32mm road tire vs light gravel tire?
#51
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,099
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2706 Post(s)
Liked 2,461 Times
in
1,390 Posts
Folks, the OP pretty well stated what he is riding:
I really don't think we need to be measuring the gravel diameter or analyzing moisture content, here.
setting up a bike for roughly 50% road and 50% mostly light gravel (so, rarely there are patches of it which are really loose - most of it is generally firm with some gravel on top)
Likes For Kapusta:
#52
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
Yup. As I implied in post #13 above, 32mm slicks. Specialized Roubaix Pro are the "budget" option at $40, the Rene Herse slick options might be a little nicer rolling, no idea by how much, and they're pricier and probably won't last for thousands of kms.
Likes For Badger6:
#53
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,099
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2706 Post(s)
Liked 2,461 Times
in
1,390 Posts
Yes, you did give a rec without overthinking it

Last edited by Kapusta; 08-20-21 at 01:53 PM.
Likes For Kapusta:
#54
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,862
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1146 Post(s)
Liked 414 Times
in
334 Posts
I'll say, the one time where slicks FAIL in the dry is riding through a rut (i.e. dry tire tracks) that run in the direction I'm riding. Tires with a side tread can typically ride out - but slicks aren't even gonna try.
#56
Obsessed with Eddington
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Brussels (BE) 🇧🇪
Posts: 1,330
Bikes: '16 Spesh Diverge, '14 Spesh Fatboy, '18 Spesh Epic, '18 Spesh SL6, '21 Spesh SL7, '21 Spesh Diverge...and maybe n+1?
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 621 Times
in
368 Posts
That's where you gotta relax the shoulders and loosen the grip chas58 and hope the bike tracks out. It's worked out pretty good for me so far, except that one time...

#58
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
Well, I built it up and did some rides to suss out any issues.

Ritchey Swiss cross
Put on the Almanzo Pros in 33mm first, going to try 32mm GP5000s too. I can definitely hear the hum of the file thread on the road when riding at over 35-40 km/hr which gets louder at higher speed, but it isn't as much slower as I feared it would be, and when pumped to 65-70 psi the handling isn't objectionable. I'll see how much I lose in terms of grip with GP5000s on gravel.
A road bike which can ride offroad is really great fun. I have to change the rear derailleur to something with a clutch, though.
Thanks for all the insights on tires 😁

Ritchey Swiss cross
Put on the Almanzo Pros in 33mm first, going to try 32mm GP5000s too. I can definitely hear the hum of the file thread on the road when riding at over 35-40 km/hr which gets louder at higher speed, but it isn't as much slower as I feared it would be, and when pumped to 65-70 psi the handling isn't objectionable. I'll see how much I lose in terms of grip with GP5000s on gravel.
A road bike which can ride offroad is really great fun. I have to change the rear derailleur to something with a clutch, though.
Thanks for all the insights on tires 😁
Last edited by Branko D; 08-22-21 at 07:20 AM.
Likes For Branko D:
#59
Senior Member
Same. As performance-oriented road tires go, Rene Herse slicks aren't unusually minimalist on tread rubber. The ELs are typically around 3mm thick at centerline when new, and that's almost entirely tread rubber, since the casing is extremely thin and there's no puncture-protection layer. Here's a crudely-hacked-up cross-section of a Rat Trap Pass EL:

Since they don't seem to vary tread thickness by model, the wider stuff lasts longer. But I seem to get maybe 3000-4000 miles out of a Rat Trap Pass EL. The Bon Jons wear faster, but I still get a couple thousand miles per.

