![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Andy_K
(Post 14616383)
Here's what the Jake looks like on my back deck! :thumb:
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8447/7...3cf604ee_c.jpg How do you like the geometry, as compared to the earlier Jakes? |
Originally Posted by waynesworld
(Post 14619710)
How do you like the geometry, as compared to the earlier Jakes?
Comparing the 53cm 2013 Jake geometry to the geometry of my 54cm 2008 Major Jake (and I believe the geometry is the same between all the Jakes through 2010): -the effective top tube length is 1mm shorter on the new Jake (550 vs 551) -the head tube angle is one degree slacker on the new Jake (71 vs 72) -the fork is six millimeter longer on the new Jake (398 vs 392) -the chainstays are 10mm shorter on the new Jake (425 vs 435) I can't feel any difference. As far as fit goes, the stack and reach are both within a millimeter between these two bikes. |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 14590234)
The Rove looks like a nice bike. Pretty much everything I would want in a commuter bike. Is it named after a certain political operative?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:41 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.