Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Average weight of cyclocross bike frames?

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Average weight of cyclocross bike frames?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-04, 05:51 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St. Paul, Mn
Posts: 136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Average weight of cyclocross bike frames?

Hello,

What's the average weight of a cyclocross frame?

What's the average weight of a complete cyclocross bike in the $1000 price range?

The reason I ask is because I was reading some reviews on Surly's Cross Check. The people who ride them really seem to like them and the only negative thing that comes up consistantly is people think they're "a little heavy". I looked on Surly's web site and the Cross Check frame was listed at about 4.5 pounds (4.45 for the smallest and 4.88 for the biggest). Other companies I looked at don't list the weights but even if a frame weighs half as much that's still a difference of only a couple pounds, that seems trivial to me but I have low standards.

I'm just wondering what standards people are comparing stuff to and if a couple of pounds are really that important.

Thanks.
chris hansen is offline  
Old 02-12-04, 06:37 PM
  #2  
Direct Hit Not Required
 
BlastRadius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 6,193

Bikes: Leopard DC1, Ridley X-Fire, GT Zaskar 9r

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
My 49cm Bianchi Axis is approx. 20.5# and my 50cm Bianchi Strada is about 22.5#.

A lot of the weight is in the tires and tubes but Tufos can help. Many cross forks are steel or aluminum so weight can be saved by using a carbon fork.
BlastRadius is offline  
Old 02-12-04, 07:53 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
RacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 1,717
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I think my Empella is around 18lbs. maybe 17 with my tubulars. I run single chainring/9speed Shimano

Surly's are heavy. I've ridden a couple and they are nice values. If the weight doesn't bother you I think you will be happy with it.
RacerX is offline  
Old 02-12-04, 09:10 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a scandium frame VooDoo it's supposed to be about 2.6 pounds.It's definately under 3 pounds.
It's a great bike but the frame alone would be $1000.
If you're planning on racing 'cross you don't want a heavy bike.
Limba is offline  
Old 02-13-04, 06:01 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St. Paul, Mn
Posts: 136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the replys.

I'm not sure if I will actually race. I'm looking for a road/off-road/commuter and cyclocross bikes seem pretty versitile. Racing is something I just started to contemplate and I don't know yet how long the interest will last. Mostly I'd like something I can sit on for a long time and cover some distance in relative comfort.
chris hansen is offline  
Old 02-13-04, 10:18 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 16

Bikes: Marinoni/Kona

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cross bikes don't make the best commuters, just like track bikes don't work well as a everyday fixie bike. Their geos are for a particular purpose. Rivendell has a model called the Romulus that would be a good all-arounder. Cost $1500 for the complete bike.
Bike666 is offline  
Old 02-13-04, 01:23 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 16

Bikes: Marinoni/Kona

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bike666
Cross bikes don't make the best commuters, just like track bikes don't work well as a everyday fixie bike. Their geos are for a particular purpose. Rivendell has a model called the Romulus that would be a good all-arounder. Cost $1500 for the complete bike.
Rivendell has stopped making the Romulus - they say they have 70 complete bikes left.
Bike666 is offline  
Old 02-13-04, 04:56 PM
  #8  
Sarcastic Member
 
Urbanmonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 482
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cannondale Cyclocross weighs in at under 21 lbs. As noted earlier, taking off the nobs, and replacing them with 28s or less will reduce that weight a little. I got this one on sale for $800.
Urbanmonk is offline  
Old 02-13-04, 10:10 PM
  #9  
Geezer Member
 
Grampy™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 1,384

Bikes: Airborne, LeMond, Bianchi CX, Volae Century, Redline 925 (fixed) and a Burley Tandem.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My Airborne Carpe Diem weighs in at 20.5 with pedals. (Triple chainring)
Grampy™ is offline  
Old 02-15-04, 06:55 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
SteelCommuter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chris hansen
Thanks for the replys.

