Diverge 2018
#476
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: PNW
Posts: 197
Bikes: Cutthroat, Scalpel, Roubaix, Sequoia, SuperX, Diverge
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
as mentioned, depends on the bike type. My 56cm 2018 Diverge Expert was 19.7 with the SWAT box, a 2017 carbon Salsa Warbird is 19.3 lbs.
I have a Cannondale SuperX (54cm) that is a hair under 17 lbs, and a Roubaix Comp Carbon disc that is right at 17 lbs. My medium 2017 Cannondale Scalpel Si Carbon-3 is right around 24 lbs
Those are stock, so if you add some carbon bits you could get them down and extra lb or possibly even 1.5-2 lbs.
Last edited by sgtrobo; 10-24-17 at 10:12 AM.
#477
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: PNW
Posts: 197
Bikes: Cutthroat, Scalpel, Roubaix, Sequoia, SuperX, Diverge
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
2018 Diverge Expert with Quarq power meter 44t, no pedals or bottle cages, including SWAT box
#478
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,827
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times
in
468 Posts
I have a Cannondale SuperX (54cm) that is a hair under 17 lbs
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
#481
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: middle north (Mpls)
Posts: 216
Bikes: some
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Any idea how much the hover bars weigh? Specialized doesn’t list their weight. I’m goin with 3T ergoterra bars and a 3T -17°stem. Also a Power Expert saddle. I’m guessing it’ll end up a little below 19 without pedals
#482
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Guys
Posted in this forum earlier regarding the ability of the Diverge alloy frame to take a clamp style derailleur. Nobody could directly answer my question but somebody referred me to Specialized and they replied that it would not be possible due to the oversize tubing.
What is advertised as a go anywhere bike, it's disappointing that both bike and component manufacturers are reluctant to allow users to modify bikes to make them suitable for the type of riding owners want.
Currently riding a 20 year old Cannondale CAAD4 frame and lowest gearing is 22-34. I am not the lightest nor strongest of climbers but sometimes I want to explore roads that look impossible to cycle. My current gearing, I am finding it is not possible to ride these extreme gradients. Would prefer 22-40 or possibly 42 or 46.
I love the spec of the Diverge Comp especially the Shimano Hydros, the Satin blue is the best colour in the range. Biggest problem, not a fan of Carbon. Second choice is the Comp E5 but it's got mechanical disk brakes, oxymoron in my opinion. Been using Shimano Hydros for almost 20 years, how can I take a massive step backwards? Spending the extra cash to upgrade is not financially responsible too. Currently stuck between and rock and a hard place on what new bike to buy. Diverge fits my needs to 90%. Like the idea of CGR seat post and Future Shock but they are not consistent throughout the range.
Can't buy a full-on race bike as my type of riding is all sorts of surfaces that a hybrid could tackle, do a lot of kerb hopping and riding rutted trails and potholed roads. Would be running 28mm or 30mm tyres and riding all day on 100+km rides.
If clamp style derailleur cannot be used, manufacturers should allow smaller cranks by facilitating a longer braze-on bracket to allow for more adjustment. Different riders ride different terrain and topography and where I live storage space is at a premium. It's a luxury to own more than one bike. I'd much prefer to own different sets of gearing and swap to which ever type of riding I am doing. I had hoped that the Diverge would allow this option. I would keep the bike stock for fairly level terrain and swap to adventure gearing as required.
Also the Diverge can be used for light touring; fender and rack mount provided, carrying extra weight and for hilly places, lower gearing would be of great use and advantageous.
Anybody else having this predicament decide which bike to buy?
Etops
Posted in this forum earlier regarding the ability of the Diverge alloy frame to take a clamp style derailleur. Nobody could directly answer my question but somebody referred me to Specialized and they replied that it would not be possible due to the oversize tubing.
What is advertised as a go anywhere bike, it's disappointing that both bike and component manufacturers are reluctant to allow users to modify bikes to make them suitable for the type of riding owners want.
Currently riding a 20 year old Cannondale CAAD4 frame and lowest gearing is 22-34. I am not the lightest nor strongest of climbers but sometimes I want to explore roads that look impossible to cycle. My current gearing, I am finding it is not possible to ride these extreme gradients. Would prefer 22-40 or possibly 42 or 46.
I love the spec of the Diverge Comp especially the Shimano Hydros, the Satin blue is the best colour in the range. Biggest problem, not a fan of Carbon. Second choice is the Comp E5 but it's got mechanical disk brakes, oxymoron in my opinion. Been using Shimano Hydros for almost 20 years, how can I take a massive step backwards? Spending the extra cash to upgrade is not financially responsible too. Currently stuck between and rock and a hard place on what new bike to buy. Diverge fits my needs to 90%. Like the idea of CGR seat post and Future Shock but they are not consistent throughout the range.
