Everyday Aerodynamics
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
#28
Descends like a rock
The trouble with getting more aero beyond position on the bike is finding what is good in all conditions. Something that is great for a headwind might be unsafe in a stiff crosswind. I will say aerodynamics was a big part in choosing my Linus panniers and the narrow Streamliner rack. I don't need to carry much back and forth to work and the low profile makes for less drag that big bulky bags. These don't stick out any further than my legs.
#29
aka Timi
Everyday Aerodynamics
Bent
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 59
Bikes: Metabikes Metaphrastic Rival
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I commute on a recumbent bike and have my seat tilted as far back as possible. The bottom bracket of my bike is a little bit above seat height as well so combined it provides a relatively small cross section which helps tremendously in picking up speed and keeping speed. Be that as it may, my main priority was/is to get to work on a bike in relative comfort and ease, without pain in the butt, so to speak . The aero benefits are simply an added bonus
#31
Senior Member
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
i think you can put a streamlined tailbox on without issue though. Other than the odd appearance.
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
My two "hybrids" have flat bars set ~4 inches below the saddle and if I place my arms on the bar I can adopt a full aero tuck. Moreover, since my bars are ~420 mm wide my arms are most definitely not overly separated. The real advantage of using a flat bar is that you can lop off ~200 gms of steering weight (drops+STIs can be boat anchors). This makes a very big difference in manoeuvrability and is the main reason I commute on flat bars. Its akin to the difference between running a 600 gm carbon fork vs an 800 gm alloy fork.
Last edited by spare_wheel; 05-28-13 at 03:09 PM.
#34
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,243
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,414 Times
in
2,523 Posts
I've heard from multiple sources that aero doesn't begin to matter until about 20mph; is it possible to develop a rule-of-thumb graph (from measurements, not speculation) that shows aero drag as a function of airspeed? (rather than ground-speed, which would be more useful for considering the very important drag of rolling resistance -- if you consider airspeed instead, you can automatically account for headwind/tailwind)
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
13 Posts
My two "hybrids" have flat bars set ~4 inches below the saddle and if I place my arms on the bar I can adopt a full aero tuck. Moreover, since my bars are ~420 mm wide my arms are most definitely not overly separated. The real advantage of using a flat bar is that you can lop off ~200 gms of steering weight (drops+STIs can be boat anchors). This makes a very big difference in manoeuvrability and is the main reason I commute on flat bars. Its akin to the difference between running a 600 gm carbon fork vs an 800 gm alloy fork.
Also, I'm not sure how 42 cm flat bars would make a bike more maneuverable than 42 cm drops but I do know that riding with your arms on flat bars isn't going to be as comfortable over a distance as riding in the drops nor would you have fingertip access to brakes and shifters.
Obviously drops are going to involve more tubing so there is some potential weight savings there with flat bars but most flat bars are significantly wider. You can cut them down but then you lose space for controls, lights, etc plus most of the advantage flat bars give you in terms of leverage.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
13 Posts
I've heard from multiple sources that aero doesn't begin to matter until about 20mph; is it possible to develop a rule-of-thumb graph (from measurements, not speculation) that shows aero drag as a function of airspeed? (rather than ground-speed, which would be more useful for considering the very important drag of rolling resistance -- if you consider airspeed instead, you can automatically account for headwind/tailwind)
Also as you've implied a moderate 10 mph headwind with a 10 mph pace means a 20 mph air speed.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 431
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Thanks for posting Darth Lefty, I thought of posting the same but didn't want to hear the flames..lol
Thanks for taking the heat.
I commute on a 2 different MTB'S both have rear racks and I don't care for a back pack.
1. single speed coaster with studded tires and fenders in the winter, swap to 2" serfas drifters for the rain.
2. Nice weather I commute on a 18 speed MTB no fenders and 26 x 1.75 marathon plus, both bikes are vintage 1980's Peugeots.
Aerodynamics are very important and My 27 1/2" nitto handle bars are very wide, I am a big guy 6'1" and 200# not fat but still not pro bike skinny.
A few things that I have found that helped me.
* I don't use aero bars but I sometimes keep my hands very close together and elbows in which helps.
* I am very flexible and stretch my upper body along the top tube with my head low, this may sound funny but coasting down hills in this position I noticed I pick up 4-5 mph+ easy coasting down hill.
* I use an expandable trunk bag, triangle frame bag and seat post bag and since it is all behind me I don't get wind drag.
* keeping my body and head down really helps (If your flexible).
I really like commuting by bike so I really liked DX-MANS post so damn true.
I recently moved from Cali to the Great Plains so commuting is vastly different especially during the winter but what a great workout.
I am interested to hear how others deal with their commute to make it more kind and gentle.
'
Thanks for taking the heat.
I commute on a 2 different MTB'S both have rear racks and I don't care for a back pack.
1. single speed coaster with studded tires and fenders in the winter, swap to 2" serfas drifters for the rain.
2. Nice weather I commute on a 18 speed MTB no fenders and 26 x 1.75 marathon plus, both bikes are vintage 1980's Peugeots.
Aerodynamics are very important and My 27 1/2" nitto handle bars are very wide, I am a big guy 6'1" and 200# not fat but still not pro bike skinny.
A few things that I have found that helped me.
* I don't use aero bars but I sometimes keep my hands very close together and elbows in which helps.
* I am very flexible and stretch my upper body along the top tube with my head low, this may sound funny but coasting down hills in this position I noticed I pick up 4-5 mph+ easy coasting down hill.
* I use an expandable trunk bag, triangle frame bag and seat post bag and since it is all behind me I don't get wind drag.
* keeping my body and head down really helps (If your flexible).
I really like commuting by bike so I really liked DX-MANS post so damn true.
I recently moved from Cali to the Great Plains so commuting is vastly different especially during the winter but what a great workout.
I am interested to hear how others deal with their commute to make it more kind and gentle.
'
#38
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,243
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,414 Times
in
2,523 Posts
Srsly? Never knew that.
Yes, 10+10=20, and 10mph wind is quite moderate (and 20mph with with 10mph TAILwind is still 10mph headwind), still like to see some concrete, measured graph showing airspeed vs drag for some typical bicycling setup (average size/shape bike, average size/shape rider, known/varied riding position, clothing, controlled/measured wind etc...)
Also as you've implied a moderate 10 mph headwind with a 10 mph pace means a 20 mph air speed.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
The equations work, and have been verified. https://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm is very good.
#40
curmudgineer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago SW burbs
Posts: 4,417
Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times
in
70 Posts
For some of us, being as aero-optimized as practical is quite important, and worthwhile. In my case, the reasons are:
Kudos to Darth for presenting such a well-informed guide to practical aerodynamics, as well as to the other posters to this thread for their contributions, both pro and con. It's all good discussion.
- I bike commute in order to get a heavy workout on a fairly regular basis, with the minimum net investment of time
- that means I want to go as fast as possible, within reason
- there is no need for a reasonably aero-optimized commuting bike to be expensive, uncomfortable, or impractical
Kudos to Darth for presenting such a well-informed guide to practical aerodynamics, as well as to the other posters to this thread for their contributions, both pro and con. It's all good discussion.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Got a Zzipper 'thriller' Fairing for a bike setup i was doing a 12 mile commute.
the aerodynamics was the airflow around a smooth frontal ..
It wasn't really a Low crouch..
a benefit I didnt have to dress so warmly, since the airflow was less through my clothing..
It was a river bottom road so pretty flat.. the Fairing also made the audio on my Books on tape
hearing easier to fill the hour..
the aerodynamics was the airflow around a smooth frontal ..
It wasn't really a Low crouch..
a benefit I didnt have to dress so warmly, since the airflow was less through my clothing..
