Question about fork rake
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 129
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Question about fork rake
So I purchased a SOMA Wolverine for a really good price. The fork that can be purchased for the wolverine is a 50mm rake and is 400mm from axle to crown. The head tube is 71.5°. I have found another fork that is a 45mm rake and is also 395mm from axle to crown. Will that make a huge difference in handling going to a 45mm rake fork?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
Different folks have different sensibility to things like that.
You can undoubtedly find some who'd swear that it's a big influence, in either direction.
Likewise, you'd be able to find people struggling to notice any change.
Only thing that can be said with reasonable certainty is that the bike will remain rideable.
You can undoubtedly find some who'd swear that it's a big influence, in either direction.
Likewise, you'd be able to find people struggling to notice any change.
Only thing that can be said with reasonable certainty is that the bike will remain rideable.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It will increase your HTA by 0.2 - 0.3 deg, so trail will increase from about 61mm to about 68mm. Steering will feel a little slower and more stable, but you're well within the "typical" range.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If you have at least 10mm of toe clearance now, you shouldn't experience any overlap with the new fork. Though, IMHO, toe overlap is really no big deal. As a shorter rider, I have toe overlap on almost all my bikes and it's never been a problem -- even racing CX.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,902
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4802 Post(s)
Liked 3,923 Times
in
2,552 Posts
I drew up the two forks on a fictional bike with 1016mm wheelbase and 72 degree head angle. Going to the second fork (395,45) lowers the trail from 69mm to 66mm and decreases your toe overlap by half a mm.
If indeed the HA is 72 degrees, the quickened steering will be a plus, becoming less of a plus if the HA is steeper. I would make my choice based on tire clearance and intended use. (Big tires and fenders?) If no biking tires, than which fork do I like better? Headtube where it is or half a cm lower?
Ben
If indeed the HA is 72 degrees, the quickened steering will be a plus, becoming less of a plus if the HA is steeper. I would make my choice based on tire clearance and intended use. (Big tires and fenders?) If no biking tires, than which fork do I like better? Headtube where it is or half a cm lower?
Ben
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
50mm_fork.jpg
45mm_fork.jpg
#10
Senior Member
With that slack of a head tube angle you don't want to decrease the rake. If you were to change out the 50 you'd probably be better off going to a 55 than a 45.
#11
Senior Member
I am not going to pretend to be an engineer so I won't.........BUT I just sold a Vassago Fisticuff in November with a 72.5 HTA and a 45 degree fork offset/rake. I bought a Wolverine with the matching fork. All I can say is NIGHT AND DAY difference. Get the fork that is made to go with the frame. You won't regret it. Super stable. Super comfy. It compliments the frame well. I love this damn bike.