Can't buy a full-on race bike as my type of riding is all sorts of surfaces that a hybrid could tackle, do a lot of kerb hopping and riding rutted trails and potholed roads. Would be running 28mm or 30mm tyres and riding all day on 100+km rides.
If clamp style derailleur cannot be used, manufacturers should allow smaller cranks by facilitating a longer braze-on bracket to allow for more adjustment. Different riders ride different terrain and topography and where I live storage space is at a premium. It's a luxury to own more than one bike. I'd much prefer to own different sets of gearing and swap to which ever type of riding I am doing. I had hoped that the Diverge would allow this option. I would keep the bike stock for fairly level terrain and swap to adventure gearing as required.
Also the Diverge can be used for light touring; fender and rack mount provided, carrying extra weight and for hilly places, lower gearing would be of great use and advantageous.
Anybody else having this predicament decide which bike to buy?
Etops
#483
Senior Member
guys
posted in this forum earlier regarding the ability of the diverge alloy frame to take a clamp style derailleur. Nobody could directly answer my question but somebody referred me to specialized and they replied that it would not be possible due to the oversize tubing.
What is advertised as a go anywhere bike, it's disappointing that both bike and component manufacturers are reluctant to allow users to modify bikes to make them suitable for the type of riding owners want.
Currently riding a 20 year old cannondale caad4 frame and lowest gearing is 22-34. I am not the lightest nor strongest of climbers but sometimes i want to explore roads that look impossible to cycle. My current gearing, i am finding it is not possible to ride these extreme gradients. Would prefer 22-40 or possibly 42 or 46.
I love the spec of the diverge comp especially the shimano hydros, the satin blue is the best colour in the range. Biggest problem, not a fan of carbon. Second choice is the comp e5 but it's got mechanical disk brakes, oxymoron in my opinion. Been using shimano hydros for almost 20 years, how can i take a massive step backwards? Spending the extra cash to upgrade is not financially responsible too. Currently stuck between and rock and a hard place on what new bike to buy. Diverge fits my needs to 90%. Like the idea of cgr seat post and future shock but they are not consistent throughout the range.
Can't buy a full-on race bike as my type of riding is all sorts of surfaces that a hybrid could tackle, do a lot of kerb hopping and riding rutted trails and potholed roads. Would be running 28mm or 30mm tyres and riding all day on 100+km rides.
If clamp style derailleur cannot be used, manufacturers should allow smaller cranks by facilitating a longer braze-on bracket to allow for more adjustment. Different riders ride different terrain and topography and where i live storage space is at a premium. It's a luxury to own more than one bike. I'd much prefer to own different sets of gearing and swap to which ever type of riding i am doing. I had hoped that the diverge would allow this option. I would keep the bike stock for fairly level terrain and swap to adventure gearing as required.
Also the diverge can be used for light touring; fender and rack mount provided, carrying extra weight and for hilly places, lower gearing would be of great use and advantageous.
Anybody else having this predicament decide which bike to buy?
Etops
posted in this forum earlier regarding the ability of the diverge alloy frame to take a clamp style derailleur. Nobody could directly answer my question but somebody referred me to specialized and they replied that it would not be possible due to the oversize tubing.
What is advertised as a go anywhere bike, it's disappointing that both bike and component manufacturers are reluctant to allow users to modify bikes to make them suitable for the type of riding owners want.
Currently riding a 20 year old cannondale caad4 frame and lowest gearing is 22-34. I am not the lightest nor strongest of climbers but sometimes i want to explore roads that look impossible to cycle. My current gearing, i am finding it is not possible to ride these extreme gradients. Would prefer 22-40 or possibly 42 or 46.
I love the spec of the diverge comp especially the shimano hydros, the satin blue is the best colour in the range. Biggest problem, not a fan of carbon. Second choice is the comp e5 but it's got mechanical disk brakes, oxymoron in my opinion. Been using shimano hydros for almost 20 years, how can i take a massive step backwards? Spending the extra cash to upgrade is not financially responsible too. Currently stuck between and rock and a hard place on what new bike to buy. Diverge fits my needs to 90%. Like the idea of cgr seat post and future shock but they are not consistent throughout the range.
Can't buy a full-on race bike as my type of riding is all sorts of surfaces that a hybrid could tackle, do a lot of kerb hopping and riding rutted trails and potholed roads. Would be running 28mm or 30mm tyres and riding all day on 100+km rides.
