![]() |
Automotive Night Vision
Old news, yes... but why isn't this the standard on all new vehicles?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_night_vision It looks like several auto makers have tried it, but most use a separate screen (distracting). Only the Cadillac projected the animal/pedestrian/(cyclist) onto the windshield as an HUD, but that's been discontinued. Seems like a good idea. Not sure why it hasn't been more popular? |
My guess is that the optics are very complicated and expensive to implement. On aircraft HUDs, the projecting surface is flat but a car windshield is curved; I think that may make the whole HUD concept impractical for auto use. (It could be done, perhaps, but at a very high cost.) If the imaging system costs more than the car, no one will buy the car.
For aircraft, the HUD provides vision in the pilot's primary field of view, a narrow area directly in front of him. For cars, hazards are often outside that area, on the periphery of vision. Later aircraft technology uses HMDs (helmet mounted displays) to give the pilot imaging over a wider field of view. I don't think most drivers would even consider that at this stage, and the helmet for a HMD needs to be tailored to each individual pilot; no easy adjustment between users. |
Drivers have enough problems concentrating already, and you want to give them something else to confuse them even more than they already are..
|
Nah, I just want to make us glow and flash... oh wait...
|
Originally Posted by Doohickie
(Post 12865729)
For aircraft, the HUD provides vision in the pilot's primary field of view, a narrow area directly in front of him.
|
Originally Posted by aaronarthur
(Post 12869626)
Nah, I just want to make us glow and flash... oh wait...
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:18 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.