OK, I just don't get the mullet concept...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 847
Bikes: Surly Cross Check, Kona Rove ST
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 139 Times
in
105 Posts
OK, I just don't get the mullet concept...
The most common mullet config seems to be a knobbier tire on the front, and a slicker one on the back. I ride in SoCal on loose over hardpack, lots of steep climbs. If anything, it's my rear wheel that loses traction, not the front, as I try and launch myself up over some pitchy section. I know technique is a big part, but that aside, what is going on with the mullet set up, and what am I missing? Is it not about climbing traction?
#2
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 20,860
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 868 Times
in
649 Posts
I'm sure I don't know anyone riding a bike like you describe, but it could be tire clearance issues in the back. This seems to be the motivation for most mullet systems on other types of bikes.
Likes For unterhausen:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Iowa
Posts: 486
Bikes: 2021 Salsa Fargo 1x12, 2019 Jamis Renegade Exploit 1x11. Motobacne NX Fat Tire
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
106 Posts
Less weight in the front = less traction. A knobbier and wider front tire can help with that especially in speedy turns.
#4
Senior Member
Typical mullet I’ve seen is a mix of 27.5 and 29 wheels on a mt. bike. I don’t get that either.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Hiawatha 3sp | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 367 Post(s)
Liked 426 Times
in
239 Posts
Bigger front tire for more float and traction is a MTB thing. Front does most of the braking, tracking, and bump absorption.
Rear slipping can be mitigated by spinning, we thought slicks were a terrible idea when they first came out. After learning how to keep the rear tire engaged, we realized how faster they were.
Rear slipping can be mitigated by spinning, we thought slicks were a terrible idea when they first came out. After learning how to keep the rear tire engaged, we realized how faster they were.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 847
Bikes: Surly Cross Check, Kona Rove ST
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 139 Times
in
105 Posts
Yeah, I'm aware of the bigger up front, smaller out back approach. But I've been seeing some gravel folks with a knobby front, smooth rear, same or very close tire size (for example, a WTB Sendero 47 front, Byway 47 back, or similar). Currently I use Ventures and if I stay seated I can get up most anything on my local terrain without the rear sliding out (which wasn't true when I ran the slicker ByWays). But I was just wondering if the added knobbies up front really did much in a climbing context. Sounds like it's more about hooking up in other ways--cornering, etc...
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,494
Bikes: Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1713 Post(s)
Liked 433 Times
in
263 Posts
I'm running a 2.35 on the front and a 2.25 on the rear, but the same tire/tread pattern on my 29r XC. Larger front will float over softer areas better. I would never run a slick on the rear... IMO that's just stupid for the dirt.
#8
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 20,860
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 868 Times
in
649 Posts
Did someone already say all gravel is local? I don't think I would run a slick around here because the tread would be shredded pretty quickly. I have lived in places where dirt roads were smooth and beautiful to ride on. Anything knobbier than slicks would be overkill.
It's all kind of moot right now for me, all the forest roads have 15 inches of snow on them
I have had occasion to wish I had a bigger tire on the front of my fat bike.
It's all kind of moot right now for me, all the forest roads have 15 inches of snow on them
I have had occasion to wish I had a bigger tire on the front of my fat bike.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 3,224
Bikes: Breezer Radar
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1716 Post(s)
Liked 987 Times
in
466 Posts
When turning and/or going downhill, traction is more important in the front. Losing traction in the front is more catastrophic than losing traction in the rear. Of course going uphill traction is more important in the rear.
A a slicker, less knobby, rear tire increases efficiency.
A a slicker, less knobby, rear tire increases efficiency.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 338
Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 161 Post(s)
Liked 148 Times
in
76 Posts
The most common mullet config seems to be a knobbier tire on the front, and a slicker one on the back. I ride in SoCal on loose over hardpack, lots of steep climbs. If anything, it's my rear wheel that loses traction, not the front, as I try and launch myself up over some pitchy section. I know technique is a big part, but that aside, what is going on with the mullet set up, and what am I missing? Is it not about climbing traction?
Mullett is the term when you use two different sized wheels (27.5/26 or 27.5/29). The point of the gripper and fatter front tire is that it helps you carve turns and deal with downhills better. Loosing traction going uphill could be because of lots of situations. A gripper front tire won't do much to help climb. Sounds like you need a grippier rear tire.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 847
Bikes: Surly Cross Check, Kona Rove ST
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 139 Times
in
105 Posts
Mullett is the term when you use two different sized wheels (27.5/26 or 27.5/29). The point of the gripper and fatter front tire is that it helps you carve turns and deal with downhills better. Loosing traction going uphill could be because of lots of situations. A gripper front tire won't do much to help climb. Sounds like you need a grippier rear tire.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brazil, Londrina PR
Posts: 264
Bikes: Kona Unit, Kona Kahuna, Kona Dew DL, Scott Big Jon, Trek Checkpoint ALR4, KHS Urban Soul, Haro Team Issue, Cernunnos Touro, GT Force Expert Carbon
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 39 Times
in
21 Posts
As far as I know,Mullet on a gravel bike is mixing SRAM AXS Road and MTB components, a road crank and shifters with an MTB cassete and rear derailleur. Mullet on a mountain bike is a 29 front wheel and a 27,5 rear wheel, I've never heard of mixing wheel sizes on a gravel bike before.