If clamp style derailleur cannot be used, manufacturers should allow smaller cranks by facilitating a longer braze-on bracket to allow for more adjustment. Different riders ride different terrain and topography and where i live storage space is at a premium. It's a luxury to own more than one bike. I'd much prefer to own different sets of gearing and swap to which ever type of riding i am doing. I had hoped that the diverge would allow this option. I would keep the bike stock for fairly level terrain and swap to adventure gearing as required.
Also the diverge can be used for light touring; fender and rack mount provided, carrying extra weight and for hilly places, lower gearing would be of great use and advantageous.
Anybody else having this predicament decide which bike to buy?
Etops
#484
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 126
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This. At some point, the hill is so steep and your gearing is so low that no matter how easily you can spin it, you can't overcome gravity and you tip over backwards. This happens on slopes that can be pedaled with your 22x34 on a modern MTB. You could probably get steeper, assuming adequate traction, with more aggressive CX geometry, but anything beyond 22x40 is likely pointless (and 22x40 is silly, just to be clear).
That satin blue is the prettiest bike I've ridden. If I could have tolerated the superlow BB for the singletrack that I like to include in my CX rides, I might have gone for it. It is just about perfect otherwise, although I'd go for a 11-36t cassette myself. That's still way out of range for what you're talking about, but it's enough for my needs. If I feel a need to tractor up a wall, I'll bring my MTB.
That satin blue is the prettiest bike I've ridden. If I could have tolerated the superlow BB for the singletrack that I like to include in my CX rides, I might have gone for it. It is just about perfect otherwise, although I'd go for a 11-36t cassette myself. That's still way out of range for what you're talking about, but it's enough for my needs. If I feel a need to tractor up a wall, I'll bring my MTB.
Last edited by ATPAH; 11-17-17 at 04:38 AM.
#485
Senior Member
Guys
Posted in this forum earlier regarding the ability of the Diverge alloy frame to take a clamp style derailleur. Nobody could directly answer my question but somebody referred me to Specialized and they replied that it would not be possible due to the oversize tubing.
What is advertised as a go anywhere bike, it's disappointing that both bike and component manufacturers are reluctant to allow users to modify bikes to make them suitable for the type of riding owners want.
Currently riding a 20 year old Cannondale CAAD4 frame and lowest gearing is 22-34. I am not the lightest nor strongest of climbers but sometimes I want to explore roads that look impossible to cycle. My current gearing, I am finding it is not possible to ride these extreme gradients. Would prefer 22-40 or possibly 42 or 46.
I love the spec of the Diverge Comp especially the Shimano Hydros, the Satin blue is the best colour in the range. Biggest problem, not a fan of Carbon. Second choice is the Comp E5 but it's got mechanical disk brakes, oxymoron in my opinion. Been using Shimano Hydros for almost 20 years, how can I take a massive step backwards? Spending the extra cash to upgrade is not financially responsible too. Currently stuck between and rock and a hard place on what new bike to buy. Diverge fits my needs to 90%. Like the idea of CGR seat post and Future Shock but they are not consistent throughout the range.
Can't buy a full-on race bike as my type of riding is all sorts of surfaces that a hybrid could tackle, do a lot of kerb hopping and riding rutted trails and potholed roads. Would be running 28mm or 30mm tyres and riding all day on 100+km rides.
If clamp style derailleur cannot be used, manufacturers should allow smaller cranks by facilitating a longer braze-on bracket to allow for more adjustment. Different riders ride different terrain and topography and where I live storage space is at a premium. It's a luxury to own more than one bike. I'd much prefer to own different sets of gearing and swap to which ever type of riding I am doing. I had hoped that the Diverge would allow this option. I would keep the bike stock for fairly level terrain and swap to adventure gearing as required.
Also the Diverge can be used for light touring; fender and rack mount provided, carrying extra weight and for hilly places, lower gearing would be of great use and advantageous.
Anybody else having this predicament decide which bike to buy?
Etops
Posted in this forum earlier regarding the ability of the Diverge alloy frame to take a clamp style derailleur. Nobody could directly answer my question but somebody referred me to Specialized and they replied that it would not be possible due to the oversize tubing.
What is advertised as a go anywhere bike, it's disappointing that both bike and component manufacturers are reluctant to allow users to modify bikes to make them suitable for the type of riding owners want.
Currently riding a 20 year old Cannondale CAAD4 frame and lowest gearing is 22-34. I am not the lightest nor strongest of climbers but sometimes I want to explore roads that look impossible to cycle. My current gearing, I am finding it is not possible to ride these extreme gradients. Would prefer 22-40 or possibly 42 or 46.
