Too Bright
#101
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,463 Times
in
1,433 Posts
cyccommute, that's interesting what you say. I'm going to see if the lux ratings are supposed to be done from a standardized distance. I certainly hope so, but you've raised doubts. And because of the inverse square law, the closer they measure, the bigger the potential for mismeasurement and fraud.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#102
I am a caffine girl
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,815
Bikes: 2012 Stumpjumper FSR Comp...2010 Scott CR1 CF...2007 Novara FS Float2.0...2009 Specialized Hardrock Disc...2009 Schwinn Le Tour GSr
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
cyccommute, that's interesting what you say. I'm going to see if the lux ratings are supposed to be done from a standardized distance. I certainly hope so, but you've raised doubts. And because of the inverse square law, the closer they measure, the bigger the potential for mismeasurement and fraud.
https://flashlightwiki.com/ANSI-NEMA_FL-1
Many of the top name flashlight manufacturer uses this standard as a rating of their flashlight under using this standard. It also worth mentioning that reviewer of flashlight over at CPF also test the flashlight they reviewed using this standard.
I noticed bicycle light manufactor has yet to catch on. Don't get me wrong, I know there will be differemce when comparing a bike light with cutoff vs one without cutoff when using the Ansi standard, but it does comes in handy when comparing light with similar design.
#103
member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 319
Bikes: 33yr old mtn bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here is another interesting site, they look only at lumens (measured using an integrating sphere).
https://reviews.mtbr.com/2014-mtbr-bike-lights-shootout
https://reviews.mtbr.com/2014-mtbr-bike-lights-shootout
#104
member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 319
Bikes: 33yr old mtn bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think there is such a thing as too much....
... but what that is keeps changing over time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL9_Tldmrhs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBuiPZm6hK4
... but what that is keeps changing over time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL9_Tldmrhs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBuiPZm6hK4
#105
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,359
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6218 Post(s)
Liked 4,215 Times
in
2,362 Posts
cyccommute, that's interesting what you say. I'm going to see if the lux ratings are supposed to be done from a standardized distance. I certainly hope so, but you've raised doubts. And because of the inverse square law, the closer they measure, the bigger the potential for mismeasurement and fraud.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#106
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2494 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
For the Lumotec lamps, I think they are measuring them at 5m which is about 1 car length. At 10m (about 2 car lengths), the lux would be around 30 for a 500 lumen and 40 for a 600 lumen light. My old halogens would be rocking a lux of 97 at 10m I may have to dust those off again.
H
#107
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,359
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6218 Post(s)
Liked 4,215 Times
in
2,362 Posts
Really? Why would that be? What lumens would that be at 10m? MagicShines are rated at 1000 lumens and most testers downrate them to around 500 lumens. It takes four 3.7V 18650 lithium cells to feed the LED's thirst for amp/hours. Do tell the wattage of halogen bulb(s) you were rocking in that obsolete light, and the other pertinent details of battery capacity and run time or your post becomes nothing more than suspect.
H
H
2. Magic Shines and other single emitter lights claim 1000 lumens. Their actual output is dependent on the emitter used. A Cree XM-L T6 emitter can put out around 700 lumens under the best laboratory conditions. The actual output is probably lower. I've seen integrating sphere data that puts Magic Shines in the 600 to 650 lumen range,
3. The number of 18650 cells required to run an LED is 2 to get to the required voltage. You could run a Magic Shine on two 18650 cells for about 1.5 hours while 4 cell 2S2P packs tend to run for 2 to 3 hours in my experience. The charge capacity of 18650's depends on a number of factors but most of the ones I've seen for LED runs around 4.4 Ah.
Finally, you can find details on the old halogen lights I ran here. I still have several sets but I have to redo my battery packs to run the packs in series instead of parallel or get 14.4 V packs. I used to run 3.3 Ah to 5.2 Ah packs and got from 1.5 to 2.5 hours.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#108
member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 319
Bikes: 33yr old mtn bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I suppose this subject has been flogged.
But here is an interesting article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminous_efficacy
The halogen bulbs are incandescent, so black body radiators, and when you "over amp" them, they get brighter and their color shifts towards the blue.
That means more energy emitted nearer to yellow light where human eyes are more sensitive.
