Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

New 2019 Motobecane Whipshot Ti from bikes direct.

Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

New 2019 Motobecane Whipshot Ti from bikes direct.

Old 06-09-19, 02:35 PM
  #76  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Yep, I think we are describing the exact same thing, just with slightly different language: your QR-type thru axle gets the final tightness from closing that lever. If for some reason the lever is unlatching, then you are definitely going to have a loose thru axle, and that’s no good at all.

The simple allen-key thru axles are great: no lever sticking out to get in the way of things (racks, hands, etc.), often much lighter, and allow you to use a proper torque wrench.
fronesis is offline  
Old 06-09-19, 05:05 PM
  #77  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Gatineau, Quebec
Posts: 293

Bikes: Lynskey GR270

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 49 Posts
Ouch, these things are expensive!!!

Both 12mm,

120mm x 1.5mm thread pitch for the front
and
174mm x 1.75mm thread pitch for the back?
ChinookTx is offline  
Old 06-09-19, 09:55 PM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by ChinookTx
Ouch, these things are expensive!!!

Both 12mm,

120mm x 1.5mm thread pitch for the front
and
174mm x 1.75mm thread pitch for the back?
Yep. I went with these specs from BD, and they worked great to choose Robert Axles that fit perfectly:

front: L:M12xP1.5x118.5mm

rear: L:M12xP1.75x174mm

I spent $90 for the Robert Axles, which I too thought was pretty steep. But they were VERY high quality, fit right, and were much lighter. It also helped that I was able to sell the original axles for about $35 on eBay Ė cushioned the blow.
fronesis is offline  
Old 06-10-19, 06:39 AM
  #79  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by fronesis
Yep. I went with these specs from BD, and they worked great to choose Robert Axles that fit perfectly:
front: L:M12xP1.5x118.5mm
rear: L:M12xP1.75x174mm

I spent $90 for the Robert Axles, which I too thought was pretty steep. But they were VERY high quality, fit right, and were much lighter. It also helped that I was able to sell the original axles for about $35 on eBay – cushioned the blow.
Get the Brand-X from chainreactionsycles for $15 each shipped. I lost the spec on the rear, not going to find it any time soon as i've got other bikes that need attention and I'm working remotely for a few days. Thought i'd try to help here a little though, save you guys some money. $90 is WAYYYY to much for a piece of aluminum. Most bike stuff is overpriced. Don't waste your dough. The rear did stick out and it can be ground down, but for $15 each shipped - who's complaining. I had it laying around from another build.

Delivery is 3-4 weeks from UK and there's a $50 minimum to get free shipping. But for me, this is no problem, I order Brand-X for all bikes I build and try to have them on hand so I don't have to wait 3-4 weeks for delivery.

Axle, F:Brand-X Bolt Thru Axle (Road Bike Option #1 ) Black - 12mm, 100-125-17-M12-P1.5 $14.77 CRC
Axle, R:Brand-X Bolt Thru Axle 12mm, 148-180-20-M12-P1.75 $14.77

Prices are after 1.5% cash back ebates

I'm on the lookout for a cheap lauf gravel fork.... Fiance wants a bit of the harshness to go away. hahaha. it's a sickness. Won't be able to mount the fenders on the Lauf though. Oh well. Fenders make transporting it in my bike rack a bit of a pain.


Last edited by Anger67; 06-10-19 at 06:54 AM.
Anger67 is offline  
Old 06-10-19, 06:42 AM
  #80  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by dwmckee
. Maybe you get lucky and get a straight one, maybe you don't...

I've owned many Bikes Direct bikes, probably ten-ish. No problems. I guess I'm lucky. Ass.
Anger67 is offline  
Old 06-10-19, 07:27 AM
  #81  
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,163

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10514 Post(s)
Liked 6,952 Times in 3,922 Posts
Originally Posted by fronesis
First off, great pics Ė looks like a gorgeous ride!

As to your thru axles: you mention a ďlock,Ē but Iím not exactly sure what you are referring to there. I have thru axles on a few bikes, and my understanding is that the threaded ďboltĒ of the thru axle simple threads into the bike frame directly, and it is held in place there by being at the correct torque spec. So itís never really ďlockedĒ in place or ďunlockedĒ itís either tight enough at its proper torque spec, or itís LOOSE.