I love the spec of the Diverge Comp especially the Shimano Hydros, the Satin blue is the best colour in the range. Biggest problem, not a fan of Carbon. Second choice is the Comp E5 but it's got mechanical disk brakes, oxymoron in my opinion. Been using Shimano Hydros for almost 20 years, how can I take a massive step backwards? Spending the extra cash to upgrade is not financially responsible too. Currently stuck between and rock and a hard place on what new bike to buy. Diverge fits my needs to 90%. Like the idea of CGR seat post and Future Shock but they are not consistent throughout the range.
Can't buy a full-on race bike as my type of riding is all sorts of surfaces that a hybrid could tackle, do a lot of kerb hopping and riding rutted trails and potholed roads. Would be running 28mm or 30mm tyres and riding all day on 100+km rides.
If clamp style derailleur cannot be used, manufacturers should allow smaller cranks by facilitating a longer braze-on bracket to allow for more adjustment. Different riders ride different terrain and topography and where I live storage space is at a premium. It's a luxury to own more than one bike. I'd much prefer to own different sets of gearing and swap to which ever type of riding I am doing. I had hoped that the Diverge would allow this option. I would keep the bike stock for fairly level terrain and swap to adventure gearing as required.
Also the Diverge can be used for light touring; fender and rack mount provided, carrying extra weight and for hilly places, lower gearing would be of great use and advantageous.
Anybody else having this predicament decide which bike to buy?
Etops
e.g. I did a google pic search, of 'gravel bike' and 'steel' and 'blue'; quite a few bikes came up e.g. the 2017 Masi CXGR Supremo (has Shimano hydraulics). Might find some ideas through those pics.
Re the suspension, you could get a standard bike and purchase a Shockstop stem for upfront, and a high-flex post like the Syntace p6 hi-flex or an Ergon CF3.
#486
Senior Member
This. At some point, the hill is so steep and your gearing is so low that no matter how easily you can spin it, you can't overcome gravity and you tip over backwards. This happens on shipped that can be pedaled with your 22x34 on my modern MTB. You could probably get steeper, assuming adequate traction, with more aggressive CX geometry, but anything beyond 22x40 is likely pointless (and 22x40 is silly, just to be clear).
That satin blue is the prettiest bike I've ridden. If I could have tolerated the superlow BB for the singletrack that I like to include in my CX rides, I might have gone for it. It is just about perfect otherwise, although I'd go for a 11-36t cassette myself. That's still way out of range for what you're talking about, but it's enough for my needs. If I feel a need to tractor up a wall, I'll bring my MTB.
That satin blue is the prettiest bike I've ridden. If I could have tolerated the superlow BB for the singletrack that I like to include in my CX rides, I might have gone for it. It is just about perfect otherwise, although I'd go for a 11-36t cassette myself. That's still way out of range for what you're talking about, but it's enough for my needs. If I feel a need to tractor up a wall, I'll bring my MTB.
#487
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 126
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yeah, I've done some of that on my 34x32, although I have a 36t cassette awaiting installation to take the stress off on longer steep climbs. I could see someone going lower than that, but I can't imagine wanting a much lower gear than 22x34, even for bike packing.
#488
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi All, I’ve searched all over the interwebs and have not found solid information about installing racks (rear and/or front) on 2018 carbon diverge. Have anyone figured this bit out?
#489
Likes to Ride Far
#490
Likes to Ride Far
Guys
Posted in this forum earlier regarding the ability of the Diverge alloy frame to take a clamp style derailleur. Nobody could directly answer my question but somebody referred me to Specialized and they replied that it would not be possible due to the oversize tubing.
What is advertised as a go anywhere bike, it's disappointing that both bike and component manufacturers are reluctant to allow users to modify bikes to make them suitable for the type of riding owners want.
Currently riding a 20 year old Cannondale CAAD4 frame and lowest gearing is 22-34. I am not the lightest nor strongest of climbers but sometimes I want to explore roads that look impossible to cycle. My current gearing, I am finding it is not possible to ride these extreme gradients. Would prefer 22-40 or possibly 42 or 46.
I love the spec of the Diverge Comp especially the Shimano Hydros, the Satin blue is the best colour in the range. Biggest problem, not a fan of Carbon. Second choice is the Comp E5 but it's got mechanical disk brakes, oxymoron in my opinion. Been using Shimano Hydros for almost 20 years, how can I take a massive step backwards? Spending the extra cash to upgrade is not financially responsible too. Currently stuck between and rock and a hard place on what new bike to buy. Diverge fits my needs to 90%. Like the idea of CGR seat post and Future Shock but they are not consistent throughout the range.
