Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Help me with the size difference please

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Help me with the size difference please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-20, 04:56 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Western NY
Posts: 149
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 15 Posts
Help me with the size difference please

Hey guys - after weeks of thinking and riding my current bike (I'm a roadie), I decided to buy a gravel bike. As we all know it's slim pickings right now, but I found a couple in my area. There are more but I'd have to travel 2-3 hours.

I'm narrowed it down to the Trek Checkpoint ALR 4, and the Jamis Renegade Expat Ltd. I rode the Jamis today and I loved it. I cannot believe how smooth and stable this bike was compared to my road bike. I was sold instantly, plus I haven't had a steel bike since my Schwinn Traveler years ago. But they only had a 56cm. My current road bike is a 58.5cm (Marin Argenta Elite with a 105 groupset). I put a shorter stem on it last year as it felt kind of long. The Jamis felt small to me, but I don't know if it's because I'm used to a longer bike.

I'm 6'0 with a 32" inseam (182 cm, and 81 cm inseam).

There is a 58 cm Checkpoint in stock, but looking at the geometry for the 58cm Trek, it's really close to the Jamis 56cm. Here are the links:

https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/b...orCode=reddark
https://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/renegadeltd.html

The Jamis is $500 less expensive, and while it's not a Shimano 105, the Tiagara shifted great.

Can you guys look at the geometry charts for the 58cm Trek vs the 56cm Jamis and offer you opinions please? To me, they seem so close that I'd be willing to go with the Jamis, but it all comes down to feel I guess. I will be test riding the Trek tomorrow. But in the past I've always bought Trek and would like to try something different.
EGBigelo is offline  
Old 06-19-20, 07:36 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,877

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3234 Post(s)
Liked 2,079 Times in 1,177 Posts
What’s the distance from center of seat to middle of stem on current, and what will it be on the 56 Jamis ?

The ETT on the Trek and Jamis are only .7 cm different and that’s an easy stem swap.

I’d prefer hydraulic brakes as on the Trek, as well it has a 46/30 crank, vs. 50/34 on the Jamis, which I would not want on a bike going off road. Then and from what I can gather, the Trek is maybe 2 lbs lighter, which is to be expected from aluminum vs. steel.
Steve B. is offline  
Old 06-19-20, 08:09 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Western NY
Posts: 149
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Steve B.
What’s the distance from center of seat to middle of stem on current, and what will it be on the 56 Jamis ?

The ETT on the Trek and Jamis are only .7 cm different and that’s an easy stem swap.

I’d prefer hydraulic brakes as on the Trek, as well it has a 46/30 crank, vs. 50/34 on the Jamis, which I would not want on a bike going off road. Then and from what I can gather, the Trek is maybe 2 lbs lighter, which is to be expected from aluminum vs. steel.
On my current bike it's 57cm, and on the Jamis (in the 56cm frame size) it's 57.0cm according to their chart. So that's interesting.

I agree with you on the hydraulic brakes. My road bike has caliper but I also have a Trek DS2 with hydraulic and I love them. The mechanical on the Jamis weren't too bad, and I could always swap for hydraulic.

The gearing I have mixed feelings on. I wanted a gravel bike mostly for all the broken roads I ride on and I wanted more comfort. But at the same time I want to start exploring and 46/30 would be nice.

Thanks for your input.
EGBigelo is offline  
Old 06-19-20, 10:03 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
You're getting a bike with a better gearset that is 2lbs lighter that is sized properly for you. I don't know exactly why you are hesitating here. If that's not $500 well spent I don't know what is.
basscadet is offline  
Old 06-20-20, 07:41 AM
  #5  
JWK
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: central Maine
Posts: 346

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, GT Grade alloy, Trek 920

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
You are almost exactly my size. Slight difference in inseam, reach, but very close. I have poured over the renegade geometry charts because I have been seriously considering getting a frameset.

Believe me; you are a 58 in a Jamis Renegade. IMO, it would be a very expensive mistake to get a 56 Renegade, regardless of what make or model you end up choosing. Mi dos centavos.
JWK is offline  
Likes For JWK:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.