It was a river bottom road so pretty flat.. the Fairing also made the audio on my Books on tape
hearing easier to fill the hour..
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 392
Bikes: Trek SU100, Surly Cross Check
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've heard from multiple sources that aero doesn't begin to matter until about 20mph; is it possible to develop a rule-of-thumb graph (from measurements, not speculation) that shows aero drag as a function of airspeed? (rather than ground-speed, which would be more useful for considering the very important drag of rolling resistance -- if you consider airspeed instead, you can automatically account for headwind/tailwind)
From personal experience on a commuter bike with drop bars, I'd say that air speed is somewhere between 15-20 mph.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
One of my old tests shows that full fairings on diamond frames can reduce drag significantly, and even just a tailbox can be a strong improvement:
("with front fairing" just differentiates two different designs) This is simply a coast-down test, coasting unpowered down a hill and recording speed.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 392
Bikes: Trek SU100, Surly Cross Check
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Any half-assed attempt at fairing will likely increase drag. If you truly want to use fairings to reduce drag, you'll need something that, at the very least, nearly meets your body. Ideally the fairing would cover the entire bike in some aerodynamic shape (thereby reducing your drag coefficient while minimizing the increase in cross-sectional area), and that's what they use for breaking speed records and such.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,742
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,862 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I like the mini essay as a starting point, but you really need to discuss trade-offs more.
Even on a road bike, I don't generally ride in the most aero position available to me because it restricts my breathing too much (not to mention my comfort). Deep section wheels are great for aerodynamics, but they add weight and so they're bad for start/stop and uphill travel. Skinny tires are slower on uneven surfaces. Then, of course, all of these have to be set on a grid of aero-drag vs. (wind relative) cruising speed. At 5 mph you can nearly get away with carrying an umbrella. At 10 mph, I doubt the backpack vs. kitty litter pannier makes a noticeable difference. At 15 mph, things start to get interesting. Of course, with even a 10 mph headwind we're all going to notice aerodynamics.
If you ever really want to geek out on aerodynamics go watch a time trial. Even the local no-prize variety time trial brings out the tear-drop helmets, full carbon disc wheels, skin suits and shoe covers. Talking to those guys about how much time each piece of equipment saves (and believe me they can tell you), will give you a lot of perspective. For a stipped down rider and bike, there really isn't a lot of payoff beyond the aerobars. The helmet saves a big chunk of time by racing standards, but not enough that you'd commute with it. Panniers are the most obvious piece of equipment with drag, but you need a pretty chunky set of panniers to cause a frontal area change as big as the difference between an upright riding position and riding in the drops of a road bike.
There is a guy around here who commutes with a velomobile. Besides being extremely aerodynamic it's also fairly visible.
I've had people draft me during my commute (which is a bigger gain than any piece of equipment will get you) on windy days. Some even asked if I would mind. It's actually surprising that in cities with big bike commuter contingents you don't see organized pacelines of commuters. It would be very sensible, and maybe even fun.
Even on a road bike, I don't generally ride in the most aero position available to me because it restricts my breathing too much (not to mention my comfort). Deep section wheels are great for aerodynamics, but they add weight and so they're bad for start/stop and uphill travel. Skinny tires are slower on uneven surfaces. Then, of course, all of these have to be set on a grid of aero-drag vs. (wind relative) cruising speed. At 5 mph you can nearly get away with carrying an umbrella. At 10 mph, I doubt the backpack vs. kitty litter pannier makes a noticeable difference. At 15 mph, things start to get interesting. Of course, with even a 10 mph headwind we're all going to notice aerodynamics.
If you ever really want to geek out on aerodynamics go watch a time trial. Even the local no-prize variety time trial brings out the tear-drop helmets, full carbon disc wheels, skin suits and shoe covers. Talking to those guys about how much time each piece of equipment saves (and believe me they can tell you), will give you a lot of perspective. For a stipped down rider and bike, there really isn't a lot of payoff beyond the aerobars. The helmet saves a big chunk of time by racing standards, but not enough that you'd commute with it. Panniers are the most obvious piece of equipment with drag, but you need a pretty chunky set of panniers to cause a frontal area change as big as the difference between an upright riding position and riding in the drops of a road bike.
