![]() |
The correct answer is pie
|
Apple, cherry, pumpkin, rhubarb, mince meat, pot, peach, etc?
|
Mmmmmm....rhubarb....
|
Originally Posted by truman
(Post 11047596)
Nothing in MPH, but an ocean of joy when I hop off a curb and the point of my saddle doesn't get rammed into my grundle when a foot slips off the pedal
|
Originally Posted by DataJunkie
(Post 11052140)
Apple, cherry, pumpkin, rhubarb, mince meat, pot, peach, etc?
|
Depends on how much faster you pedal.
|
Originally Posted by chipcom
(Post 11052401)
3.14159265 of each please. :D
|
Maybe a mile per hour at best. I doubt even that though. Clipless pedals take time to get used to, in terms of skill and muscular development. Most of the benefit comes when climbing or sprinting.
|
Originally Posted by GeneO
(Post 11052454)
That is pi, not pie LOL
|
Originally Posted by groovestew
(Post 11052197)
Mmmmmm....rhubarb....
Serve it up, nice and hot Maybe things aren't as bad as you thought. Momma's little baby loves rhubarb rhubarb, Be-Bop-A-Re-Bop Rhubarb Pie! |
Those of you who think that most of the benefit comes when climbing or sprinting, are probably not pedalling very efficiently. If you are pedalling nice round circles, then you're significantly more efficient with clipless pedals. I don't think it can be answered in how many mph. It will depend on timeframe & what sort of speed you're trying to maintain. In a short burst, it may not be real significant. However, I am significantly faster over a longer period because I can employ different muscles. I've done simple tests with a heart rate monitor & varying how efficiently I pedal. Not real scientific, but when I change from just pushing on the downstroke to trying to pedal perfect circles, my speed will increase from 20 to 22mph while my "perceived effort" decreases. Heart rate, however, increases. This is due to the wattage that I'm producing has increased. The "perceived effort" has decreased because I'm employing more than just my quads to produce that wattage.
Personally, I'd probably be about 20mph slower with platforms since I've only ridden with them a handful of times in the last 17 years. The last time I did, I really had a hard time keeping my feet on the pedals. :p |
Originally Posted by daveF
(Post 11052768)
Those of you who think that most of the benefit comes when climbing or sprinting, are probably not pedalling very efficiently. If you are pedalling nice round circles, then you're significantly more efficient with clipless pedals.
|
Originally Posted by daveF
(Post 11052768)
Those of you who think that most of the benefit comes when climbing or sprinting, are probably not pedalling very efficiently. If you are pedalling nice round circles, then you're significantly more efficient with clipless pedals.
Originally Posted by daveF
(Post 11052768)
t 20mph slower with platforms since I've only ridden with them a handful of times in the last 17 years. The last time I did, I really had a hard time keeping my feet on the pedals.
|
Originally Posted by AdamDZ
(Post 11053413)
So.... you're saying that with platforms I don't pedal round circles? I've done centuries with platforms, no problems.
Clips and straps are usually somewhere between dodecagons and ovals. |
No. With anything but clipless pedals, you make a death spiral. :eek:
|
Originally Posted by HiYoSilver
(Post 11048579)
Best guess is .75 mph. At least .50 and any claim of results over 1.50 is very suspect. Part of the differences will depend on how much the rider pulls with clipless.
I got a big jump as the mountain bike pedals feel as though they have been bent as my feet and shoes (the soles don't) now feel like they are rolling off the pedals. And as I alternate between the two when commuting and fun rides is when it is most notable. I'm probably going to get a pair of clipless for commuting when I replace my cromoly commuter. |
Originally Posted by chipcom
(Post 11052475)
ya think? Wow, it doesn't take a piano to fall on your head to see the obvious. :lol: :thumb:
|
Originally Posted by mikeshoup
(Post 11053450)
Its a well established and known fact that on platforms, you make a decagon shape instead, and with clipless you make perfect circles.
Clips and straps are usually somewhere between dodecagons and ovals. |
Originally Posted by GeneO
(Post 11053932)
I guess it is just your humor is so subtle
|
Originally Posted by mikeshoup
(Post 11053450)
Its a well established and known fact that on platforms, you make a decagon shape instead, and with clipless you make perfect circles.
Clips and straps are usually somewhere between dodecagons and ovals. |
Rode with the plastic pedals today, right one with bad bearings, and swear I lost a good 5 mph from running with metal pedals w/ clips and straps.
It was sprinkling so I didn't dare stand up on those slippery little beasts. |
Is the OP interested in knowing the speed gain in going from toe clips to power grips to clipless pedals? Or, just from 'platform' to clipless?
|
I assumed from no foot retention to clipless when I arrived at my completely bogus (but good as any other) figure of 1.75 mph, but the OP wasn't very precise in his/her post.
|
Originally Posted by mikeshoup
(Post 11053450)
Its a well established and known fact that on platforms, you make a decagon shape instead, and with clipless you make perfect circles.
Clips and straps are usually somewhere between dodecagons and ovals. |
I haven't ridden platforms in over a decade so I can't tell you for sure. It's a rare thing to be passed by someone not clipped in though. If you are wondering if it is worth it to get clipless pedals, I would say yes without a doubt unless you are a DH or freestyle mountain biker or BMX'er.
Anyone who answers that clipless doesn't make you faster except on hills, over long distances, while sprinting, when wearing cycling shoes, when tired etc.... really just mean to say yes, they make you faster. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.