Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

What's your preferred frame geometry?

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

What's your preferred frame geometry?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-17, 01:43 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 852
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 471 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
What's your preferred frame geometry?

I've spend some time comparing the geometry of my two bikes, both of which I bought before I properly understood what bike geometry meant to handling and ride quality. I have a Giant TCX and a Trek Crossrip.

I've played around with the fit, so that both bikes have very close saddle heights and saddle-to-bar distances, but they feel very different to actually ride.

I'm actually more comfortable, and feel safer, on the Trek, despite it being the cheaper bike (half the price of the Giant), but recognise that it's a slower and less agile bike - that also has a rougher ride due to the aluminium frame vs the carbon of the Giant.

But I'm interested in what makes the Trek feel more stable and composed, and I'm guessing that it's mostly geometry.

Here's a summary of the two geometries:

Screenshot 2017-05-18 17.28.51.jpg

The Trek has a longer wheelbase (1043 vs 1019mm) and lower bottom bracket (74mm vs 60mm), and from what I've read, both of these will aid the feeling of stability, particularly on corners.

Interestingly I feel quite a bit more stretched out (on the hoods) on the Giant, even though the reach is 20mm shorter than on the Trek. I don't think the stems are that different in length (but maybe a centimetre).

I particularly notice that I feel far further forward over the front wheel on the Giant, and when standing, the bike feels much more twitchy. Is this due to total wheelbase, or the "front center" measurement (front axle to BB?) which is not listed?

I imagine that the shorter overall wheelbase and shorter chain stays are more in keeping with a race geometry (for CX races), so would I expect something similar on any bike designed for this use (or a road bike)?

How many of you also have road bikes, and do you find you have to adjust your technique when you move from a more relaxed gravel grinder geometry to the road bike?

John.
johngwheeler is offline  
Old 05-18-17, 04:58 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Spoonrobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,065
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1217 Post(s)
Liked 186 Times in 117 Posts
Could be the wheels and tires too.

And don't forget when you measure reach you want measure the actual reach as well to account for handlebar reach and shifter reach; which can vary by 20-30mm easily.
Spoonrobot is offline  
Old 05-18-17, 08:51 AM
  #3  
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
Giant is more compact, so your weight is closer to the bars. That Trek is really stretched out. It has just 10mm shorter wheelbase than my 59cm Ritchey, which actually sizes comparably to other mfrs. 61cm frames. When I stand and pedal, my knees only miss the bars by about 20mm-- my frame is very compact. Crossrip also not especially spritely in the weight department, perhaps some "butt dyno" in effect here, where the heavier bike feels more stable?
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 05-18-17, 10:58 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Favorite would be made to measure.. but you want shopping help for stock frames.

no comment.








.....
fietsbob is offline  
Old 05-18-17, 03:24 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 852
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 471 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
Giant is more compact, so your weight is closer to the bars. That Trek is really stretched out. It has just 10mm shorter wheelbase than my 59cm Ritchey, which actually sizes comparably to other mfrs. 61cm frames. When I stand and pedal, my knees only miss the bars by about 20mm-- my frame is very compact. Crossrip also not especially spritely in the weight department, perhaps some "butt dyno" in effect here, where the heavier bike feels more stable?
That's a really good point! The Trek has a rack and pannier when I commute, and all up weight is > 16kg. The Giant is propbably only 10kg with the usual lights/saddle bag etc. Perhaps I should stick some weights on to Giant and do a test....
johngwheeler is offline  
Old 05-18-17, 08:01 PM
  #6  
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by johngwheeler
I've spend some time comparing the geometry of my two bikes, both of which I bought before I properly understood what bike geometry meant to handling and ride quality. I have a Giant TCX and a Trek Crossrip.

I've played around with the fit, so that both bikes have very close saddle heights and saddle-to-bar distances, but they feel very different to actually ride.

I'm actually more comfortable, and feel safer, on the Trek, despite it being the cheaper bike (half the price of the Giant), but recognise that it's a slower and less agile bike - that also has a rougher ride due to the aluminium frame vs the carbon of the Giant.

But I'm interested in what makes the Trek feel more stable and composed, and I'm guessing that it's mostly geometry.

Here's a summary of the two geometries:

Attachment 563811

The Trek has a longer wheelbase (1043 vs 1019mm) and lower bottom bracket (74mm vs 60mm), and from what I've read, both of these will aid the feeling of stability, particularly on corners.

Interestingly I feel quite a bit more stretched out (on the hoods) on the Giant, even though the reach is 20mm shorter than on the Trek. I don't think the stems are that different in length (but maybe a centimetre).

I particularly notice that I feel far further forward over the front wheel on the Giant, and when standing, the bike feels much more twitchy. Is this due to total wheelbase, or the "front center" measurement (front axle to BB?) which is not listed?

I imagine that the shorter overall wheelbase and shorter chain stays are more in keeping with a race geometry (for CX races), so would I expect something similar on any bike designed for this use (or a road bike)?

How many of you also have road bikes, and do you find you have to adjust your technique when you move from a more relaxed gravel grinder geometry to the road bike?

John.
Trek also has the slacker head angle.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 05-21-17, 10:03 AM
  #7  
Nice Guy
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 21

Bikes: 1985 Trek | 1988 Bianchi Superleggera | +++

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My wife road the Crossrip and Domane and said the Crossrip felt way more planted, less twitchy, and more comfortable overall. She did say the Domane felt lighter and faster, but that the tradeoff wasn't worth it. She loves the crossrip.
Atsuico is offline  
Old 05-21-17, 03:30 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 363
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
I love my Lemond frame set ups. That being said when I was looking for my bike years ago I really like the ride of a Merlin ti but don't remember the model.

Zman
Zurichman2 is offline  
Old 05-21-17, 07:02 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 852
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 471 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Getting used to the different geometry now!

I've now had a couple of longer rides on the Giant TCX and have started to use it for some of commutes (when I don't need to carry stuff).

I think I'm now considerably more comfortable with it than I was first posted this thread. I went back to the Trek Crossrip for a test and it felt very slow and sluggish, so I guess it's all just a case of adapting to different bikes, and with experience, this adaption will be nearly instant every time I get on a different bike.

Probably a lot of my initial concern was just lack of confidence in my ability to handle the bike and the more "reactive" front end steering. I deliberately did some exercises riding out of the saddle and sprinting on the hoods and drops, getting well over the front wheel, which initially scared me a bit. Now that I know I'm not going to lose control, I feel much more confident.

Practice makes perfect!

John.
johngwheeler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cloud5
Road Cycling
6
12-19-18 04:26 PM
johngwheeler
General Cycling Discussion
33
05-22-17 11:52 PM
Spiff_P239
Road Cycling
13
05-25-12 08:38 AM
Roasted
Road Cycling
14
11-10-10 08:03 PM
TomLBC
Road Cycling
6
07-01-10 12:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.