I'm not sure if I will actually race. I'm looking for a road/off-road/commuter and cyclocross bikes seem pretty versitile. Racing is something I just started to contemplate and I don't know yet how long the interest will last. Mostly I'd like something I can sit on for a long time and cover some distance in relative comfort.

Chris,

For your purposes, the Surly is an excellent choice. You could even set it up as a tourer. All the young mechanics I know love the bike, and it is perfect for touring. I would ignore the comment that cross bikes don't make good commuters; some cross bikes may not, but the ones I'm familiar with--the Surly and the Gunnar Crosscheck--are steel bikes with rack eyelets and plenty of clearance for fat tires and fenders. For $900, the Surly is a fantastic deal.

As far as the weight question, 24 pounds is fine for a commuter. If you're a weight weenie racer, or someone who has to have the most expensive materials, it would be heavy. If you're like me and you need a versatile bike that will last a long time, then it's absolutely OK. Some of that weight could be shed with some higher grade components, if you choose. But I occasionally commute on a much heavier bike than the Surly (30-32 pounds plus luggage) and I'm having fun. None of those lighter bikes (18-20 pound range), by the way, can be used for heavy-loaded touring.

One other thing: if you are thinking about doing a bunch of commuting and maybe touring, and you're not in a hurry to get the bike, you might wait a few weeks and get the Surly Long Haul Trucker, which will have more Rivendelll/touring-style geometry.

best!
SteelCommuter is offline  
Old 02-16-04, 07:08 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St. Paul, Mn
Posts: 136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I haven't heard of the "Long Haul Trucker". Where can I find out more?

Thanks.
chris hansen is offline  
Old 02-16-04, 04:09 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
SteelCommuter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chris hansen
I haven't heard of the "Long Haul Trucker". Where can I find out more?

Thanks.
You can download their catalog on the Surly website, it's the first bike described. It won't be available until March.

BTW, if you are pretty sure about doing cyclocross, you should consider the Crosscheck instead. You can take the Long Haul Trucker off-road, but it's not for racing.
SteelCommuter is offline  
Old 02-19-04, 10:51 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
tlippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I too looked for an all around bike

All I can tell you is there is a BIG BUNCH of difference in commuing on the two bikes I own--(see below) I have to peddle a mile of dirt road to get to the asphalt so I first bought the Schwinn. Peddled fine for three years because I didn't know the difference. Now I hate to even get the Schwinn out of the garage. Here's the real world difference: Four guys around my age ride together to town - 5 miles one way - to get a cup of coffee. On the Schwinn somebody was always on my tail - or passing. On the Fuji I'm leading the pack - and without exerting anymore effort---cadence around 80 c/m. I love the lighter weight !!!!!!!!!!!!
tlippy is offline  
Old 02-22-04, 08:59 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Diesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 95
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chris hansen
Hello,

What's the average weight of a cyclocross frame?

What's the average weight of a complete cyclocross bike in the $1000 price range?

The reason I ask is because I was reading some reviews on Surly's Cross Check. The people who ride them really seem to like them and the only negative thing that comes up consistantly is people think they're "a little heavy". I looked on Surly's web site and the Cross Check frame was listed at about 4.5 pounds (4.45 for the smallest and 4.88 for the biggest). Other companies I looked at don't list the weights but even if a frame weighs half as much that's still a difference of only a couple pounds, that seems trivial to me but I have low standards.

I'm just wondering what standards people are comparing stuff to and if a couple of pounds are really that important.

Thanks.

My '02 Lemond Proprad weighs in about 23 pounds (59 cm). It has the chromolly fork that creates a large weight penalty, but I feel safe about taking harder hits when offroading.
Diesel is offline  
Old 02-22-04, 09:49 PM
  #15  
human
 
velocipedio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: living in the moment
Posts: 3,562

Bikes: 2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
i can't say for the frame, but my 52cm 2001 kona major jake, with campy centaur, open pro wheels, fizik saddle and winwood fork comes in at 20.5 pounds.
__________________
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.

The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
velocipedio is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.