IRC Boken Doublecross Tires
#1
Habitual User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,531
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3365 Post(s)
Liked 5,372 Times
in
2,543 Posts
IRC Boken Doublecross Tires
Has anyone used these tires for gravel riding? I'm considering giving them a try (38s), but would like to hear some feedback from anyone who has actually tried them. Most of the online review info I'm finding is from IRC-related sources. Pete Stetina seems to be having much racing success on them, but he would probably have the same success on almost any tire.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,056
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6322 Post(s)
Liked 9,742 Times
in
4,185 Posts
I found a few reviews with this google search. Though two of the 'hits' are of the same review written by...Peter Stetina. 
I'm not familiar with those tires, but did look them up. Looks like a pretty good option if you are expecting some mud.
PS: how much tire clearance have you got?

I'm not familiar with those tires, but did look them up. Looks like a pretty good option if you are expecting some mud.
PS: how much tire clearance have you got?
Last edited by Koyote; 01-17-23 at 09:09 AM.
#3
Habitual User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,531
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3365 Post(s)
Liked 5,372 Times
in
2,543 Posts
I found a few reviews with this google search. Though two of the 'hits' are of the same review written by...Peter Stetina. 
I'm not familiar with those tires, but did look them up. Looks like a pretty good option if you are expecting some mud.
PS: how much tire clearance have you got?