Because of the color shift at higher filament temperature, their efficacy increases. And these bulbs can be overdriven with only some loss of lifetime.
LEDs cannot be easily overdriven because their efficiency drops as temperature goes up, and there is also the danger of thermal runaway leading to possible destruction. LED's are usually driven by constant current to get constant intensity, incandescents can be driven with a voltage or current since they are resistive.
Based on that data, for a given light duration, the halogens should require a greater battery capacity compared to LEDs at the same light intensity,
because they would use more power. Also, halogens emit much more energy than LEDs out of the visible region, for example, as heat.
A long time ago, I knew someone who had a 12V Diehard battery (on a rear rack) running a ~50W halogen headlight, yes it was very bright and very heavy.
My take on this thread is that although many of us think our lights are more than bright enough already, others want more.
But here is an interesting article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminous_efficacy
The halogen bulbs are incandescent, so black body radiators, and when you "over amp" them, they get brighter and their color shifts towards the blue.
That means more energy emitted nearer to yellow light where human eyes are more sensitive.
Because of the color shift at higher filament temperature, their efficacy increases. And these bulbs can be overdriven with only some loss of lifetime.
LEDs cannot be easily overdriven because their efficiency drops as temperature goes up, and there is also the danger of thermal runaway leading to possible destruction. LED's are usually driven by constant current to get constant intensity, incandescents can be driven with a voltage or current since they are resistive.
Based on that data, for a given light duration, the halogens should require a greater battery capacity compared to LEDs at the same light intensity,
because they would use more power. Also, halogens emit much more energy than LEDs out of the visible region, for example, as heat.
A long time ago, I knew someone who had a 12V Diehard battery (on a rear rack) running a ~50W halogen headlight, yes it was very bright and very heavy.
My take on this thread is that although many of us think our lights are more than bright enough already, others want more.
#109
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,359
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6218 Post(s)
Liked 4,215 Times
in
2,362 Posts
The halogen bulbs are incandescent, so black body radiators, and when you "over amp" them, they get brighter and their color shifts towards the blue.
That means more energy emitted nearer to yellow light where human eyes are more sensitive.
Because of the color shift at higher filament temperature, their efficacy increases. And these bulbs can be overdriven with only some loss of lifetime.
That means more energy emitted nearer to yellow light where human eyes are more sensitive.
Because of the color shift at higher filament temperature, their efficacy increases. And these bulbs can be overdriven with only some loss of lifetime.
Based on that data, for a given light duration, the halogens should require a greater battery capacity compared to LEDs at the same light intensity,
because they would use more power. Also, halogens emit much more energy than LEDs out of the visible region, for example, as heat.
because they would use more power. Also, halogens emit much more energy than LEDs out of the visible region, for example, as heat.
An 20W MR16 run at 14.4V will put out just about as much light as a 50W bulb run at nominal voltage. And, from my experience, you don't need a car battery to run one. Lead batteries really aren't that good as a power source.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#110
member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 319
Bikes: 33yr old mtn bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree with all that you said.
And I agree that measuring lux at 10m would be a good standard method for bike lights.
That would mean, 10m on axis, with very little reflection from other surfaces
BTW, this link shows how MTBR measures lux in a 10' x 10' room
https://reviews.mtbr.com/httpreviews-...ights-shootout
They get a direct conversion from lumens to lux shown here:
https://reviews.mtbr.com/2013-bike-li...-lux-vs-lumens
And I agree that measuring lux at 10m would be a good standard method for bike lights.
That would mean, 10m on axis, with very little reflection from other surfaces
BTW, this link shows how MTBR measures lux in a 10' x 10' room
https://reviews.mtbr.com/httpreviews-...ights-shootout
They get a direct conversion from lumens to lux shown here:
https://reviews.mtbr.com/2013-bike-li...-lux-vs-lumens
#111
What, me worry?
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,226
Bikes: Corratec / Jamis
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I've been reading (and have posted) in this thread from day 1, and IMHO, I believe that you are missing the point on bicycle lighting. To explain this, I prefer to give a real world example with a couple of different light I already own and use on my nightly commutes.
