Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Commuting (https://www.bikeforums.net/commuting/)
-   -   aside from obvious functionality is the LHT a joy to ride? (https://www.bikeforums.net/commuting/618855-aside-obvious-functionality-lht-joy-ride.html)

SSfreak 02-02-10 05:39 AM


Originally Posted by crx7 (Post 10350207)
I've never understood people's love affairs with these. They're very expensive and heavy to boot. Made with thick gauge 4130 I believe. I guess if you're looking for a new steel bike then this is an option, however, there are lots of much better and cheaper steel frames out there.

Really? I think not.

I own a bunch of bikes and if I had to pick one I had to keep, the LHT would be it. It's a joy to ride. I use to be one of those fellows thinking "what's up with those people and those Surlys". Then I tried one and never looked back. She's the only thing I ride. to and from work. To and from school and more. People talking down on this bike are the people that have never ridden one. My next bike will be a CC.

mihlbach 02-02-10 05:41 AM

The LHT is a tank. Its comfortable, it handles well, and it is very utilitarian. But make no mistake about it....it is a tank. It gets its name Long Haul TRUCKER for a reason and I am reminded of this everytime I ride mine. It really is a tractor among bikes. I ride my LHT when conditions are poor (snow or bad road), and/or if I need to carry a load and when riding rail-trails with the kids at an average pace of 6mph. Otherwise, I'm on a different bike. If agility and speed factor into your concept of fun then the LHT is not for you.
Now, I have 6 other bikes, so my LHT is really only ridden when absolutely necessary....and I do love it for its functionality. But if I had to ride the same bike everyday, and only occasionally burdened with a heavy load, I'd choose something a little more in-between, like a cross-check...somewhat sporty, but still reasonably utilitarian.

astroman 02-02-10 08:15 AM

thanks again all. so i get it now. trucker really does equal buick. cross check equals jeep. basically i love solid, so for me both sound fun. and i dig my cantis too (pauls, lovely) so both frames/bikes sit ahead of the pacer for me. i still feel the (hypothetical) trucker love and appreciate getting a better sense of it (in the absence of real bikes to test ride where i live). the only minor quibble i have about the trucker is how i might feel being more upright and a dead feeling. hmm. on the dead feeling, a cool compromise might be the trucker with the 26inch wheels (on what'll prolly be a 58cm). that would give it some more pep, off the mark at least... and also, as per my on-one, i kinda dig a high bb, so CC wins there...but seems with either i can't go wrong... and will be happy either way... oh, maybe i am leaning CC's way...tomorrow i will change my mind!

HardyWeinberg 02-02-10 11:00 AM


Originally Posted by astroman (Post 10350706)
on the dead feeling, a cool compromise might be the trucker with the 26inch wheels (on what'll prolly be a 58cm). that would give it some more pep, off the mark at least... and also, as per my on-one, i kinda dig a high bb, so CC wins there...but seems with either i can't go wrong... and will be happy either way... oh, maybe i am leaning CC's way...tomorrow i will change my mind!

I have one of each and love them both. CC set up FG, LHT geared for hauling. LHT is 26". If I had to pare to one bike that would be the keeper. With the possible exception of if I got into a gearhub setup for the CC.

LeeG 02-02-10 12:37 PM


Originally Posted by astroman (Post 10350706)
thanks again all. so i get it now. trucker really does equal buick. cross check equals jeep.


nope, LHT equals Starship Enterprise and CC equals Millenium Falcon.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:51 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.