Since they don't seem to vary tread thickness by model, the wider stuff lasts longer. But I seem to get maybe 3000-4000 miles out of a Rat Trap Pass EL. The Bon Jons wear faster, but I still get a couple thousand miles per.
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 833
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 409 Post(s)
Liked 856 Times
in
386 Posts
I just picked up 32c GK SS tires and for poorly maintained city streets they're perfect. The SS tires have similar side tread as the GK SK knobbies, but with a flat center. I did a 40mph downhill and braking was excellent with no slippage. Also acceleration on the flats is very good compared to my wider 38c GK SK and TLC tires. I'd be fine riding these tires on rough fire roads and mild dirt/gravel trails. I also want to note the 32c GK SS non-plus casing seems quite sturdy compared to GK SK and TLC plus/+ tire casing (better puncture resistance). The SS tread is raised giving you a bit of extra rubber.
Overall I'm quite happy with a 32c gravel tire, leaning towards urban roads and gravel light surfaces.
Overall I'm quite happy with a 32c gravel tire, leaning towards urban roads and gravel light surfaces.
Likes For jonathanf2:
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,862
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1146 Post(s)
Liked 414 Times
in
334 Posts
I just picked up 32c GK SS tires and for poorly maintained city streets they're perfect. The SS tires have similar side tread as the GK SK knobbies, but with a flat center. I did a 40mph downhill and braking was excellent with no slippage. Also acceleration on the flats is very good compared to my wider 38c GK SK and TLC tires. I'd be fine riding these tires on rough fire roads and mild dirt/gravel trails. I also want to note the 32c GK SS non-plus casing seems quite sturdy compared to GK SK and TLC plus/+ tire casing (better puncture resistance). The SS tread is raised giving you a bit of extra rubber.
Overall I'm quite happy with a 32c gravel tire, leaning towards urban roads and gravel light surfaces.
Overall I'm quite happy with a 32c gravel tire, leaning towards urban roads and gravel light surfaces.
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,823
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1425 Post(s)
Liked 1,446 Times
in
853 Posts
I did 30 miles of paved riding this morning on a brand new set of Donnely PDX WC's (33mm) tubeless at around 30psi. They are fantastic on dirt/grass and really supple, but felt pretty draggy and slow on pavement.
I also have a set of MXP (smaller tread but still knobby) 33mm in tubed clincher, and by comparison those feel a lot faster on pavement, but also usually run those at higher PSI (45-50psi).
Both of these tires still feel noticeably slower than GP5000 32mm tubeless.
I also have a set of MXP (smaller tread but still knobby) 33mm in tubed clincher, and by comparison those feel a lot faster on pavement, but also usually run those at higher PSI (45-50psi).
Both of these tires still feel noticeably slower than GP5000 32mm tubeless.
Likes For msu2001la:
#63
Newbie
GP5000 TL 32C working fine for me so far
Having this question myself I moved down from 35C semi slicks with tubes to Continental GP 5000 Tubeless in 32C for gravel riding. In my case, to get to the gravel I first have to do to about 15-20 miles of on-road trip to get out of town on to the trails.
Been a couple weeks and I can report this is working out pretty well. The on-road part is no longer a drag and on gravel (compacted to semi-loose logging trails with crushed limestone and sometimes dirt with rocks) the 32C tubeless does well. Have been out a few times now, varying the tire pressure from about 80 psi down to about 60 (label says 65-87 is officially OK) and in this range it feels secure on gravel and sharp and responsive on tarmac. Am running these on rims that are 25mm internal width (wheel manufacturer says its OK to use 32c tubeless tires on these, while the tire manufacturer is more conservative saying 21mm rim width is max).
On loose descents at speed my style is to be a bit more careful and more technical, and in the corners cut back on the speed a little, but but that’s common sense in all cases really. But actually the tire tracks better through the corners with this 32mm tubeless than the semi slick with file tread that I had used before.
Visually, 32mm it doesn’t look like a lot of tire volume but it’s enough - the tire feels nice and stable on the wide rim.
I don’t know why it took me do long to brave this. Should have done it way earlier. Less is more. I’m not very good with taking photos while out but here are a couple of the basic type of gravel. I can’t find any photos of the rockier downhills.