I recently bought a MagicShine clone supposedly rated at 1800 lumens which had a very bright spot beam which only a very small portion was utilized for viewing the road (city streets). After a fellow forum member suggested, I went ahead and purchased a diffuser lens which replaced the original clear lens and threw a much wider beam across my path, with a big hit on the distance ahead, but overall a major improvement.
And for the comparison; I have a B&M CyoT (properly aimed via the instructions) driven by a dynamohub on my other bike which is rated at 60 lux, with my guesstimate of around 200-300 lumens (compared to other quality lights I've seen).
Even though the MS has a more powerful light source, the CyoT is a far better light for commuting since the optics on it almost 100% utilize the light with almost no side spill and total vertical cutoff. I have never been told of having the light shine onto cars or pedestrians, or fellow cyclists, which is not the case with the diffused MS.
At least in the urban environment, more is NOT better if you have the majority of the light shining on everything except where it should be focused on.
That's my 0,01 cents and I hope I didn't come out condescending.
I recently bought a MagicShine clone supposedly rated at 1800 lumens which had a very bright spot beam which only a very small portion was utilized for viewing the road (city streets). After a fellow forum member suggested, I went ahead and purchased a diffuser lens which replaced the original clear lens and threw a much wider beam across my path, with a big hit on the distance ahead, but overall a major improvement.
And for the comparison; I have a B&M CyoT (properly aimed via the instructions) driven by a dynamohub on my other bike which is rated at 60 lux, with my guesstimate of around 200-300 lumens (compared to other quality lights I've seen).
Even though the MS has a more powerful light source, the CyoT is a far better light for commuting since the optics on it almost 100% utilize the light with almost no side spill and total vertical cutoff. I have never been told of having the light shine onto cars or pedestrians, or fellow cyclists, which is not the case with the diffused MS.
At least in the urban environment, more is NOT better if you have the majority of the light shining on everything except where it should be focused on.
That's my 0,01 cents and I hope I didn't come out condescending.
#112
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Potashville
Posts: 1,079
Bikes: Reynolds 531P road bike, Rocky Mountain Metropolis, Rocky Mountain Sherpa 10, Look 566
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hard to say where the happy medium is.
#113
Banned
I've been reading (and have posted) in this thread from day 1, and IMHO, I believe that you are missing the point on bicycle lighting. To explain this, I prefer to give a real world example with a couple of different light I already own and use on my nightly commutes.
I recently bought a MagicShine clone supposedly rated at 1800 lumens which had a very bright spot beam which only a very small portion was utilized for viewing the road (city streets). After a fellow forum member suggested, I went ahead and purchased a diffuser lens which replaced the original clear lens and threw a much wider beam across my path, with a big hit on the distance ahead, but overall a major improvement.
And for the comparison; I have a B&M CyoT (properly aimed via the instructions) driven by a dynamohub on my other bike which is rated at 60 lux, with my guesstimate of around 200-300 lumens (compared to other quality lights I've seen).
Even though the MS has a more powerful light source, the CyoT is a far better light for commuting since the optics on it almost 100% utilize the light with almost no side spill and total vertical cutoff. I have never been told of having the light shine onto cars or pedestrians, or fellow cyclists, which is not the case with the diffused MS.
At least in the urban environment, more is NOT better if you have the majority of the light shining on everything except where it should be focused on.
That's my 0,01 cents and I hope I didn't come out condescending.
I recently bought a MagicShine clone supposedly rated at 1800 lumens which had a very bright spot beam which only a very small portion was utilized for viewing the road (city streets). After a fellow forum member suggested, I went ahead and purchased a diffuser lens which replaced the original clear lens and threw a much wider beam across my path, with a big hit on the distance ahead, but overall a major improvement.
And for the comparison; I have a B&M CyoT (properly aimed via the instructions) driven by a dynamohub on my other bike which is rated at 60 lux, with my guesstimate of around 200-300 lumens (compared to other quality lights I've seen).
Even though the MS has a more powerful light source, the CyoT is a far better light for commuting since the optics on it almost 100% utilize the light with almost no side spill and total vertical cutoff. I have never been told of having the light shine onto cars or pedestrians, or fellow cyclists, which is not the case with the diffused MS.
At least in the urban environment, more is NOT better if you have the majority of the light shining on everything except where it should be focused on.