A few thoughts there:
1. By ďlockĒ I suspect you might be referring to the quick-release like ďleverĒ on the standard DT Swiss thru axles that came with the whip shot. Itís possible that somehow that lever is vibrating loose and this would obviously lead directly to a loose axle.

2. I HATE those thru axles because they make it impossible to know if you have the torque spec correct and because the extra force added by the lever makes it hard to always return to the same torque (which effects the caliper/rotor centering). Accordingly, I sold thus ďquick releaseĒ thru axles on eBay and replaced mine with some really nice Robertís Axle project axles. These tighten with a 6mm hex, so you can use a torque wrench on them and get the proper torque.

3. Note: the torque spec on most 12mm thru axles is quite high, around 15Nm or 132inch-pounds. I have encountered a number of riders who had loose thru axles because they didnít tighten them enough. And I made the same mistake myself on my first thru axle bike: what feels ďpretty tightĒ by hand for me was only around 80 inch-pounds. To get to 130 inch-pounds requires some real force (Iím weak).
I dont totally follow your reasoning for not using the lever style. You mention this style makes it impossible to know if you have the torque spec correct, but unless you carry a 6mm hex torque wrench around with you, you often times wouldnt know what is correct spec for the Roberts Axle setup either.
Riders frequently have their wheels off-
- at home
- to transport to and from a ride point in vehicle
- flat tire change

Of those 3, i would say that the bottom 2 are the super majority of instances where a wheel is removed, and without carrying a torque wrench with you while riding, you wont know if the wheels are properly torqued until you get home to check. Anyone that has to pull their wheel off to load a bike into a vehicle will then be right back to not knowing if the torque is correct once they arrive at the start of their next ride.

Perhaps you ride with a torque wrench. Or perhaps you dont remove your wheel to transport and also rarely ever get flats(this applies to me, so i get it if you arent affected either).
I am just not sure how the lever style is a drawback for most riders when it comes to knowing the correct torque. They are in the same boat with either skewer once a wheel comes off.



disclosure- my only bike with TA is my MTB and it has the lever. It tightens thru screwing, then the lever hinges closed. Cant say I have ever thought twice about it, but i for sure will on my next ride!
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 06-10-19, 10:53 AM
  #82  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
I dont totally follow your reasoning for not using the lever style. You mention this style makes it impossible to know if you have the torque spec correct, but unless you carry a 6mm hex torque wrench around with you, you often times wouldnt know what is correct spec for the Roberts Axle setup either.
Riders frequently have their wheels off-
- at home
- to transport to and from a ride point in vehicle
- flat tire change

Of those 3, i would say that the bottom 2 are the super majority of instances where a wheel is removed, and without carrying a torque wrench with you while riding, you wont know if the wheels are properly torqued until you get home to check. Anyone that has to pull their wheel off to load a bike into a vehicle will then be right back to not knowing if the torque is correct once they arrive at the start of their next ride.

Perhaps you ride with a torque wrench. Or perhaps you dont remove your wheel to transport and also rarely ever get flats(this applies to me, so i get it if you arent affected either).
I am just not sure how the lever style is a drawback for most riders when it comes to knowing the correct torque. They are in the same boat with either skewer once a wheel comes off.



disclosure- my only bike with TA is my MTB and it has the lever. It tightens thru screwing, then the lever hinges closed. Cant say I have ever thought twice about it, but i for sure will on my next ride!
I’m not trying to argue definitively for the one true way to tighten a thru axle, so if other people prefer thru axles with QR-like levers, then that’s just fine by me.

But just to clarify, the issues for me are multiple:
1) With the lever, there is simply NO way to EVER measure the torque spec. With a 6mm hex bolt I can use a proper torque wrench when I’m at home. I can also then loosen and tighten that same bolt by hand get a feel for the correct torque.

2) When you tighten the axle you are also moving the brake caliper pads in relation to the wheel rotor. You therefore want the tightness to be exactly the same – way too tight or way too loose and the rotor will rub one of the caliper pads. I find that with the hex bolt thru axles I can tighten the thru axle to the right spec and put the rotor *dead center* between the pads. With the lever, I was always guessing: sometimes I would not screw it in enough, and clamping the lever was too tight. So I’d unclamp the lever, tighten a bit more, and then when I closed the lever it would be too tight (and/or rubbing the rotor on the caliper).

