Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Commuting (https://www.bikeforums.net/commuting/)
-   -   Rules while on right only lane (https://www.bikeforums.net/commuting/970879-rules-while-right-only-lane.html)

dscheidt 09-10-14 12:04 PM


Originally Posted by Walter S (Post 17117520)
Yes. I'd rather deal with that risk than others. In practice I don't find much of a problem there.

Edit: Especially since the cars that might suddenly move into the right lane probably just passed me and know exactly where I am.

Relying on morons who drive cars not to kill you is a bad plan. They've forgotten you, or think you move the pace a fat, old, and lazy slob would.

Walter S 09-11-14 06:09 AM


Originally Posted by dscheidt (Post 17118130)
Relying on morons who drive cars not to kill you is a bad plan. They've forgotten you, or think you move the pace a fat, old, and lazy slob would.

Your point is valid. I watch the traffic and pace myself relative to it so as to minimize that risk. There's no perfect plan. They all have risks. So my plan is a compromise. That brings up another important point though. When I say what "my strategy" is I'm talking about my default plan for the average intersection around the Atlanta area. But different intersections are different, and different at different times of day. I read what's going on and while commuting have the benefit of intimate knowledge of the route and whip out the plan for that intersection while also watching for unusual conditions to adjust for.

In the end I don't think everything is reduced to logic that you can rationalize ad infinitum. What I do in any given situation is primarily governed by how it makes me feel - safe or not. I've played with all the strategies discussed on this thread and more over 40+ years of riding in traffic and what I do day to day now is based on intuition that is hopefully influenced by experience in a way that helps protect me. So far so good.

mikeybikes 09-11-14 07:04 AM


Originally Posted by spivonious (Post 17117844)
Move to the center of the rightmost straight lane, then move back right once through the intersection.

Advantages:
1. Makes it obvious to other road users that you're going straight.
2. Lets right-turning road users turn.
3. Prevents passes within the intersection.

This is pretty standard stuff right here and is what most bicycle safety instructors will teach. If in doubt, this is how to handle intersections with RTOL.

noglider 09-11-14 10:15 AM

There are at least two possible scenarios.

1. If the right-only lane is formed by branching off of the right-most lane, then all you have to do is stay in the lane you are in. Don't move into the right-only lane.

2. If the right-most lane becomes a right-only lane, you have to move to the left-most edge of it or move into the next lane to the left. This is essentially a lane change, so you have to yield to traffic behind you.

In either case, it is not a good idea to pass people who you know are turning right on their right sides. Stay behind them if you can't move left. When you can move left, do so.

the sci guy 09-11-14 12:17 PM


Originally Posted by GamblerGORD53 (Post 17116233)
You should be on the line between the thru and turn lane, works both sides.
If there is no turn lane, then I usually have my foot on the curb.
If the lane is wide, I filter to the front and let the first car get going while I accelerate.

This.

/thread.

RidingMatthew 09-11-14 01:01 PM


Originally Posted by Tundra_Man (Post 17117384)
At intersections I do the same thing I would do if I were driving a car.

I would never drive my car straight out of a right turn lane and then merge back into traffic, so why would I want to do that on my bike?


Originally Posted by spivonious (Post 17117844)
Move to the center of the rightmost straight lane, then move back right once through the intersection.

Advantages:
1. Makes it obvious to other road users that you're going straight.
2. Lets right-turning road users turn.
3. Prevents passes within the intersection.

i think [MENTION=313684]spivonious[/MENTION] says it best and in my opinion closes this thread. I also agree with [MENTION=175954]Tundra_Man[/MENTION] as well. I would ride my bike as if i was driving a car. we want respect we should be patient and wait our turn to cross intersection.

Worknomore 09-11-14 01:52 PM


Originally Posted by GamblerGORD53 (Post 17116233)
You should be on the line between the thru and turn lane, works both sides.
If there is no turn lane, then I usually have my foot on the curb.
If the lane is wide, I filter to the front and let the first car get going while I accelerate.

Me three

noglider 09-11-14 03:15 PM


Originally Posted by RidingMatthew (Post 17121560)
i think @spivonious says it best and in my opinion closes this thread. I also agree with @Tundra_Man as well. I would ride my bike as if i was driving a car. we want respect we should be patient and wait our turn to cross intersection.

Agreed.

Here in NYC, there are bike lanes on several of our avenues. Most avenues are one-way, and the NYC standard is to put the bike lane on the left side of the avenue. Now they are in the process of converting the avenues so that the bike lane is against the curb. Then, moving right, is a parking lane. Then, moving right further, there are travel lanes for motor vehicles.