Been a couple weeks and I can report this is working out pretty well. The on-road part is no longer a drag and on gravel (compacted to semi-loose logging trails with crushed limestone and sometimes dirt with rocks) the 32C tubeless does well. Have been out a few times now, varying the tire pressure from about 80 psi down to about 60 (label says 65-87 is officially OK) and in this range it feels secure on gravel and sharp and responsive on tarmac. Am running these on rims that are 25mm internal width (wheel manufacturer says its OK to use 32c tubeless tires on these, while the tire manufacturer is more conservative saying 21mm rim width is max).
On loose descents at speed my style is to be a bit more careful and more technical, and in the corners cut back on the speed a little, but but that’s common sense in all cases really. But actually the tire tracks better through the corners with this 32mm tubeless than the semi slick with file tread that I had used before.
Visually, 32mm it doesn’t look like a lot of tire volume but it’s enough - the tire feels nice and stable on the wide rim.
I don’t know why it took me do long to brave this. Should have done it way earlier. Less is more. I’m not very good with taking photos while out but here are a couple of the basic type of gravel. I can’t find any photos of the rockier downhills.





Last edited by Kanon25; 08-29-21 at 07:56 PM.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,549
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 642 Times
in
328 Posts
Going the other direction -- I just got a second wheelset for my gravel bike so I could have road wheelset and a gravel wheelset. And by "road" I mean 700x40mm tubeless. Challenge Strada Biancas.
I've used the 32mm Strada Biancas in the past as road tires and I loved them, now Challenge offers them in tubeless and wider so I wanted to try them. Did >80 miles on asphalt Saturday and 30 miles mostly asphalt but some gravel on Sunday.
Honestly my average speed on Saturday was a bit lower than I expected but it was really, really hot and pretty windy, and it was a solo ride with some steep rollers so I don't know if this is a good sample or an outlier. As far as ride quality, they're great. Super smooth and comfortable. I had the PSI a little too low so they got a little squirrely in the corners but once I pumped them up to 40psi they were great.
For the limited amount of gravel I've had them on they're surprisingly capable. There's no tread so I have to remain seated during steep climbs but honestly that's not really different from my other gravel tires with a file tread.
We'll have to see how they do on a fast group ride. I wanted a fat slick tire for road rides but with the option of getting off pavement if the mood strikes me or if there's a detour, etc., and so far they seem like a good option for that.
I've used the 32mm Strada Biancas in the past as road tires and I loved them, now Challenge offers them in tubeless and wider so I wanted to try them. Did >80 miles on asphalt Saturday and 30 miles mostly asphalt but some gravel on Sunday.
Honestly my average speed on Saturday was a bit lower than I expected but it was really, really hot and pretty windy, and it was a solo ride with some steep rollers so I don't know if this is a good sample or an outlier. As far as ride quality, they're great. Super smooth and comfortable. I had the PSI a little too low so they got a little squirrely in the corners but once I pumped them up to 40psi they were great.
For the limited amount of gravel I've had them on they're surprisingly capable. There's no tread so I have to remain seated during steep climbs but honestly that's not really different from my other gravel tires with a file tread.
We'll have to see how they do on a fast group ride. I wanted a fat slick tire for road rides but with the option of getting off pavement if the mood strikes me or if there's a detour, etc., and so far they seem like a good option for that.

Likes For ksryder:
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,823
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1425 Post(s)
Liked 1,446 Times
in
853 Posts
Having this question myself I moved down from 35C semi slicks with tubes to Continental GP 5000 Tubeless in 32C for gravel riding. In my case, to get to the gravel I first have to do to about 15-20 miles of on-road trip to get out of town on to the trails.
Been a couple weeks and I can report this is working out pretty well. The on-road part is no longer a drag and on gravel (compacted to semi-loose logging trails with crushed limestone and sometimes dirt with rocks) the 32C tubeless does well. Have been out a few times now, varying the tire pressure from about 80 psi down to about 60 (label says 65-87 is officially OK) and in this range it feels secure on gravel and sharp and responsive on tarmac. Am running these on rims that are 25mm internal width (wheel manufacturer says its OK to use 32c tubeless tires on these, while the tire manufacturer is more conservative saying 21mm rim width is max).
On loose descents at speed my style is to be a bit more careful and more technical, and in the corners cut back on the speed a little, but but that’s common sense in all cases really. But actually the tire tracks better through the corners with this 32mm tubeless than the semi slick with file tread that I had used before.
Visually, 32mm it doesn’t look like a lot of tire volume but it’s enough - the tire feels nice and stable on the wide rim.
I don’t know why it took me do long to brave this. Should have done it way earlier. Less is more. I’m not very good with taking photos while out but here are a couple of the basic type of gravel. I can’t find any photos of the rockier downhills.





