Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Took the rack of my bike/heaviest components on your bike

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Took the rack of my bike/heaviest components on your bike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-12, 07:04 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Took the rack of my bike/heaviest components on your bike

Hey, so I decided to remove the Surly Nice Rack rear from my Cross Check because I just haven't been using it as much as I thought I would here in Korea where I don't commute much anymore since the school I work at is only 2 blocks away and everything really is just very close and convenient. Seriously, I live above a convenience store. No more long hauls loaded down with crap in my panniers. These days, I mostly just do recreational rides and sometimes I'll take it to go the bar, department store or bank...

Anyway, I just figured it was a useless dead weight penalty and thought I'd see how it handles without the 3 lb (1.3kg) rack. I'm actually kind of surprised that the difference is very noticeable, at least in my mind. Maybe it's a placebo effect but I really think that the bike accelerates faster, is more responsive to my hip steering (as opposed to handlebar steering), and is just a lot easier to haul up the stairs. I'm now only using my Wingnut backpack. Thoughts? Could removing 3lbs really make that much of a difference?


This got me thinking about the other weighty items on my bike. I don't think the stock wheels are the lightest, but that's okay with me for now. I think they're pretty strong. I also got the 420g MKS King Grip or Lambda pedals and a 860g sprung Brooks Flyer. I'm not willing to part with either of those for weight's sake but I might upgrade the wheels some day. So what's the heaviest component on your bikes? Is it worth it to you?

Last edited by SurlyLaika; 06-07-12 at 04:33 PM.
SurlyLaika is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 07:08 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 458

Bikes: LHT + FreeRadical

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
N+1. If your bike is too heavy it's time to get a lighter bike.
benda18 is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 07:21 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by benda18
N+1. If your bike is too heavy it's time to get a lighter bike.
I thinkk it was topping out at 30lbs, but now it's 3lbs lighter and feels so good and zippy!
SurlyLaika is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 07:47 AM
  #4  
Crawler
 
linus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: OH~ CANADA
Posts: 1,410
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Me. And next to that is my Kryptonite Evo 5. It's definitely not coming off my bike tho.
linus is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 08:09 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
tarwheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 8,896

Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 196 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
The weight of a single component usually doesn't make much difference, but it all starts to add up pretty quickly. My touring bike weighed only about 22 lbs when built up with no fenders, rear rack, seat bags, etc. However, it weighs closer to 30 lbs when fenders, front and rear racks and other parts -- not even including panniers, water bottles, etc. I also took the rear rack off my touring bike when I was using it for commuting. Not only did it add more weight, but I found that it made the frame ride a lot stiffer. I'm using that bike for actual touring now, however, so I have reinstalled the rear rack, added a front rack, Brooks saddle, frame pump, etc. and it feels like it weighs a ton.
tarwheel is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 08:13 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by linus
Me. And next to that is my Kryptonite Evo 5. It's definitely not coming off my bike tho.
haha, yea I know what you mean. I'm not overweight but I'm definitely not in optimal condition either. Just checked the weight on that Evo 5, 2.3 lbs compared to the Faghettaboutit's 4.5lbs. holy cow, right? I'm having seconds thoughts about buying the Faghettaboutit now. How much do you weigh?
SurlyLaika is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 08:17 AM
  #7  
The Left Coast, USA
 
FrenchFit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,757

Bikes: Bulls, Bianchi, Koga, Trek, Miyata

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
The Surly Nice was a monster, I eBayed mine last year. I've been lightened my tourer, including my beloved double kickstand - probably another 1.5 lbs right there. My hold-out on that bike so far is the Jandd rear rack, it's simply too practicable to lose. But I'm eyeing the saddle and seatpost, wheelset, probably another couple of pounds to pick up there.

I just like how much livelier the bike feels on a diet. Yes, I could lose the same lbs, but a lighter bike is a lighter bike.
FrenchFit is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 08:18 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tarwheel
The weight of a single component usually doesn't make much difference, but it all starts to add up pretty quickly. My touring bike weighed only about 22 lbs when built up with no fenders, rear rack, seat bags, etc. However, it weighs closer to 30 lbs when fenders, front and rear racks and other parts -- not even including panniers, water bottles, etc. I also took the rear rack off my touring bike when I was using it for commuting. Not only did it add more weight, but I found that it made the frame ride a lot stiffer. I'm using that bike for actual touring now, however, so I have reinstalled the rear rack, added a front rack, Brooks saddle, frame pump, etc. and it feels like it weighs a ton.
I'm not a gram counter, by any means...but I'd rather put my grams in where they're most useful like my pedals and saddle.
SurlyLaika is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 08:20 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FrenchFit
The Surly Nice was a monster, I eBayed mine last year. I've been lightened my tourer, including my beloved double kickstand - probably another 1.5 lbs right there. My hold-out on that bike so far is the Jandd rear rack, it's simply too practicable to lose. But I'm eyeing the saddle and seatpost, wheelset, probably another couple of pounds to pick up there.