Can't buy a full-on race bike as my type of riding is all sorts of surfaces that a hybrid could tackle, do a lot of kerb hopping and riding rutted trails and potholed roads. Would be running 28mm or 30mm tyres and riding all day on 100+km rides.
If clamp style derailleur cannot be used, manufacturers should allow smaller cranks by facilitating a longer braze-on bracket to allow for more adjustment. Different riders ride different terrain and topography and where I live storage space is at a premium. It's a luxury to own more than one bike. I'd much prefer to own different sets of gearing and swap to which ever type of riding I am doing. I had hoped that the Diverge would allow this option. I would keep the bike stock for fairly level terrain and swap to adventure gearing as required.
Also the Diverge can be used for light touring; fender and rack mount provided, carrying extra weight and for hilly places, lower gearing would be of great use and advantageous.
Anybody else having this predicament decide which bike to buy?
Etops
Posted in this forum earlier regarding the ability of the Diverge alloy frame to take a clamp style derailleur. Nobody could directly answer my question but somebody referred me to Specialized and they replied that it would not be possible due to the oversize tubing.
What is advertised as a go anywhere bike, it's disappointing that both bike and component manufacturers are reluctant to allow users to modify bikes to make them suitable for the type of riding owners want.
Currently riding a 20 year old Cannondale CAAD4 frame and lowest gearing is 22-34. I am not the lightest nor strongest of climbers but sometimes I want to explore roads that look impossible to cycle. My current gearing, I am finding it is not possible to ride these extreme gradients. Would prefer 22-40 or possibly 42 or 46.
I love the spec of the Diverge Comp especially the Shimano Hydros, the Satin blue is the best colour in the range. Biggest problem, not a fan of Carbon. Second choice is the Comp E5 but it's got mechanical disk brakes, oxymoron in my opinion. Been using Shimano Hydros for almost 20 years, how can I take a massive step backwards? Spending the extra cash to upgrade is not financially responsible too. Currently stuck between and rock and a hard place on what new bike to buy. Diverge fits my needs to 90%. Like the idea of CGR seat post and Future Shock but they are not consistent throughout the range.
Can't buy a full-on race bike as my type of riding is all sorts of surfaces that a hybrid could tackle, do a lot of kerb hopping and riding rutted trails and potholed roads. Would be running 28mm or 30mm tyres and riding all day on 100+km rides.
If clamp style derailleur cannot be used, manufacturers should allow smaller cranks by facilitating a longer braze-on bracket to allow for more adjustment. Different riders ride different terrain and topography and where I live storage space is at a premium. It's a luxury to own more than one bike. I'd much prefer to own different sets of gearing and swap to which ever type of riding I am doing. I had hoped that the Diverge would allow this option. I would keep the bike stock for fairly level terrain and swap to adventure gearing as required.
Also the Diverge can be used for light touring; fender and rack mount provided, carrying extra weight and for hilly places, lower gearing would be of great use and advantageous.
Anybody else having this predicament decide which bike to buy?
Etops
It would be better if I could use a clamp-on front derailleur because then I could use XT Di2 derailleurs so that I could run an 11-40 cassette and then a regular 34/50 road compact crank, but you can't use an XT Di2 rear derailleur without the matching front derailleur, which can't mount to a braze-on attachment. I've tried the 11-40 cassette, Ultegra Di2 RD with a Wolf Tooth derailleur hanger extender, but the shifting on the smaller cogs is too compromised because of the derailleur being too far from the cogs in those combinations.
#491
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: middle north (Mpls)
Posts: 216
Bikes: some
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I also replaced the saddle with the Power Expert saddle.
Anyhoo, with pedals, bottle cages and Garmin mount, but without swat box it’s 19.42 lbs. Without pedals, Garmin mount, cages, and swat box, it’s 18.4 lbs. When not racing, I only usually use one bottle and but my saddle bag in the empty cage. Similar idea to the swat box- keeping center of gravity low- but easier to move from bike to bike.
All in all, I’m quite pleased.
#492
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi to everyone, I’m new to this forum and I’m looking for info about the Diverge E5 Sport. There are several reviews and videos on youtube about the higher end models with Future Shock but very little on the lower specced models.
I’m evaluating the Diverge E5 Sport as my first “serious” bike. I’m planning to use it for riding in my area (Italy, Venice area) that is plain but there are also mountains, woods and plateau. Being just starting out, the truth is that I don’t know exactly what kind of terrains I’m going to ride, but I’d like to keep all the possibilities opened. I’ve tried a few bikes around and I’m preferring lighter and faster gravel bikes vs bikes with iron frame and big tires. Basically I would like to have a bike that is fun on mixed terrain but that is not too slow or bulky on tarmac.