At intersections, there are signals for (1) straight-ahead motor vehicles, (2) left turn motor vehicles, and (3) straight-ahead bike. Lights 2 and 3 are never green simultaneously. Lots of cyclists ride to the left of the left turners, which is asking for trouble. I slip in behind them when it is safe and pass them on the right.

I've considered moving my eyeglass-mounted mirror to my right temple, but I'm not sure I can adjust quickly and safely. It will be like driving in the UK. ;)

bubbagrannygear 09-13-14 08:00 AM

I take the lane that is going straight and wait in line like a car. When the light turns I generally go through the intersection with traffic then get to the right once I'm through. There isn't always room to straddle lanes and I think the cars that want to turn right on red appreciate me getting out of the way and all drivers appreciate me demonstrating my unambiguous intention of going straight.

spare_wheel 09-13-14 08:36 AM


Originally Posted by RidingMatthew (Post 17121560)
i think @spivonious says it best and in my opinion closes this thread. I also agree with @Tundra_Man as well.

or you could filter through gaps tighter than a retrogrouch's sphincter, get in front of the SUV, track sit, and then jump the red as soon as the coast is clear.


I would ride my bike as if i was driving a car. we want respect we should be patient and wait our turn to cross intersection.
do you make vroom vroom noises when you bike too?

Lanovran 09-13-14 08:50 AM


Originally Posted by sunray2003 (Post 17116201)
I think it makes sense cos I dont want to block the right lane. So I should move to the right , stand where the pedestrians are standing and then cross the lane when the light turns green ?

The best rule of thumb is to ride in the rightmost lane that is serving your intended direction of travel. So, you'd only want to be in the right-turn-only lane if you are planning to turn right. Otherwise, if you're going straight through the intersection, then signal and move to take the rightmost through lane. This leaves the right-turn lane open for people turning right, and makes your intention to go straight through the intersection clear to everyone else. Riding straight from a right-turn-only lane is only going to increase the likelihood of getting hit by someone who was expecting you to go in a different direction.

TransitBiker 09-13-14 11:16 AM

CA & local law should be followed here.

In PA you cannot ride in a right turn lane and go straight. It is a ticket-able moving violation. If a cop sees you do it more than once, you can be assured you will be cited. It is true that in multi-lane intersections the lanes can be narrow, but if you stay in a straight line, most sane drivers will understand that you are part of traffic & try to not edge you into the next lane.

Part of the responsibility of owning and operating a bicycle is to comply with traffic laws that apply to bicycles, or of there are no specified laws, you follow the laws governing automobiles, as bicycles are still considered vehicles no matter where you ride.

- Andy

spare_wheel 09-13-14 03:13 PM


Originally Posted by TransitBiker (Post 17126500)
Part of the responsibility of owning and operating a bicycle is to comply with traffic laws that apply to bicycles, or of there are no specified laws, you follow the laws governing automobiles, as bicycles are still considered vehicles no matter where you ride.


Laws made for and by motorists that typically have little bearing on public safety and discriminate against active transport. I consider it my civic duty to violate these laws as much as is practical.


If a cop sees you do it more than once, you can be assured you will be cited.
Bwahahaha! I've flagrantly violated the law in front of philly cops countless times without a ticket. No harm...no foul.

noglider 09-13-14 03:28 PM

[MENTION=369902]TransitBiker[/MENTION], I learned recently that in New York State, bicycles are not classified as vehicles though they are classified as traffic. Sorry I don't have a citation handy. It may be functionally equivalent, but the nomenclature is different.

TransitBiker 09-13-14 09:58 PM


Originally Posted by spare_wheel (Post 17127006)
Laws made for and by motorists that typically have little bearing on public safety and discriminate against active transport. I consider it my civic duty to violate these laws as much as is practical.



Bwahahaha! I've flagrantly violated the law in front of philly cops countless times without a ticket. No harm...no foul.

I don't live anywhere near philly. The police here actually enforce laws actively.

- Andy

TransitBiker 09-13-14 10:02 PM


Originally Posted by noglider (Post 17127042)
@TransitBiker, I learned recently that in New York State, bicycles are not classified as vehicles though they are classified as traffic. Sorry I don't have a citation handy. It may be functionally equivalent, but the nomenclature is different.

Yea, some language in laws is odd/vague and often very dated. My town still has laws on the book from 120 years ago that are no longer relevant. I guess my point was that every state addresses cyclists somehow. :)

- Andy

Mark Stone 09-13-14 11:26 PM

There's too many variables in a discussion like this. I'm thinking it would be impossible to come up with a hard and fast rule that would fit in all situations. :) The variables:
  • Every intersection is different and presents its own right turn lane challenges.
  • Laws are different everywhere.
  • Even if laws are the same, they are oftentimes interpreted by a police officer, who is just a person, subject to moods and personal beliefs.
  • Sometimes intersections are defined by the types of drivers that are there. Also, the types of vehicles.
  • Weather is different, changing road conditions and visibility.
  • A thousand (ok, maybe just a hundred) other possibilities
Therefore, when I come to an intersection with a right turn lane, I'm going to act in a way that I think is the safest for me and everyone else there. Thinking about laws will be secondary. If I get ticketed? Lol I'll deal with that when (if) it happens :)

noglider 09-14-14 07:31 AM

Basically, if you have to cross paths with another vehicle, cross as soon as you can do so safely. Since cars generally go faster than bikes, cross behind the nearest car. I do this by following behind as closely as I can, bordering on tailgating. This reduces my likelihood of being hit from behind, and it might also help being seen.

Giant Doofus 09-14-14 09:25 AM


Originally Posted by spivonious (Post 17117844)
Move to the center of the rightmost straight lane, then move back right once through the intersection.

Advantages:
1. Makes it obvious to other road users that you're going straight.
2. Lets right-turning road users turn.
3. Prevents passes within the intersection.

This is how I handle it too. I have one intersection along my route where a single lane of traffic splits just before the intersection into two lanes: One right turning and one straight lane. Since I'm already riding AFRAP, it can be a little tricky to get over into the left (through) lane, but I get over there as soon as I can and occupy the center of that lane. Just as soon as I get to the other side of the intersection, I move back over to the right.

spare_wheel 09-14-14 09:29 AM


Originally Posted by tractorlegs (Post 17128088)
There's too many variables in a discussion like this. I'm thinking it would be impossible to come up with a hard and fast rule that would fit in all situations. :) The variables:
  • Every intersection is different and presents its own right turn lane challenges.
  • Laws are different everywhere.
  • Even if laws are the same, they are oftentimes interpreted by a police officer, who is just a person, subject to moods and personal beliefs.
  • Sometimes intersections are defined by the types of drivers that are there. Also, the types of vehicles.
  • Weather is different, changing road conditions and visibility.
  • A thousand (ok, maybe just a hundred) other possibilities
Therefore, when I come to an intersection with a right turn lane, I'm going to act in a way that I think is the safest for me and everyone else there. Thinking about laws will be secondary. If I get ticketed? Lol I'll deal with that when (if) it happens :)

Excellent advice. When it comes to safe riding there are no hard and fast rules.

spare_wheel 09-14-14 09:41 AM

What kills me about these threads is the way so many give diametrically contradictory advice as dogma. What works for someone in bumblefrack suburbia may not work in a concrete jungle. Likewise, what works in 'murrica may not work in other nations.

kickstart 09-14-14 10:09 AM


Originally Posted by spare_wheel (Post 17128745)
What kills me about these threads is the way so many give diametrically contradictory advice as dogma. What works for someone in bumblefrack suburbia may not work in a concrete jungle. Likewise, what works in 'murrica may not work in other nations.



Originally Posted by spare_wheel (Post 17128718)
Excellent advice. When it comes to safe riding there are no hard and fast rules.

Agreed,

jon c. 09-14-14 10:30 AM


Originally Posted by spivonious (Post 17117844)
Move to the center of the rightmost straight lane, then move back right once through the intersection.

Advantages:
1. Makes it obvious to other road users that you're going straight.
2. Lets right-turning road users turn.
3. Prevents passes within the intersection.

I agree that there can be situational variances, but I follow this as SOP.

SlowJoeCrow 09-14-14 10:37 AM

Where I live, whenever there is a right turn lane and a bike lane the road markings move the bike lane across the turn lane to the rightmost straight lane via dotted lines. Based on this, when I'm faced with a turn lane and no bike lane I move into the next traffic lane to avoid being right hooked and take as much lane as I need.

playera 09-14-14 11:40 AM

On my bike, I am a vehicle so I am traffic. I use the middle of the lane to pull in behind any traffic (cars) in the traffic lane, going where I,m going. The cars in front of me dont have to pass me again. The cars behind me will have to be behind me until I get through the intersection and move toward the right edge. Cars can then go around me. Going through an intersection in pedestrian crossing is dangerous and shows ignorance.

practical 09-14-14 01:12 PM

Multiple lanes can be tricky for cyclist and there is no hard and fast rule for navigating through them. The guidelines are: be safe (not right), be visible, be predictable and be smart. I can think of lane situations that are (on paper) the same but I will navigate through differently because of the nature of the traffic that goes through it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.