![]() |
Originally Posted by bkrownd
(Post 14785268)
Maybe it could have, maybe not. However, it's worth having even if it's only 50% effective. Yes, you're supposed to monitor it every few seconds, which is a really trivial amount of effort to those of us who don't have vision problems. I value my mirror mostly for keeping me aware of my surroundings, and not having to unbalance myself or take my eye off the road by looking back over my shoulder. The mirror also keeps ME from making stupid mistakes like crossing in front of other vehicles' paths or panic-stopping in front of cars.
As far as riding in the lane...that's where you're supposed to ride, practical or not. (providing you've got all the proper and necessary visibility gear) H |
Glad to hear you're ok.
|
Originally Posted by Leisesturm
(Post 14785736)
I own, and use, mirrors every ride. I won't make a lane change without checking my mirrors. That said, I stand by my earlier observation that a mirror would not have been of much use in the incident that was described above. And, no, you are not supposed to ride in the lane. You are supposed to ride to the side of the lane out of the path of vehicle traffic. That's the law here and most everywhere else that I know of.
H |
I'm a realist. The cop was a bit of a dick, but he did his job. I have no desire to waste my time whining to his superior that he could have been more sensitive. I'll just ***** about him on the net like any good American. And I don't see how this crime could be solved, no witnesses, admittedly shaky description from me, and if I left a mark on the vehicle it's just going to blend in with the others (old pickup that had seen better days).
For the poster wondering where this happened, it was eastbound on 11th, just west of Garnet. I was "in" the right lane. It had rained and I was moving in the lane as needed to avoid puddles near the curb. When i was struck i was on the left side of the right hand lane. i have deduced that he probably hit me with the drivers side front bumper which means he just drove straight into me without attempting to avoid. Who knows, drunk, dirty windshield, no headlights, texting...the list goes on. As a safety trainer for a large trucking company my day job is to prevent accidents, and I've been thinking about what I could have done to prevent this. Obviously I have no control over the other driver, I'll let karma take care of him, but what could I have done to try and prevent this? Maybe nothing, maybe no amount of flashers, vests, mirrors, or force fields would have helped. Nothing in life is without risk, and if you spend too much time trying to mitigate it, life stops being enjoyable. I've been meaning to get a mirror, might have helped-as a truck driver I'm pretty used to monitoring them without losing my forward focus.- call it 50/50 but it's not a huge impact on my wallet or enjoyment of my ride. Safety vest? considering the brightness of my flasher I don't think visibility was a factor, but I'm thinking better to have too much than not enough. No telling what is going to catch their eye. Add reflective tape to this list also. Camera? Doubt it would have worked or survived the impact. It was dark and wet, add my flasher and the oncoming headlights and I doubt there would have been any useful information gathered. Too much money and something else i have to worry about maintaining for probably no payoff. For the poster who mentioned my helmet, definitely getting a new one. no worries there. Only other thing i can think of is the bike and my route. Even if I had spotted him coming in my mirror, I haven't really practiced jumping up the curb at speed in a long time, or if I don't want to be bike specific and go to something more suited to jumping curbs maybe my reaction to perceived threats should be to slow down or stop and get as close to the curb as possible. As for route, I might be able to vary it, but the area i would have to travel through, although it might have slower traffic, it might expose me to nefarious activities. Is there any excuse for the guy hitting me? Nope, i was well within my rights to be there. Could I have done more to prevent it? I'm going to say yes and take action to correct my deficiencies. Could it happen again even though I've taken action? Of course, but who knows, if I'd continued driving my car, I might have been t-boned by a dump truck. You leave the house, you take the risk. heck! you're not even safe in your own house. Don't get me started on bathtubs and power tools. Be safe everyone. |
Originally Posted by silmarillion
(Post 14782562)
What kind of asshat rear-ends someone on a bike, and takes off? :mad:
b) asshat without a valid license c) asshat, N.O.S. d) all of the above
Originally Posted by silmarillion
(Post 14782562)
Thank goodness you'll be okay. Gear can be fixed and replaced. I'm sorry your ride got jacked up though.