I’m quite sure about what I’m NOT gonna do: rides longer then a few hours (not for now at least) and technical or difficult paths that would suits better to a MTB.
Now the Diverge E5 Sport. The cost for me is just right for my first bike. I could also afford the E5 Comp but I’m not sure I will take any real advantage of the better specs. I’ve compared the E5 sport to others bikes I can buy in my area for the same money and for me it has the best value: new geometry, flat mount discs, Through Axle front and rear, mudguards and rack mounts. No other bike that I’m aware of (and I can buy locally) offers all this features for this price. Also Specialized is well supported by my local shop. Maybe I could buy something with Tiagra instead of Sora at the same price or near, but nothing more. Don’t see it as a big benefit.
Comparing the E5 sport to the E5 Comp, the E5 sport surely have something less:
- Future Shock: is it a must have for this Diverge? Does a 38 tires would give me the same amount of comfort as the future shock or would be night and day? My doubt is that this bike is built around it, and the same frame without the Future Shock could turn to be more uncomfortable than another “classic” gravel frame that use other ways to dump the road.
- 105 vs Sora: I’ve read the the new Sora is not bad at all. Probably the biggest advantage of 105 is to have more gears and less gaps between gears
- Weight of the wheels: The E5 Sport has the Axis Sport Disc, while the E5 Comp has the Axis Elite Disc. Don’t know how much differences there is actually
- Breaks: Tektro Spyre (Comp) vs Tektro Mira (Sport)
But the E5 Sport does still have some advantages:
- Color: both are uninspiring, but I slightly prefer the light grey of the E5 Sport (in Italy no black/red option)
- Upgradability: being the E5 Sport cheaper, I can think to add maybe next year the 105 group with Hydro Brakes. I would still miss the Future Shock, but I would have hydro brakes
- No futuristic gadgets. I have no experience with bikes but I’m not totally attracted by the future shock. It’s a sort of attraction/repulsion but I don't have any serious arguments in favor or against. It’s just by instinct.
Every posts I’ve read seems to agree that the E5 Comp has the bigger value for the money. Has the E5 Sport some chance to win for my use?
I’m evaluating the Diverge E5 Sport as my first “serious” bike. I’m planning to use it for riding in my area (Italy, Venice area) that is plain but there are also mountains, woods and plateau. Being just starting out, the truth is that I don’t know exactly what kind of terrains I’m going to ride, but I’d like to keep all the possibilities opened. I’ve tried a few bikes around and I’m preferring lighter and faster gravel bikes vs bikes with iron frame and big tires. Basically I would like to have a bike that is fun on mixed terrain but that is not too slow or bulky on tarmac.
I’m quite sure about what I’m NOT gonna do: rides longer then a few hours (not for now at least) and technical or difficult paths that would suits better to a MTB.
Now the Diverge E5 Sport. The cost for me is just right for my first bike. I could also afford the E5 Comp but I’m not sure I will take any real advantage of the better specs. I’ve compared the E5 sport to others bikes I can buy in my area for the same money and for me it has the best value: new geometry, flat mount discs, Through Axle front and rear, mudguards and rack mounts. No other bike that I’m aware of (and I can buy locally) offers all this features for this price. Also Specialized is well supported by my local shop. Maybe I could buy something with Tiagra instead of Sora at the same price or near, but nothing more. Don’t see it as a big benefit.
Comparing the E5 sport to the E5 Comp, the E5 sport surely have something less:
- Future Shock: is it a must have for this Diverge? Does a 38 tires would give me the same amount of comfort as the future shock or would be night and day? My doubt is that this bike is built around it, and the same frame without the Future Shock could turn to be more uncomfortable than another “classic” gravel frame that use other ways to dump the road.
- 105 vs Sora: I’ve read the the new Sora is not bad at all. Probably the biggest advantage of 105 is to have more gears and less gaps between gears
- Weight of the wheels: The E5 Sport has the Axis Sport Disc, while the E5 Comp has the Axis Elite Disc. Don’t know how much differences there is actually
- Breaks: Tektro Spyre (Comp) vs Tektro Mira (Sport)
But the E5 Sport does still have some advantages:
- Color: both are uninspiring, but I slightly prefer the light grey of the E5 Sport (in Italy no black/red option)
- Upgradability: being the E5 Sport cheaper, I can think to add maybe next year the 105 group with Hydro Brakes. I would still miss the Future Shock, but I would have hydro brakes
- No futuristic gadgets. I have no experience with bikes but I’m not totally attracted by the future shock. It’s a sort of attraction/repulsion but I don't have any serious arguments in favor or against. It’s just by instinct.
