![]() |
What I was trying to get at was there appears to be a absolute cast iron belief from some Roadies that they must be on the road at all times, sort of like VC cyclists who always practice VC no matter what. Anywhere else is not cool or something.
I am not a Roadie, I'm not part of a club and was wondering if this "you must ride on the road and nowhere else" is actually some sort of code that Roadies have? I'm genuinely interested. Also I'm not anti Roadie, anyone on a bike is good thing for me I just think that it's a shame that they are not appreciating the versatility of the bike, which is one of the reasons I enjoy cycling. Talking of Roadies/Fred Roadies I've seen a sudden increase in the number of middle-aged men from around their mid forties to sixties riding mostly very nice road bikes at the mo. They don't seem to be enjoying it with all the facial grimacing going on :lol:, (Was it Robert Hurst who mentioned this in his blog recently?) They seem intent on passing me then slowing down, cheers for the draft though lads. I'm glad as I don't get to see many cyclists on my route in and having a quick chat or just a hello is nice. |
pain is joy!
|
Originally Posted by hairnet
(Post 10851294)
pain is joy!
emptiness is loneliness, and loneliness is cleanliness and cleanliness is godliness, and god is empty just like me |
Another reason why the MUP might be avoided: LEO using a Smart Car on the trail itself.
As far as the Road vs. MUP debate, it's entirely up to the individual. |
Originally Posted by Jonahhobbes
(Post 10851058)
What I was trying to get at was there appears to be a absolute cast iron belief from some Roadies that they must be on the road at all times, sort of like VC cyclists who always practice VC no matter what. Anywhere else is not cool or something.
I am not a Roadie, I'm not part of a club and was wondering if this "you must ride on the road and nowhere else" is actually some sort of code that Roadies have? I'm genuinely interested. Also I'm not anti Roadie, anyone on a bike is good thing for me I just think that it's a shame that they are not appreciating the versatility of the bike, which is one of the reasons I enjoy cycling. Talking of Roadies/Fred Roadies I've seen a sudden increase in the number of middle-aged men from around their mid forties to sixties riding mostly very nice road bikes at the mo. They don't seem to be enjoying it with all the facial grimacing going on :lol:, (Was it Robert Hurst who mentioned this in his blog recently?) They seem intent on passing me then slowing down, cheers for the draft though lads. I'm glad as I don't get to see many cyclists on my route in and having a quick chat or just a hello is nice. Just curious. When you say that roadies aren't appreciating the full versatility of the bike, what do you mean? The normal leader for my Thursday group road ride races MTBs. He also uses a single speed to get to work year round and I know part of his route is on MUPs. |
If I have the choice between using a MUP or using a road that are covering the same path I will use the MUP every time. Unfortunately on my general commute into work it is always through the city because there isn't a MUP that can take me there quickly. On the way home though I always use a MUP (and some city) because I love taking the long way home and the bike path is beautiful.
|
Originally Posted by Jonahhobbes
(Post 10851058)
Talking of Roadies/Fred Roadies I've seen a sudden increase in the number of middle-aged men from around their mid forties to sixties riding mostly very nice road bikes at the mo. They don't seem to be enjoying it with all the facial grimacing going on.
Some of us were racing when you had training wheels.. :50: Time marches on my friend.. :) Oh... and that's not grimacing; that's our game face......:p |
I skip the MUP on some portions of my commute, those where the road offers a more direct path, and where there is a safe bike option.
For a portion of my ride, the MUP follows the river, winds back and forth, is often covered with leaves & peds, and includes unnecessary hills. Becuase there is a better option if I get onto the road adjacent to it, I take that option. There are a couple MUP's around Seattle that i purposely avoid, because they're full of people, most of whom don't understand that half the path doesn't belong to pedestrians. |
Originally Posted by Jonahhobbes
(Post 10851058)
They don't seem to be enjoying it with all the facial grimacing going on :lol:, (Was it Robert Hurst who mentioned this in his blog recently?)
|
For those of us who work downtown, even in western cities, the streets we take pre-date the existence of the automobile.
|
If you thought getting off the road is the key to avoiding injury, you might want to think again. Two studies of cyclists in Toronto and Ottawa found that cyclists riding on sidewalks were four to eight times more likely to suffer an injury than cyclists on the road — and 1.2 to 1.8 times more likely to be injured on a paved or unpaved multi-use path than on the road. In the Netherlands, another study showed that while you are twice as likely to be injured while riding in an on-road bike lane than an off-road bike path, the pattern was nearly reversed when it came to intersections. The danger increased when an off-road bike path crossed a road. |
Originally Posted by caloso
(Post 10857823)
For those of us who work downtown, even in western cities, the streets we take pre-date the existence of the automobile.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.