That's my 0,01 cents and I hope I didn't come out condescending.
people don't have an understanding if they haven't used an excellent dynamo powered light built to the standard provided within the Straßenverkehrszulassungsordnung (StVZO).
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/st...067910012.html
#114
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,359
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6218 Post(s)
Liked 4,215 Times
in
2,362 Posts
I've been reading (and have posted) in this thread from day 1, and IMHO, I believe that you are missing the point on bicycle lighting. To explain this, I prefer to give a real world example with a couple of different light I already own and use on my nightly commutes.
I recently bought a MagicShine clone supposedly rated at 1800 lumens which had a very bright spot beam which only a very small portion was utilized for viewing the road (city streets). After a fellow forum member suggested, I went ahead and purchased a diffuser lens which replaced the original clear lens and threw a much wider beam across my path, with a big hit on the distance ahead, but overall a major improvement.
And for the comparison; I have a B&M CyoT (properly aimed via the instructions) driven by a dynamohub on my other bike which is rated at 60 lux, with my guesstimate of around 200-300 lumens (compared to other quality lights I've seen).
Even though the MS has a more powerful light source, the CyoT is a far better light for commuting since the optics on it almost 100% utilize the light with almost no side spill and total vertical cutoff. I have never been told of having the light shine onto cars or pedestrians, or fellow cyclists, which is not the case with the diffused MS.
At least in the urban environment, more is NOT better if you have the majority of the light shining on everything except where it should be focused on.
That's my 0,01 cents and I hope I didn't come out condescending.
I recently bought a MagicShine clone supposedly rated at 1800 lumens which had a very bright spot beam which only a very small portion was utilized for viewing the road (city streets). After a fellow forum member suggested, I went ahead and purchased a diffuser lens which replaced the original clear lens and threw a much wider beam across my path, with a big hit on the distance ahead, but overall a major improvement.
And for the comparison; I have a B&M CyoT (properly aimed via the instructions) driven by a dynamohub on my other bike which is rated at 60 lux, with my guesstimate of around 200-300 lumens (compared to other quality lights I've seen).
Even though the MS has a more powerful light source, the CyoT is a far better light for commuting since the optics on it almost 100% utilize the light with almost no side spill and total vertical cutoff. I have never been told of having the light shine onto cars or pedestrians, or fellow cyclists, which is not the case with the diffused MS.
At least in the urban environment, more is NOT better if you have the majority of the light shining on everything except where it should be focused on.
That's my 0,01 cents and I hope I didn't come out condescending.
It took me a long time to understand why the "1800 lumen" claim on lights was wrong. I'm not an electronics guy but I can learn. The Cree emitter that is used on these lights has a maximum output of around 700 lumens. The claims of 1800 lumens is highly inflated and I wish that the manufacturers wouldn't do that but they do. We just have to live with the claims and understand that the output is more realistically in the 600 to 700 lumen range. That, by the way, is about what a car provides per lamp on low beam. Now on to the lights.
I think you are misunderstanding what you are seeing for the clone. Magic Shine and their clone lights use a reflector that is about a 35 degree flood light. That means that the light intensity across the beam is greatly reduced. It will have a central hot spot but all lights have that. The rest of the light will be spread out over a large circle on the ground. When you add a diffuser, you are increasing the diffusion of the beam to something similar to a 50 degree flood light. If the light were evenly spread over the beam, a 35 degree 600 lumen light has a lux of 77. Diffuse the light over a wider area with a wider angle and the lux drops to 35. Going to a diffuser or even a wide angle flood light shots more of your light off into directions that you don't want it to go.
Going to a tighter beam puts more light in a smaller space, which is what the CyoT does as well as other tighter beam spot lights do. All you've done is purchase a narrower spot light and noticed that you have a better beam. I use a spot light...not a Magic Shine clone but another type of LED...which has a reflector angle of about 20 degrees. Back in my halogen days, I use a beam that was 12 degrees and a 7 degree spot. Because of the very tight angle, you don't get much spillage outside of the beam's hot spot and glare is reduced. In fact the 7 degree beam was too tight. You need a little spillage outside of the beam or you end up with tunnel vision.
