Forks bent on this Cross Check?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#3
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,137
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3672 Post(s)
Liked 2,141 Times
in
1,351 Posts
#5
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 15,100
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9425 Post(s)
Liked 5,784 Times
in
3,347 Posts
That is an insane looking amount of rake.
Thru all sizes, the CC has the same HTA and fork rake. None look like that.
Thru all sizes, the CC has the same HTA and fork rake. None look like that.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,169
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 674 Post(s)
Liked 685 Times
in
417 Posts
It is hard to tell for sure, but it looks like there is a spacer installed on top of the fork crown to increase the axle to crown length of the fork, which has slackened the head tube and seat tube angles. The top of the fork crown looks to be about an inch below the bottom of the head tube.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,041
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 203 Post(s)
Liked 138 Times
in
118 Posts
Smaller frame sizes have slacker HTA to prevent toe overlap? I agree doesn't look right but doesn't look bent either.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 3,586
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1388 Post(s)
Liked 1,384 Times
in
799 Posts
Notice that the seller (I assume the photo is from a Craigslist or eBay ad or the equivalent) artfully placed that olive drab piece of fabric or whatever it is to conceal the fact that the forks start bending forward at the crown.
Once had a mother bring her teenage son into the shop with his mountain bike's fork bent like that, demanding a refund. I said to the son, "Didn't I see you doing 15-foot drops on that trail in Lake Roland the other day?" He said, "Yeah, there are some awesome jumps back there!"
Once had a mother bring her teenage son into the shop with his mountain bike's fork bent like that, demanding a refund. I said to the son, "Didn't I see you doing 15-foot drops on that trail in Lake Roland the other day?" He said, "Yeah, there are some awesome jumps back there!"
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 94
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
That does look odd, but no one here is going to give you a definitive answer. Take it to a GOOD shop that can do some quick measurements and know for sure. It would be very easy to measure trail for example and compare to stock specs. Usually forks are bend backwards from running into something, but as suggested above someone could have been trying to do jumps with it too. Those forks are very stout steel, but I guess enough force could bend anything...
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,144
Bikes: 2016 Surly Cross Check, 2019 Kona Rove ST
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 269 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
199 Posts
I've got a "smaller" CC, size 50, and it looks nothing like that. That HT angle is much more extreme. Also, the smaller sizes have a sloping top tube (starting at size 50 I believe). So that one isn't a smaller size frame anyway.
#11
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 23,102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 2,691 Times
in
1,874 Posts
it looks weird, for sure, but I'm positive I have never seen a bike bent that way. You think they jumped it off a tall building?