Been a couple weeks and I can report this is working out pretty well. The on-road part is no longer a drag and on gravel (compacted to semi-loose logging trails with crushed limestone and sometimes dirt with rocks) the 32C tubeless does well. Have been out a few times now, varying the tire pressure from about 80 psi down to about 60 (label says 65-87 is officially OK) and in this range it feels secure on gravel and sharp and responsive on tarmac. Am running these on rims that are 25mm internal width (wheel manufacturer says its OK to use 32c tubeless tires on these, while the tire manufacturer is more conservative saying 21mm rim width is max).
On loose descents at speed my style is to be a bit more careful and more technical, and in the corners cut back on the speed a little, but but that’s common sense in all cases really. But actually the tire tracks better through the corners with this 32mm tubeless than the semi slick with file tread that I had used before.
Visually, 32mm it doesn’t look like a lot of tire volume but it’s enough - the tire feels nice and stable on the wide rim.
I don’t know why it took me do long to brave this. Should have done it way earlier. Less is more. I’m not very good with taking photos while out but here are a couple of the basic type of gravel. I can’t find any photos of the rockier downhills.





I ride roads like your first two photos on 32mm GP5000's all the time and find it to be a perfect combo. The 3rd photo would give me pause... I'd probably slow down and gingerly pick my way through something like that, and if it went on for miles I'd want more tire. Those larger rocks can be tricky on narrower tires.
The 4th photo is getting to the edge of what I'd be comfortable riding a road tire on. It looks perfectly passable but I'd probably be more comfortable on something like a 35mm tire.
I don't think any of those roads would require, or even benefit from a treaded tire. Slicks would be fine, it's mostly just a volume game for providing more cushion and protection from sharp rocks.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,823
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1425 Post(s)
Liked 1,446 Times
in
853 Posts
I did 30 miles of paved riding this morning on a brand new set of Donnely PDX WC's (33mm) tubeless at around 30psi. They are fantastic on dirt/grass and really supple, but felt pretty draggy and slow on pavement.
I also have a set of MXP (smaller tread but still knobby) 33mm in tubed clincher, and by comparison those feel a lot faster on pavement, but also usually run those at higher PSI (45-50psi).
Both of these tires still feel noticeably slower than GP5000 32mm tubeless.
I also have a set of MXP (smaller tread but still knobby) 33mm in tubed clincher, and by comparison those feel a lot faster on pavement, but also usually run those at higher PSI (45-50psi).
Both of these tires still feel noticeably slower than GP5000 32mm tubeless.
After fixing that, things felt very normal on the PDX's. They feel basically the same as the MDX's on pavement, which is to say fast... but slightly slower than the GP5000's.
As an aside, I managed to find the top half of a broken beer bottle hidden in the grass while warming up for a CX race yesterday. It cut 1" long gash in the sidewall of my brand new PDX WC tubeless tire - causing instant flat and blew sealant all over my bike. I took the tire off, used a dollar bill to boot the gash, and inserted a tube into the tire - all just minutes before my start time. I rode the entire race assuming it would go flat at any moment, but it held with about 35-40psi, and got me through the Cat 4 race and also was good for the 15 mile ride back home after. I'll be buying a new tire, unfortunately.
#67
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,142
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10496 Post(s)
Liked 6,943 Times
in
3,917 Posts
As an aside, I managed to find the top half of a broken beer bottle hidden in the grass while warming up for a CX race yesterday. It cut 1" long gash in the sidewall of my brand new PDX WC tubeless tire - causing instant flat and blew sealant all over my bike. I took the tire off, used a dollar bill to boot the gash, and inserted a tube into the tire - all just minutes before my start time. I rode the entire race assuming it would go flat at any moment, but it held with about 35-40psi, and got me through the Cat 4 race and also was good for the 15 mile ride back home after. I'll be buying a new tire, unfortunately.