Every posts I’ve read seems to agree that the E5 Comp has the bigger value for the money. Has the E5 Sport some chance to win for my use?
#493
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi to everyone, I’m new to this forum and I’m looking for info about the Diverge E5 Sport. There are several reviews and videos on youtube about the higher end models with Future Shock but very little on the lower specced models.
I’m evaluating the Diverge E5 Sport as my first “serious” bike. I’m planning to use it for riding in my area (Italy, Venice area) that is plain but there are also mountains, woods and plateau. Being just starting out, the truth is that I don’t know exactly what kind of terrains I’m going to ride, but I’d like to keep all the possibilities opened. I’ve tried a few bikes around and I’m preferring lighter and faster gravel bikes vs bikes with iron frame and big tires. Basically I would like to have a bike that is fun on mixed terrain but that is not too slow or bulky on tarmac.
I’m quite sure about what I’m NOT gonna do: rides longer then a few hours (not for now at least) and technical or difficult paths that would suits better to a MTB.
Now the Diverge E5 Sport. The cost for me is just right for my first bike. I could also afford the E5 Comp but I’m not sure I will take any real advantage of the better specs. I’ve compared the E5 sport to others bikes I can buy in my area for the same money and for me it has the best value: new geometry, flat mount discs, Through Axle front and rear, mudguards and rack mounts. No other bike that I’m aware of (and I can buy locally) offers all this features for this price. Also Specialized is well supported by my local shop. Maybe I could buy something with Tiagra instead of Sora at the same price or near, but nothing more. Don’t see it as a big benefit.
Comparing the E5 sport to the E5 Comp, the E5 sport surely have something less:
- Future Shock: is it a must have for this Diverge? Does a 38 tires would give me the same amount of comfort as the future shock or would be night and day? My doubt is that this bike is built around it, and the same frame without the Future Shock could turn to be more uncomfortable than another “classic” gravel frame that use other ways to dump the road.
- 105 vs Sora: I’ve read the the new Sora is not bad at all. Probably the biggest advantage of 105 is to have more gears and less gaps between gears
- Weight of the wheels: The E5 Sport has the Axis Sport Disc, while the E5 Comp has the Axis Elite Disc. Don’t know how much differences there is actually
- Breaks: Tektro Spyre (Comp) vs Tektro Mira (Sport)
But the E5 Sport does still have some advantages:
- Color: both are uninspiring, but I slightly prefer the light grey of the E5 Sport (in Italy no black/red option)
- Upgradability: being the E5 Sport cheaper, I can think to add maybe next year the 105 group with Hydro Brakes. I would still miss the Future Shock, but I would have hydro brakes
- No futuristic gadgets. I have no experience with bikes but I’m not totally attracted by the future shock. It’s a sort of attraction/repulsion but I don't have any serious arguments in favor or against. It’s just by instinct.
Every posts I’ve read seems to agree that the E5 Comp has the bigger value for the money. Has the E5 Sport some chance to win for my use?
I’m evaluating the Diverge E5 Sport as my first “serious” bike. I’m planning to use it for riding in my area (Italy, Venice area) that is plain but there are also mountains, woods and plateau. Being just starting out, the truth is that I don’t know exactly what kind of terrains I’m going to ride, but I’d like to keep all the possibilities opened. I’ve tried a few bikes around and I’m preferring lighter and faster gravel bikes vs bikes with iron frame and big tires. Basically I would like to have a bike that is fun on mixed terrain but that is not too slow or bulky on tarmac.
I’m quite sure about what I’m NOT gonna do: rides longer then a few hours (not for now at least) and technical or difficult paths that would suits better to a MTB.
Now the Diverge E5 Sport. The cost for me is just right for my first bike. I could also afford the E5 Comp but I’m not sure I will take any real advantage of the better specs. I’ve compared the E5 sport to others bikes I can buy in my area for the same money and for me it has the best value: new geometry, flat mount discs, Through Axle front and rear, mudguards and rack mounts. No other bike that I’m aware of (and I can buy locally) offers all this features for this price. Also Specialized is well supported by my local shop. Maybe I could buy something with Tiagra instead of Sora at the same price or near, but nothing more. Don’t see it as a big benefit.
Comparing the E5 sport to the E5 Comp, the E5 sport surely have something less:
- Future Shock: is it a must have for this Diverge? Does a 38 tires would give me the same amount of comfort as the future shock or would be night and day? My doubt is that this bike is built around it, and the same frame without the Future Shock could turn to be more uncomfortable than another “classic” gravel frame that use other ways to dump the road.