You know, this is why I went ahead and bought a GoPro camera. If you could have captured the tag, then you would have been able to recover the stuff they damaged. What kind of asshat rear-ends someone on a bike, and takes off? :mad: And they would have been in hot water too. Dick Tracy would have had to actually do his job instead of adding insult to injury. Try to keep the wounds clean and dry, You'll probably need some Aleve in the morning. :) cops lack resources (everything from bicycle training to manpower) and if you walked away, that makes the incident low priority. video is a total game-changer; it turns the cops' job of finding a hit-n-run driver from something that could take hundreds of hours of resources with low probability of a prosecution, to something that could take less than an hour and result in a high probability of prosecution. |
Originally Posted by WorldPax
(Post 14785892)
Camera? Doubt it would have worked or survived the impact. It was dark and wet, add my flasher and the oncoming headlights and I doubt there would have been any useful information gathered. Too much money and something else i have to worry about maintaining for probably no payoff.
|
Originally Posted by WorldPax
(Post 14782466)
Think I'm going to just drive in to work tomorrow, get a mirror and safety vest this weekend, then back on the bike Monday.
Also consider this http://store.dinottelighting.com/300...tery-p111.aspx |
Originally Posted by bkrownd
(Post 14785907)
The only thing that really needs to survive the impact is the data card, and they almost certainly will.
|
Sigh, another one of these threads...
Need to get a camera or get a car =X |
Originally Posted by WorldPax
(Post 14785967)
Even then, would they capture any valuable information in such poor conditions.
it also helps to mount a wide-angle light (eg red-zone-4) near the camera. this will reflect off of plates and often results in some very crisp plate captures, even at night, even with headlights pointed at the camera. the other "trick" is to run multiple cameras. four cameras = 4x the chance of getting a plate on video. |
reflective vest and reflective ankle bands make a huge difference in your visibility in the dark
|
Originally Posted by drjava
(Post 14784632)
|
Originally Posted by silmarillion
(Post 14784260)
Yeah, maybe for Christmas. I actually have a Kodak video camera that's every bit as good at capturing video as the GoPro, but there is just no way to mount it to the seat post unless I fab one up.
The only reason I have one on my bike at all is because of situations like this one right here. If you don't have any way to prove that you were hit, then it's your word against theirs. That's only if you aren't injured to the point where you couldn't get a tag#. Cameras don't lie...and video evidence is admissible in court. Especially if it's a felonious hit and run. It would be really cool if GoPro, or another camera company could make a camera that had 2 small remote lenses that fed video data into a central unit. |
Originally Posted by chefisaac
(Post 14784984)
That would be pretty neat. Is the Kodak waterproof? Anyway you could mount it to the rack on the back if you have one?
I don't have a rack, but I have thought about designing a holder that could attach to the seat post. I kinda sketched up this claw looking, Voyage to The Bottom of the Sea flying sub thingamajig in SolidWorks. But I'm not too happy with it. I could machine away most of the material to lighten it up, but I think it's still too bulky. I'm really surprised with the technology that they put in cellphones and laptops, that they haven't come up with a good remote lens setup like I mentioned before. I bet you can get something like that, but it's probably wicked expensive. You know something like a surveillance camera.... |
Originally Posted by silmarillion
(Post 14786208)
My only concern is at 30FPS, I wonder if you could capture a tag# on a moving vehicle very well.
IMHO, the HERO2 is the best bike camera (and impartial witness) for the money, overall. |
Originally Posted by unterhausen
(Post 14786182)
reflective vest and reflective ankle bands make a huge difference in your visibility in the dark
Believe it or not.. I have been equally impressed with the little "Spock" lights too. They sure are bright for being such a small light. |
Originally Posted by smasha
(Post 14786272)
in direct sunlight, 60fps may come out ahead. in other conditions (less light, low speed differential) 30fps may come out ahead. there are a lot of variables, and no One Right Answer™.
