Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Cyclocross vs Roadbike sizing

Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Cyclocross vs Roadbike sizing

Old 06-23-07, 04:15 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cyclocross vs Roadbike sizing

So I was at the LBS again, this time looking more into cyclocross bikes rather than road bikes. They carry mostly Trek and Specialized bikes. Road bikes, 60cm feels great for me, with 58cm just a bit too small.

However when it comes to cross bikes both Trek and Specialized seem to only go up to 58 or 61 while their road bikes are 62-64 or so. This leads me to the main question, do cross bikes typically run 1-2 cm smaller than their roadbike counterpart? ie if a 60cm is great for a roadbike for me would I love to rock a 58cm cross bike?


Side question: Trek/Specialized I'd have to special order, pay full price (about $1800-2200 for the ones I'm looking at), would it be looked down upon to hit up some place like REI (or Performance) and get one for $1500 with full Ultegra, etc? Their 'Rivet' cross bike looks decent, but I haven't heard much about their house brand. The LBS has a 1 year free fit guarantee where they swap components for free (or pay the difference for upgrades), but this limits me to more expensive brands like Trek/Specialized, and having to order them and pay full price. Can't discount on a model they have to special order


Thanks,

Bill
glacious is offline  
Old 06-23-07, 04:50 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 50

Bikes: 2006 Kona Jake, 2011 Trek Cronus CX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This will explain the sizing in detail:

https://www.bikeforums.net/cyclocross-gravelbiking-recreational/138316-sizing-cyclocross-bikes.html

However I think the gist is that you should drop 1 size (2cm) for cyclocross.
majwell is offline  
Old 06-23-07, 04:53 PM
  #3  
nowheels
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Yes cyclocross bike run about a size smaller. I ride a 56 in a road bike and a 54 in a cross. Don't know much about thise bikes....fot that type of change, you might want to look into building your own bike from scratch. I partial to Ridley frames my self.
 
Old 06-24-07, 01:04 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the extra info, the LBS agrees as well. I'm psyched about getting a cross bike, it should be a slightly easier shift from all mountain bikes to cross bike, rather than straight to a road bike. With that said, everyone I've talked to about it (friends, other bikers, LBS people, etc...) have all said that any decent cross bike ($1500+) can come extremely close if not match the performance of a road bike on pavement if you just toss on smaller tires. Bonus.

Thanks again! This forum is quickly becoming another favorite of mine.

-Bill
glacious is offline  
Old 06-24-07, 03:43 AM
  #5  
cs1
Senior Member
 
cs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clev Oh
Posts: 7,093

Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 225 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Originally Posted by glacious
So I was at the LBS again, this time looking more into cyclocross bikes rather than road bikes. They carry mostly Trek and Specialized bikes. Road bikes, 60cm feels great for me, with 58cm just a bit too small.

However when it comes to cross bikes both Trek and Specialized seem to only go up to 58 or 61 while their road bikes are 62-64 or so. This leads me to the main question, do cross bikes typically run 1-2 cm smaller than their roadbike counterpart? ie if a 60cm is great for a roadbike for me would I love to rock a 58cm cross bike?


Side question: Trek/Specialized I'd have to special order, pay full price (about $1800-2200 for the ones I'm looking at), would it be looked down upon to hit up some place like REI (or Performance) and get one for $1500 with full Ultegra, etc? Their 'Rivet' cross bike looks decent, but I haven't heard much about their house brand. The LBS has a 1 year free fit guarantee where they swap components for free (or pay the difference for upgrades), but this limits me to more expensive brands like Trek/Specialized, and having to order them and pay full price. Can't discount on a model they have to special order


Thanks,

Bill
The answer is yes and no. If you use the seat tube size then yes, you should buy one size smaller. If you use the correct top tube then no. Look for a cross bike with your size top tube and standover height. Because of the increased BB height, it will have a 2 CM smaller seat tube than you usually ride. All the other dimensions should be comparable. Good luck

Tim
cs1 is offline  
Old 06-24-07, 04:15 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
socalrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: La Verne CA
Posts: 5,049

Bikes: Litespeed Liege, Motorola Team Issue Eddy Mercxk, Santana Noventa Tandem, Fisher Supercaliber Mtn. Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
drop 1 size is correct.. I ride a 60cm road bike and a 58cm cross fits me perfectly..
socalrider is offline  
Old 06-24-07, 06:53 AM
  #7  
Double Secret Member
 
CaptMatt15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 298

Bikes: 2004 Gary Fisher Marlin, 2007 Redline Conquest

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cs1
The answer is yes and no. If you use the seat tube size then yes, you should buy one size smaller. If you use the correct top tube then no. Look for a cross bike with your size top tube and standover height. Because of the increased BB height, it will have a 2 CM smaller seat tube than you usually ride. All the other dimensions should be comparable. Good luck

Tim
Follow THIS advice, don't drop a size recklessly, follow Top Tube fit first!
CaptMatt15 is offline  
Old 06-25-07, 08:49 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 792

Bikes: Brompton M6R, Specialized Tricross Comp, Ellsworth Isis, Dahon Speed P8

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 325 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 16 Posts
I downsized on the cyclocross as well. If you look at the Specialized website, the Tricross standover height is equiv. to a larger sized Specialized road bike. Also one the reasons I chose cyclocross over a road bike was because I wanted a more relax geometry and upright riding positon (shorter toptube) - I'm getting old. You can also fine tune your reach by swapping a handbar stem.
reppans is offline  
Old 06-26-07, 07:31 PM
  #9  
titleless
 
Houston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
First post. I do not have a road bike and I want to get a cyclocross bike for commuting. Where to start? Top tube on mountain bike is 59 cm. and fits me well, inseam 34.5". Obviously a trip to the LBS would be advisable but it is a long way from here and I want to prepare.
Houston is offline  
Old 06-26-07, 08:04 PM
  #10  
Hoosier runner
 
Valpo Hawkeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Posts: 58

Bikes: Specialized Tricross Sport Triple

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 6'3", 34" inseam and the 58cm Tricross fits me perfectly.
Valpo Hawkeye is offline  
Old 06-26-07, 08:04 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Timo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 707
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Top tube on a cyclocross bike should be at least 3 to 4 cm shorter than on a mountain bike. So I'd check out some bikes with a 55 or 56 cm top tube.
Timo is offline  
Old 06-26-07, 08:14 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Great advice, thanks again everyone. Looks like I'm going with a 58cm tricross, usually 60cm road bike. Gonna test ride one sometime this week/weekend and probably take the plunge. Money well spent

Now I just have to find a pair of road bike tires (probably 25-27) that will work well for the longer all pavement rides with my buddies. I assume the slightly wider rim on a cross bike will still take the standard width roadbike tires?

-Bill
glacious is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.