- 105 vs Sora: I’ve read the the new Sora is not bad at all. Probably the biggest advantage of 105 is to have more gears and less gaps between gears
- Weight of the wheels: The E5 Sport has the Axis Sport Disc, while the E5 Comp has the Axis Elite Disc. Don’t know how much differences there is actually
- Breaks: Tektro Spyre (Comp) vs Tektro Mira (Sport)
But the E5 Sport does still have some advantages:
- Color: both are uninspiring, but I slightly prefer the light grey of the E5 Sport (in Italy no black/red option)
- Upgradability: being the E5 Sport cheaper, I can think to add maybe next year the 105 group with Hydro Brakes. I would still miss the Future Shock, but I would have hydro brakes
- No futuristic gadgets. I have no experience with bikes but I’m not totally attracted by the future shock. It’s a sort of attraction/repulsion but I don't have any serious arguments in favor or against. It’s just by instinct.
Every posts I’ve read seems to agree that the E5 Comp has the bigger value for the money. Has the E5 Sport some chance to win for my use?
#494
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 91
Bikes: 1972 Raleigh Professional, 1980 Raleigh Gran Sport (frame only), 1989 Diamondback Apex, 1997 LeMond Zurich, 2018 Specialized Diverge running R8020 Ultegra.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I've been running a rack on a 2018 carbon Diverge since August, including doing some off-road touring with light panniers. The lower attachment point is easy. For the upper attachment point, I switched the seatpost for an aluminum model then installed a Salsa Post-lock clamp on that (Post-Lock | Salsa Cycles). I looked at the clamp that comes on the aluminum Diverge and wasn't impressed that you have to remove the rack stays to adjust the saddle height. I think I prefer my Salsa post-lock and will keep it even if Specialized do make the integrated seatpost clamp / fender mount available for the carbon frames.
#495
Likes to Ride Far
The rack I'm using is a RackTime Light-It, which is pretty standard.
#496
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi guys. I got my 2018 Diverge two weeks ago and I am very happy about it. I jumped to gravel from MTB. I run the bike on Trigger 700x38 tyres. They are good but not suitable for wet and muddy off-roads in Central Europe between October and March. Have you got any suggestion for different tyres, please? Any experience and photos welcome. Does anyone use x42mm tyres? Thanks.
#497
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: PNW
Posts: 197
Bikes: Cutthroat, Scalpel, Roubaix, Sequoia, SuperX, Diverge
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hi guys. I got my 2018 Diverge two weeks ago and I am very happy about it. I jumped to gravel from MTB. I run the bike on Trigger 700x38 tyres. They are good but not suitable for wet and muddy off-roads in Central Europe between October and March. Have you got any suggestion for different tyres, please? Any experience and photos welcome. Does anyone use x42mm tyres? Thanks.
In the 42c arena, I'm not entirely sure these have enough mud clearance, but some of the ones I'm going to be checking out:
Soma Cazadero 42c tire
Bruce Gordon Rock'n'Road 43c
Terravail Cannonball 42c
#498
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: middle north (Mpls)
Posts: 216
Bikes: some
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Specialized updated their mud-cyclocross Terra Pro tire to include a 38c version. I can confirm it's pretty doggone awesome for the slop.
In the 42c arena, I'm not entirely sure these have enough mud clearance, but some of the ones I'm going to be checking out:
Soma Cazadero 42c tire
Bruce Gordon Rock'n'Road 43c
Terravail Cannonball 42c
In the 42c arena, I'm not entirely sure these have enough mud clearance, but some of the ones I'm going to be checking out:
Soma Cazadero 42c tire
Bruce Gordon Rock'n'Road 43c
Terravail Cannonball 42c
measure 38 on the Alex 24 wheelset. Much lighter than the triggers. They aren’t the best in mud, but friends with the GravelKing Muds swear by them.
https://www.gravelcyclist.com/bicycle-tech/review-panaracer-gravelking-mud-tire/
#499
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: PNW
Posts: 197
Bikes: Cutthroat, Scalpel, Roubaix, Sequoia, SuperX, Diverge
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I run Panaracer GravelKing SK’s 35 mm for gravel, they
measure 38 on the Alex 24 wheelset. Much lighter than the triggers. They aren’t the best in mud, but friends with the GravelKing Muds swear by them.
REVIEW: Panaracer GravelKing Mud Tires - Gravel Cyclist: The Gravel Cycling Experience
measure 38 on the Alex 24 wheelset. Much lighter than the triggers. They aren’t the best in mud, but friends with the GravelKing Muds swear by them.
REVIEW: Panaracer GravelKing Mud Tires - Gravel Cyclist: The Gravel Cycling Experience
#500
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: middle north (Mpls)
Posts: 216
Bikes: some
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts