![]() |
Originally Posted by dynaryder
(Post 10669836)
Half Canadian:
http://www.konaworld.com/page.cfm?content=contact Kona is 50% US and 50% Canadian owned. It is an independent company; no one owns us and we don't own anything else. |
I found the Fuji Touring to be the most comfortable new bike that I test road last year FWIW.
anybody ask the OP how many miles the commute will be? all paved roads? |
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
(Post 10659240)
...and it's a steel frame with a steel fork, which is contradictory to "a light frame; I'm no expert here, but thousands of kms I made riding on a heavy steel frame taught me one thing: a good bike is a light bike".
Steel isn't inherently heavy. Yes a cheap steel cruiser can weigh upwards of 40 lbs, but there are also plenty of steel bikes out there in the 20-25lb range, which I think is well within the realm of "light frames." And on the other side of things, there are plenty of tank-like aluminum frames out there. My girlfriend's aluminum mtb weighs waaay more than my steel Ironman. I think the OP would be more than pleased with any number of high-quality steel frames. For the amount of money the OP is willing to spend, I would think about getting two bikes, rather than forcing one to be their "jack-of-all-trades." |
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
(Post 10665573)
Yeah, I think that's what I was thinking of. I don't own a cyclocross bike myself, but I've heard about the debate several times about how cyclocross brakes aren't as fast at stopping as regular road bike brakes.
|
I think most bikes are faster if someone else is riding them.
|
Jamis Supernova or Nova Pro http://jamisbikes.com/usa/thebikes/r...0_novapro.html
Opus Bikes (Stelle or Spark) http://www.opusbike.com/site_route_10.php?lang=en |
Originally Posted by jtgotsjets
(Post 10670320)
For the amount of money the OP is willing to spend, I would think about getting two bikes, rather than forcing one to be their "jack-of-all-trades."
|
Ok, I finally bought a bike: Kona Jake (2010). I'm very happy with it, although there's one thing that bothers me: the tires make a lot of noise while I'm riding on the asphalt. Is it normal with cyclocross bikes? I guess I'll just have to get used to it.
Anyway, thanks to everyone for all the advices. Cheers! |
Originally Posted by pkazmierczak
(Post 10833436)
Ok, I finally bought a bike: Kona Jake (2010). I'm very happy with it, although there's one thing that bothers me: the tires make a lot of noise while I'm riding on the asphalt. Is it normal with cyclocross bikes? I guess I'll just have to get used to it.
Anyway, thanks to everyone for all the advices. Cheers! Glad to hear an update. I hope you enjoy the bike as much as I enjoy my Surly LHT :) |
Originally Posted by fat_bike_nut
(Post 10833452)
Cyclocross tires have knobs for off-roading. They are not huge, fat, and aggressive like on a mountain bike, but they're still there. If you are going to be riding mostly asphalt with it, you might as well roll with slick tires instead.
Glad to hear an update. I hope you enjoy the bike as much as I enjoy my Surly LHT :) |
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
(Post 10665573)
Yeah, I think that's what I was thinking of. I don't own a cyclocross bike myself, but I've heard about the debate several times about how cyclocross brakes aren't as fast at stopping as regular road bike brakes.
|
Originally Posted by pkazmierczak
(Post 10833436)
Ok, I finally bought a bike: Kona Jake (2010). I'm very happy with it, although there's one thing that bothers me: the tires make a lot of noise while I'm riding on the asphalt. Is it normal with cyclocross bikes? I guess I'll just have to get used to it.
Anyway, thanks to everyone for all the advices. Cheers! |
Originally Posted by es82
(Post 10833480)
I have a Kona Jake, and my only complaint about it is the breaking power -- it hasn't been an issue yet, but I need to be a bit more on my toes. Even slamming on the breaks as hard as I can tends to lead to more of a slowing-stop then an immediate-stop. Initially I thought the breaks were just loose, but no - it's just the nature of canti breaks.
|
Originally Posted by es82
(Post 10833482)
Do you have the stock tires on them? (The fatter ones with stubs?) - if so, I'd say the noise is probably expected. I have a 2009 Jake, and they were a bit loud on Asphalt, but I've since switched to Road tires and all is well.
|
Originally Posted by pkazmierczak
(Post 10833486)
Yes, I have the stock tires. It's Continental Speed King.
|
Tire noise on a cyclecross, it is the tires, get a different tire, a touring or multi-path type tire or road tire.
Brakes, my Cross Check can lock wheels. All I needed to do is change pads out. True, I do apply more force than with a dual pivot. |
if tsl were here he'd tell you that the Trek Portland has drop bars and disc brakes, not to mention SPD pedals and a 105 rear derailleur: http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes...land/portland/
|
Originally Posted by pkazmierczak
(Post 10833455)
yeah well, I'm riding mainly on the road, but I don't think slick tires would be a good choice in Bergen. every now and then I have to take a gravel path and then having these knobs really pays off. It's just that I haven't ridden an MTB for a long long time, and I'm not used to such tires:)
There's an understandable (though untrue) theme that people have that a skinny road tire can only be ridden on pure pavement. With people new to biking who are buying their first bike, I've heard "I might ride across grass sometime so I need a mountain bike with suspension and knobby tires" a lot - though it's totally untrue. I regularly ride my 23c tire road race bike (Specialized Tarmac) on a crushed limestone MUP by where I live. And across grass whenever need be. Without *any* drawbacks (well - the vibration absorbing frame definitely helps with comfort on the trail :-)). Here's pictures of someone else doing the same thing: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_mt2fanAB88...h/HPIM0184.JPG http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_mt2fanAB88...h/HPIM0184.JPG A gravel bike path isn't a problem for a skinny road tire. The limits for a skinny road tire, from my experience, are - 1. An actual dirt road designed for cars - with much larger rocks I can ride it, but it's bumpy and unpleasant. A fatter road slick would handle this fine I would expect, though. 2. Gravel when it's wet. The skinnier tire sinks into it more and has trouble getting a grip. A wider tire would be better. I'm not sure if knobbies would help, they probably would. 3. Loose gravel - paths that aren't packed down. Here knobbies are definitely a necessity. But riding over stretches of grass, gravel bike trails, or even just packed down trails through the woods when it's not wet - a wider slick tire is almost overkill and works great. And a skinny road tire is definitely better on the road. Full knobbies are worse in every aspect on the road - they brake worse (less contact with the road and the knobs flex when braking), they turn worse (doing a high speed turn works on a slick, on a knobby you'll fall over), they're slower, noisier, etc. Sounds like you're running a cyclocross tire so it's not as bad, just saying - it's counter intuitive, but if you've tried it that's how it goes, tread isn't helpful at all on the road. Anyways, I probably wrote way to much, lol. Have fun. :-) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:37 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.