Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Commuting (https://www.bikeforums.net/commuting/)
-   -   Conversation with a buzzer in a big black Expedition (https://www.bikeforums.net/commuting/897514-conversation-buzzer-big-black-expedition.html)

Lightingguy 06-29-13 05:56 PM


Originally Posted by spare_wheel (Post 15797035)
I've had motorists apologize to me many times. I also make an effort to apologize when I do something dumb.

One incident caused you to give up a route that you used for 15 years?

Traffic's gotten worse in 18 years and it's marginal to begin with. It's a 2 lane road with hit/miss as to parked cars and how many. If I hit it at rush hour it's never been fun, and it inspired me to search out and find a much better set of side streets thru a convoluted neighborhood. The old way was straight, no turns for 2 miles, with maybe 1/3 of that occasionally stressful. The new way has one way going in, different coming home, thus I had to learn the route. Add's maybe 1/3 -1/2 mile.

Leisesturm 07-01-13 08:40 AM


Originally Posted by gyozadude (Post 15786409)
In California, we have the California Vehicle Code (CVC) that is the law for on-road/off road of moving vehicles. CVC 21202 states that bikes which are like vehicles travelling at a rate of speed less than the average speed of traffic need to ride to the far right of the roadway as is practical. So folks who think they could hog the lane... well, that's part 1 of the bad news. Part 2 of the bad news is section 3 of 21202, which refers to applicability of the turn-out for slow moving vehicles with 5 or more cars behind them (CVC 21656). This explicitly says that bicyclists must follow that rule too. So if you're slow and blocking traffic, you need to pull over and allow the 5+ vehicles behind you pass. This only applies on two-lane (one in each direction) roads. It does not apply on multi-lane roads with more than one lane in the direction of travel. However, the first rule still applies about riding as far right as is practical.

I believe the law is similar in most states.

Again, it's not cool to get buzzed, but again, it's a lot about common sense. We're sharing the road. If a cyclist blocks the lane and is going to slow and sustains that position forcing drivers to encroach on other lanes to get around, well, that increases by 10X the risk of accident at that point because now the slow cyclist is requiring cars to perform a course correction to change lanes exposing the cars to other cars in another lane who have the right of way. So I think the trick is to pick routes and times that reduce bike/car interaction and/or provide more bike lanes.


This exactly. Its nice to know that someone else gets it. I've just been back from a week on the Oregon Coast. If a cyclist riding 101 thinks that they are going to take the lane for any reason and live peacefully... ... but in seven days of driving up and down the coast I didn't see any cyclists do that. Many, many times it simply wasn't possible to even put one set of wheels over the center line when going past a cyclist struggling up one of those 6%'s with a loaded trailer. I always tried to, but I would look in my rearview mirrlor and see that the car behind me would simply blast by the biker without moving over so much as an inch and call it good. What you guys call buzzing is... ... reality. I was thinking about this thread all week as I saw all those Oregon Coast cyclists dealing with the reality of multiple close passes day after day and I doubt many of them are posting or blogging about it. I've yet to see a cyclist "take the lane". I've said that here before. I didn't witness it, but there was a head on collision on 26 as we were coming back yesterday. My SO and I heard the BOOM and we came around the curve and cars were all over the road. One car was on fire and the other one had its front end completely sheared off. That double yellow center-line is DEATH to anyone who isn't properly respectful of it. Cars and trucks that would NEVER go over the double yellow to pass a slowpoke in a car, no matter how much s/he was annoying them, will slide over it and blast by a cyclist without a second thought. They think the cyclist is going so slow they can get around him or her in plenty of time to avoid disaster. Often they can, but if it were a car they would have given a lot of thought to how they were going to make the pass safely. When its a bike they do not. They do not scan the road ahead they just go for it. Cyclists have created this state of fear that causes drivers to think that they have to be passed with 3' of clearance and other niceties... ... ok if you are a cyclist (and I am) but... ... there is a downside. I don't know if that car was passing a cyclist when he collided with oncoming traffic but he could have been. There is a lot of anger around here about drivers that cross the center-line to go around cyclists. Just saying. Really, be careful what you ask for. In many places, Portland Oregon, and environs, drivers are extremely bike aware and treat cyclists very courteously... to their own detriment. That will have a backlash. Advocacy is good. Entitlement is not. Learning to hold a line, learning to share the lane, these are skills more cyclists need to develop.