#68
Newbie
Good examples and that looks like a really great place to ride.
I ride roads like your first two photos on 32mm GP5000's all the time and find it to be a perfect combo. The 3rd photo would give me pause... I'd probably slow down and gingerly pick my way through something like that, and if it went on for miles I'd want more tire. Those larger rocks can be tricky on narrower tires.
The 4th photo is getting to the edge of what I'd be comfortable riding a road tire on. It looks perfectly passable but I'd probably be more comfortable on something like a 35mm tire.
I don't think any of those roads would require, or even benefit from a treaded tire. Slicks would be fine, it's mostly just a volume game for providing more cushion and protection from sharp rocks.
I ride roads like your first two photos on 32mm GP5000's all the time and find it to be a perfect combo. The 3rd photo would give me pause... I'd probably slow down and gingerly pick my way through something like that, and if it went on for miles I'd want more tire. Those larger rocks can be tricky on narrower tires.
The 4th photo is getting to the edge of what I'd be comfortable riding a road tire on. It looks perfectly passable but I'd probably be more comfortable on something like a 35mm tire.
I don't think any of those roads would require, or even benefit from a treaded tire. Slicks would be fine, it's mostly just a volume game for providing more cushion and protection from sharp rocks.
4th photo was perfectly OK on 32mm at tubeless pressures. No worries at all.
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,862
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1146 Post(s)
Liked 414 Times
in
334 Posts
Having this question myself I moved down from 35C semi slicks with tubes to Continental GP 5000 Tubeless in 32C for gravel riding. In my case, to get to the gravel I first have to do to about 15-20 miles of on-road trip to get out of town on to the trails.
Been a couple weeks and I can report this is working out pretty well. The on-road part is no longer a drag and on gravel (compacted to semi-loose logging trails with crushed limestone and sometimes dirt with rocks) the 32C tubeless does well. Have been out a few times now, varying the tire pressure from about 80 psi down to about 60 (label says 65-87 is officially OK) and in this range it feels secure on gravel and sharp and responsive on tarmac. Am running these on rims that are 25mm internal width (wheel manufacturer says its OK to use 32c tubeless tires on these, while the tire manufacturer is more conservative saying 21mm rim width is max).
Been a couple weeks and I can report this is working out pretty well. The on-road part is no longer a drag and on gravel (compacted to semi-loose logging trails with crushed limestone and sometimes dirt with rocks) the 32C tubeless does well. Have been out a few times now, varying the tire pressure from about 80 psi down to about 60 (label says 65-87 is officially OK) and in this range it feels secure on gravel and sharp and responsive on tarmac. Am running these on rims that are 25mm internal width (wheel manufacturer says its OK to use 32c tubeless tires on these, while the tire manufacturer is more conservative saying 21mm rim width is max).
I don't run those tires more than 60psi (well, I'm hookless, and that is the max psi they are rated for hookless). But I wouldn't go more if I could.
That is the rear, in the front I'm more like 45psi (cause - weight distribution).
If I'm going to be doing more than 1/3 of the ride on gravel, I'll put a 40mm gravel tire on the front (Terra speed, so its fairly fast).
Realistically, you probably get 70% of your power loss through your rear wheel (+/- 10%), so there isn't much of a disadvantage to putting a fast gravel tire on the front. The advantage is being able to run harder through that chunky stuff, and 32mm tires are a nightmare if your front tire sinks into soft gravel.