IMHO, the HERO2 is the best bike camera (and impartial witness) for the money, overall. That still really bums me out. But as far as dry land, the GoPro should catch most any image if it's within aspect range. |
Originally Posted by Ridefreemc
(Post 14786246)
Go to Ram mounts and look at the smaller balls. They screw in the bottom of the Kodak, then there are brackets that you could mount to the seatpost.
Wow! aren't we just a load of techno-freds! Our bikes are going to become something similar to Darth Vader..More technology than machine...twisted and evil. :eek: |
Originally Posted by silmarillion
(Post 14786285)
Yeah, I have the Hero2. I really like it, but I was messed up when I took it on a drift dive in Florida, and the resolution is just like opening your naked eyes underwater.
|
Originally Posted by smasha
(Post 14786319)
i'm not an expert on underwater use (i always ride the bike on land), but there's at least one after-market lens adaptor thing for using it underwater.
Hey New Zealand! Have you seen any Hobbits down under mate? Can't wait until Dec 14th... |
Originally Posted by silmarillion
(Post 14786331)
Hey New Zealand! Have you seen any Hobbits down under mate?
|
Originally Posted by smasha
(Post 14786361)
i haven't seen any hobbits.... but there are plenty of muppets, driving cars.
As long as they aren't rear-ending cyclists! Sorry OP, I don't mean to make light of your situation... |
One thing I've found with my 1.3mp Vivitar camera is the audio sensitivity is very high. Visually in less than daylight(like mornings) the resolution is not particularly high, but usable. The place where it shines is when I talk to it. Even in traffic I can talk a little above conversation level and describe scenarios/licenses. There have been times where I have actually timed/observed cars from the behind until out of sight forward with the audio portion. It takes a bit of composure to call the situation while riding but it provides a constructive outlet and at least the 'black box' factor would be good in the event of a crash to determine forensically what the incoming car's throttle/speed was.
|
Originally Posted by Ns1
(Post 14785974)
Sigh, another one of these threads...
Need to get a camera or get a car =X
Originally Posted by bkrownd
(Post 14785907)
The only thing that really needs to survive the impact is the data card, and they almost certainly will.
H |
Originally Posted by mtbikerinpa
(Post 14786426)
and at least the 'black box' factor would be good in the event of a crash to determine forensically what the incoming car's throttle/speed was.
|
Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
(Post 14784082)
I am not anti-police, though it may come off that way...I'm a law and order guy, but I'm also a pragmatist. The average police officer isn't the best educated, or brightest guy out there. Most really don't know the laws very well, certainly not the subtleties, and we're trusting them with exercising a LOT of authority when they aren't really adequately trained in the laws they're enforcing. If you're expecting most police officers to understand laws relating to cyclists, I think you're going to be disappointed. These aren't lawyers or judges...they're blue collar guys who are looking to get home with as little grief as possible and who have a difficult job dealing with the scum of the earth all day, every day.
|
Originally Posted by smasha
(Post 14786001)
one never knows. there have been times when i've been surprised by getting a plate capture, and there have been times when i've been surprised to not get a plate capture. there are no guarantees. all i can say is the HERO2s do better than any of the other cameras i've used.
it also helps to mount a wide-angle light (eg red-zone-4) near the camera. this will reflect off of plates and often results in some very crisp plate captures, even at night, even with headlights pointed at the camera. the other "trick" is to run multiple cameras. four cameras = 4x the chance of getting a plate on video. Have you used the GoPro? |
Originally Posted by Leisesturm
(Post 14786715)
For real... this one just slays me... ...
Too right. It might be just me but I would also like to survive the $%^$# impact. Fat lot of good the #@$% data is going to do my corpse. Oh, did you see #40... four camera's... to get a plate number... so the insurance company will pay the ex you already gave a quarter million to even more money. Stop please, just stop, you're killing me here... H |
Originally Posted by Ns1
(Post 14785974)
Sigh, another one of these threads...
Need to get a camera or get a car =X |
Originally Posted by chefisaac
(Post 14786817)
You run 4 cameras?
Have you used the GoPro? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:13 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.