I just like how much livelier the bike feels on a diet. Yes, I could lose the same lbs, but a lighter bike is a lighter bike.
I was thinking about saving my beastly Surly Nice Rack for my touring bike when I get one and getting a lighter, more practical rack for my uh commuter. I forget if it was a Jandd but I heard about one a while ago that was quite light and had a good cargo weight capacity.

Also, Frenchfit, I've been running 6 out of 7 days the last 2 weeks...only 1.5 miles every day but at least it's consistent. I feel good, in a different way than I do when I bike. I mean, I just feel a little more springy, lively, etc. Try it out, even if it isn't far. Any plans to lose a few lbs? I'd like to get down 15lbs, not much but damn it's hard when you're not actually fat. Just little motivation.
SurlyLaika is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 08:42 AM
  #10  
Crawler
 
linus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: OH~ CANADA
Posts: 1,410
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by SurlyLaika
haha, yea I know what you mean. I'm not overweight but I'm definitely not in optimal condition either. Just checked the weight on that Evo 5, 2.3 lbs compared to the Faghettaboutit's 4.5lbs. holy cow, right? I'm having seconds thoughts about buying the Faghettaboutit now. How much do you weigh?
I also have the Faghettaboutit and NY Standard. Awesome but I need to see a chiropractor after carrying them around.

I'm 190lbs now.
linus is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 08:49 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 81 Times in 64 Posts
Surlylaika, if you're thinking of putting a rack back on for carrying panniers consider one of the narrow ones like the Axiom StreamlinerDLX or Tubus Airy. I had various wide platform rear racks on my Cross-Check and noticed the handling was noticably better with a narrow rack like the Axiom Streamliner DLX.
LeeG is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 09:13 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
groovestew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,688
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Liked 43 Times in 33 Posts
Originally Posted by SurlyLaika
...Maybe it's a placebo effect but I really think that the bike accelerates faster, is more responsive to my hip steering (as opposed to handlebar steering), and is just a lot easier to haul up the stairs. I'm now only using my Wingnut backpack. Thoughts? Could removing 3lbs really make that much of a difference?...
...So what's the heaviest component on your bikes? Is it worth it to you?
I certainly like a nice, light bike, but I don't mind riding a heavy bike for commuting. When I do really long rides on the weekend (300+km) when I need extra room for carrying layers, food, etc., I will sometimes put a seatpost rack with a trunk bag (about 10lbs) on my bike, and I absolutely hate how it makes the bike handle. It's not really noticeable 98% of the time, which is why I tolerate it, but that other 2% (climbing, accelerating) is really annoying.

For commuting, I keep my light bike light, and use a backpack to maintain good handling characteristics. My all-weather commuter is heavy, so I just don't expect as much from it.
groovestew is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 10:19 AM
  #13  
dazed and confused
 
newkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 251

Bikes: 2011 Cube Hyde Team Alfine 8 IGH, 2007 Giant Rock hardtail mtb

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a fully built up commuter with IGH, fenders, 2 stands, ring lock, u-lock. Depending on my route, I have to lift the bike over a chest-high wall. I always notice how heavy the rear is on this monster. With the front so light and the rear so ladden when I first got it I really noticed the handling was different and a bit squirrely. I've since gotten used to it and when I take my beater to the pub, the beater is the one that feels strange. It makes a difference yes, but your physical and mental memory can learn anything.
newkie is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 10:29 AM
  #14  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Posts: 8,543

Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid / 2013 Mango FGSS

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1053 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 36 Posts
2.95kg is more like 6.5 lbs.

you're removing 3 1L milk tetra-paks from over the back wheel ... of course it will make a difference.
acidfast7 is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 10:34 AM
  #15  
GATC
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: south Puget Sound
Posts: 8,728
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times in 27 Posts
I can't think of a single chunkier piece of anything to hang on a bike than a surly nice rack. Other than that they fit pugsley wheels and cost less than OMM racks that do the same, I honestly can't figure out how they sell those at all.


I do have one on my pugsley though, which itself is a giant chunky piece of a lot of stuff.
HardyWeinberg is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 10:50 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Surly's racks are rather excessively heavy.. Front one definitely.
Tubus are a bit more reasonable, of the steel tube racks.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 10:58 AM
  #17  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Who makes a really light, dare I say it, "flimsy" rear rack? I'm looking to get rid of the backpack, but won't need more than 10lbs of capacity.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 11:04 AM
  #18  
ROM 6:23
 
flipped4bikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Coastal Maine
Posts: 1,713

Bikes: Specialized Tricross Comp, Lemond Tourmalet, Bridgestone MB-5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by acidfast7
2.95kg is more like 6.5 lbs.

you're removing 3 1L milk tetra-paks from over the back wheel ... of course it will make a difference.
Not sure where the OP got 2.95 kg. Surly lists the Nice rear rack at 1260g = 2.78 lbs.

