that of metals. In general terms, a component made from carbon fiber will far out last a component made from metal" Calfee: "Carbon fiber also has a better fatigue life than steel, titanium, or aluminum." Trek: The benefits of carbon (over metals) are increased stiffness, lighter weight and longer fatigue life..." Talk is cheap and fast, education is expensive and time consuming, but answers are ever so much useful that way. |
And there you have it. Five posts for a thread on wood bicycles to devolve into a debate over carbon versus steel.
|
Originally Posted by kamajii
(Post 8983911)
Talk is cheap and fast, education is expensive and time consuming, but answers are ever so much useful that way.
PS- Google carbon fiber fatigue life, carbon fiber DOES fatigue and fail catastrophically.
Originally Posted by GearsForFears
(Post 8984346)
And there you have it. Five posts for a thread on wood bicycles to devolve into a debate over carbon versus steel.
|
Originally Posted by GearsForFears
(Post 8984346)
And there you have it. Five posts for a thread on wood bicycles to devolve into a debate over carbon versus steel.
|
Originally Posted by noglider
(Post 8984949)
But wood is carbon. :lol:
|
http://www.tr719.com/charinco-blog/i...en-bicycle.jpg
http://www.bike123.com/images/wooden_bike01_550x413.jpg Wooden bikes look cool. I;ll bet some of the originals were wooden. |
[QUOTE=Tabor;8984561]"I am not convinced that quoting a bunch of manufacturers that sell carbon fiber frames is very smart."
Jeez, yeah, it would be dangerous to trust these guys alright: Deda manufactures high-end steel frame tubing sets, carbon frame sets and other accessories. Columbus manufactures steel frame tubing sets, (some say the finest), and carbon frame components. Reynolds manufactures steel frame tubing sets as well as carbon components. Easton manufactures aluminum frame tubing sets and wheels, as well as carbon forks and wheels. Calfee manufactures carbon and bamboo frames. There is no debate about the fatigue life of carbon vs. steel in the engineering community, only among those who substitute opinions for knowledge. |
:roflmao2:
Originally Posted by GearsForFears
(Post 8984346)
And there you have it. Five posts for a thread on wood bicycles to devolve into a debate over carbon versus steel.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:12 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.