I agree that more isn't better if you diffuse the light all over everywhere. But I don't do that. I want...and get...a bright coherent beam that lights up what I need to be lighted while still providing enough illumination to be seen against a sea of lights in an urban environment.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#115
What, me worry?
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,226
Bikes: Corratec / Jamis
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I think you are misunderstanding what you are seeing for the clone. Magic Shine and their clone lights use a reflector that is about a 35 degree flood light. That means that the light intensity across the beam is greatly reduced. It will have a central hot spot but all lights have that. The rest of the light will be spread out over a large circle on the ground. When you add a diffuser, you are increasing the diffusion of the beam to something similar to a 50 degree flood light. If the light were evenly spread over the beam, a 35 degree 600 lumen light has a lux of 77. Diffuse the light over a wider area with a wider angle and the lux drops to 35. Going to a diffuser or even a wide angle flood light shots more of your light off into directions that you don't want it to go.
Going to a tighter beam puts more light in a smaller space, which is what the CyoT does as well as other tighter beam spot lights do. All you've done is purchase a narrower spot light and noticed that you have a better beam. I use a spot light...not a Magic Shine clone but another type of LED...which has a reflector angle of about 20 degrees. Back in my halogen days, I use a beam that was 12 degrees and a 7 degree spot. Because of the very tight angle, you don't get much spillage outside of the beam's hot spot and glare is reduced. In fact the 7 degree beam was too tight. You need a little spillage outside of the beam or you end up with tunnel vision.
I agree that more isn't better if you diffuse the light all over everywhere. But I don't do that. I want...and get...a bright coherent beam that lights up what I need to be lighted while still providing enough illumination to be seen against a sea of lights in an urban environment.
Going to a tighter beam puts more light in a smaller space, which is what the CyoT does as well as other tighter beam spot lights do. All you've done is purchase a narrower spot light and noticed that you have a better beam. I use a spot light...not a Magic Shine clone but another type of LED...which has a reflector angle of about 20 degrees. Back in my halogen days, I use a beam that was 12 degrees and a 7 degree spot. Because of the very tight angle, you don't get much spillage outside of the beam's hot spot and glare is reduced. In fact the 7 degree beam was too tight. You need a little spillage outside of the beam or you end up with tunnel vision.
I agree that more isn't better if you diffuse the light all over everywhere. But I don't do that. I want...and get...a bright coherent beam that lights up what I need to be lighted while still providing enough illumination to be seen against a sea of lights in an urban environment.
But that's my point, that the CyoT isn't a spotlight, and it definitely isn't as wide as a MS with diffuser (clone or not). There's a specific pattern emerging because of the optics which covers the needs of a commuter (at least mine).
Here's a beam pattern taken directly from the manufacturers site which shows the pattern (not conical as a spotlight would be) which resembles a car's headlight without the center line cutout which exists on cars so they don't blind the drivers coming in the other direction.
#116
Banned
But that's my point, that the CyoT isn't a spotlight, and it definitely isn't as wide as a MS with diffuser (clone or not). There's a specific pattern emerging because of the optics which covers the needs of a commuter (at least mine).
Here's a beam pattern taken directly from the manufacturers site which shows the pattern (not conical as a spotlight would be) which resembles a car's headlight without the center line cutout which exists on cars so they don't blind the drivers coming in the other direction.
Here's a beam pattern taken directly from the manufacturers site which shows the pattern (not conical as a spotlight would be) which resembles a car's headlight without the center line cutout which exists on cars so they don't blind the drivers coming in the other direction.
it only highlights what's necessary, which is very nice when commuting in darkness, rather than everything, which i find completely useless as one's eyes don't adjust to the dark as well.
more is not better when it comes to most things, including bike lights.
#117
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,359
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6218 Post(s)
Liked 4,215 Times
in
2,362 Posts
But that's my point, that the CyoT isn't a spotlight, and it definitely isn't as wide as a MS with diffuser (clone or not). There's a specific pattern emerging because of the optics which covers the needs of a commuter (at least mine).
Here's a beam pattern taken directly from the manufacturers site which shows the pattern (not conical as a spotlight would be) which resembles a car's headlight without the center line cutout which exists on cars so they don't blind the drivers coming in the other direction.