3) I don’t take a torque wrench with me when I leave the house, but my calipers/rotors are centered when my thru axle is tightened to 15Nm (at home with a torque wrench). So when I take my wheel off to change a flat, I can then put it back on and tighten the thru axle right back to dead center. When I tried to remove and replace the wheel on the road with the lever-design thru axle, I always struggled to get the caliper/rotor centered.

Maybe I’m just no good with the clamping levers! But the above is why I personally prefer either plain hexbolt design, or the NEW DT Swiss design, which has a “lever” on it, but the lever does not clamps like a quick release, it’s just used to turn the bolt.

Final note: I see that your TA bike is a MTB, and I have read that road calipers are harder to center the rotor on than MTB setups. I know for me on the SRAM HRD road calipers, there is only a TINY space between the rotors and the pads, so you really have to be exact. If you are off by 1/4 a turn before you clamp the lever, then you’ll be off a bit.

Last edited by fronesis; 06-10-19 at 12:25 PM. Reason: Spelling (damn autocorrect!)
fronesis is offline  
Old 06-10-19, 10:59 AM
  #83  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Here are photos of the stock axles that came with my Whipshot Ti delivered 27Dec2018:










I thought it odd that the lever handles were a different shape. They do not appear to be DT Swiss.




This is my first gravel/road bike with thru-axles. They seem to operate differently than the RockShox front fork thru-axles on my BD MTB bikes. On the RockShox you thread up the axle tight by hand then flip the lever closed. If the lever is too tight or loose there is a little Allen key adjustment to set the proper tension on the flip mechanism. Flipping the lever closed does not tighten the axle any further. I don't think these levers have such an Allen key adjustment? If I thread these in as tight as I think they should go, then the lever is too hard to close. So I have to play around with threading them in less than tight, so that the lever can flip closed, which tightens the axle the rest of the way. This seems odd to me, maybe I just need to get the hang of them?
MTBHHP is offline  
Old 06-10-19, 11:26 AM
  #84  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Gatineau, Quebec
Posts: 293

Bikes: Lynskey GR270

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 49 Posts
I have the same axles. They are pretty annoying to adjust.

To me, like @fronesis, the biggest issue is "repeatability" when changing wheels. I have 2 identical wheelsets, one with slick tires for commuting, one with knobby tires for the trails. Whenever I swap the wheels, I spend the next 15 minutes fiddling with the axles to get the disks to stop rubbing. Same wheels, same hubs, same disks.

I suspect being able to torque them to a specific value that remains constant throughout wheel changes would make things a bit more predictable. Sure, if I puncture on the trails, I don't have a torque wrench and may need to do the axle dance, but I can at least avoid it when I am home where I do most of the wheel changes.
ChinookTx is offline  
Old 06-30-19, 08:19 PM
  #85  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 262
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If the rear triangle is anything similar to the prior Motobecane Fantom Cross Ti, the bike is limited to 650x42b or so by the width at the chainstays— 650x48b rubs the chainstays.

If the chainstays are still made out of Ti tubing, as they appear to be, rather than some sort of machined yoke or plate or something, they probably don't have clearance for anything wider than 42mm or so.
AlanKHG is offline  
Old 07-07-19, 02:05 PM
  #86  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Tarrytown NY
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey all,

first post, but long time lurker here at BikeForums.

Iím looking at getting the whip shot TI or the century pro TI. Iím actually very close on pulling the trigger, but I have a question for you Whipshot owners:

Can any of you comment on bottom bracket stiffness? Iím coming from a Specialized Allez and one thing I love about that bike is that I canít get it to noticeably flex. (210 lbs).

Iíve heard ďrumorsĒ that some of the Ora TI frames tend to flex in the BB area, but I just wanted to hear what your thoughts were or if you notice any issues with power transfer.

Thanks all!
esoteric17 is offline  
Old 07-07-19, 02:20 PM
  #87  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Gatineau, Quebec
Posts: 293

Bikes: Lynskey GR270

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 49 Posts
I can't comment on the Allez, but I used to ride a Scott CR1 and currently have a Devinci Leo SL (both carbon). Maybe apples and oranges, but the Whipshot is "stiff" compared to the 2 carbon frames I've had. I can literally see the frame flex on the carbon frames just putting my weight on the pedals at a stand still, which doesn't happen on the Whipshot. Even when climbing while standing, the flex is pretty minimal. (5'10", 195 lbs).

I think the Whipshots are out of stock but I was told they'd restock in ~ September when the cross seasons apparently picks up.
ChinookTx is offline  
Old 07-07-19, 03:12 PM
  #88  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Tarrytown NY
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChinookTx
I can't comment on the Allez, but I used to ride a Scott CR1 and currently have a Devinci Leo SL (both carbon). Maybe apples and oranges, but the Whipshot is "stiff" compared to the 2 carbon frames I've had. I can literally see the frame flex on the carbon frames just putting my weight on the pedals at a stand still, which doesn't happen on the Whipshot. Even when climbing while standing, the flex is pretty minimal. (5'10", 195 lbs).

I think the Whipshots are out of stock but I was told they'd restock in ~ September when the cross seasons apparently picks up.

ChinookTx,

thats awesome to hear, thank you! Iíve had the opportunity to recently test ride a giant defy and a specialized Roubaix (both carbon). Felt a tiny bit of flex on the Roubaix (most likely compliance), but I got the front derailleur to rub while climbing on the defy.

I noted that the whipshots are out of stock. Good to know that they should be restocked in September. Now I just have to decide on either the century or the whipshot. The geometries seem pretty similar, with the whipshot coming in with slightly shorter chainstays, head tube and wheelbase. Both have same head/ seat tube angles, bb drop, top tube and seat tube lengths in a size 58. Iím not sure if I would be able to tell the difference between the two if I rode them back to back.

I appreciate all of the info posted here on this thread. Definitely helping with my decision!
esoteric17 is offline  
Old 07-07-19, 03:22 PM
  #89  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Gatineau, Quebec
Posts: 293

Bikes: Lynskey GR270

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 49 Posts
Others can chime in, but I suspect the Whipshot is more "twitchy", which is a good thing if you ride trails and like tighter handling. If you ride mostly roads, I'd go for the Century as the longer wheelbase would be a bit more comfortable and handling isn't as critical. Max tire size seems to be the same on both. As you say, probably very minimal differences.
ChinookTx is offline  
Old 08-25-19, 05:45 PM
  #90  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fronesis
I just placed an order for hangers at BD, and they allowed me to go through checkout and paypal took my money! Now to wait and see if they ship out

Note: they raised the price to $25.

ChinookTx: Will send you a PM about details to get one to you.
Hi fronesis - did your order arrive? I am thinking about buying a replacement hanger in the event mine snaps as well, but want to ensure that BD will indeed ship it to me since the link leads me directly to a paypal site.

Looking forward to your response!
borgborg10 is offline  
Old 08-25-19, 05:49 PM
  #91  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fronesis
Yep. I went with these specs from BD, and they worked great to choose Robert Axles that fit perfectly:

front: L:M12xP1.5x118.5mm

rear: L:M12xP1.75x174mm

I spent $90 for the Robert Axles, which I too thought was pretty steep. But they were VERY high quality, fit right, and were much lighter. It also helped that I was able to sell the original axles for about $35 on eBay Ė cushioned the blow.
Hi - I realize I need to buy a rear axle for my whipshot (853 Reynolds steel - not TI but same specs). Would this axle work?

spacing: 12x142mm
thread pitch: 1.75
Length: 174mm

The BD site shows nothing about rear axle spacing. Want to make sure this is right before I pull the trigger. Thanks in advance and looking forward to hearing back!
borgborg10 is offline  
Old 08-25-19, 08:55 PM
  #92  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by borgborg10
Hi fronesis - did your order arrive? I am thinking about buying a replacement hanger in the event mine snaps as well, but want to ensure that BD will indeed ship it to me since the link leads me directly to a paypal site.