It took me a second to figure out why they named it Nice. Too funny.
flipped4bikes is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 11:09 AM
  #19  
GATC
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: south Puget Sound
Posts: 8,728
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times in 27 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
Surly's racks are rather excessively heavy.. Front one definitely.
Tubus are a bit more reasonable, of the steel tube racks.
A bit more reasonable in the sense of 30% of the weight but 90% of the capacity... (and ~80% of the cost)
HardyWeinberg is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 11:11 AM
  #20  
ROM 6:23
 
flipped4bikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Coastal Maine
Posts: 1,713

Bikes: Specialized Tricross Comp, Lemond Tourmalet, Bridgestone MB-5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HardyWeinberg
I can't think of a single chunkier piece of anything to hang on a bike than a surly nice rack. Other than that they fit pugsley wheels and cost less than OMM racks that do the same, I honestly can't figure out how they sell those at all.


I do have one on my pugsley though, which itself is a giant chunky piece of a lot of stuff.
I own a OMM Sherpa, and the Surly Nice is rated to carry TWICE the weight of the Sherpa. So here's my question: say you even load up a Nice to 80 lbs, something's got to give, right? Can you break off a bolt/screw with that kind of load?
flipped4bikes is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 11:15 AM
  #21  
The Left Coast, USA
 
FrenchFit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,757

Bikes: Bulls, Bianchi, Koga, Trek, Miyata

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by SurlyLaika
I was thinking about saving my beastly Surly Nice Rack for my touring bike when I get one and getting a lighter, more practical rack for my uh commuter. I forget if it was a Jandd but I heard about one a while ago that was quite light and had a good cargo weight capacity.

Also, Frenchfit, I've been running 6 out of 7 days the last 2 weeks...only 1.5 miles every day but at least it's consistent. I feel good, in a different way than I do when I bike. I mean, I just feel a little more springy, lively, etc. Try it out, even if it isn't far. Any plans to lose a few lbs? I'd like to get down 15lbs, not much but damn it's hard when you're not actually fat. Just little motivation.
I am a fairly regular runner, 30-40 minutes 2 or 3 times a week. Love it, probably as much as cycling. But my knees won't take the concrete, I'm confined to treadmills or the soft track at the local HS. Great for climbing stamina.
FrenchFit is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 11:37 AM
  #22  
Insane Member
 
Onions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 125

Bikes: Huffy Grand Prairie 15sp MTB (don't hate!), 1980 Schwinn World Tourist, 1976 Schwinn Traveler, 1974 Romic Custom (project bike!)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For my commuter, I got the lightest one I could afford on Amazon with decent reviews. It's a tad small, but big enough to hold my panniers, and, properly installed, is pretty sturdy. I've carried both panniers and two crates full of groceries bungeed on a few times, and it didn't even try to give way. I've been pretty impressed. replace the crappy aluminum bolts that come with it, though. they're awful.

https://www.amazon.com/Avenir-Rear-AT...dp/B0014URFPS/
Onions is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 11:57 AM
  #23  
ROM 6:23
 
flipped4bikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Coastal Maine
Posts: 1,713

Bikes: Specialized Tricross Comp, Lemond Tourmalet, Bridgestone MB-5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
And to answer your question, the heaviest component other than my Sherpa rack is my Brooks Imperial saddle. 530g (1.16 lbs) and worth it. I use do to be a weight weenie, thinking that saddles that weight 200g were the shiznit. Until certain things went numb.
flipped4bikes is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 07:59 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by acidfast7
2.95kg is more like 6.5 lbs.

you're removing 3 1L milk tetra-paks from over the back wheel ... of course it will make a difference.
sorry, that was a type I met 2.95lbs or 1.3kg. Not 6.5lbs haha, but yea...it feels like a new bike to me. I don't think I've ever not had the rack on there and now I'm able to just use my backpack for just about everything.
SurlyLaika is offline  
Old 06-07-12, 08:00 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by flipped4bikes
And to answer your question, the heaviest component other than my Sherpa rack is my Brooks Imperial saddle. 530g (1.16 lbs) and worth it. I use do to be a weight weenie, thinking that saddles that weight 200g were the shiznit. Until certain things went numb.
I've only ever had Brooks. I rode the stock WTB SST saddle for a while but it was a pain in the ass. If I were to ever try a synthetic saddle, it might be Fizik's saddles.
SurlyLaika is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.