I'm not familiar with those tires, but did look them up. Looks like a pretty good option if you are expecting some mud.
PS: how much tire clearance have you got?
I'm running Pirelli 40s now, and I like them a lot. The front has lots of room, but the rear is pretty tight at the chainstays. I'm considering staying with the same Pirelli H/M combo that I have now, but go to 35 for a little more clearance and slightly lighter weight, or trying the IRCs in 38. I'm leaning towards the IRCs at the moment. My long term goal is to find the tires I want to run at BWR CA in April. I know some people do it on wide road tires, but since I'm looking to just finish, rather than race, I'm more inclined to go with something a little beefier, decently grippy in the dirt, and puncture resistant, but still rolls on pavement reasonably efficiently.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,056
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6322 Post(s)
Liked 9,742 Times
in
4,185 Posts
I found the same reviews. Pretty limited.
I'm running Pirelli 40s now, and I like them a lot. The front has lots of room, but the rear is pretty tight at the chainstays. I'm considering staying with the same Pirelli H/M combo that I have now, but go to 35 for a little more clearance and slightly lighter weight, or trying the IRCs in 38. I'm leaning towards the IRCs at the moment. My long term goal is to find the tires I want to run at BWR CA in April. I know some people do it on wide road tires, but since I'm looking to just finish, rather than race, I'm more inclined to go with something a little beefier, decently grippy in the dirt, and puncture resistant, but still rolls on pavement reasonably efficiently.
I'm running Pirelli 40s now, and I like them a lot. The front has lots of room, but the rear is pretty tight at the chainstays. I'm considering staying with the same Pirelli H/M combo that I have now, but go to 35 for a little more clearance and slightly lighter weight, or trying the IRCs in 38. I'm leaning towards the IRCs at the moment. My long term goal is to find the tires I want to run at BWR CA in April. I know some people do it on wide road tires, but since I'm looking to just finish, rather than race, I'm more inclined to go with something a little beefier, decently grippy in the dirt, and puncture resistant, but still rolls on pavement reasonably efficiently.
I've been looking for a new tire in the 40mm range, too, and am currently trying these; like 'em so far, after about 700 miles. They actually came up lighter than claimed at 408g on my kitchen scale, and they are a true 40mm width on my 25mm ID rims. I've got a pair of them with the puncture protection belt in the garage, but haven't mounted them yet; apparently, they ride quite nicely.
Likes For Koyote:
#5
Senior Member
A friend of a friend runs the IRC Boken Doublecross tires. All I really know is that he is on his 3rd pair and that he really likes them.
Likes For katsup:
#6
Habitual User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,531
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3365 Post(s)
Liked 5,372 Times
in
2,543 Posts
Those Pirellis get good reviews, and 40mm is a great all-rounder tire width. I wouldn't worry about the tight fit between the chainstays, assuming that you have confidence in your wheels. (The reality is that, with almost any wheelset, even one broken spoke will end your ride, as even with ample clearance you'll probably have a tire rubbing something.) 35mm is pretty narrow for gravel riding.
I've been looking for a new tire in the 40mm range, too, and am currently trying these; like 'em so far, after about 700 miles. They actually came up lighter than claimed at 408g on my kitchen scale, and they are a true 40mm width on my 25mm ID rims. I've got a pair of them with the puncture protection belt in the garage, but haven't mounted them yet; apparently, they ride quite nicely.
I've been looking for a new tire in the 40mm range, too, and am currently trying these; like 'em so far, after about 700 miles. They actually came up lighter than claimed at 408g on my kitchen scale, and they are a true 40mm width on my 25mm ID rims. I've got a pair of them with the puncture protection belt in the garage, but haven't mounted them yet; apparently, they ride quite nicely.
Those WTBs look interesting, but I'm curious how efficiently they roll on pavement with the center block spacing they have. That weight is attractive, though. That would knock about a 1/2 lb. of rotating weight off my bike. My bike originally had Riddler 37s on it, which seemed pretty decent, but weren't tubeless, so they got replaced with the Pirellis.
I'm new enough to gravel riding that I'm still figuring out many of my personal preferences through experimentation. Because of this, I will probably try the IRCs just because they are a different flavor than the Pirellis, instead of just being a variation of the same flavor.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#7
Habitual User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,531
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3365 Post(s)
Liked 5,372 Times
in
2,543 Posts
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,056
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6322 Post(s)
Liked 9,742 Times
in
4,185 Posts
I definitely like the Pirellis, and my confidence in their ability to hook up in the dirt continues to grow. My wheels seem pretty bulletproof, but that's usually the case until the moment they aren't.
Those WTBs look interesting, but I'm curious how efficiently they roll on pavement with the center block spacing they have. That weight is attractive, though. That would knock about a 1/2 lb. of rotating weight off my bike. My bike originally had Riddler 37s on it, which seemed pretty decent, but weren't tubeless, so they got replaced with the Pirellis.
I'm new enough to gravel riding that I'm still figuring out many of my personal preferences through experimentation. Because of this, I will probably try the IRCs just because they are a different flavor than the Pirellis, instead of just being a variation of the same flavor.
Those WTBs look interesting, but I'm curious how efficiently they roll on pavement with the center block spacing they have. That weight is attractive, though. That would knock about a 1/2 lb. of rotating weight off my bike. My bike originally had Riddler 37s on it, which seemed pretty decent, but weren't tubeless, so they got replaced with the Pirellis.
I'm new enough to gravel riding that I'm still figuring out many of my personal preferences through experimentation. Because of this, I will probably try the IRCs just because they are a different flavor than the Pirellis, instead of just being a variation of the same flavor.
I've tried the Riddler 37s (tubeless), and...meh. They're okay, but don't really do anything very well. Too skinny for me, too.
I'll be interested to hear your impressions of the IRCs; they look interesting.
Likes For Koyote:
#9
Habitual User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,531
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3365 Post(s)
Liked 5,372 Times
in
2,543 Posts
The Vulpines roll very well on pavement and dry gravel and dirt roads...Very fast. They likely wouldn't be good in the mud, but I don't ride in those conditions very often.
I've tried the Riddler 37s (tubeless), and...meh. They're okay, but don't really do anything very well. Too skinny for me, too.
I'll be interested to hear your impressions of the IRCs; they look interesting.
I've tried the Riddler 37s (tubeless), and...meh. They're okay, but don't really do anything very well. Too skinny for me, too.
I'll be interested to hear your impressions of the IRCs; they look interesting.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,056
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6322 Post(s)
Liked 9,742 Times
in
4,185 Posts
Just found this review on the Vulpines... https://www.ridinggravel.com/compone...at-the-finish/ I may need to consider these at some point.
Likes For Koyote:
#11
Habitual User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,531
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3365 Post(s)
Liked 5,372 Times
in
2,543 Posts
Tires ordered. Will report.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#12
Habitual User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,531
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3365 Post(s)
Liked 5,372 Times
in
2,543 Posts
The IRC tires mounted on my aluminum American Classic rims very easily - easier than the Pirellis, for sure. First one inflated with just my floor pump. Second one needed a boost from a canister, but that’s likely because the valve seems to be a little clogged. I’m hoping to get them out for a ride on Saturday. Pics coming soon…
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#13
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 11,850
Bikes: '15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, '76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, '17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, '12 Breezer Venturi, '09 Dahon Mariner, '12 Mercier Nano, '95 DeKerf Team SL, '19 Tern Rally, ‘21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, ‘19 T-Lab X3
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2269 Post(s)
Liked 1,338 Times
in
815 Posts
ACs…lucky you! Man, I miss that brand…
I tried IRC road tires some years ago— the rice bran Formulas— but they got mortally wounded before I could really assess them. I should revisit the brand and see what’s new.
I tried IRC road tires some years ago— the rice bran Formulas— but they got mortally wounded before I could really assess them. I should revisit the brand and see what’s new.
#14
Habitual User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,531
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3365 Post(s)
Liked 5,372 Times
in
2,543 Posts
First ride impressions (pavement, hardpack fire roads, and hardpack singletrack)…
They seem to roll really nicely on pavement and hardpack dirt, and aren’t noticeably slower or faster than my previous Pirelli H/M combo. I would like to attribute a new PR in my first significant climb to the tires, but data shows that my power output was higher than previous efforts. Cornering grip in the dirt is good, but not as confidence-inspiring as the Pirelli M on the front (maybe I just need more time on them). Cornering on pavement was predictable and stable. The rear bites a little better under power than the Pirelli H. No surprise there. Today’s ride didn’t include any significant sections of loose/soft surfaces. Overall, I like them a lot, and they will stay on my bike for the time being.
Measured width (700x38): 40.5mm @ 38psi
Measured weights: 463g, 506g

They seem to roll really nicely on pavement and hardpack dirt, and aren’t noticeably slower or faster than my previous Pirelli H/M combo. I would like to attribute a new PR in my first significant climb to the tires, but data shows that my power output was higher than previous efforts. Cornering grip in the dirt is good, but not as confidence-inspiring as the Pirelli M on the front (maybe I just need more time on them). Cornering on pavement was predictable and stable. The rear bites a little better under power than the Pirelli H. No surprise there. Today’s ride didn’t include any significant sections of loose/soft surfaces. Overall, I like them a lot, and they will stay on my bike for the time being.
Measured width (700x38): 40.5mm @ 38psi
Measured weights: 463g, 506g


__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#15
Habitual User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 5,531
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3365 Post(s)
Liked 5,372 Times
in
2,543 Posts
More feedback...I did a ride this past weekend that included a wider variety of surfaces, including mildly chunky stuff and loose sandy patches on a fire road descent. What I'm finding is that these tires are tough, and reassuringly predictable when surfaces get squirrely. I like these tires quite a lot.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Last edited by Eric F; 02-21-23 at 01:34 PM.