There is a guy around here who commutes with a velomobile. Besides being extremely aerodynamic it's also fairly visible.
I've had people draft me during my commute (which is a bigger gain than any piece of equipment will get you) on windy days. Some even asked if I would mind. It's actually surprising that in cities with big bike commuter contingents you don't see organized pacelines of commuters. It would be very sensible, and maybe even fun.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#46
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,243
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,414 Times
in
2,523 Posts
Just imagine the upward portion of an exponential graph. The calculation for air resistance is proportional to the square of the relative air speed. The speed at which it "matters" all depends on your situation (i.e. uphill, downhill, heavy bike, how aero you can get).
If nothing else, this thread has convinced me to eventually replace my panniers with collapsing baskets. I've always thought they were really cool anyways, now I understand they'll give me some amount of aero benefit (that I can pretend is significant)!
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,742
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,862 Times
in
1,439 Posts
From https://sheldonbrown.com/rinard/aero/formulas.htm
It's interesting to see that a Dutch-style upright is "distinguishing" itself at speeds as low as 10 kph, while the racing bike hangs with its more aerodynamic cousins until about 15 kph and even then only slowly diverges from the "aero bike" (which I'm guessing is a time trial bike).
It's interesting to see that a Dutch-style upright is "distinguishing" itself at speeds as low as 10 kph, while the racing bike hangs with its more aerodynamic cousins until about 15 kph and even then only slowly diverges from the "aero bike" (which I'm guessing is a time trial bike).
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
13 Posts
That right there is very helpful (except replace "exponential" with "quadratic"...). Now I can go out and make measurements myself on an out-and-back windy route (for example, the Silver Strand bike path (Bayshore bikeway?) to Coronado island), and use the airspeed^2 relationship to get an understanding of how my bike/posture/clothing/etc is affected for lower/higher airspeeds. If I ever do anything quantitative I'll report back with method/results...
If nothing else, this thread has convinced me to eventually replace my panniers with collapsing baskets. I've always thought they were really cool anyways, now I understand they'll give me some amount of aero benefit (that I can pretend is significant)!
If nothing else, this thread has convinced me to eventually replace my panniers with collapsing baskets. I've always thought they were really cool anyways, now I understand they'll give me some amount of aero benefit (that I can pretend is significant)!
Anyway, here's a chart from active.com regarding aerodynamics and triathlons. While you won't find folding baskets vs. panniers, you do find upright (relatively) vs aero bars. The difference isn't that huge over typical commuting distances.
I'm kind of surprised that a skin suit makes that much difference over standard bike shorts and a jersey.
#49
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,243
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,414 Times
in
2,523 Posts
But thx for the table, that's the kind of thing I was looking for!
Also Andy_K, super thx for the graph, should have known SB would have something! I guess me and my CrossCheck are going to fall somewhere between "Dutch upright" and "Racing Bike" (maybe closer to the former, as even though my bike is American and Japanese, I am half Dutch, and relatively Upright...)
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,742
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,862 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Anecdotally speaking, I can tell you that dropping from my normal position on the hoods down to a semi-tuck on the drops is usually good for an instant 1 mph boost. In a stiff headwind, the difference in effort between those two positions is huge.
I've also done some relatively unscientific measurements on the max speed I reach coasting down the hill from my house from a stop at a fixed location. I did this thinking I would measure tire rolling resistance that way, but the only thing I found that changed the numbers in a repeatable way was whether or not I was wearing a loose, flappy coat. Panniers versus trunk bag versus backpack didn't seem to make a significant difference. The flappy coat took me from ~37 mph to ~34 mph top speed.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes