![]() |
Originally Posted by Oregonroadruner
(Post 17374028)
walking is also a privilege.
I'm a firm believer in transportation hierarchies and walking is at the absolute pinnacle of this hierarchy, in my view. |
Originally Posted by tarwheel
(Post 17374487)
It doesn't matter who is right or wrong, if you get run over by a car, truck or bicycle. You are gonna get hurt and possibly killed. Some people just don't use their brains.
|
Walking is a privilege? Like breathing and water?
People do dumb stuff, whether walking, riding a bike or driving. That's just the way the world is. |
This thread has become my favorite "popcorn thread", interesting discussion.
The way that I like to think about pedestrians is this: 1. Ride *as if* you will be liable for hitting any pedestrian, no matter the circumstance. It's better to avoid a collision with Peds, regardless of the situation. 2. Be polite, but be prepared to defend yourself legally or otherwise when a collision occurs, if you feel the other party is at fault. |
If I'm driving or riding so fast that I can't see a non-lit pedestrian in time to avoid hitting him without drama, what will stop me from having the same problem with animals, rocks, or fallen trees? At least sometimes the deer are watching me and their eyes make pretty good reflectors. You can't assume the way is clear.
|
Originally Posted by dynaryder
(Post 17370404)
No it isn't,not at all. Bikes belong on the road and are legally allowed to use them. Peds do not belong in bike lanes(which are part of the roadway),and at least here in DC it is illegal for them to be in them. I can't imagine it was legal for the dog walker to be in the street where the OP lives,so they were breaking the law.
Originally Posted by enigmaT120
(Post 17381740)
If I'm driving or riding so fast that I can't see a non-lit pedestrian in time to avoid hitting him without drama, what will stop me from having the same problem with animals, rocks, or fallen trees? At least sometimes the deer are watching me and their eyes make pretty good reflectors. You can't assume the way is clear.
Is it dumb to be wearing dark clothing at night in poorly lit areas? Absolutely. Should peds wear safety vests/reflective clothing or lights? Yeah, it's a great idea. But that doesn't absolve me from riding responsibly. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Sullalto
(Post 17389061)
Local laws here are the exact opposite, bike lanes are shared.
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=423005 MUPs I can see,but I'm amazed anywhere would allow foot traffic in the street. |
Originally Posted by dynaryder
(Post 17389071)
Just to be sure we're on the same page,where you are it's legal for peds to walk in a bike lane? Like this?
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=423005 MUPs I can see,but I'm amazed anywhere would allow foot traffic in the street. In residential areas with bike lanes, sidewalks are often obstructed by people with a number of cars in their driveway, or just plain parking on the sidewalk-bike lanes here generally mean prohibited or limited street parking in areas that were designed for it. |
Update: I passed the lady I almost hit this am. She smiled and waved to me and I at her. The funny thing is she had reflective clothing on her and the dog and she had a flash light and I got a cool new light. Looks like all parties are better off in the end.
|
That's sweet. Good will all around!
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:38 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.