Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Council doubles parking fees for SUVs

Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Council doubles parking fees for SUVs

Old 02-15-05, 05:59 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Council doubles parking fees for SUVs

I heard on the TV news last night that the North Sydney Council is about to double parking fees for SUVs. I can't remember the details, but it seems everyone there is getting a bit jack of the space they seem to take up.
Rowan is offline  
Old 02-15-05, 06:08 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
PaulBravey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 532
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I presume they're not going to start charging smart cars and (old) minis half price? They're a pain here when they decide to park their huge great SUV in a spot that's marked 'compact' and then leave dents in the doors of cars next to them 'cos there's no room to open the door.
PaulBravey is offline  
Old 02-15-05, 06:11 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 270

Bikes: 2003 Jamis Nova - commuter setup

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Socialism at it's best.
mikdes is offline  
Old 02-15-05, 06:14 PM
  #4  
contrarian
 
lala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CO Springs
Posts: 2,848

Bikes: 80's ross road bike/commuter, 80's team miyata, 90's haro mtb xtracycle conversion, koga mitaya world traveler

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
woot!
__________________
Higher ground for the apocalypse!
lala is offline  
Old 02-15-05, 06:15 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by mikdes
Socialism at it's best.
How so? I would have thought commercial entrepreneurship at its best. I bet the privately owned car parking stations will follow suit very quickly.
Rowan is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 03:13 AM
  #6  
Every lane is a bike lane
 
Chris L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia - passionfruit capital of the universe!
Posts: 9,663
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Rowan
How so? I would have thought commercial entrepreneurship at its best. I bet the privately owned car parking stations will follow suit very quickly.
I think the only thing that stopped them from doing so previously was being accused of discrimination.
__________________
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.

That is all.
Chris L is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 05:37 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by mikdes
Socialism at it's best.
Socialism would make everyone pay the SAME price, regardless of how much space they take. Conservative capitalism would have everyone pay for EXACTLY what they use.
Cyclist0383 is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 06:59 AM
  #8  
Just riding
 
andygates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Exeter, UK
Posts: 651

Bikes: Cannondale Bad Boy / Mercian track / BOB trailer / Moulton recumbent project

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Socialism would also have them driving the same cars, of course. How else could it be equitable and fair?

This is nothing of the sort: it's resource pricing. Consumer pays. Don't see how that can be objected to in a market economy.
andygates is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 07:43 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Bolo Grubb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,892

Bikes: 1984 Trek 720 with a Nexus hub, 2016 Cannondale Synapse

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 10 Posts
I read or heard somewhere that a state in the USA (maybe Oregon?) is watning to charge a road tax based on how many miles are driven. I like the theory of "pay for what you use" but it all depends on how it is enforced.

I think large SUVs should pay more then my Honda Civic.
Bolo Grubb is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 07:51 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
FXjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 12,969
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2985 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Define an SUV.

Does a Subaru count?
FXjohn is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 08:48 AM
  #11  
He drop me
 
Grasschopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central PA
Posts: 11,664

Bikes: '03 Marin Mill Valley, '02 Eddy Merckx Corsa 0.1, '12 Giant Defy Advance, '20 Giant Revolt 1, '20 Giant Defy Advanced Pro 1, some random 6KU fixie

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 138 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by FXjohn
Define an SUV.

Does a Subaru count?
As much as Subaru would like you to think the Forester is an SUV so they can sell more...no it is a station wagon. No other model is even in question IMO, they are cars.
__________________
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
Grasschopper is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 09:25 AM
  #12  
Retrogrouch in Training
 
bostontrevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Knee-deep in the day-to-day
Posts: 5,484
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Actually the Forester and Outback are both SUV's. It's a definition based on ground clearance and curb weight. That makes them light trucks and relaxes fuel economy standards. Last year's Outback was intentionally raised up because the fuel economy had become so bad that they couldn't keep it in the sedan class anymore without hurting their fleet ratings.
bostontrevor is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 09:45 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 270

Bikes: 2003 Jamis Nova - commuter setup

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rowan
How so? I would have thought commercial entrepreneurship at its best. I bet the privately owned car parking stations will follow suit very quickly.
The difference is that this is a government entity doing this. If an SUV takes up one spot just like a sedan, why charge more? It's probably an overly environmentally "conscious" council that has decided that it's their responsibility to penalize people just because they drive less fuel-efficient vehicles.

