![]() |
speaking of bags for commuting...
4 Attachment(s)
I just bought my GF an Arc'teryx Spear 20 today (and saw my first Surly in Germany at the outdoor store as well). It fit her quite well and we didn't even realize that it had the capacity for carry a water bag, so that's a nice bonus.
We'll try it on commuting trip and day rides and let you know how it goes. Here it is: http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=256317 http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=256316 http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=256315 http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=256314 |
nice bag, but I don't like wearing a backpack while riding.
|
Originally Posted by CigTech
(Post 14364750)
nice bag, but I don't like wearing a backpack while riding.
|
Topeak MTX. Backpacks suck on bikes.
|
Originally Posted by Igo
(Post 14365640)
Topeak MTX. Backpacks suck on bikes.
if you ride on flat ground, in the middle of a desert, maybe it doesn't matter. but if you're on/off the bike all the time, it's quite nice. in addition, the bag doesn't have a built in holster, which may be a limitation for people in the US.\ also, only with someone of limited knowledge would call a 20L rucksack a "backpack" |
Originally Posted by acidfast7
(Post 14365730)
your opinion.
if you ride on flat ground, in the middle of a desert, maybe it doesn't matter. but if you're on/off the bike all the time, it's quite nice. in addition, the bag doesn't have a built in holster, which may be a limitation for people in the US.\ also, only with someone of limited knowledge would call a 20L rucksack a "backpack" |
Meh. I'm in the backpacking set, but I'm not too impressed with this particular one. Sure, it has a couple of good features going for it, but lacks a rain cover of it's own and has virtually no organizational capacity that I could tell from doing a Google search. Besides, 20L/1,200 c.i. capacity is a bit too small for my needs.
|
Originally Posted by no1mad
(Post 14366376)
Meh. I'm in the backpacking set, but I'm not too impressed with this particular one. Sure, it has a couple of good features going for it, but lacks a rain cover of it's own and has virtually no organizational capacity that I could tell from doing a Google search. Besides, 20L/1,200 c.i. capacity is a bit too small for my needs.
|
Originally Posted by no1mad
(Post 14366376)
Meh. I'm in the backpacking set, but I'm not too impressed with this particular one. Sure, it has a couple of good features going for it, but lacks a rain cover of it's own and has virtually no organizational capacity that I could tell from doing a Google search. Besides, 20L/1,200 c.i. capacity is a bit too small for my needs.
the commute isn't super long and the bag easily handles 2 changes of clothes and lunch for day without being super huge. also, it may not be waterproof, but i have a hard time imagining anything getting really wet inside (doesn't rain so long/heavy here) i'll take a ride with it today and see how it goes. |
Looks like a nice bag. Arc Teryx stuff is rock solid, build-wise. Let us know how it works once you give it a spin. I'm in the backpacking camp & agree that they are more practical than panniers (for me & my uses).
|
Originally Posted by MK313
(Post 14368009)
Looks like a nice bag. Arc Teryx stuff is rock solid, build-wise. Let us know how it works once you give it a spin. I'm in the backpacking camp & agree that they are more practical than panniers (for me & my uses).
Even the opening at the top is brilliant. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:22 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.