H

spare_wheel 07-01-13 09:41 AM


Originally Posted by Leisesturm (Post 15801949)
In many places, Portland Oregon, and environs, drivers are extremely bike aware and treat cyclists very courteously... to their own detriment. That will have a backlash. Advocacy is good. Entitlement is not. Learning to hold a line, learning to share the lane, these are skills more cyclists need to develop.
H


I've been riding at least ~4K a year in Portland for over a decade. I have yet to see any sign of a backlash in motorist behavior on the roads. If anything, the number of angry confrontations has decreased from a few times a year to less than once a year. The only backlash I see in the Portland area is in the comment section of our irrelevant and dying dead tree media.


My SO and I heard the BOOM and we came around the curve and cars were all over the road. One car was on fire and the other one had its front end completely sheared off. That double yellow center-line is DEATH to anyone who isn't properly respectful of it.
How you see this as an event that in any way informs the behavior of cyclists is mind boggling. This society turns a blind eye to the carnage, pollution, increased incidence of obesity, increase incidence of cancer, and enormous environmental destruction caused by motoring. The speed limit on Highway 26 should be dropped and agressively enforced with automated traffic cams and LEO enforcement. There is absolutely no reasons for motorists to feel entitled to speed along at 60 mph. Many modern vehicles show peak efficiency at 35-40.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/drivehabits.shtml

Our current speed limits are an absolute @#$*$#@ disgrace. I would strongly support a national 45 mph speed limit.

bhtooefr 07-01-13 10:18 AM

The problem is, modern vehicles are designed for speeds well above any current US speed limit (even the 85 mph ones), in many cases.

A national 45 mph speed limit would be simply ignored en masse. Just like the 55 mph one was. Law enforcement simply ignored it in many states, even.

The only way you're going to get 45 mph out of modern cars and drivers is massive traffic calming, and in ways that make the road nearly impassible to cyclists other than fatbike and MTB riders. And you'll never see that level on freeways.

Booger1 07-02-13 10:07 AM

I see that went well.......So you ready for another conversation yet?....:)

nudave2005 07-02-13 12:03 PM


Originally Posted by ItsJustMe (Post 15785353)
I don't think I would ever bother to talk to a car driver about an incident like this. Trying to stop driver stupidity one driver at a time is like bailing out the ocean with a thimble. I don't argue with the wind if it tries to blow me over, and I think of stupid car drivers in pretty much the same way. I do blow my horn at them at the time but I treat them like dogs - OK to yell at them during the incident but by the time 30 seconds have passed, they've either forgotten about it or self-justified and will just be angry if confronted. If it's really dangerous and I got a plate number I might report it, but that's never happened to me.

Here are the last couple of dumb ones. The first one I would have reported if I had a plate number. The second one, just an idiot being an idiot.

http://youtu.be/UOwv_IXZdIk

http://youtu.be/vuVKDTMh4ZM


If it was me in the first vid, I'd be bailing into the ravine.

PatrickGSR94 07-02-13 12:36 PM


Originally Posted by ItsJustMe (Post 15785353)
I don't think I would ever bother to talk to a car driver about an incident like this. Trying to stop driver stupidity one driver at a time is like bailing out the ocean with a thimble. I don't argue with the wind if it tries to blow me over, and I think of stupid car drivers in pretty much the same way. I do blow my horn at them at the time but I treat them like dogs - OK to yell at them during the incident but by the time 30 seconds have passed, they've either forgotten about it or self-justified and will just be angry if confronted. If it's really dangerous and I got a plate number I might report it, but that's never happened to me.

Here are the last couple of dumb ones. The first one I would have reported if I had a plate number. The second one, just an idiot being an idiot.

http://youtu.be/UOwv_IXZdIk

http://youtu.be/vuVKDTMh4ZM

Oh lawds I just now watched those. My entire commute is on roads like that 1st vid, and thankfully I haven't experienced anyone passing coming towards me yet. But FWIW I always run my ExpiliOn 700 on daytime strobe during daylight hours. People have told me they can literally see the light flashing a mile away.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.