![]() |
I have often thought we should have a "cyclists yell 'hey!' at random innocent motorists day."
|
Originally Posted by windhchaser
(Post 14631621)
Just have had enough with the people yelling stuff at me.I ride my bike in a perfect line and am as far over as a i can get yet they still yell for me to get out of the road or drive so close to me that it is unsafe.As i said before im the only bike rider i see in this town.
|
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
(Post 14632926)
A gun response to being yelled at? OP didn't report any other problem. The OP should harden up or get a set of ear plugs or a music device with headphones; no more problem.
Granted, being yelled at is not pleasant, but there sure seems lately to be a lot of cry babies whining about each and every slight. |
Originally Posted by chandltp
(Post 14632399)
I think a gun rack with a loaded 12 gauge is more appropriate :) Surely there's a way to mount that to the back of the bike.
If people think I'm crazy, they don't get close. They think the crazy is going to rub off. The Santa hat last winter really helped.. or the goggles when it's really cold. Seriously though, to the OP, sounds like you're riding too close to the edge of the road. If there's not enough room for people to safely pass where you are, then take the lane and force them to move over. They may not like it but it will keep you save. The other option is to find a less direct route with bigger shoulders. |
Originally Posted by tractorlegs
(Post 14635276)
Hey, I think you're right - I re-read the op and all that happened was he got yelled at? If I quit things just because I got yelled at, . . .well, you know. If they're just yellin' at you, then just keep on riding. Maybe the drivers love you - my wife yells at me all the time and she still loves me.
|
i thought i said they also drive very close to me to act as if they will hit me .I invite any of you to come down and ride with me >you will see for ya selfs.Ps we have zero room on the left of the white line
|
I am with out the doubt the worst typer on this forum >and i try so hard
|
Originally Posted by windhchaser
(Post 14635297)
i thought i said they also drive very close to me to act as if they will hit me .I invite any of you to come down and ride with me >you will see for ya selfs.Ps we have zero room on the left of the white line
|
I think i mean the right the die towards the curb
|
Originally Posted by genec
(Post 14635288)
I wonder if you even have to have an actual gun... or just something that looks like one. Interesting idea. Of course still won't help with cell phone distracted drivers that flat out don't see you.
|
Originally Posted by chandltp
(Post 14637098)
I agree a fake gun would be sufficient in most cases.. even the gun rack on the bike is probably enough to make people question your mental stability and give you plenty of room and not engage you.
|
Originally Posted by windhchaser
(Post 14635297)
i thought i said they also drive very close to me to act as if they will hit me .I invite any of you to come down and ride with me >you will see for ya selfs.Ps we have zero room on the left of the white line
|
I rarely ever see other bike commuters in my city and my route doesn't have any bike paths or lanes that I can follow. However, I seldom get honked or yelled at. Maybe once every 6 months or so. Perhaps you are doing things that surprise drivers -- like not being visible enough. I am convinced that one reason why drivers are generally polite to me is that I am extremely visible. I always wear bright jerseys or jackets (usually neon green) and have 3 taillights and 1-2 headlights on my bike. I keep a consistent line about 3' from the curb, enough in the lane where drivers see me but not so far right that they try to squeeze by. Another factor is my route. I try to stay off the busy roads as much as possible. My route is 2-3 miles longer than the shortest route to work because I take neighborhood streets and less traveled roads wherever possible. I only ride on the busy 4-lane roads when there are no other options.
|
I got yelled at or honked at a few times when I first started commuting (we're talking a few months ago). As I've gotten more comfortable with riding on streets it has happened less... in fact it really hasn't happened since those first few times. I don't really know if there's anything specific I'm doing differently that has led to this (I don't think the people who yelled had a particularly specific reason to yell). Maybe there's something to be said just for the fact that I'm more comfortable and uncomfortable riding can draw out those kinds of responses? That sounds like new age kookiness perhaps but I do think there's an intangible cause and effect at play here.
Still I won't chastise the OP for not wanting to deal with it. Commuting isn't the right decision for everyone. I feel fortunate that my location and work location lends itself to a very bike friendly route. If I had to traverse more unfriendly territory I probably would never have picked up commuting in the first place. |
I can't believe all the talk about getting a gun, or even a fake one. If all that's happening is he's getting insulted or yelled at then flashing a gun will do nothing but get him in trouble, legally and physically. That's just irresponsible. Real or fake, its liable to get him shot or run over by a motorist that thinks they are in danger. At the least it'll probably get him arrested. The cyclist that pulls a gun on me in traffic is going to get squashed, although I can't imagine giving him/her a reason to do so in the first place.
I'm sure cyclist harrassment happens in my area, but I've never seen it. My job requires me to drive all over the metro area and while at times I get annoyed by slow cyclists, I have to remind myself they have as much right to the road as I do. I do get perturbed though, when they take the whole lane when there's no reason for them to. It makes me think they're doing it on purpose just to annoy the drivers. Whether that's their reason or not, appearances of such can give them a bad rep. My thinking is this: the cyclist is supposed to follow the same laws as, and is considered the same as a motor vehicle, but because they are by far the smallest and most vulnerable "vehicle" on the road, they should do all they can to safely stay out of the way of motor vehicles. That means staying as far right as is safely possible and giving proper hand signals when turning or stopping. It also means yielding to motor vehicles, even if they are in the wrong. Better to be inconvenienced than dead or injured. |
Originally Posted by homechicken
(Post 14637472)
I can't believe all the talk about getting a gun, or even a fake one. If all that's happening is he's getting insulted or yelled at then flashing a gun will do nothing but get him in trouble, legally and physically. That's just irresponsible. Real or fake, its liable to get him shot or run over by a motorist that thinks they are in danger. At the least it'll probably get him arrested. The cyclist that pulls a gun on me in traffic is going to get squashed, although I can't imagine giving him/her a reason to do so in the first place.
I'm sure cyclist harrassment happens in my area, but I've never seen it. My job requires me to drive all over the metro area and while at times I get annoyed by slow cyclists, I have to remind myself they have as much right to the road as I do. I do get perturbed though, when they take the whole lane when there's no reason for them to. It makes me think they're doing it on purpose just to annoy the drivers. Whether that's their reason or not, appearances of such can give them a bad rep. My thinking is this: the cyclist is supposed to follow the same laws as, and is considered the same as a motor vehicle, but because they are by far the smallest and most vulnerable "vehicle" on the road, they should do all they can to safely stay out of the way of motor vehicles. That means staying as far right as is safely possible and giving proper hand signals when turning or stopping. It also means yielding to motor vehicles, even if they are in the wrong. Better to be inconvenienced than dead or injured. So... you're not a bike commuter, are you? |
Originally Posted by cycronin
(Post 14637275)
I got yelled at or honked at a few times when I first started commuting (we're talking a few months ago). As I've gotten more comfortable with riding on streets it has happened less... in fact it really hasn't happened since those first few times. I don't really know if there's anything specific I'm doing differently that has led to this (I don't think the people who yelled had a particularly specific reason to yell). Maybe there's something to be said just for the fact that I'm more comfortable and uncomfortable riding can draw out those kinds of responses? That sounds like new age kookiness perhaps but I do think there's an intangible cause and effect at play here.
|
In response to Wolfwerx.
No, as I stated, my job doesn't allow for it. I drive anywhere from 15 to 180 miles a day for my work. I'm just giving a perspective from a non-bike commuter. Everything I said about how I think a cyclist should behave in traffic is either the law here or at least how I would behave if I were on the road with motor vehicles. I'd rather yield my right of way than be dead because I tried to assert my right to go before that 3000 pound car. Being legally in the right won't protect you from broken bones or death at the hands of an ignorant or rude driver. I yield multiple times every day to other motorists that don't have the right of way simply because I'd rather be inconvenienced than in an accident. You'd better believe I'll accquiesce to them if I'm on a bicycle. I wouldn't like it, but I'd get home in one piece. |
Originally Posted by homechicken
(Post 14637666)
No, as I stated, my job doesn't allow for it. I drive anywhere from 15 to 180 miles a day for my work. I'm just giving a perspective from a non-bike commuter. Everything I said about how I think a cyclist should behave in traffic is either the law here or at least how I would behave if I were on the road with motor vehicles. I'd rather yield my right of way than be dead because I tried to assert my right to go before that 3000 pound car. Being legally in the right won't protect you from broken bones or death at the hands of an ignorant or rude driver. I yield multiple times every day to other motorists that don't have the right of way simply because I'd rather be inconvenienced than in an accident. You'd better believe I'll accquiesce to them if I'm on a bicycle. I wouldn't like it, but I'd get home in one piece.
Nobody here would suggest playing chicken with a car. But the reality of the situation is that being on a bike requires a whole different outlook on the road than being in a car. Yes, a bike has "as much right to the road as" you do, even more than that, they are often legally required to be on the road. When a bike is taking "the whole lane when there's no reason for them to" they may be avoiding the door zone of parked cars, or maybe that stretch of road has poor conditions on the shoulder, etc. Or, maybe, they feel that the car behind them is being squirrelly, so they are blocking that car from doing something dangerous. Not sure what your interest is in this forum. Hopefully it's to educate yourself. Maybe I'm picking up a tone that isn't there, but you seem to be trolling. |
Originally Posted by homechicken
(Post 14637472)
I'm sure cyclist harrassment happens in my area, but I've never seen it. My job requires me to drive all over the metro area and while at times I get annoyed by slow cyclists, I have to remind myself they have as much right to the road as I do. I do get perturbed though, when they take the whole lane when there's no reason for them to. It makes me think they're doing it on purpose just to annoy the drivers. Whether that's their reason or not, appearances of such can give them a bad rep. My thinking is this: the cyclist is supposed to follow the same laws as, and is considered the same as a motor vehicle, but because they are by far the smallest and most vulnerable "vehicle" on the road, they should do all they can to safely stay out of the way of motor vehicles. That means staying as far right as is safely possible and giving proper hand signals when turning or stopping. It also means yielding to motor vehicles, even if they are in the wrong. Better to be inconvenienced than dead or injured.
I will move into the center of the lane if the right shoulder is badly paved or has glass and debris strewn about. The right side of the road might be plenty wide, but if it's not rideable, the cyclist can move to the center of the lane. |
You need to do what is best for your own safety. None of us here can tell you what that is.
That said, I hate to see a situation where motorist think continually harassing a cyclist forced them to stop riding. In my case, I never got a lot of harassment, but I did get a few honks and dbags doing stupid stuff like pulling up beside me and then peeling out, diesels trying to smoke me, etc. After a year of commuting, it all stopped. I haven't had a single issue in a long time - not even a honk. |
Originally Posted by Wolfwerx
(Post 14637748)
Nobody here would suggest playing chicken with a car. But the reality of the situation is that being on a bike requires a whole different outlook on the road than being in a car. Yes, a bike has "as much right to the road as" you do, even more than that, they are often legally required to be on the road.
When a bike is taking "the whole lane when there's no reason for them to" they may be avoiding the door zone of parked cars, or maybe that stretch of road has poor conditions on the shoulder, etc. Or, maybe, they feel that the car behind them is being squirrelly, so they are blocking that car from doing something dangerous. Not sure what your interest is in this forum. Hopefully it's to educate yourself. Maybe I'm picking up a tone that isn't there, but you seem to be trolling. Not trolling at all, I was just perusing all the forums and came across this thread and wondered what the OP was giving up and why. Once I read some of the thread I had to throw my 2 cents in, more about the gun suggestion than anything else, but once I got started I had to speak my mind on the whole issue as I see it. Not that I'm anti-gun, just that in this scenario it seems a totally inappropriate response. I really wish I could commute by bike to one location for work every day. It would be great exercise and save some money at the same time, but its not feasible. And yes, cyclists here are required to use the roadways if they are over 12 years old. I think that age is a little low, I'd think 16 would be the proper age since that's when they can start driving. I personally feel they should be allowed to use the sidewalks when its safe for them to do so, ie: not crowded with pedestrians. |
Originally Posted by homechicken
(Post 14637472)
... My job requires me to drive all over the metro area and while at times I get annoyed by slow cyclists, I have to remind myself they have as much right to the road as I do. I do get perturbed though, when they take the whole lane when there's no reason for them to. It makes me think they're doing it on purpose just to annoy the drivers. Whether that's their reason or not, appearances of such can give them a bad rep. My thinking is this: the cyclist is supposed to follow the same laws as, and is considered the same as a motor vehicle, but because they are by far the smallest and most vulnerable "vehicle" on the road, they should do all they can to safely stay out of the way of motor vehicles. That means staying as far right as is safely possible and giving proper hand signals when turning or stopping. It also means yielding to motor vehicles, even if they are in the wrong. Better to be inconvenienced than dead or injured.
What you should be saying - or at least accepting - is that the larger and most dangerous vehicles should be doing all they can to stay safely out of the way of all other vehicles. Which especially means yielding to other vehicles, even when you think by right of the superior threat you shouldn't have to. When you think about it, that attitude about what the 'vulnerable' vehicles should do, instead of what you should do, is exactly why cyclists joke and fantasize about being conspicuously armed. That would make YOU equally vulnerable, and perhaps lead to an attitude adjustment. |
Originally Posted by Wolfwerx
(Post 14637748)
Not sure what your interest is in this forum. Hopefully it's to educate yourself.
Trolling, as I see it, would be advising the OP to buy a gun because his feelings get hurt when people yell at him. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by CbadRider
(Post 14637779)
How do you know there's no reason for them to take the lane?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:47 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.