Looking forward to your response!
Yep, hanger arrived quickly and looked high quality. Sitting in my toolbox now, where I hope it will stay.
fronesis is offline  
Old 09-11-19, 07:27 PM
  #93  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fronesis
Yep, hanger arrived quickly and looked high quality. Sitting in my toolbox now, where I hope it will stay.
Weird question - but do you think that the derailleur hanger for the 2019 Whipshot Ti would be different than the one for the 853 Reynolds steel? I have the Reynolds steel version and ordered this hanger, and at quick glance I donít think it would fit. Granted Iím no mechanic but it doesnít look the same as the hanger thatís on there, I donít think.

Would they do that? Run different hangers on the same frame but different material? Or is it known that the 853 has a different hanger and that is a different number? Canít seem to find any details on the steel frame online anywhere, and havenít heard back from the BD team...
borgborg10 is offline  
Old 09-12-19, 07:42 AM
  #94  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by borgborg10
Weird question - but do you think that the derailleur hanger for the 2019 Whipshot Ti would be different than the one for the 853 Reynolds steel? I have the Reynolds steel version and ordered this hanger, and at quick glance I donít think it would fit. Granted Iím no mechanic but it doesnít look the same as the hanger thatís on there, I donít think.

Would they do that? Run different hangers on the same frame but different material? Or is it known that the 853 has a different hanger and that is a different number? Canít seem to find any details on the steel frame online anywhere, and havenít heard back from the BD team...
My bet would be different hangers for the different models; the hanger for the Ti bike won't fit the steel bike.

I don't have a Steel whipshot, but I DO have both a Ti and an Alu, and they use totally different hangers.
fronesis is offline  
Old 09-12-19, 07:54 AM
  #95  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fronesis
My bet would be different hangers for the different models; the hanger for the Ti bike won't fit the steel bike.

I don't have a Steel whipshot, but I DO have both a Ti and an Alu, and they use totally different hangers.
Yeah - you are definitely right. Well - now I have two Titanium derailleur hangers that I won't be able to use. I'll try and return them, but I won't hold my breath!

If you (or anyone reading this) is interested in a great deal on these, let me know!!
borgborg10 is offline  
Old 10-03-19, 10:18 AM
  #96  
jhu
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Can anyone please tell me how much the stock bike weighs (inc. the frame size you got)?

And anyone know the stock weight on the 2019 Motobecane Century PRO Ti Disc?
I'm curious if the jtech hubs/wtb rims on the century pro are a lot heavier/worse than the dt swiss c 1800 that comes with the whipshot.

Last edited by jhu; 10-03-19 at 10:23 AM.
jhu is offline  
Old 10-03-19, 11:59 AM
  #97  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey everyone! I'm curious if anyone could share the geo of the fork? Especially the axle to crown length. If you know the offset, rake etc, great. Bikesdirect doesn' specify that detail. In leiu of this, if it's branded, that would suffice, too.

Thank you!
misteranderson is offline  
Old 06-21-23, 02:43 PM
  #98  
rap
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anger67
that's a stretch. it's 700c x 42 max. Granted 650b is smaller diameter, but where you going to hide that extra 6mm width?
I have Panaracer SK 38s mounted and they actually measure 42mm wide. These are mounted with full SKS Blumel fenders and there is plenty of room. If I removed the fenders, I think there is plenty of room to fit a 48mm (actual measured width) tire.
rap is offline  
Old 08-13-23, 03:30 PM
  #99  
Retro on steroids
 
Repack Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Marin County, California
Posts: 522

Bikes: Breezer Repack 650-B, 2011 Gary Fisher Rumblefish II, Gary Fisher HiFi 29er, 1983 Ritchey Annapurna, 1994 Ritchey P-21, 1978 Breezer #2, 1975 Colnago, Ritchey P-29er

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Liked 534 Times in 117 Posts
I ran across this review of a Motobecane Le Champion in the October, 1973 issue of Bicycling.



Repack Rider is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Poguemahone
Classic & Vintage
87
02-13-14 09:07 AM
KonAaron Snake
Classic & Vintage
5
10-27-13 09:57 AM
radshark
Road Cycling
14
05-26-11 04:28 AM
robertofergy
Classic & Vintage
9
05-06-11 03:25 PM
Steve90068
Road Cycling
66
02-21-11 11:58 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.