Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Why smaller for cross?

Old 02-24-04, 09:57 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Desert Southwest
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why smaller for cross?

Hello to all -

I have seen several posts that mention sizing a cross frame 1-2 cm smaller than a road frame. Why is this? When you decrease the seat tube length, you also decrease the top tube length. You then must make up for a cramped fit by installing an extra-long stem. It just seems to me that any decrease in seat/top tube (smaller than your road frame size) is asking for an uncomfortable and poor-handling bike, as your weight is now too far forward (short top tube & long stem).

Am I missing something? I am in the market for a cross frame and my road frame measures 57 cm (c-c) at the seat tube and 57.5 cm (c-c) on the top tube. It seems that all manufacturers offer a 56 and a 58. Since I fit squarely in between sizes, I really want to make sure of the correct frame before I lay out the cash.

Thanks for any and all help.

Rgds,

Steve Marley
S. Marley is offline  
Old 02-24-04, 10:26 PM
  #2  
Direct Hit Not Required
 
BlastRadius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 6,193

Bikes: Leopard DC1, Ridley X-Fire, GT Zaskar 9r

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I think you want the smaller frame for better clearance over the top tube and more agile handling in the rough stuff. I'd imagine the 56cm would be great for you. If you factor in the larger tires, your standover would likely be the same as a 57cm road bike.
BlastRadius is offline  
Old 02-25-04, 07:50 AM
  #3  
Tiocfidh r L
 
jfmckenna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The edge of b#
Posts: 5,476

Bikes: A whole bunch-a bikes.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 123 Times in 76 Posts
The bottom bracket is higher on cx bikes typically. So this would effectivly shorten your seat tube length and not the top tube. imo the top tube is the real important measurement.
jfmckenna is offline  
Old 02-25-04, 08:21 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Everyone measures differently anyway so try both sizes before you buy anything.
Limba is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.