Are CX-specific tires too thin for gravel riding?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Are CX-specific tires too thin for gravel riding?
My Giant TCX came with Schwalbe X-One tires, which although very grippy on grass, seemed to roll slowly on pavement. I swapped these for Schwalbe Marathon Supremes because most of my riding seemed to be on pavement or hard-packed tracks.
I'm now looking for more gravel / single-track routes, and am considering tire choice again. The Marathons will probably be OK, but they do slip a bit on sandy surfaces, and I have the feeling (but the not the experience!) that I should probably have a bit more tread on the tire. I'm happy to be corrected if this assumption is wrong!
So I've been looking at my X-One tires again. My question is whether these are a bad choice for gravel which is likely to have much sharper surfaces than a typical Cyclocross course, for which the tires are intended. I recall reading that many CX tires are actually very thin between the knobs, and can be easily punctured when riding on anything other than grass/mud or smooth roads. Is there any truth in this?
Would I be better off with one of the many gravel-specific tires (like the Schwalbe G-One - to compare ranges for the same manufacturer)?
I'm already looking at getting a separate wheel set for road use, and now it seems I may need a total of 3 sets: road, CX and gravel :-)
Thanks for any advice!
I'm now looking for more gravel / single-track routes, and am considering tire choice again. The Marathons will probably be OK, but they do slip a bit on sandy surfaces, and I have the feeling (but the not the experience!) that I should probably have a bit more tread on the tire. I'm happy to be corrected if this assumption is wrong!
So I've been looking at my X-One tires again. My question is whether these are a bad choice for gravel which is likely to have much sharper surfaces than a typical Cyclocross course, for which the tires are intended. I recall reading that many CX tires are actually very thin between the knobs, and can be easily punctured when riding on anything other than grass/mud or smooth roads. Is there any truth in this?
Would I be better off with one of the many gravel-specific tires (like the Schwalbe G-One - to compare ranges for the same manufacturer)?
I'm already looking at getting a separate wheel set for road use, and now it seems I may need a total of 3 sets: road, CX and gravel :-)
Thanks for any advice!
#2
Senior Member
Re the sandy surfaces; in my opinion its not so much the 'more tread' (at 33mm; X-One), but greater tire width/contact patch you need.
I think you would be better off with gravel-specific (your actual surfaces) tires.
Why not one wheelset (using an internal rim width that covers the tire widths and pressure range you desire) for a bunch of different tires?
Though I suppose that would only make the best sense if you're running tubes, which I'd try to put behind me and go tubeless.
I think you would be better off with gravel-specific (your actual surfaces) tires.
Why not one wheelset (using an internal rim width that covers the tire widths and pressure range you desire) for a bunch of different tires?
Though I suppose that would only make the best sense if you're running tubes, which I'd try to put behind me and go tubeless.
Last edited by tangerineowl; 05-15-17 at 02:07 AM. Reason: txt
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,549
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 642 Times
in
328 Posts
Not sure whether they're too thin or not but when I ran some Conti CX-Kings (35mm) I felt like I was working harder on gravel than with my specialized trigger 38s. This is going to depend somewhat on your local gravel conditions, but for the riding conditions where I live, you don't need that much tread, and a lot of gravel specific tires that are coming out now are basically a file tread. So I would agree with @tangerineowl that wider is more important.
The triggers also roll surprisingly fast on pavement, but they're no substitute for a road tire.
The triggers also roll surprisingly fast on pavement, but they're no substitute for a road tire.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 174
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In my experience, volume makes more of a difference than tread does when it comes to comfort, traction, and control. When in doubt, run the biggest tires that will safely clear your frame/fork (and run them at sensibly low pressures).
#5
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,782
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 732 Times
in
466 Posts
I thought CX rules limited tires to 31mm max?
-Tim-
-Tim-
#7
Senior Member
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,549
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 642 Times
in
328 Posts
No one ever checked my width though, I probably could've run 38s and been fine. No one cares about what the Cat 5s are doing though.
#9
Senior Member
You're probably right, my tires are probably 33s. I only raced cross a few times and didn't love the tires so they've been sitting in my pile for a while.
No one ever checked my width though, I probably could've run 38s and been fine. No one cares about what the Cat 5s are doing though.
No one ever checked my width though, I probably could've run 38s and been fine. No one cares about what the Cat 5s are doing though.
When you're racing for socks it's not a big deal. When you're racing for UCI points, things get a bit more serious.
#11
Senior Member
I can only speak for Arkansas but, the wider the tire, the better off you are. Here, the gravel is so all over the map on size, you never know what you're going to encounter. Even on the same routes from week to week.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
You're probably right, my tires are probably 33s. I only raced cross a few times and didn't love the tires so they've been sitting in my pile for a while.
No one ever checked my width though, I probably could've run 38s and been fine. No one cares about what the Cat 5s are doing though.
No one ever checked my width though, I probably could've run 38s and been fine. No one cares about what the Cat 5s are doing though.
Cat 5's are people too.
We just sux...🦖😋
#13
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 399
Bikes: TCX & CAAD3 SAECO
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times
in
66 Posts
Cross tires are typically skinnier and knobbier. Depends.
For a 700c tire on gravel/road mixture, the following are popular in the 38-45 range depending on preference in no specific order:
WTB Resolute
WTB Riddler
WTB Byway
Schwalbe G-One Allround
Maxxis Rambler
Donnelly MSO
Vittoria Terreno Dry
Panaracer Gravel King SK & File Tread
ReneHerse (all of them?)
The list goes on! I have a TCX and enjoy Maxxis Ramblers in 40 as well as WTB Riddlers in 45. But... the WTB Byway in 700x44 look amazing.
For a 700c tire on gravel/road mixture, the following are popular in the 38-45 range depending on preference in no specific order:
WTB Resolute
WTB Riddler
WTB Byway
Schwalbe G-One Allround
Maxxis Rambler
Donnelly MSO
Vittoria Terreno Dry
Panaracer Gravel King SK & File Tread
ReneHerse (all of them?)
The list goes on! I have a TCX and enjoy Maxxis Ramblers in 40 as well as WTB Riddlers in 45. But... the WTB Byway in 700x44 look amazing.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,862
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1146 Post(s)
Liked 414 Times
in
334 Posts
Notice any difference between the Ramblers and Riddlers? My Ramblers are blistering in the tread, so I'm looking to replace them. riddlers are on the list...
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,862
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1146 Post(s)
Liked 414 Times
in
334 Posts
33mm is fine for a lot of the summer gravel we have around here (YMMV). But if its 33mm weather on gravel (Hardpack for me), I'm on slicks. If I need more traction or flotation or rougher course, I'm on 40 (or 50).
They would be good for muddy courses where you are worried about mud packing, and need to cut through to the bottom of the mud - but that describes CX more than Gravel (of course some courses have everything).
#16
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 399
Bikes: TCX & CAAD3 SAECO
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times
in
66 Posts
That being said, the Riddler 45s are so fun off road I think the Ramblers will start collecting dust.
If I knew they would come out with the Byways in 700x44 I would have gone for those. That looks like a fun, fast, big tire. I've read on these boards the Resolute rolls better than the Riddlers as well if you're looking to keep the speed of the Rambler.
Likes For Hmmm:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johngwheeler
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
100
10-22-18 12:15 PM
jcivic00
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
5
06-05-17 07:47 AM
tomazo
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
7
12-27-16 08:00 PM
merlinextraligh
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
13
04-24-14 02:38 PM