As long as they're doing this, maybe they should lower parking fees for hybrid cars and motorcycles. Do you think that will happen? Likely not.
mikdes is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 10:12 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Kabloink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 605
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
I don't know if I agree with doubling fines for legally parked suvs, but I would strongly agree with doubling fines for suv and truck owners that take up more than one space. I am sure you have seen these drivers. The ones that somehow need to park at an angle taking up two spaces or even worse parking in the wrong direction taking up 3 or 4 spaces.
Kabloink is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 10:25 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 270

Bikes: 2003 Jamis Nova - commuter setup

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kabloink
I don't know if I agree with doubling fines for legally parked suvs, but I would strongly agree with doubling fines for suv and truck owners that take up more than one space. I am sure you have seen these drivers. The ones that somehow need to park at an angle taking up two spaces or even worse parking in the wrong direction taking up 3 or 4 spaces.
I agree. That goes for anyone, not just SUV drivers. I've seen plently of BMW and Mercedes sedans doing exactly the same thing.
mikdes is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 10:33 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
FXjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 12,969
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2985 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by mikdes
I agree. That goes for anyone, not just SUV drivers. I've seen plently of BMW and Mercedes sedans doing exactly the same thing.
So we've come to the logical conclusion that SUV's are just being scapegoated and all the other cars on the road are pretty much just as bad.
FXjohn is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 10:33 AM
  #17  
No one carries the DogBoy
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Upper Midwest USA
Posts: 2,320

Bikes: Roubaix Expert Di2, Jamis Renegade, Surly Disc Trucker, Cervelo P2, CoMotion Tandem

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
if you charge me twice as much, I'm going to straddle a line and take up two spots. Heck, I paid for 'em. See what happens to parking availablity then.
DogBoy is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 11:06 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
nick burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Absecon, NJ
Posts: 2,947

Bikes: Puch Luzern, Puch Mistral SLE, Bianchi Pista, Motobecane Grand Touring, Austro-Daimler Ultima, Legnano, Raleigh MountainTour, Cannondale SM600

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
How about just reducing the size of the parking spots so that larger vehicles (regardless of if they are suv's) will be forced to pay double since they're taking up two spots?
nick burns is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 11:08 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
FXjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 12,969
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2985 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by nick burns
How about just reducing the size of the parking spots so that larger vehicles (regardless of if they are suv's) will be forced to pay double since they're taking up two spots?
That MIGHT work..but also there might be odd size spots left in between vehicles that no one could use though.
FXjohn is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 01:09 PM
  #20  
dangerous with tools
 
halfbiked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: minneapolis
Posts: 4,502

Bikes: fat, long, single & fast

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bolo Grubb
I read or heard somewhere that a state in the USA (maybe Oregon?) is watning to charge a road tax based on how many miles are driven. I like the theory of "pay for what you use" but it all depends on how it is enforced.

I think large SUVs should pay more then my Honda Civic.
Mileage isn't a good variable for calculating 'use'. A long commute in a compact car does much less damage than a short commute in an SUV. If you want to penalize large vehicles for what they use, then set a tax rate based on vehicle weight. Heavier vehicles do more damage to the roads, make 'em pay more.
halfbiked is offline  
Old 02-16-05, 02:31 PM
  #21  
No one carries the DogBoy
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Upper Midwest USA
Posts: 2,320

Bikes: Roubaix Expert Di2, Jamis Renegade, Surly Disc Trucker, Cervelo P2, CoMotion Tandem

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by halfbiked
Mileage isn't a good variable for calculating 'use'. A long commute in a compact car does much less damage than a short commute in an SUV. If you want to penalize large vehicles for what they use, then set a tax rate based on vehicle weight. Heavier vehicles do more damage to the roads, make 'em pay more.
Seems like the time to do this is with vehicle registration/license renewal since they know the vehicle make/model at that time.
DogBoy is offline  
Old 02-18-05, 10:12 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 86
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Capitalism doesn't make people pay for what they use. Capitalism is all about getting other people to wipe your booty so you can think your stuff doesn't smell. Remember what happened to all those buffalo?
Gardener is offline  
Old 02-19-05, 10:23 AM
  #23  
Just riding
 
andygates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Exeter, UK
Posts: 651

Bikes: Cannondale Bad Boy / Mercian track / BOB trailer / Moulton recumbent project

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well yeah, capitalism is a fundamentally unfair and unsustainable model, but let's not get bogged down in details

As for variable pricing, hell, there exists a tax based on engine size (ie environmental impact) and vehicle weight (ie mpg) - fuel tax. But I understand that you chaps don't like paying $2 for a gallon of gas?
andygates is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.