Here's a beam pattern taken directly from the manufacturers site which shows the pattern (not conical as a spotlight would be) which resembles a car's headlight without the center line cutout which exists on cars so they don't blind the drivers coming in the other direction.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#118
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,359
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6218 Post(s)
Liked 4,215 Times
in
2,362 Posts
honestly, i think that most won't understand it until they use one.
it only highlights what's necessary, which is very nice when commuting in darkness, rather than everything, which i find completely useless as one's eyes don't adjust to the dark as well.
more is not better when it comes to most things, including bike lights.
it only highlights what's necessary, which is very nice when commuting in darkness, rather than everything, which i find completely useless as one's eyes don't adjust to the dark as well.
more is not better when it comes to most things, including bike lights.
The picture is also playing fast and loose with the photo set up. If they had pulled back and shined the light on the black part of the pavement, you'd see that less isn't necessarily better, either. Without that white surface to reflect the light, the black pavement would have swallowed the light and given us a better representation of what happens when you go to less light.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#120
Banned
I don't know about you, but I don't ride anywhere without huge textural contrasts, usually in the form of water pooled on the side of the path/road, just like in the photo, or where the surface is painted, or where individual textures are interlocked.
I can't remember the last time I peddled anywhere that had a uniformly solid dark, darker or darkest background so I think your point is moot.
#121
What, me worry?
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,226
Bikes: Corratec / Jamis
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
After all this discussion on lights, I finally took the time tonight and passed by a friend who has a auto-body shop and built the following base for the MS clone...
Tremendous difference from it's last position on the handlebars. Now I can clearly see even the most minute of road surface abnormality for a distance of at least 7 meters (around 20 ft). Because of the positioning closer to the road surface, I think I can get away with changing the diffuser lens back to the original clear lens.
Unfortunately I couldn't take any photos because it was raining, but I will take some photos asap with before and after pictures with both clear and diffuser lens.
BTW, the actual base was taken off some sort of electronics mount (ECU maybe) from a 5 or 7 series BMW, and when cleaned and polished should look like it was developed specifically for the MS lights.
Tremendous difference from it's last position on the handlebars. Now I can clearly see even the most minute of road surface abnormality for a distance of at least 7 meters (around 20 ft). Because of the positioning closer to the road surface, I think I can get away with changing the diffuser lens back to the original clear lens.
Unfortunately I couldn't take any photos because it was raining, but I will take some photos asap with before and after pictures with both clear and diffuser lens.
BTW, the actual base was taken off some sort of electronics mount (ECU maybe) from a 5 or 7 series BMW, and when cleaned and polished should look like it was developed specifically for the MS lights.
#122
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,463 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Looks good. For version 2.0, I recommend a way to adjust the vertical angle. You'll want to point it up when traffic is light and down when it's heavy. I do that with my headlights.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#123
What, me worry?
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,226
Bikes: Corratec / Jamis
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Actually because of the diffuser (probably), it seems perfect, and it doesn't blind anyone on the streets since the beam reached a little below the rear truck lid on most sedans while I was stopped behind them.
Now any ideas on how the !@#$!$! wiring can be managed?
Now any ideas on how the !@#$!$! wiring can be managed?
#124
member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 319
Bikes: 33yr old mtn bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I liked the cutoff of the beam.
So the add on diffuser helped make this beam change? I think I've seen these advertised.
BTW, you might want a little more wire length going into the light head IMO.
Also, I usually use tie wraps near the ends of where wires spiral around brake/shifter cables (do not make them too tight).
Otherwise, the spiral section can slide around, and perhaps wear out the wire over time with vibration.
#125
Banned
Now any ideas on how the !@#$!$! wiring can be managed?
to cover wire connections?
B&M has twin lead wires with the plugs on them , either on one end or both.
I just ordered a B&M double ended wire to cut and strip
for the short distance from the Brommy Fork crown mount to the Hub,
and use the other plug end to redo the taillight wire a bit longer ,
it already had the plugs on it for the taillight , but, it takes a more indirect path
to the rear light, than a regular diamond frame Bike ..
the plugs and the terminal pliers to make the connections are available
Peter White is in the US , but his website has how to suggestions.
in Greece , You would go through a German seller, I expect.
Last edited by fietsbob; 11-20-13 at 12:53 PM.