#13
Airplanes, bikes, beer.
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Off the front
Posts: 437
Bikes: Canyon Endurace CF SL 8.0 current favorite, newest bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 220 Post(s)
Liked 454 Times
in
190 Posts
I thought all gravel riders had mullets, beards, flannel ****s and major body odor? I'm surprised this is even a question.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Liked 31 Times
in
22 Posts
Unfortunately I’ve seen mullet used to describe three totally separate things in cycling: mixed wheel sizes in MTBs, then drop bar bikes using drop bar sram shifters with MTB sram derailleurs, and now mixed tread type on gravel bikes. Despite the OP being crystal clear in their question, people cannot help but post about one of the other uses.
The reason here is that with a gravel bike there’s a reasonable chance that you might ride 20 miles of tarmac to get to the dirt section. Of course the slick or semi slick rear is going to be worse in dirt, no one will argue otherwise. But it might be a lot better for rolling resistance and squirm on pavement. It’s about the best overall compromise for mixed rides that really truly are mixed. Maybe you suffer or walk some in the dirt in exchange for suffering less on the ride to and from.
Most MTBers I know drive those miles so they might have little idea how awful full knobbies are on long road rides (especially those flirting with mullet setups for more exxxxxtreme whatever). And the AXS ‘mullet’ shifting setup, again I’ve mainly seen this on bikes that are really drop-bar mountain bikes.
As a matter of fact on my current 650b gravel wheel set I have a WTB Venture front and Byway rear. However IMHO WTBs are ass and I’m looking forward to replacing with one of the recent file-tread tires (Pirelli, Spec, Vittorio etc) that roll better than the semi slick WTB on pavement and outperform it in dirt to boot, with the same tread front and rear.
The reason here is that with a gravel bike there’s a reasonable chance that you might ride 20 miles of tarmac to get to the dirt section. Of course the slick or semi slick rear is going to be worse in dirt, no one will argue otherwise. But it might be a lot better for rolling resistance and squirm on pavement. It’s about the best overall compromise for mixed rides that really truly are mixed. Maybe you suffer or walk some in the dirt in exchange for suffering less on the ride to and from.
Most MTBers I know drive those miles so they might have little idea how awful full knobbies are on long road rides (especially those flirting with mullet setups for more exxxxxtreme whatever). And the AXS ‘mullet’ shifting setup, again I’ve mainly seen this on bikes that are really drop-bar mountain bikes.
As a matter of fact on my current 650b gravel wheel set I have a WTB Venture front and Byway rear. However IMHO WTBs are ass and I’m looking forward to replacing with one of the recent file-tread tires (Pirelli, Spec, Vittorio etc) that roll better than the semi slick WTB on pavement and outperform it in dirt to boot, with the same tread front and rear.
Likes For Darth Lefty:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,209
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1407 Post(s)
Liked 246 Times
in
183 Posts
The most common mullet config seems to be a knobbier tire on the front, and a slicker one on the back. I ride in SoCal on loose over hardpack, lots of steep climbs. If anything, it's my rear wheel that loses traction, not the front, as I try and launch myself up over some pitchy section. I know technique is a big part, but that aside, what is going on with the mullet set up, and what am I missing? Is it not about climbing traction?
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
#17
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 11,542
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Timberjack, Expert TG, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2230 Post(s)
Liked 890 Times
in
586 Posts
https://www.mtbr.com/threads/surly-g...ppler.1154577/
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 174
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 111 Times
in
55 Posts
It’s really going to irritate you when this thing shows up
https://www.mtbr.com/threads/surly-g...ppler.1154577/
https://www.mtbr.com/threads/surly-g...ppler.1154577/
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,490
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1020 Post(s)
Liked 266 Times
in
213 Posts
The most common mullet config seems to be a knobbier tire on the front, and a slicker one on the back. I ride in SoCal on loose over hardpack, lots of steep climbs. If anything, it's my rear wheel that loses traction, not the front, as I try and launch myself up over some pitchy section. I know technique is a big part, but that aside, what is going on with the mullet set up, and what am I missing? Is it not about climbing traction?
I sometimes ride with a wider front tire. This gives me
- better flotation, and steering in soft conditions
- a little bit of suspension up front. (riding at below 25psi will smooth out a lot of bumps).
- more trail and stability for a rougher route.
People address some of the above by using a front fork, or a shock absorbing stem, or even more exotic stuff with Trek & Specialized frames.
I like a smaller faster tire on the rear, because 70% of my rolling resistance comes from the rear tire - and my bike is very smooth riding in the rear.
Maybe work on your technique? I don't have traction problems with a slick or near slick on the rear (except muddy slick/wet conditions). Pick the right tire pressure, have a smooth pedal stroke, a little body English. When racing, I'll ride up stuff on near slicks that others are walking up.